Taking due care: moral obligations in dual use research.

Abstract:

:In the past decade, the perception of a bioterrorist threat has increased and created a demand on life scientists to consider the potential security implications of dual use research. This article examines a selection of proposed moral obligations for life scientists that have emerged to meet these concerns and the extent to which they can be considered reasonable. It also describes the underlying reasons for the concerns, how they are managed, and their implications for scientific values. Five criteria for what constitutes preventable harm are suggested and a number of proposed obligations for life scientists are considered against these criteria, namely, the obligations to prevent bioterrorism; to engage in response activities; to consider negative implications of research; not to publish or share sensitive information; to oversee and limit access to dangerous material; and to report activities of concern. Although bioterrorism might be perceived as an imminent threat, the analysis illustrates that this is beyond the responsibility of life scientists either to prevent or to respond to. Among the more reasonable obligations are duties to consider potential negative implications of one's research, protect access to sensitive material, technology and knowledge, and report activities of concern. Responsibility, therefore, includes obligations concerned with preventing foreseeable and highly probable harm. A central conclusion is that several of the proposed obligations are reasonable, although not unconditionally.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

Kuhlau F,Eriksson S,Evers K,Höglund AT

doi

10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00695.x

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2008-11-01 00:00:00

pages

477-87

issue

9

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

pii

BIOT695

journal_volume

22

pub_type

杂志文章
  • The doctor-patient relationship: a survey of attitudes and practices of doctors in Singapore.

    abstract::This article reports the results of a survey, by mailed questionnaire, of the attitudes, values and practices of doctors in Singapore with respect to the doctor-patient relationship. Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 475 doctors (261 general practitioners and 214 medical specialists), out of which 249 (52...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00180

    authors: Chan D,Goh LG

    更新日期:2000-01-01 00:00:00

  • AIDS, gays, and state coercion.

    abstract::Mohr argues that coercive government policies in response to the AIDS crisis are unjustified and pose a serious threat to the rights of homosexuals. AIDS presently can be transmitted only to those whose actions place them at risk. Paternalistic state coercion is warranted only when a person has diminished capacity o...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00003.x

    authors: Mohr RD

    更新日期:1987-01-01 00:00:00

  • Overstating values: medical facts, diverse values, bioethics and values-based medicine.

    abstract::Fulford has argued that (1) the medical concepts illness, disease and dysfunction are inescapably evaluative terms, (2) illness is conceptually prior to disease, and (3) a model conforming to (2) has greater explanatory power and practical utility than the conventional value-free medical model. This 'reverse' model em...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01902.x

    authors: Parker M

    更新日期:2013-02-01 00:00:00

  • Two puzzles for Marquis's conservative view on abortion.

    abstract::Don Marquis argues that abortion is morally wrong in most cases since it deprives the fetus of the value of its future. I criticize Marquis's argument for the modified conservative view by adopting an argumentative strategy in which I work within his basic account: if it is granted that his fundamental idea is sound, ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00503.x

    authors: Card RF

    更新日期:2006-09-01 00:00:00

  • Political legitimacy and research ethics.

    abstract::In democratic theory, "legitimacy" refers to the set of conditions that must be in place in order for the claims to authority of somebody to be deemed appropriate, and for their claims to compliance to be warranted. Though criteria of legitimacy have been elaborated in the context of democratic states, there is no rea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12489

    authors: Smith MJ,Weinstock D

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Moral philosophers are moral experts! A reply to David Archard.

    abstract::In his article 'Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts' David Archard attempts to show that his argument from common-sense morality is more convincing than other competing arguments in the debate. I examine his main line of argumentation and eventually refute his main argument in my reply. ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02004.x

    authors: Gordon JS

    更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00

  • Narrative ARTifice and women's agency.

    abstract::The choice to pursue fertility treatments is a complex one. In this paper I explore the issues of choice, agency, and gender as they relate to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). I argue that narrative approaches to bioethics such as those by Arthur Frank and Hilde Lindemann Nelson clarify judgments about auton...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00428.x

    authors: Kalbian AH

    更新日期:2005-04-01 00:00:00

  • Misunderstanding death on a respirator.

    abstract::As Tom Tomlinson's study indicates, there is considerable misunderstanding and confusion among physicians and nurses working in the area. Brain death is often not well-understood by healthcare professionals and hence inadequately explained to relatives, leaving them confused as to whether their loved-one is alive or ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1990.tb00088.x

    authors: Tomlinson T

    更新日期:1990-07-01 00:00:00

  • When speed truly matters, openness is the answer.

