Abstract:
:Recent ethical and legal challenges have arisen concerning the rights of individuals over their IVF embryos, leading to questions about how, when the wishes of parents regarding their embryos conflict, such situations ought to be resolved. A notion commonly invoked in relation to frozen embryo disputes is that of reproductive rights: a right to have (or not to have) children. This has sometimes been interpreted to mean a right to have, or not to have, one's own genetic children. But can such rights legitimately be asserted to give rise to claims over embryos? We examine the question of property in genetic material as applied to gametes and embryos, and whether rights over genetic information extend to grant control over IVF embryos. In particular we consider the purported right not to have one's own genetically related children from a property-based perspective. We argue that even if we concede that such (property) rights do exist, those rights become limited in scope and application upon engaging in reproduction. We want to show that once an IVF embryo is created for the purpose of reproduction, any right not to have genetically-related children that may be based in property rights over genetic information is ceded. There is thus no right to prevent one's IVF embryos from being brought to birth on the basis of a right to avoid having one's own genetic children. Although there may be reproductive rights over gametes and embryos, these are not grounded in genetic information.
journal_name
Bioethicsjournal_title
Bioethicsauthors
Chan S,Quigley Mdoi
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00581.xsubject
Has Abstractpub_date
2007-10-01 00:00:00pages
439-48issue
8eissn
0269-9702issn
1467-8519pii
BIOT581journal_volume
21pub_type
杂志文章相关文献
BIOETHICS文献大全abstract::Respect for autonomy is problematic in relation to public health programmes such as vaccination, as the success of such programmes depends on widespread compliance. European countries have different policies for dealing with objectors to vaccination programmes. In some countries compliance is compulsory, while in othe...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00630.x
更新日期:2008-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::Funders (located primarily in high-income countries) and high-income country researchers have historically dominated decision-making within global health research collaborations: from setting agendas and research design to determining how data are collected and analysed and what happens with findings and outputs. The ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12793
更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Rebecca Bennett, in a recent paper dismissing Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence, advances both a negative and a positive thesis. The negative thesis holds that the principle's theoretical foundation - the notion of impersonal harm or non-person-affecting wrong - is indefensible. Therefore, there ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x
更新日期:2012-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::The recent case of the UK woman who lost her legal struggle to be impregnated with her own frozen embryos, raises critical issues about the meaning of reproductive autonomy and the scope of regulatory practices. I revisit this case within the context of contemporary debate about the moral and legal dimensions of assis...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00676.x
更新日期:2009-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::In controlled human infection (CHI) studies, investigators deliberately infect healthy individuals with pathogens in order to study mechanisms of disease or obtain preliminary efficacy data on investigational vaccines and medicines. CHI studies offer a fast and cost-effective way of generating new scientific insights,...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12794
更新日期:2020-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::This paper considers Habermas' model of a post-secular political order in the light of the debate on male circumcision that arose in Germany after a court ruled that male circumcision was an unjustifiable act of bodily harm. Central to this model is the idea that religious reasons can only become effective in central ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12526
更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::I argue that appeals to conscience do not constitute reasons for granting healthcare professionals exemptions from providing services they consider immoral (e.g. abortion). My argument is based on a comparison between a type of objection that many people think should be granted, i.e. to abortion, and one that most peo...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12333
更新日期:2017-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::Western studies of national differences in pain have indicated that pain tolerance is higher in white than in Asian patients. The authors' clinical experiences in China seem to contradict this conclusion, and they have investigated the incidence or prevalence of some pain syndromes and have made comparisons with West...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1989.tb00343.x
更新日期:1989-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::A common reason for giving research participants post-trial access (PTA) to the trial intervention appeals to reciprocity, the principle, stated most generally, that if one person benefits a second, the second should reciprocate: benefit the first in return. Many authors consider it obvious that reciprocity supports P...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12039
更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::The New Zealand health service has been extensively changed over the past four years, with the introduction of four new Regional Health Authorities, required to purchase services on behalf of the Government from a range of providers. In order to ensure fairness across the four regions a Core Services Committee has bee...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00359.x
更新日期:1995-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Contemporary realities of global population movement increasingly bring to the fore the challenge of quality and equitable health provision across language barriers. While this linguistic challenge is not unique to immigration contexts and is likewise shared by health systems responding to the needs of aboriginal peop...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12435
更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::This article will explore whether the law should allow people with anorexia nervosa to refuse nutrition and hydration with special reference to the English decision in Re E (Medical Treatment: Anorexia). It argues that the judge in that case made the correct decision in holding that the patient, who suffered from seve...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12593
更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::In the aftermath of allegations of the misuse of human eggs in the United States, questions are being raised about whether profitable reproductive services should continue to function in a free market under the aegis of physicians or should be regulated. Other countries in which reproductive technologies are employed ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00075
