The social value requirement reconsidered.

Abstract:

:It is widely assumed that it is ethical to conduct research with human subjects only if the research has social value. There are two standard arguments for this view. The allocation argument claims that public funds should not be devoted to research that lacks social value. The exploitation avoidance argument claims that subjects are exploited if research has no social value. The primary purpose of this article is to argue that these arguments do not succeed. The allocation argument has little relevance to commercial research. Social value is not necessary to avoid exploitation if subjects benefit from participation. Although the standard arguments for a social value requirement do not succeed, that view might be justified in a different way. It might be justified by appeal to the importance of social trust or the integrity of physician investigators. It is possible but doubtful that these arguments succeed.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

Wertheimer A

doi

10.1111/bioe.12128

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2015-06-01 00:00:00

pages

301-8

issue

5

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

journal_volume

29

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Symbiotic empirical ethics: a practical methodology.

    abstract::Like any discipline, bioethics is a developing field of academic inquiry; and recent trends in scholarship have been towards more engagement with empirical research. This 'empirical turn' has provoked extensive debate over how such 'descriptive' research carried out in the social sciences contributes to the distinctiv...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01843.x

    authors: Frith L

    更新日期:2012-05-01 00:00:00

  • Administrative gatekeeping - a third way between unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing.

    abstract::The inevitable need for rationing of healthcare has apparently presented the medical profession with the dilemma of choosing the lesser of two evils. Physicians appear to be obliged to adopt either an implausible version of traditional professional ethics or an equally problematic ethics of bedside rationing. The form...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00652.x

    authors: Lauridsen S

    更新日期:2009-06-01 00:00:00

  • Slipping on slippery slope arguments.

    abstract::Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) are used in a wide range of philosophical debates, but are often dismissed as empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious. In particular, leading authors put forward a meta-SSA which points to instances of empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious SSAs and to the alleged exi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12727

    authors: Fumagalli R

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Global solidarity, migration and global health inequity.

    abstract::The grounds for global solidarity have been theorized and conceptualized in recent years, and many have argued that we need a global concept of solidarity. But the question remains: what can motivate efforts of the international community and nation-states? Our focus is the grounding of solidarity with respect to glob...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01991.x

    authors: Eckenwiler L,Straehle C,Chung R

    更新日期:2012-09-01 00:00:00

  • Moral philosophers are moral experts! A reply to David Archard.

    abstract::In his article 'Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts' David Archard attempts to show that his argument from common-sense morality is more convincing than other competing arguments in the debate. I examine his main line of argumentation and eventually refute his main argument in my reply. ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02004.x

    authors: Gordon JS

    更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00

  • Health, vital goals, and central human capabilities.

    abstract::I argue for a conception of health as a person's ability to achieve or exercise a cluster of basic human activities. These basic activities are in turn specified through free-standing ethical reasoning about what constitutes a minimal conception of a human life with equal human dignity in the modern world. I arrive at...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01953.x

    authors: Venkatapuram S

    更新日期:2013-06-01 00:00:00

  • Overstating values: medical facts, diverse values, bioethics and values-based medicine.

    abstract::Fulford has argued that (1) the medical concepts illness, disease and dysfunction are inescapably evaluative terms, (2) illness is conceptually prior to disease, and (3) a model conforming to (2) has greater explanatory power and practical utility than the conventional value-free medical model. This 'reverse' model em...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01902.x

    authors: Parker M

    更新日期:2013-02-01 00:00:00

  • Who gets the gametes? An argument for a points system for fertility patients.

    abstract::This paper argues that the convention of allocating donated gametes on a 'first come, first served' basis should be replaced with an allocation system that takes into account more morally relevant criteria than waiting time. This conclusion was developed using an empirical bioethics methodology, which involved a study...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12411

    authors: Jenkins S,Ives J,Avery S,Draper H

    更新日期:2018-01-01 00:00:00

  • Beyond sun, sand, and stitches: assigning responsibility for the harms of medical tourism.

    abstract::Medical tourism (MT) can be conceptualized as the intentional pursuit of non-emergency surgical interventions by patients outside their nation of residence. Despite increasing popular interest in MT, the ethical issues associated with the practice have thus far been under-examined. MT has been associated with a range ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01942.x

    authors: Snyder J,Crooks V,Johnston R,Kingsbury P

    更新日期:2013-06-01 00:00:00

  • Acculturation and end-of-life decision making: comparison of Japanese and Japanese-American focus groups.