    abstract::In this paper I analyse the ethical implications of the two main competing methodologies in genomic research. I do not aim to provide another contribution from the mainstream legal and public policy perspective; rather I offer a novel approach in which I analyse and describe the patent-and-publish regime (the propriet...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01723.x

    authors: Marturano A

    更新日期:2009-09-01 00:00:00

  • Artificial reproductive technologies: the Israeli scene.

    abstract::In 1991, the Israeli Minister of Health and the Minister of Justice jointly nominated a commission to consider the subject of IVF in all its aspects. Heyd summarizes the commission's recommendations on the following issues as put forth in an interim report: access to fertility treatments, financing of treatment, couns...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00293.x

    authors: Heyd D

    更新日期:1993-04-01 00:00:00

  • Getting a Fair Share: Attitudes and Perceptions of Biobank Stakeholders Concerning the Fairness of Sample Sharing.

    abstract::Biobanks are essential tools for furthering a broad range of medical research areas. However, despite the plethora of national and international laws and guidelines which apply to them, the access and sharing policies of biobanks are only sparsely addressed by regulatory bodies. The 'give and take' process of biosampl...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12134

    authors: Colledge F,Elger B

    更新日期:2015-07-01 00:00:00

  • The limits of intimate citizenship: reproduction of difference in Flemish-Ethiopian 'adoption cultures'.

    abstract::The concept of 'intimate citizenship' stresses the right of people to choose how they organize their personal lives and claim identities. Support and interest groups are seen as playing an important role in the pursuit of recognition for these intimate choices, by elaborating visible and positive cultures that invade ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01830.x

    authors: De Graeve K

    更新日期:2010-09-01 00:00:00

  • The debate over risk-related standards of competence.

    abstract::This discussion paper continues the debate over risk-related standards of mental competence which appears in Bioethics 5. Dan Brock there defends an approach to mental competence in patients which defines it as being relative to differing standards, more or less rigorous depending on the degree of risk involved in pro...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00081

    authors: Wilks I

    更新日期:1997-10-01 00:00:00

  • A Defence of the Counterfactual Account of Harm.

    abstract::In order to determine whether a particular course of conduct is ethically permissible it is important to have a concept of what it means to be harmed. The dominant theory of harm is the counterfactual account, most famously proposed by Joel Feinberg. This determines whether harm is caused by comparing what actually ha...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12207

    authors: Purshouse C

    更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00

  • Wrongs, preferences, and the selection of children: a critique of Rebecca Bennett's argument against the principle of procreative beneficence.

    abstract::Rebecca Bennett, in a recent paper dismissing Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence, advances both a negative and a positive thesis. The negative thesis holds that the principle's theoretical foundation - the notion of impersonal harm or non-person-affecting wrong - is indefensible. Therefore, there ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x

    authors: Herissone-Kelly P

    更新日期:2012-10-01 00:00:00

  • Racist organ donors and saving lives.

    abstract::This paper considers what should be done about offers of organs for transplant that come with racist strings attached. Saving lives or improving their quality seem powerful reasons to accept the offer. Fairness, justice, and rejecting racism seem like powerful reasons against. This paper argues that conditional alloca...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00526.x

    authors: Wilkinson TM

    更新日期:2007-02-01 00:00:00

  • Vaccine mandates, value pluralism, and policy diversity.

    abstract::Political communities across the world have recently sought to tackle rising rates of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, by implementing coercive immunization programs, or by making existing immunization programs more coercive. Many academics and advocates of public health have applauded these policy developments, and the...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12645

    authors: Navin MC,Attwell K

    更新日期:2019-11-01 00:00:00

  • Surrogate mothering: exploitation or empowerment?

    abstract::The morality of surrogate mothering is analyzed from a "consequentialist" framework which attempts to separate those consequences that invariably accompany a given act from those that accompany it only in particular circumstances. Critics of surrogacy argue that it transfers the burden and risk of pregnancy onto anot...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1989.tb00324.x

    authors: Purdy LM

    更新日期:1989-01-01 00:00:00

  • The responsibilities of the engaged bioethicist: Scholar, advocate, activist.

    abstract::The work of a bioethicist carries distinctive responsibilities. Alongside those of any worker, there are responsibilities associated with giving guidance to practitioners, policy makers and the public. In addition, bioethicists are professionally exposed to and required to identify situations of moral trouble, and as ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12659

    authors: Scully JL

    更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00

  • Human cloning: category, dignity, and the role of bioethics.

