Overstating values: medical facts, diverse values, bioethics and values-based medicine.

Abstract:

:Fulford has argued that (1) the medical concepts illness, disease and dysfunction are inescapably evaluative terms, (2) illness is conceptually prior to disease, and (3) a model conforming to (2) has greater explanatory power and practical utility than the conventional value-free medical model. This 'reverse' model employs Hare's distinction between description and evaluation, and the sliding relationship between descriptive and evaluative meaning. Fulford's derivative 'Values Based Medicine' (VBM) readjusts the imbalance between the predominance of facts over values in medicine. VBM allegedly responds to the increased choices made available by, inter alia, the progress of medical science itself. VBM attributes appropriate status to evaluative meaning, where strong consensus about descriptive meaning is lacking. According to Fulford, quasi-legal bioethics, while it can be retained as a kind of deliberative framework, is outcome-based and pursues 'the right answer', while VBM approximates a democratic, process-oriented method for dealing with diverse values, in partnership with necessary contributions from evidence-based medicine (EBM). I support the non-cognitivist underpinnings of VBM, and its emphasis on the importance of values in medicine. But VBM overstates the complexity and diversity of values, misrepresents EBM and VBM as responses to scientific and evaluative complexity, and mistakenly depicts 'quasi-legal bioethics' as a space of settled descriptive meaning. Bioethical reasoning can expose strategies that attempt to reduce authentic values to scientific facts, illustrating that VBM provides no advantage over bioethics in delineating the connections between facts and values in medicine.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

Parker M

doi

10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01902.x

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2013-02-01 00:00:00

pages

97-104

issue

2

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

journal_volume

27

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Taking due care: moral obligations in dual use research.

    abstract::In the past decade, the perception of a bioterrorist threat has increased and created a demand on life scientists to consider the potential security implications of dual use research. This article examines a selection of proposed moral obligations for life scientists that have emerged to meet these concerns and the ex...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00695.x

    authors: Kuhlau F,Eriksson S,Evers K,Höglund AT

    更新日期:2008-11-01 00:00:00

  • Political legitimacy and research ethics.

    abstract::In democratic theory, "legitimacy" refers to the set of conditions that must be in place in order for the claims to authority of somebody to be deemed appropriate, and for their claims to compliance to be warranted. Though criteria of legitimacy have been elaborated in the context of democratic states, there is no rea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12489

    authors: Smith MJ,Weinstock D

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Wrongs, preferences, and the selection of children: a critique of Rebecca Bennett's argument against the principle of procreative beneficence.

    abstract::Rebecca Bennett, in a recent paper dismissing Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence, advances both a negative and a positive thesis. The negative thesis holds that the principle's theoretical foundation - the notion of impersonal harm or non-person-affecting wrong - is indefensible. Therefore, there ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x

    authors: Herissone-Kelly P

    更新日期:2012-10-01 00:00:00

  • The social value requirement reconsidered.

    abstract::It is widely assumed that it is ethical to conduct research with human subjects only if the research has social value. There are two standard arguments for this view. The allocation argument claims that public funds should not be devoted to research that lacks social value. The exploitation avoidance argument claims t...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12128

    authors: Wertheimer A

    更新日期:2015-06-01 00:00:00

  • Alternative Medicine and the Ethics Of Commerce.

    abstract::Is it ethical to market complementary and alternative medicines? Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are medical products and services outside the mainstream of medical practice. But they are not just medicines (or supposed medicines) offered and provided for the prevention and treatment of illness. They are...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12226

    authors: Macdonald C,Gavura S

    更新日期:2016-02-01 00:00:00

  • Frozen embryos, genetic information and reproductive rights.

    abstract::Recent ethical and legal challenges have arisen concerning the rights of individuals over their IVF embryos, leading to questions about how, when the wishes of parents regarding their embryos conflict, such situations ought to be resolved. A notion commonly invoked in relation to frozen embryo disputes is that of repr...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00581.x

    authors: Chan S,Quigley M

    更新日期:2007-10-01 00:00:00

  • Misplaced Paternalism and other Mistakes in the Debate over Kidney Sales.

    abstract::Erik Malmqvist defends the prohibition on kidney sales as a justifiable measure to protect individuals from harms they have not autonomously chosen. This appeal to 'group soft paternalism' requires that three conditions be met. It must be shown that some vendors will be harmed, that some will be subject to undue press...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12303

    authors: Semrau L

    更新日期:2017-03-01 00:00:00

  • Artificial reproductive technologies: the Israeli scene.

