Abstract:
:Variation in decision-making about end-of-life care among ethnic groups creates clinical conflicts. In order to understand changes in preferences for end-of-life care among Japanese who immigrate to the United States, we conducted 18 focus groups with 122 participants: 65 English-speaking Japanese Americans, 29 Japanese-speaking Japanese Americans and 28 Japanese living in Japan. Negative feelings toward living in adverse health states and receiving life-sustaining treatment in such states permeated all three groups. Fear of being meiwaku, a physical, psychological or financial caregiving burden on loved ones, was a prominent concern. They preferred to die pokkuri (popping off) before they become end stage or physically frail. All groups preferred group-oriented decision-making with family. Although advance directives were generally accepted, Japanese participants saw written directives as intrusive whereas Japanese Americans viewed them mainly as tools to reduce conflict created by dying person's wishes and a family's kazoku no jo--responsibility to sustain the dying patient. These findings suggest that in the United States Japanese cultural values concerning end-of-life care and decision-making process are largely preserved.
journal_name
Bioethicsjournal_title
Bioethicsauthors
Bito S,Matsumura S,Singer MK,Meredith LS,Fukuhara S,Wenger NSdoi
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00551.xsubject
Has Abstractpub_date
2007-06-01 00:00:00pages
251-62issue
5eissn
0269-9702issn
1467-8519pii
BIOT551journal_volume
21pub_type
杂志文章相关文献
BIOETHICS文献大全abstract::In 'New Threats to Academic Freedom' Francesca Minerva argues that anonymity for the authors of controversial articles is a prerequisite for academic freedom in the Internet age. This argument draws its intellectual and emotional power from the author's account of the reaction to the on-line publication of ' After-bir...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 评论,杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12093
更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Much of the debate about the ethics of abortion has centered on whether the fetus is a person. In an attempt to sidestep this complex issue, I argue that, even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral. To arrive at this conclusion, I argue that giving a fetus fetal alcohol syndrome is immoral, and that if thi...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12533
更新日期:2019-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::Over the past 10 years, John Harris has made important contributions to thinking about distributive justice in health care. In his latest work, Harris controversially argues that clinicians should stop prioritising patients according to prognosis. He argues that the good or benefit of health care is providing each ind...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00109
更新日期:1998-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::The assumption that people have a right to have children is considered in relation to the question of whether society has an obligation to allocate resources to make clinical in vitro fertilization available, at least to married couples where the woman is infertile and the couple provides the ovum and sperm. The auth...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00010.x
更新日期:1987-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::It has been claimed in several places that the new genetic technologies allow humanity to achieve in a generation or two what might take natural selection hundreds of millennia in respect of the elimination of certain diseases and an increase in traits such as intelligence. More radically, it has been suggested that t...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.01703.x
更新日期:2010-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::An educated guess about the future of academic bioethics can only be made on the basis of the historical conditions of its success. According to its official history, which attributes its success primarily to the service it has done for the patient, it should be safe at least as long as the patient still needs its ser...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01807.x
更新日期:2010-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::Current practices of identifying and treating small indolent thyroid cancers constitute an important but in some ways unusual form of overdiagnosis. Overdiagnosis refers to diagnoses that generally harm rather than benefit patients, primarily because the diagnosed condition is not a harmful form of disease. Patients w...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12383
更新日期:2017-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::This article is a response to McLeod and Baylis (2007) who speculate on the dangers of requesting fresh 'spare' embryos from IVF patients for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research, particularly when those embryos are good enough to be transferred back to the woman. They argue that these embryos should be frozen in...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 评论,杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01792.x
更新日期:2011-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Beauchamp and Childress' definition of autonomous decision-making includes the conditions of intentionality, understanding, and non-control. In genetics, however, a relational conception of autonomy has been increasingly recognized. This article aims to empirically assess aspects of social influence in genetic testing...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12816
更新日期:2021-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::In From Chance to Choice, Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels and Daniel Wikler propose a new way of defending the moral significance of the distinction between genetic treatments and enhancements. They develop what they call a 'normal function model' of equality of opportunity and argue that it offers a 'limite...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01750.x
更新日期:2011-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::A common strategy in bioethics is to posit a prima facie case in favour of one policy, and to then claim that the burden of proof (that this policy should be rejected) falls on those with opposing views. If the burden of proof is not met, it is claimed, then the policy in question should be accepted. This article illu...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12194
更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Prominent international and national ethics commissions such as the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee rarely achieve anything remotely resembling gender equality, although local research and ethics committees are somewhat more egalitarian. Under-representation of women is particularly troubling when the subject...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00485.x
更新日期:2006-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::In the past decade, the perception of a bioterrorist threat has increased and created a demand on life scientists to consider the potential security implications of dual use research. This article examines a selection of proposed moral obligations for life scientists that have emerged to meet these concerns and the ex...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00695.x