    abstract::Human cloning has been simultaneously a running joke for massive worldwide publicity of fringe groups like the Raelians, and the core issue of an international movement at the United Nations in support of a treaty to ban the use of cloning techniques to produce a child (so called reproductive cloning). Yet, even thoug...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00365

    authors: Shuster E

    更新日期:2003-10-01 00:00:00

  • Rethinking parenthood within assisted reproductive technology: The need for regulation in Nigeria.

    abstract::In Nigeria, reproduction is highly valued, with many people desiring to produce a child 'in their own image and likeness'. Previously, aspiring parents often resorted to adoption. Today, the availability of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) has provided options other than adoption for those desiring to procrea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12759

    authors: Egbokhare OO,Akintola SO

    更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00

  • The genesis of public health ethics.

    abstract::As bioethics emerged in the 1960s and 1970s and began to have enormous impacts on the practice of medicine and research--fuelled, by broad socio-political changes that gave rise to the struggles of women, African Americans, gay men and lesbians, and the antiauthoritarianism impulse that characterised the New Left in d...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00412.x

    authors: Bayer R,Fairchild AL

    更新日期:2004-11-01 00:00:00

  • Enhancing evolution and enhancing evolution.

    abstract::It has been claimed in several places that the new genetic technologies allow humanity to achieve in a generation or two what might take natural selection hundreds of millennia in respect of the elimination of certain diseases and an increase in traits such as intelligence. More radically, it has been suggested that t...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.01703.x

    authors: Brassington I

    更新日期:2010-10-01 00:00:00

  • Tu Youyou winning the Nobel Prize: Ethical research on the value and safety of traditional Chinese medicine.

    abstract::In 2015, the Chinese pharmacologist, Tu Youyou, was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of artemisinin. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) was the source of inspiration for Tu's discovery and provides an opportunity for the world to know more about TCM as a source of medical knowledge ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 传,历史文章,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12456

    authors: Zheng WR,Li EC,Peng S,Wang XS

    更新日期:2020-02-01 00:00:00

  • Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy.

    abstract::The purpose of this paper is to describe the scientific background to the current ethical and legislative debates about the generation and use of human stem cells, and to give an overview of the ethical issues underlying these debates. The ethical issues discussed are 1) stem cells and the status of the embryo, 2) wom...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307

    authors: Holm S

    更新日期:2002-11-01 00:00:00

  • Incentivizing Patient Choices: The Ethics of Inclusive Shared Savings.

    abstract::Is it ethical to pay patients for selecting cheaper medical treatments? The healthcare system in the United States is notoriously profligate, at least in part because when insurers foot the bill, patients have little incentive to avoid wasteful treatments. One familiar means for dealing with this problem is for insure...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12267

    authors: Chappell RY

    更新日期:2016-10-01 00:00:00

  • Reciprocity-based reasons for benefiting research participants: most fail, the most plausible is problematic.

    abstract::A common reason for giving research participants post-trial access (PTA) to the trial intervention appeals to reciprocity, the principle, stated most generally, that if one person benefits a second, the second should reciprocate: benefit the first in return. Many authors consider it obvious that reciprocity supports P...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12039

    authors: Sofaer N

    更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00

  • Beyond accountability for reasonableness.

    abstract::This paper is a critique of Norman Daniels' and James Sabin's 'Accountability for Reasonableness' framework for making priority-setting decisions in health care in the face of widespread disagreement about values. Accountability for Reasonableness has been rapidly gaining worldwide acceptance, arguably to the point of...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00605.x

    authors: Friedman A

    更新日期:2008-02-01 00:00:00

  • The injustice of fat stigma.

    abstract::Fatness stigma is pervasive. Being fat is widely regarded a bad thing, and fat persons suffer numerous social and material disadvantages in virtue of their weight being regarded that way. Despite the seriousness of this problem, it has received relatively little attention from analytic philosophers. In this paper, I s...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12560

    authors: Nath R

    更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00

  • Moral dilemmas in (not) treating patients who feel they are a burden.

    abstract::Working as clinical ethicists in an academic hospital, we find that practitioners tend to take a principle-based approach to moral dilemmas when it comes to (not) treating patients who feel like a burden, in which respect for autonomy tends to trump other principles. We argue that this approach insufficiently deals wi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12579

    authors: Metselaar S,Widdershoven G

    更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00