更新日期:1997-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Germline genome editing is often disapproved of at the international policy level because of its possible threats to human dignity. However, from a critical perspective the relationship between this emerging technology and human dignity is relatively understudied. We explore the main principles that are referred to wh...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12607
更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::A common strategy in bioethics is to posit a prima facie case in favour of one policy, and to then claim that the burden of proof (that this policy should be rejected) falls on those with opposing views. If the burden of proof is not met, it is claimed, then the policy in question should be accepted. This article illu...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12194
更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Are fetuses, at any stage of their development, capable of feeling pain? In his paper, "Locating the Beginnings of Pain," Stuart Derbyshire argues that they are not. We argue that he reaches this conclusion by way of conceptual confusion, a misreading of the available scientific data and the inclusion of irrelevant da...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00212
更新日期:2001-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::Like any discipline, bioethics is a developing field of academic inquiry; and recent trends in scholarship have been towards more engagement with empirical research. This 'empirical turn' has provoked extensive debate over how such 'descriptive' research carried out in the social sciences contributes to the distinctiv...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01843.x
更新日期:2012-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::In this paper we consider the three categories offered by Howard Brody for understanding power in medicine. In his book The Healer's Power, Brody separates out power in medicine into the categories of Aesculapian, Social, and Charismatic power. We examine these three categories and then apply them to a case. In this c...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00065
更新日期:1997-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::In the past decade, the perception of a bioterrorist threat has increased and created a demand on life scientists to consider the potential security implications of dual use research. This article examines a selection of proposed moral obligations for life scientists that have emerged to meet these concerns and the ex...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00695.x
更新日期:2008-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Biobanks are essential tools for furthering a broad range of medical research areas. However, despite the plethora of national and international laws and guidelines which apply to them, the access and sharing policies of biobanks are only sparsely addressed by regulatory bodies. The 'give and take' process of biosampl...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12134
更新日期:2015-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::In 2017 and 2019, two research teams claimed 'proof of principle' for artificial womb technology (AWT). AWT has long been a subject of speculation in bioethical literature, with broad consensus that it is a welcome development. Despite this, little attention is afforded to more immediate ethical problems in the develo...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12701
更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::The choice to pursue fertility treatments is a complex one. In this paper I explore the issues of choice, agency, and gender as they relate to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). I argue that narrative approaches to bioethics such as those by Arthur Frank and Hilde Lindemann Nelson clarify judgments about auton...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00428.x
更新日期:2005-04-01 00:00:00
abstract::This discussion paper continues the debate over risk-related standards of mental competence which appears in Bioethics 5. Dan Brock there defends an approach to mental competence in patients which defines it as being relative to differing standards, more or less rigorous depending on the degree of risk involved in pro...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00081
更新日期:1997-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::In this paper I discuss the view that the appropriate concept of competence is a decision-relative one: that a person may be competent to make one decision but not another. The argument that I present is that neither of the two competing theories supporting the decision-relative approach, internalism and externalism, ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00218
更新日期:2001-04-01 00:00:00
abstract:RESEARCH OBJECTIVE:This study focuses on ADs in the Netherlands and introduces a cross-cultural perspective by comparing it with other countries. METHODS:A questionnaire was sent to a panel comprising 1621 people representative of the Dutch population. The response was 86%. RESULTS:95% of the respondents didn't have ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01788.x
更新日期:2010-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::If we have a duty not to infect others, how far does it go? This question is often discussed with respect to HIV transmission, but reflection on other diseases like influenza raises a number of interesting theoretical issues. I argue that a duty to avoid infection not only yields requirements for persons who know they...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00446.x
更新日期:2005-08-01 00:00:00
abstract::The future development of bioethics has been discussed in a number of articles in recent years, principally with regard to the trend towards empirical studies. However, what is meant by empirical studies in this context and how it is to be used concretely have been subject to varying interpretations. The purpose of th...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00492.x
更新日期:2006-08-01 00:00:00
abstract::In this paper I analyse the ethical implications of the two main competing methodologies in genomic research. I do not aim to provide another contribution from the mainstream legal and public policy perspective; rather I offer a novel approach in which I analyse and describe the patent-and-publish regime (the propriet...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01723.x
更新日期:2009-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::In his article 'The substance view: A critique', Rob Lovering argues that the substance view -according to which a human person comes into existence at the moment of conception - leads to such implausible implications that this view should be abandoned. I responded to his reductio arguments in 'A critique of Rob Lover...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12450
更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::This paper considers what should be done about offers of organs for transplant that come with racist strings attached. Saving lives or improving their quality seem powerful reasons to accept the offer. Fairness, justice, and rejecting racism seem like powerful reasons against. This paper argues that conditional alloca...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00526.x
更新日期:2007-02-01 00:00:00