    abstract::In 1991, the Israeli Minister of Health and the Minister of Justice jointly nominated a commission to consider the subject of IVF in all its aspects. Heyd summarizes the commission's recommendations on the following issues as put forth in an interim report: access to fertility treatments, financing of treatment, couns...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00293.x

    authors: Heyd D

    更新日期:1993-04-01 00:00:00

  • Uterus transplants and the insufficient value of gestation.

    abstract::Uterus transplants provide another treatment for infertility. Some might think that we should embrace such transplants as one more way to assist people to have children. However, in this paper I argue that uterus transplants are not something that we ought to fund, nor something that we should make easy to access. Fir...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12523

    authors: McTernan E

    更新日期:2018-10-01 00:00:00

  • Analysis of some Filipino perspectives on ethical issues in multi-country collaborative research: a case of deep listening.

    abstract::The discussion on ethical issues, it is said, should not be confined to experts but should be extended to patients and local communities, because of the real need to engage stakeholders and non-stakeholders alike not only in carrying out any biomedical research project, but also in the drafting and legislation of bioe...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00464.x

    authors: Manaloto RB,Alvarez AA,Alvarez MA

    更新日期:2005-10-01 00:00:00

  • Surrogate mothering: exploitation or empowerment?

    abstract::The morality of surrogate mothering is analyzed from a "consequentialist" framework which attempts to separate those consequences that invariably accompany a given act from those that accompany it only in particular circumstances. Critics of surrogacy argue that it transfers the burden and risk of pregnancy onto anot...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1989.tb00324.x

    authors: Purdy LM

    更新日期:1989-01-01 00:00:00

  • The Ties that Undermine.

    abstract::Do biological relations ground responsibilities between biological fathers and their offspring? Few think biological relations ground either necessary or sufficient conditions for responsibility. Nevertheless, many think biological relations ground responsibility at least partially. Various scenarios, such as cases co...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12213

    authors: Beverley J

    更新日期:2016-06-01 00:00:00

  • Humanity and Justice in Global Health: Problems with Venkatapuram's Justification of the Global Health Duty.

    abstract::One of the most ambitious and sophisticated recent approaches to provide a theory of global health justice is Sridhar Venkatapuram's recent work. In this commentary, we first outline the core idea of Venkatapuram's approach to global health justice. We then argue that one of the most important elements of the account,...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12224

    authors: Kollar E,Laukötter S,Buyx A

    更新日期:2016-01-01 00:00:00

  • Acculturation and end-of-life decision making: comparison of Japanese and Japanese-American focus groups.

    abstract::Variation in decision-making about end-of-life care among ethnic groups creates clinical conflicts. In order to understand changes in preferences for end-of-life care among Japanese who immigrate to the United States, we conducted 18 focus groups with 122 participants: 65 English-speaking Japanese Americans, 29 Japane...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00551.x

    authors: Bito S,Matsumura S,Singer MK,Meredith LS,Fukuhara S,Wenger NS

    更新日期:2007-06-01 00:00:00

  • Are patients' decisions to refuse treatment binding on health care professionals?

    abstract::When patients refuse to receive medical treatment, the consequences of honouring their decisions can be tragic. This is no less true of patients who autonomously decide to refuse treatment. I distinguish three possible implications of these autonomous decisions. According to the Permissibility Claim, such a decision i...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00436.x

    authors: Murphy P

    更新日期:2005-06-01 00:00:00

  • Is it time for bioethics to go empirical?

    abstract::Observers who note the increasing popularity of bioethics discussions often complain that the social sciences are poorly represented in discussions about things like abortion and stem-cell research. Critics say that bioethicists should be incorporating the methods and findings of social scientists, and should move tow...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00621.x

    authors: Herrera C

    更新日期:2008-03-01 00:00:00

  • Is sex-selective abortion morally justified and should it be prohibited?

    abstract::In this paper we argue that sex-selective abortion (SSA) cannot be morally justified and that it should be prohibited. We present two main arguments against SSA. First, we present reasons why the decision for a woman to seek SSA in cultures with strong son-preference cannot be regarded as autonomous on either a narrow...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00599.x

    authors: Rogers W,Ballantyne A,Draper H

    更新日期:2007-11-01 00:00:00

  • In vitro fertilization and the right to reproduce.

    abstract::The assumption that people have a right to have children is considered in relation to the question of whether society has an obligation to allocate resources to make clinical in vitro fertilization available, at least to married couples where the woman is infertile and the couple provides the ovum and sperm. The auth...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00010.x

    authors: Uniacke S

    更新日期:1987-07-01 00:00:00

  • Bystanders and ethical review of research: Proceed with caution.

