当前位置： SCI文献检索 > WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY期刊下所有文献 > Effects of premedication with Pronase for endoscopic ultrasound of the stomach: A randomized controlled trial.

Effects of premedication with Pronase for endoscopic ultrasound of the stomach: A randomized controlled trial.

Abstract：

AIM:To analyze the effects of premedication with Pronase for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examination of the stomach. METHODS:This was a prospective, randomized and controlled clinical study. All patients were randomly assigned to either the Pronase group or placebo group. The pretreatment solution was a mixed solution of 20000 U of Pronase and 60 mL sodium bicarbonate solution in the Pronase group, while an equal amount of sodium bicarbonate solution was administered to the placebo group. All operators, image evaluators and experimental recorders in EUS did not participate in the preparation and allocation of pretreatment solution. Two blinded investigators assessed the obscurity scores for the EUS images according to the size of artifacts (including ultrasound images of the gastric cavity and the gastric wall). Differences in imaging quality, the duration of examination and the usage of physiological saline during the examination process between the Pronase group and the control group were compared. RESULTS:No differences existed in patient demographics between the two groups. For the gastric cavity, the Pronase group had significantly lower mean obscurity scores than the placebo group (1.0476 ± 0.77 vs 1.6129 ± 0.96, respectively, P = 0.000). The mean obscurity scores for the gastric mucosal surface were significantly lower in the Pronase group than the placebo group (1.2063 ± 0.90 vs 1.7581 ± 0.84, respectively, P = 0.001). The average EUS procedure duration for the Pronase group was 11.60 ± 3.32 min, which was significantly shorter than that of the placebo group (13.13 ± 3.81 min, P = 0.007). Less saline was used in the Pronase group than the placebo group, and the difference was significant (417.94 ± 121.38 mL vs 467.42 ± 104.52 mL, respectively, P = 0.016). CONCLUSION:The group that had Pronase premedication prior to the EUS examination had clearer images than the placebo group. With Pronase premedication, the examination time was shorter, and the amount of saline used during the EUS examination was less.

journal_name

World J Gastroenterol

journal_title

World journal of gastroenterology

authors

Wang GX,Liu X,Wang S,Ge N,Guo JT,Sun SY

doi

10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10673

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2016-12-28 00:00:00

pages

10673-10679

issue

eissn

1007-9327

issn

2219-2840

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章,随机对照试验

在线工具

Effects of premedication with Pronase for endoscopic ultrasound of the stomach: A randomized controlled trial.