当前位置： SCI文献检索 > JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING期刊下所有文献 > Comparison of the use of AnaConDa® versus AnaConDa-S® during the post-operative period of cardiac surgery under standard conditions of practice.

Comparison of the use of AnaConDa® versus AnaConDa-S® during the post-operative period of cardiac surgery under standard conditions of practice.

Abstract：

:Changes have been made to the AnaConDa device (Sedana Medical, Stockholm, Sweden), decreasing its size to reduce dead space and carbon dioxide (CO2) retention. However, this also involves a decrease in the surface area of the activated carbon filter. The CO2 elimination and sevoflurane (SEV) reflection of the old device (ACD-100) were thus compared with the new version (ACD-50) in patients sedated after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. After ERC approval and written informed consent, 23 patients were sedated with SEV, using first the ACD-100 and then the ACD-50 for 60 min each. With each device, patients were ventilated with tidal volumes (TV) of 5 ml/kg of ideal body weight for the first 30 min, and with 7 ml/kg for the next 30 min. Ventilation parameters, arterial blood gases, Bispectral-Index™ (BIS, Aspect Medical Systems Inc., Newton, MA, USA), SEV concentrations exhaled by the patient (SEV-exhaled) and from the expiratory hose (SEV-lost) were recorded every 30 min. A SEV reflection index was calculated: SRI [%] = 100 × (1 - (SEV-lost/SEV-exhaled)). Data were compared using ANOVA with repeated measurements and Student's T-tests for pairs. Respiratory rates, tidal and minute volumes were not significantly different between the two devices. End tidal and arterial CO2 partial pressures were significantly higher with the ACD-100 as compared with the ACD-50. SEV infusion rate remained constant. SEV reflection was higher (SRI: ACD-100 vs. ACD-50, TV 5 ml/kg: 95.29 ± 6.45 vs. 85.54 ± 11.15, p = 0.001; 7 ml/kg: 93.42 ± 6.55 vs. 88.77 ± 12.26, p = 0.003). BIS was significantly lower when using the higher TV (60.91 ± 9.99 vs. 66.57 ± 8.22, p = 0.012), although this difference was not clinically relevant. During postoperative sedation, the use of ACD-50 significantly reduced CO2 retention. SEV reflection was slightly reduced. However, patients remained sufficiently sedated without increasing SEV infusion.

journal_name

J Clin Monit Comput

journal_title

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing

authors

Marcos-Vidal JM,Merino M,González R,García C,Rey S,Pérez I

doi

10.1007/s10877-019-00285-0

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-02-01 00:00:00

pages

89-95

issue

eissn

1387-1307

issn

1573-2614

pii

10.1007/s10877-019-00285-0

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Comparison of the use of AnaConDa® versus AnaConDa-S® during the post-operative period of cardiac surgery under standard conditions of practice.