Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?

Abstract:

:In 2017 and 2019, two research teams claimed 'proof of principle' for artificial womb technology (AWT). AWT has long been a subject of speculation in bioethical literature, with broad consensus that it is a welcome development. Despite this, little attention is afforded to more immediate ethical problems in the development of AWT, particularly as an alternative to neonatal intensive care. To start this conversation, I consider whether experimental AWT is innovative treatment or medical research. The research-treatment distinction, pervasive in regulation worldwide, is intended to isolate research activities and subject them to a greater degree of oversight. I argue that there is a tendency in the literature to conceptualize AWT for partial ectogenesis as innovative treatment. However, there are sufficiently serious ethical concerns with experimental AWT that mean that it must not be first used on humans on the basis that it is a 'beneficial treatment'. First, I outline the prospects for translation of AWT animal studies into treatment for human preterms. Second, I challenge the conceptualizations of experimental AWT as innovative treatment. It must be considered medical research to reflect the investigatory nature of the process and guarantee sufficient protections for subjects. Identifying that AWT is research is crucial in formulating further ethico-legal questions regarding the experimental use of AWT. Third, I demonstrate that clinical trials will be a necessary part of the clinical translation of AWT because of requirements laid out by regulators. I consider the justification for clinical trials and highlight some of the crucial ethical questions about the conditions under which they should proceed.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

Romanis EC

doi

10.1111/bioe.12701

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-05-01 00:00:00

pages

392-402

issue

4

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

journal_volume

34

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Are patients' decisions to refuse treatment binding on health care professionals?

    abstract::When patients refuse to receive medical treatment, the consequences of honouring their decisions can be tragic. This is no less true of patients who autonomously decide to refuse treatment. I distinguish three possible implications of these autonomous decisions. According to the Permissibility Claim, such a decision i...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00436.x

    authors: Murphy P

    更新日期:2005-06-01 00:00:00

  • Duties to stakeholders amidst pressures from shareholders: lessons from an advisory panel on transplant policy.

    abstract::The distinction between stakeholders and shareholders frequently employed in business ethics can illuminate challenges faced by a bioethics advisory panel. I use the distinction to reflect back on the work of an advisory panel on which I served, a panel on US transplant policy. The panel hearings were akin to a shareh...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00348

    authors: Mongoven AM

    更新日期:2003-08-01 00:00:00

  • Trading with the waiting-list: the justice of living donor list exchange.

    abstract::In a Living Donor List Exchange program, the donor makes his kidney available for allocation to patients on the postmortal waiting-list and receives in exchange a postmortal kidney, usually an O-kidney, to be given to the recipient he favours. The program can be a solution for a candidate donor who is unable to donate...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00684.x

    authors: den Hartogh G

    更新日期:2010-05-01 00:00:00

  • The contributions of empirical evidence to socio-ethical debates on fresh embryo donation for human embryonic stem cell research.

    abstract::This article is a response to McLeod and Baylis (2007) who speculate on the dangers of requesting fresh 'spare' embryos from IVF patients for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research, particularly when those embryos are good enough to be transferred back to the woman. They argue that these embryos should be frozen in...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01792.x

    authors: Haimes E,Taylor K

    更新日期:2011-07-01 00:00:00

  • Political legitimacy and research ethics.

    abstract::In democratic theory, "legitimacy" refers to the set of conditions that must be in place in order for the claims to authority of somebody to be deemed appropriate, and for their claims to compliance to be warranted. Though criteria of legitimacy have been elaborated in the context of democratic states, there is no rea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12489

    authors: Smith MJ,Weinstock D

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Vaccine mandates, value pluralism, and policy diversity.

    abstract::Political communities across the world have recently sought to tackle rising rates of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, by implementing coercive immunization programs, or by making existing immunization programs more coercive. Many academics and advocates of public health have applauded these policy developments, and the...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12645

    authors: Navin MC,Attwell K

    更新日期:2019-11-01 00:00:00

  • The injustice of fat stigma.

    abstract::Fatness stigma is pervasive. Being fat is widely regarded a bad thing, and fat persons suffer numerous social and material disadvantages in virtue of their weight being regarded that way. Despite the seriousness of this problem, it has received relatively little attention from analytic philosophers. In this paper, I s...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12560

    authors: Nath R

    更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00

  • Knowledge and power in the clinical setting.

