当前位置： SCI文献检索 > INHALATION TOXICOLOGY期刊下所有文献 > Is PM more toxic than the sum of its parts? Risk-assessment toxicity factors vs. PM-mortality "effect functions".

Is PM more toxic than the sum of its parts? Risk-assessment toxicity factors vs. PM-mortality "effect functions".

Abstract：

:Epidemiology studies of populations living in areas with good air quality report correlations between levels of ambient particulate matter (PM) and mortality rates. These associations occur at low PM concentrations that are below current air quality standards. Can such concentrations cause mortality, given the toxicity of PM chemical constituents? We examined chemical-specific, dose-response data typically used in U.S. EPA human health risk assessments. These assessments rely on established, no-effect thresholds for noncancer health endpoints. We found that chemicals identified as constituents of ambient PM are present at concentrations considerably below the regulatory thresholds used in risk assessment (i.e., below the RfCs and RfDs that identify levels for which no adverse health effects are anticipated). From the perspective of risk assessment, exposure to the concentrations of chemicals in ambient PM (e.g., sulfate, nitrate, and elemental carbon) cannot be expected to cause death. Hence, the health effects attributed to ambient PM in "regulatory impact analyses" appear to be at odds with what would be predicted from a standard U.S. EPA health-risk assessment for PM chemicals. Four possible resolutions of this paradox are that (1) the mixtures of chemicals present in ambient PM are vastly more toxic than the sum of individual components, (2) small portions of the general population are vastly more sensitive to certain ambient PM chemicals than reflected in U.S. EPA toxicity factors, (3) the toxicity of ambient PM is unrelated to its chemical constituents, or (4) PM mass concentration is not the causal factor in the reported associations. The associations may arise because ambient PM concentrations (1) are a surrogate for unmeasured copollutants (e.g., HAPs), (2) covary with confounding factors that cannot be fully controlled (e.g., weather, demographics), or (3) covary with unmeasured (e.g., societal, behavioral, or stress) factors.

journal_name

Inhal Toxicol

journal_title

Inhalation toxicology

authors

Valberg PA

doi

10.1080/08958370490442935

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2004-01-01 00:00:00

pages

19-29

eissn

0895-8378

issn

1091-7691

pii

0Q7QXD0F4F6TGFU2

journal_volume

16 Suppl 1

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Is PM more toxic than the sum of its parts? Risk-assessment toxicity factors vs. PM-mortality "effect functions".