更新日期:2008-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::A crucial premise in many recent arguments against the moral permissibility of surrogate motherhood arrangements is the claim that a woman cannot autonomously consent to gestating and relinquishing a child to another couple, because she cannot be fully informed about what her future emotional responses will be to the ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1992.tb00206.x
更新日期:1992-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::Like any discipline, bioethics is a developing field of academic inquiry; and recent trends in scholarship have been towards more engagement with empirical research. This 'empirical turn' has provoked extensive debate over how such 'descriptive' research carried out in the social sciences contributes to the distinctiv...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01843.x
更新日期:2012-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Peter Singer has argued that nothing done to a fetus before it acquires consciousness can harm it. At the same time, he concedes that a child can be harmed by something done to it when it was a non-conscious fetus. But this implies that the non-conscious fetus can be harmed. The mistake lies in thinking that, since ex...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00158
更新日期:1999-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Jansen and Wall suggest a new way of defending hard paternalism in clinical research. They argue that non-therapeutic research exposing people to more than minimal risk should be banned on egalitarian grounds: in preventing poor decision-makers from making bad decisions, we will promote equality of welfare. We argue t...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 评论,杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01816.x
更新日期:2012-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::This article reports the results of a survey, by mailed questionnaire, of the attitudes, values and practices of doctors in Singapore with respect to the doctor-patient relationship. Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 475 doctors (261 general practitioners and 214 medical specialists), out of which 249 (52...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00180
更新日期:2000-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::The ethical aspects of placebo control in clinical trials have been extensively and controversially debated in the last decade. However, a thorough analytical comparison of the different existing international regulations, their terminologies and their ethical principles concerning placebo, is still missing. The centr...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00587.x
更新日期:2008-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::The progress of genetic knowledge magnifies existing ethical problems in medical genetics. Among the most troubling types of problems -- for medicine, patients, and the larger society -- are those of privacy and disclosure. Examples of the range of problems involving privacy and disclosure are: 1) disclosure of fals...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00161.x
更新日期:1991-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Recent ethical and legal challenges have arisen concerning the rights of individuals over their IVF embryos, leading to questions about how, when the wishes of parents regarding their embryos conflict, such situations ought to be resolved. A notion commonly invoked in relation to frozen embryo disputes is that of repr...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00581.x
更新日期:2007-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::In 2001, Julian Savulescu wrote an article entitled 'Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children', in which he argued for the genetic selection of intelligence in children. That article contributes to a debate on whether genetic research on intelligence should be undertaken at all and, if so, shoul...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 评论,杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00422.x
更新日期:2005-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::In Nigeria, reproduction is highly valued, with many people desiring to produce a child 'in their own image and likeness'. Previously, aspiring parents often resorted to adoption. Today, the availability of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) has provided options other than adoption for those desiring to procrea...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12759
更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::In this paper I discuss the view that the appropriate concept of competence is a decision-relative one: that a person may be competent to make one decision but not another. The argument that I present is that neither of the two competing theories supporting the decision-relative approach, internalism and externalism, ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00218
更新日期:2001-04-01 00:00:00
abstract::When patients refuse to receive medical treatment, the consequences of honouring their decisions can be tragic. This is no less true of patients who autonomously decide to refuse treatment. I distinguish three possible implications of these autonomous decisions. According to the Permissibility Claim, such a decision i...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00436.x
更新日期:2005-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::In his article 'Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts' David Archard attempts to show that his argument from common-sense morality is more convincing than other competing arguments in the debate. I examine his main line of argumentation and eventually refute his main argument in my reply. ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 评论,杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02004.x
更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::In 2017 and 2019, two research teams claimed 'proof of principle' for artificial womb technology (AWT). AWT has long been a subject of speculation in bioethical literature, with broad consensus that it is a welcome development. Despite this, little attention is afforded to more immediate ethical problems in the develo...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12701
更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::In this essay, we present three case studies which suggest that sometimes we are better off supporting a so-called irrational suicide, and that emotional or psychological distress--even if medically controllable--might justify a suicide. We underscore how complicated these decisions are and how murky a physician's mor...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00300
更新日期:2002-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::The purpose of this paper is to describe the scientific background to the current ethical and legislative debates about the generation and use of human stem cells, and to give an overview of the ethical issues underlying these debates. The ethical issues discussed are 1) stem cells and the status of the embryo, 2) wom...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307
更新日期:2002-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::We explore whether a Rawlsian approach might provide a guiding philosophy for the development of a healthcare system, in particular with regard to resolving tensions between different groups within it. We argue that an approach developed from some of Rawls' principles - using his 'veil of ignorance' and both the 'diff...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12568
更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00