    abstract::Variation in decision-making about end-of-life care among ethnic groups creates clinical conflicts. In order to understand changes in preferences for end-of-life care among Japanese who immigrate to the United States, we conducted 18 focus groups with 122 participants: 65 English-speaking Japanese Americans, 29 Japane...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00551.x

    authors: Bito S,Matsumura S,Singer MK,Meredith LS,Fukuhara S,Wenger NS

    更新日期:2007-06-01 00:00:00

  • Conflicting demands on a modern healthcare service: Can Rawlsian justice provide a guiding philosophy for the NHS and other socialized health services?

    abstract::We explore whether a Rawlsian approach might provide a guiding philosophy for the development of a healthcare system, in particular with regard to resolving tensions between different groups within it. We argue that an approach developed from some of Rawls' principles - using his 'veil of ignorance' and both the 'diff...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12568

    authors: Fritz Z,Cox C

    更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00

  • Tu Youyou winning the Nobel Prize: Ethical research on the value and safety of traditional Chinese medicine.

    abstract::In 2015, the Chinese pharmacologist, Tu Youyou, was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of artemisinin. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) was the source of inspiration for Tu's discovery and provides an opportunity for the world to know more about TCM as a source of medical knowledge ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 传,历史文章,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12456

    authors: Zheng WR,Li EC,Peng S,Wang XS

    更新日期:2020-02-01 00:00:00

  • A Defence of the Counterfactual Account of Harm.

    abstract::In order to determine whether a particular course of conduct is ethically permissible it is important to have a concept of what it means to be harmed. The dominant theory of harm is the counterfactual account, most famously proposed by Joel Feinberg. This determines whether harm is caused by comparing what actually ha...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12207

    authors: Purshouse C

    更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00

  • Vaccine mandates, value pluralism, and policy diversity.

    abstract::Political communities across the world have recently sought to tackle rising rates of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, by implementing coercive immunization programs, or by making existing immunization programs more coercive. Many academics and advocates of public health have applauded these policy developments, and the...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12645

    authors: Navin MC,Attwell K

    更新日期:2019-11-01 00:00:00

  • The genesis of public health ethics.

    abstract::As bioethics emerged in the 1960s and 1970s and began to have enormous impacts on the practice of medicine and research--fuelled, by broad socio-political changes that gave rise to the struggles of women, African Americans, gay men and lesbians, and the antiauthoritarianism impulse that characterised the New Left in d...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00412.x

    authors: Bayer R,Fairchild AL

    更新日期:2004-11-01 00:00:00

  • Why a right to life rules out infanticide: A final reply to Räsänen.

    abstract::Joona Räsänen has argued that pro-life arguments against the permissibility of infanticide are not persuasive, and fail to show it to be immoral. We responded to Räsänen's arguments, concluding that his critique of pro-life arguments was misplaced. Räsänen has recently replied in 'Why pro-life arguments still are not ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12646

    authors: Blackshaw BP,Rodger D

    更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00

  • In vitro fertilization and the right to reproduce.

    abstract::The assumption that people have a right to have children is considered in relation to the question of whether society has an obligation to allocate resources to make clinical in vitro fertilization available, at least to married couples where the woman is infertile and the couple provides the ovum and sperm. The auth...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00010.x

    authors: Uniacke S

    更新日期:1987-07-01 00:00:00

  • The doctor-patient relationship: a survey of attitudes and practices of doctors in Singapore.

    abstract::This article reports the results of a survey, by mailed questionnaire, of the attitudes, values and practices of doctors in Singapore with respect to the doctor-patient relationship. Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 475 doctors (261 general practitioners and 214 medical specialists), out of which 249 (52...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00180

    authors: Chan D,Goh LG

    更新日期:2000-01-01 00:00:00

  • Justification for conscience exemptions in health care.

    abstract::Some bioethicists argue that conscientious objectors in health care should have to justify themselves, just as objectors in the military do. They should have to provide reasons that explain why they should be exempt from offering the services that they find offensive. There are two versions of this view in the literat...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12055

    authors: Kantymir L,McLeod C

    更新日期:2014-01-01 00:00:00

  • Artificial reproductive technologies: the Israeli scene.

