Is sex-selective abortion morally justified and should it be prohibited?

Abstract:

:In this paper we argue that sex-selective abortion (SSA) cannot be morally justified and that it should be prohibited. We present two main arguments against SSA. First, we present reasons why the decision for a woman to seek SSA in cultures with strong son-preference cannot be regarded as autonomous on either a narrow or a broad account of autonomy. Second, we identify serious harms associated with SSA including perpetuation of discrimination against women, disruption to social and familial networks, and increased violence against women. For these reasons, SSA should be prohibited by law, and such laws should be enforced. Finally, we describe additional strategies for decreasing son-preference. Some of these strategies rely upon highlighting the disadvantages of women becoming scarce, such as lack of brides and daughters-in-law to care for elderly parents. We should, however, be cautious not to perpetuate the view that the purpose of women is to be the consorts for, and carers of, men, and the providers of children. Arguments against SSA should be located within a concerted effort to ensure greater, deeper social and cultural equality between the sexes.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

Rogers W,Ballantyne A,Draper H

doi

10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00599.x

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2007-11-01 00:00:00

pages

520-4

issue

9

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

pii

BIOT599

journal_volume

21

pub_type

杂志文章
  • The debate over risk-related standards of competence.

    abstract::This discussion paper continues the debate over risk-related standards of mental competence which appears in Bioethics 5. Dan Brock there defends an approach to mental competence in patients which defines it as being relative to differing standards, more or less rigorous depending on the degree of risk involved in pro...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00081

    authors: Wilks I

    更新日期:1997-10-01 00:00:00

  • Bystanders and ethical review of research: Proceed with caution.

    abstract::Scientists seeking to conduct research with human subjects must first submit their proposals to research ethics committees (Institutional Review Boards [IRBs], in the United States). Some of these studies pose risks to "bystanders," i.e., people who may be affected by the research but who are not enrolled as study sub...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12823

    authors: Wikler D

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Monological versus dialogical consciousness: two epistemological views on the use of theory in clinical ethical practice.

    abstract::In this article, we argue that a critical examination of epistemological and anthropological presuppositions might lead to a more fruitful use of theory in clinical-ethical practice. We differentiate between two views of conceptualizing ethics, referring to Charles Taylors' two epistemological models: 'monological' ve...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01912.x

    authors: Ohnsorge K,Widdershoven G

    更新日期:2011-09-01 00:00:00

  • Why a right to life rules out infanticide: A final reply to Räsänen.

    abstract::Joona Räsänen has argued that pro-life arguments against the permissibility of infanticide are not persuasive, and fail to show it to be immoral. We responded to Räsänen's arguments, concluding that his critique of pro-life arguments was misplaced. Räsänen has recently replied in 'Why pro-life arguments still are not ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12646

    authors: Blackshaw BP,Rodger D

    更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00

  • Reciprocity-based reasons for benefiting research participants: most fail, the most plausible is problematic.

    abstract::A common reason for giving research participants post-trial access (PTA) to the trial intervention appeals to reciprocity, the principle, stated most generally, that if one person benefits a second, the second should reciprocate: benefit the first in return. Many authors consider it obvious that reciprocity supports P...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12039

    authors: Sofaer N

    更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00

  • Obligatory precautions against infection.

    abstract::If we have a duty not to infect others, how far does it go? This question is often discussed with respect to HIV transmission, but reflection on other diseases like influenza raises a number of interesting theoretical issues. I argue that a duty to avoid infection not only yields requirements for persons who know they...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00446.x

    authors: Verweij M

    更新日期:2005-08-01 00:00:00

  • Surrogate mothering: exploitation or empowerment?

    abstract::The morality of surrogate mothering is analyzed from a "consequentialist" framework which attempts to separate those consequences that invariably accompany a given act from those that accompany it only in particular circumstances. Critics of surrogacy argue that it transfers the burden and risk of pregnancy onto anot...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1989.tb00324.x

    authors: Purdy LM

    更新日期:1989-01-01 00:00:00

  • Microethics in action.

    abstract::The future development of bioethics has been discussed in a number of articles in recent years, principally with regard to the trend towards empirical studies. However, what is meant by empirical studies in this context and how it is to be used concretely have been subject to varying interpretations. The purpose of th...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00492.x

    authors: Nikku N,Eriksson BE

    更新日期:2006-08-01 00:00:00

  • Our brains are not us.