    abstract::In this paper we consider the three categories offered by Howard Brody for understanding power in medicine. In his book The Healer's Power, Brody separates out power in medicine into the categories of Aesculapian, Social, and Charismatic power. We examine these three categories and then apply them to a case. In this c...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00065

    authors: McMillan J,Anderson L

    更新日期:1997-07-01 00:00:00

  • Unmanaged care: the need to regulate new reproductive technologies in the United States.

    abstract::In the aftermath of allegations of the misuse of human eggs in the United States, questions are being raised about whether profitable reproductive services should continue to function in a free market under the aegis of physicians or should be regulated. Other countries in which reproductive technologies are employed ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00075

    authors: Cohen CB

    更新日期:1997-07-01 00:00:00

  • Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy.

    abstract::The purpose of this paper is to describe the scientific background to the current ethical and legislative debates about the generation and use of human stem cells, and to give an overview of the ethical issues underlying these debates. The ethical issues discussed are 1) stem cells and the status of the embryo, 2) wom...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307

    authors: Holm S

    更新日期:2002-11-01 00:00:00

  • The German debate on male circumcision and Habermas' model of post-secularity.

    abstract::This paper considers Habermas' model of a post-secular political order in the light of the debate on male circumcision that arose in Germany after a court ruled that male circumcision was an unjustifiable act of bodily harm. Central to this model is the idea that religious reasons can only become effective in central ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12526

    authors: Greve J

    更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00

  • Burden of Proof in Bioethics.

    abstract::A common strategy in bioethics is to posit a prima facie case in favour of one policy, and to then claim that the burden of proof (that this policy should be rejected) falls on those with opposing views. If the burden of proof is not met, it is claimed, then the policy in question should be accepted. This article illu...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12194

    authors: Koplin JJ,Selgelid MJ

    更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Is it time for bioethics to go empirical?

    abstract::Observers who note the increasing popularity of bioethics discussions often complain that the social sciences are poorly represented in discussions about things like abortion and stem-cell research. Critics say that bioethicists should be incorporating the methods and findings of social scientists, and should move tow...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00621.x

    authors: Herrera C

    更新日期:2008-03-01 00:00:00

  • Genetic therapy, identity and the person-regarding reasons.

    abstract::It has been argued that there can be no person-regarding reasons for practising genetic therapy, since it affects identity and causes to exist an individual who would not otherwise have existed. And there can be no such reasons for causing somebody to exist because existing cannot be better for an individual than neve...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00298.x

    authors: Persson I

    更新日期:1995-01-01 00:00:00

  • Microethics in action.

    abstract::The future development of bioethics has been discussed in a number of articles in recent years, principally with regard to the trend towards empirical studies. However, what is meant by empirical studies in this context and how it is to be used concretely have been subject to varying interpretations. The purpose of th...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00492.x

    authors: Nikku N,Eriksson BE

    更新日期:2006-08-01 00:00:00

  • The debate over risk-related standards of competence.

    abstract::This discussion paper continues the debate over risk-related standards of mental competence which appears in Bioethics 5. Dan Brock there defends an approach to mental competence in patients which defines it as being relative to differing standards, more or less rigorous depending on the degree of risk involved in pro...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00081

    authors: Wilks I

    更新日期:1997-10-01 00:00:00

  • Taking due care: moral obligations in dual use research.

    abstract::In the past decade, the perception of a bioterrorist threat has increased and created a demand on life scientists to consider the potential security implications of dual use research. This article examines a selection of proposed moral obligations for life scientists that have emerged to meet these concerns and the ex...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00695.x

    authors: Kuhlau F,Eriksson S,Evers K,Höglund AT

    更新日期:2008-11-01 00:00:00

  • The concept of risk in biomedical research involving human subjects.

    abstract::An established ethical principle of biomedical research involving human subjects stipulates that risk to subjects should be proportionate to an experiment's potential benefits. Sometimes this principle is imprecisely stated as a requirement that 'risks and benefits' be balanced. First, it is noted why this language is...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00244

    authors: Van Ness P

    更新日期:2001-08-01 00:00:00

  • Killing, letting die and moral perception: a reply to Grant Gillett.

    abstract::A number of philosophers in recent times have employed arguments to show that there is no morally relevant difference between killing a patient and allowing that patient to die in those circumstances where the outcome is virtually identical and where death is preventable, at least for a significant time. From his per...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00169

    authors: Thornton J

    更新日期:1999-10-01 00:00:00

  • Against anonymity.