    abstract::In 1991, the Israeli Minister of Health and the Minister of Justice jointly nominated a commission to consider the subject of IVF in all its aspects. Heyd summarizes the commission's recommendations on the following issues as put forth in an interim report: access to fertility treatments, financing of treatment, couns...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00293.x

    authors: Heyd D

    更新日期:1993-04-01 00:00:00

  • The responsibilities of the engaged bioethicist: Scholar, advocate, activist.

    abstract::The work of a bioethicist carries distinctive responsibilities. Alongside those of any worker, there are responsibilities associated with giving guidance to practitioners, policy makers and the public. In addition, bioethicists are professionally exposed to and required to identify situations of moral trouble, and as ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12659

    authors: Scully JL

    更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00

  • Regret, shame, and denials of women's voluntary sterilization.

    abstract::Women face extraordinary difficulty in seeking sterilization as physicians routinely deny them the procedure. Physicians defend such denials by citing the possibility of future regret, a well-studied phenomenon in women's sterilization literature. Regret is, however, a problematic emotion upon which to deny reproducti...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12431

    authors: Lalonde D

    更新日期:2018-06-01 00:00:00

  • Narrative ARTifice and women's agency.

    abstract::The choice to pursue fertility treatments is a complex one. In this paper I explore the issues of choice, agency, and gender as they relate to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). I argue that narrative approaches to bioethics such as those by Arthur Frank and Hilde Lindemann Nelson clarify judgments about auton...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00428.x

    authors: Kalbian AH

    更新日期:2005-04-01 00:00:00

  • What Justifies a Future with Humans in It?

    abstract::Antinatalist commentators recommend that humanity bring itself to a close, on the theory that pain and suffering override the value of any possible life. Other commentators do not require the voluntary extinction of human beings, but they defend that outcome if people were to choose against having children. Against su...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12290

    authors: Murphy TF

    更新日期:2016-11-01 00:00:00

  • Competence and risk-relativity.

    abstract::In this paper I discuss the view that the appropriate concept of competence is a decision-relative one: that a person may be competent to make one decision but not another. The argument that I present is that neither of the two competing theories supporting the decision-relative approach, internalism and externalism, ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00218

    authors: Buller T

    更新日期:2001-04-01 00:00:00

  • Adolescent and parental perceptions of medical decision-making in Hong Kong.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:To investigate whether Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong share similar perceptions with their Western counterparts regarding their capacity for autonomous decision-making, and secondarily whether Chinese parents underestimate their adolescent children's desire and capacity for autonomous decision-making. MET...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01803.x

    authors: Hui E

    更新日期:2011-11-01 00:00:00

  • The cost of safety: Balancing risk and liberty in psychiatric units.

    abstract::The systems approach is a widely accepted method for addressing healthcare adverse events. However, when adverse events are behavioral in nature, such as self-injury or aggression, a systems approach can restrict patient autonomy. We propose guidelines for balancing safety and autonomy considerations when developing s...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12804

    authors: Zhong R,Wasser T

    更新日期:2021-02-01 00:00:00

  • Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement.

    abstract::Several recent articles have weighed in on the question of whether moral philosophers can be counted as moral experts. One argument denying this has been rejected by both sides of the debate. According to this argument, the extent of disagreement in modern moral philosophy prevents moral philosophers from being classi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12173

    authors: Cross B

    更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00

  • Is sex-selective abortion morally justified and should it be prohibited?

    abstract::In this paper we argue that sex-selective abortion (SSA) cannot be morally justified and that it should be prohibited. We present two main arguments against SSA. First, we present reasons why the decision for a woman to seek SSA in cultures with strong son-preference cannot be regarded as autonomous on either a narrow...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00599.x

    authors: Rogers W,Ballantyne A,Draper H

    更新日期:2007-11-01 00:00:00

  • Against anonymity.

    abstract::In 'New Threats to Academic Freedom' Francesca Minerva argues that anonymity for the authors of controversial articles is a prerequisite for academic freedom in the Internet age. This argument draws its intellectual and emotional power from the author's account of the reaction to the on-line publication of ' After-bir...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12093

    authors: Baker R

    更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00