    abstract::Many neuroscientists have claimed that our minds are just a function of and thus reducible to our brains. I challenge neuroreductionism by arguing that the mind emerges from and is shaped by interaction among the brain, body, and environment. The mind is not located in the brain but is distributed among these three en...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01727.x

    authors: Glannon W

    更新日期:2009-07-01 00:00:00

  • Human cloning: category, dignity, and the role of bioethics.

    abstract::Human cloning has been simultaneously a running joke for massive worldwide publicity of fringe groups like the Raelians, and the core issue of an international movement at the United Nations in support of a treaty to ban the use of cloning techniques to produce a child (so called reproductive cloning). Yet, even thoug...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00365

    authors: Shuster E

    更新日期:2003-10-01 00:00:00

  • Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy.

    abstract::The purpose of this paper is to describe the scientific background to the current ethical and legislative debates about the generation and use of human stem cells, and to give an overview of the ethical issues underlying these debates. The ethical issues discussed are 1) stem cells and the status of the embryo, 2) wom...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307

    authors: Holm S

    更新日期:2002-11-01 00:00:00

  • AIDS, gays, and state coercion.

    abstract::Mohr argues that coercive government policies in response to the AIDS crisis are unjustified and pose a serious threat to the rights of homosexuals. AIDS presently can be transmitted only to those whose actions place them at risk. Paternalistic state coercion is warranted only when a person has diminished capacity o...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00003.x

    authors: Mohr RD

    更新日期:1987-01-01 00:00:00

  • Defining and Negotiating the Social Value of Research in Public Health Facilities: Perceptions of Stakeholders in a Research-Active Province of South Africa.

    abstract::This article reports on qualitative research conducted in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, among researchers and gate-keepers of health facilities in the province. Results suggest disparate but not irreconcilable perceptions of the social value of research in provincial health facilities. This study found that researchers...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12323

    authors: Lutge E,Slack C,Wassenaar D

    更新日期:2017-02-01 00:00:00

  • Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement.

    abstract::Several recent articles have weighed in on the question of whether moral philosophers can be counted as moral experts. One argument denying this has been rejected by both sides of the debate. According to this argument, the extent of disagreement in modern moral philosophy prevents moral philosophers from being classi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12173

    authors: Cross B

    更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00

  • An Eliminativist Approach to Vulnerability.

    abstract::The concept of vulnerability has been subject to numerous different interpretations but accounts are still beset with significant problems as to their adequacy, such as their contentious application or the lack of genuine explanatory role for the concept. The constant failure to provide a compelling conceptual analysi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12144

    authors: Wrigley A

    更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00

  • Who gets the gametes? An argument for a points system for fertility patients.

    abstract::This paper argues that the convention of allocating donated gametes on a 'first come, first served' basis should be replaced with an allocation system that takes into account more morally relevant criteria than waiting time. This conclusion was developed using an empirical bioethics methodology, which involved a study...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12411

    authors: Jenkins S,Ives J,Avery S,Draper H

    更新日期:2018-01-01 00:00:00

  • Enhancing evolution and enhancing evolution.

    abstract::It has been claimed in several places that the new genetic technologies allow humanity to achieve in a generation or two what might take natural selection hundreds of millennia in respect of the elimination of certain diseases and an increase in traits such as intelligence. More radically, it has been suggested that t...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.01703.x

    authors: Brassington I

    更新日期:2010-10-01 00:00:00

  • Ought we to enhance our cognitive capacities?

    abstract::Ought we to improve our cognitive capacities beyond the normal human range? It might be a good idea to level out differences between peoples cognitive capacities; and some people's reaching beyond normal capacities may have some good side-effects on society at large (but also bad side-effects, of course). But is there...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00721.x

    authors: Tännsjö T

    更新日期:2009-09-01 00:00:00

  • Conflicting demands on a modern healthcare service: Can Rawlsian justice provide a guiding philosophy for the NHS and other socialized health services?

    abstract::We explore whether a Rawlsian approach might provide a guiding philosophy for the development of a healthcare system, in particular with regard to resolving tensions between different groups within it. We argue that an approach developed from some of Rawls' principles - using his 'veil of ignorance' and both the 'diff...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12568

    authors: Fritz Z,Cox C

    更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00

  • Altruism and reward: motivational compatibility in deceased organ donation.