    abstract::Scientists seeking to conduct research with human subjects must first submit their proposals to research ethics committees (Institutional Review Boards [IRBs], in the United States). Some of these studies pose risks to "bystanders," i.e., people who may be affected by the research but who are not enrolled as study sub...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12823

    authors: Wikler D

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • No ethical bypass of moral status in stem cell research.

    abstract::Recent advances in reprogramming technology do not bypass the ethical challenge of embryo sacrifice. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPS) research has been and almost certainly will continue to be conducted within the context of embryo sacrifice. If human embryos have moral status as human beings, then participation in...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01891.x

    authors: Brown M

    更新日期:2013-01-01 00:00:00

  • Slipping on slippery slope arguments.

    abstract::Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) are used in a wide range of philosophical debates, but are often dismissed as empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious. In particular, leading authors put forward a meta-SSA which points to instances of empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious SSAs and to the alleged exi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12727

    authors: Fumagalli R

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Mass-vaccination programmes and the value of respect for autonomy.

    abstract::Respect for autonomy is problematic in relation to public health programmes such as vaccination, as the success of such programmes depends on widespread compliance. European countries have different policies for dealing with objectors to vaccination programmes. In some countries compliance is compulsory, while in othe...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00630.x

    authors: Asveld L

    更新日期:2008-06-01 00:00:00

  • Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement.

    abstract::Several recent articles have weighed in on the question of whether moral philosophers can be counted as moral experts. One argument denying this has been rejected by both sides of the debate. According to this argument, the extent of disagreement in modern moral philosophy prevents moral philosophers from being classi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12173

    authors: Cross B

    更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00

  • The limits of intimate citizenship: reproduction of difference in Flemish-Ethiopian 'adoption cultures'.

    abstract::The concept of 'intimate citizenship' stresses the right of people to choose how they organize their personal lives and claim identities. Support and interest groups are seen as playing an important role in the pursuit of recognition for these intimate choices, by elaborating visible and positive cultures that invade ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01830.x

    authors: De Graeve K

    更新日期:2010-09-01 00:00:00

  • A pain in the fetus: toward ending confusion about fetal pain.

    abstract::Are fetuses, at any stage of their development, capable of feeling pain? In his paper, "Locating the Beginnings of Pain," Stuart Derbyshire argues that they are not. We argue that he reaches this conclusion by way of conceptual confusion, a misreading of the available scientific data and the inclusion of irrelevant da...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00212

    authors: Benatar D,Benatar M

    更新日期:2001-02-01 00:00:00

  • Prescribing Posttraumatic Growth.

    abstract::This article introduces questions in psychiatric ethics regarding the substantial field of qualitative and quantitative research into 'posttraumatic growth', which investigates how, after devastating experiences, individuals can come to feel that they have developed warmer relationships, increased spirituality, or a c...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12164

    authors: Harbin A

    更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Consequentialism, reasons, value and justice.

    abstract::Over the past 10 years, John Harris has made important contributions to thinking about distributive justice in health care. In his latest work, Harris controversially argues that clinicians should stop prioritising patients according to prognosis. He argues that the good or benefit of health care is providing each ind...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00109

    authors: Savulescu J

    更新日期:1998-07-01 00:00:00

  • Counterfactual reasoning in surrogate decision making -- another look.

    abstract::Incompetent patients need to have someone else make decisions on their behalf. According to the Substituted Judgment Standard the surrogate decision maker ought to make the decision that the patient would have made, had he or she been competent. Objections have been raised against this traditional construal of the sta...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01768.x

    authors: Johansson M,Broström L

    更新日期:2011-06-01 00:00:00

  • Trading with the waiting-list: the justice of living donor list exchange.

    abstract::In a Living Donor List Exchange program, the donor makes his kidney available for allocation to patients on the postmortal waiting-list and receives in exchange a postmortal kidney, usually an O-kidney, to be given to the recipient he favours. The program can be a solution for a candidate donor who is unable to donate...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00684.x

    authors: den Hartogh G

    更新日期:2010-05-01 00:00:00

  • 'Aching to be a boy': A preliminary analysis of gender assignment of intersex persons in India in a culture of son preference.

    abstract::Intersexuality, particularly in the global South, remains an under-researched field of study. In my in-progress doctoral research project, I explore the cultural, social, and medical discourses that influence how key stakeholders such as healthcare providers make decisions about the sex and gender assignment of the in...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12750

    authors: Das A

    更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00