    abstract::In 'New Threats to Academic Freedom' Francesca Minerva argues that anonymity for the authors of controversial articles is a prerequisite for academic freedom in the Internet age. This argument draws its intellectual and emotional power from the author's account of the reaction to the on-line publication of ' After-bir...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12093

    authors: Baker R

    更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00

  • A pain in the fetus: toward ending confusion about fetal pain.

    abstract::Are fetuses, at any stage of their development, capable of feeling pain? In his paper, "Locating the Beginnings of Pain," Stuart Derbyshire argues that they are not. We argue that he reaches this conclusion by way of conceptual confusion, a misreading of the available scientific data and the inclusion of irrelevant da...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00212

    authors: Benatar D,Benatar M

    更新日期:2001-02-01 00:00:00

  • Wrongs, preferences, and the selection of children: a critique of Rebecca Bennett's argument against the principle of procreative beneficence.

    abstract::Rebecca Bennett, in a recent paper dismissing Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence, advances both a negative and a positive thesis. The negative thesis holds that the principle's theoretical foundation - the notion of impersonal harm or non-person-affecting wrong - is indefensible. Therefore, there ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x

    authors: Herissone-Kelly P

    更新日期:2012-10-01 00:00:00

  • The genesis of public health ethics.

    abstract::As bioethics emerged in the 1960s and 1970s and began to have enormous impacts on the practice of medicine and research--fuelled, by broad socio-political changes that gave rise to the struggles of women, African Americans, gay men and lesbians, and the antiauthoritarianism impulse that characterised the New Left in d...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00412.x

    authors: Bayer R,Fairchild AL

    更新日期:2004-11-01 00:00:00

  • Hard paternalism, fairness and clinical research: why not?

    abstract::Jansen and Wall suggest a new way of defending hard paternalism in clinical research. They argue that non-therapeutic research exposing people to more than minimal risk should be banned on egalitarian grounds: in preventing poor decision-makers from making bad decisions, we will promote equality of welfare. We argue t...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01816.x

    authors: Edwards SJ,Wilson J

    更新日期:2012-02-01 00:00:00

  • The ongoing charity of organ donation. Contemporary English Sunni fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Empirical studies in Muslim communities on organ donation and blood transfusion show that Muslim counsellors play an important role in the decision process. Despite the emerging importance of online English Sunni fatwas, these fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion have hardly been studied, thus crea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01782.x

    authors: Van den Branden S,Broeckaert B

    更新日期:2011-03-01 00:00:00

  • Administrative gatekeeping - a third way between unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing.

    abstract::The inevitable need for rationing of healthcare has apparently presented the medical profession with the dilemma of choosing the lesser of two evils. Physicians appear to be obliged to adopt either an implausible version of traditional professional ethics or an equally problematic ethics of bedside rationing. The form...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00652.x

    authors: Lauridsen S

    更新日期:2009-06-01 00:00:00

  • Defining core health services: the New Zealand experience.

    abstract::The New Zealand health service has been extensively changed over the past four years, with the introduction of four new Regional Health Authorities, required to purchase services on behalf of the Government from a range of providers. In order to ensure fairness across the four regions a Core Services Committee has bee...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00359.x

    authors: Campbell AV

    更新日期:1995-07-01 00:00:00

  • Overstating values: medical facts, diverse values, bioethics and values-based medicine.

    abstract::Fulford has argued that (1) the medical concepts illness, disease and dysfunction are inescapably evaluative terms, (2) illness is conceptually prior to disease, and (3) a model conforming to (2) has greater explanatory power and practical utility than the conventional value-free medical model. This 'reverse' model em...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01902.x

    authors: Parker M

    更新日期:2013-02-01 00:00:00

  • Misunderstanding death on a respirator.

    abstract::As Tom Tomlinson's study indicates, there is considerable misunderstanding and confusion among physicians and nurses working in the area. Brain death is often not well-understood by healthcare professionals and hence inadequately explained to relatives, leaving them confused as to whether their loved-one is alive or ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1990.tb00088.x

    authors: Tomlinson T

    更新日期:1990-07-01 00:00:00

  • Moral dilemmas in (not) treating patients who feel they are a burden.

    abstract::Working as clinical ethicists in an academic hospital, we find that practitioners tend to take a principle-based approach to moral dilemmas when it comes to (not) treating patients who feel like a burden, in which respect for autonomy tends to trump other principles. We argue that this approach insufficiently deals wi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12579

    authors: Metselaar S,Widdershoven G

    更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00