    abstract::Acts of helping others are often based on mixed motivations. Based on this claim, it has been argued that the use of a financial reward to incentivize organ donation is compatible with promoting altruism in organ donation. In its report Human Bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research, the Nuffield Council on Bioethic...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12078

    authors: Voo TC

    更新日期:2015-03-01 00:00:00

  • The injustice of fat stigma.

    abstract::Fatness stigma is pervasive. Being fat is widely regarded a bad thing, and fat persons suffer numerous social and material disadvantages in virtue of their weight being regarded that way. Despite the seriousness of this problem, it has received relatively little attention from analytic philosophers. In this paper, I s...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12560

    authors: Nath R

    更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00

  • Misunderstanding death on a respirator.

    abstract::As Tom Tomlinson's study indicates, there is considerable misunderstanding and confusion among physicians and nurses working in the area. Brain death is often not well-understood by healthcare professionals and hence inadequately explained to relatives, leaving them confused as to whether their loved-one is alive or ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1990.tb00088.x

    authors: Tomlinson T

    更新日期:1990-07-01 00:00:00

  • Objection to Conscience: An Argument Against Conscience Exemptions in Healthcare.

    abstract::I argue that appeals to conscience do not constitute reasons for granting healthcare professionals exemptions from providing services they consider immoral (e.g. abortion). My argument is based on a comparison between a type of objection that many people think should be granted, i.e. to abortion, and one that most peo...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12333

    authors: Giubilini A

    更新日期:2017-06-01 00:00:00

  • Presuming patient autonomy in the face of therapeutic misconception.

    abstract::Therapeutic misconception involves the failure of subjects either to understand or to incorporate into their own expectations the distinctions in nature and purpose of personally responsive therapeutic care, and the generic relationship between subject and investigator which is constrained by research protocols. Resea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12384

    authors: McConville P

    更新日期:2017-11-01 00:00:00

  • Hard paternalism, fairness and clinical research: why not?

    abstract::Jansen and Wall suggest a new way of defending hard paternalism in clinical research. They argue that non-therapeutic research exposing people to more than minimal risk should be banned on egalitarian grounds: in preventing poor decision-makers from making bad decisions, we will promote equality of welfare. We argue t...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01816.x

    authors: Edwards SJ,Wilson J

    更新日期:2012-02-01 00:00:00

  • Reinterpreting Responsiveness for Health Systems Research in Low and Middle-Income Countries.

    abstract::The ethical concept of responsiveness has largely been interpreted in the context of international clinical research. In light of the increasing conduct of externally funded health systems research (HSR) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), this article examines how responsiveness might be understood for such ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12138

    authors: Pratt B,Hyder AA

    更新日期:2015-07-01 00:00:00

  • The social value requirement reconsidered.

    abstract::It is widely assumed that it is ethical to conduct research with human subjects only if the research has social value. There are two standard arguments for this view. The allocation argument claims that public funds should not be devoted to research that lacks social value. The exploitation avoidance argument claims t...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12128

    authors: Wertheimer A

    更新日期:2015-06-01 00:00:00

  • Gender and ethics committees: where's the 'different voice'?

    abstract::Prominent international and national ethics commissions such as the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee rarely achieve anything remotely resembling gender equality, although local research and ethics committees are somewhat more egalitarian. Under-representation of women is particularly troubling when the subject...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00485.x

    authors: Dickenson D

    更新日期:2006-06-01 00:00:00

  • When speed truly matters, openness is the answer.

    abstract::In this paper I analyse the ethical implications of the two main competing methodologies in genomic research. I do not aim to provide another contribution from the mainstream legal and public policy perspective; rather I offer a novel approach in which I analyse and describe the patent-and-publish regime (the propriet...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01723.x

    authors: Marturano A

    更新日期:2009-09-01 00:00:00

  • Wrongs, preferences, and the selection of children: a critique of Rebecca Bennett's argument against the principle of procreative beneficence.

    abstract::Rebecca Bennett, in a recent paper dismissing Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence, advances both a negative and a positive thesis. The negative thesis holds that the principle's theoretical foundation - the notion of impersonal harm or non-person-affecting wrong - is indefensible. Therefore, there ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x

    authors: Herissone-Kelly P

    更新日期:2012-10-01 00:00:00