What constitutes fair shared decision-making in global health research collaborations?

Abstract:

:Funders (located primarily in high-income countries) and high-income country researchers have historically dominated decision-making within global health research collaborations: from setting agendas and research design to determining how data are collected and analysed and what happens with findings and outputs. The ethical principle of shared decision-making has been proposed as a way to help address these imbalances within collaborations and to reduce semicolonial and exploitative forms of global health research. It is important to be clear about what shared decision-making means in order to ensure that it is not done in a tokenistic, shallow way. Thus far, the principle's content has not been examined and articulated in detail. This paper aims to start the process of delineating a concept of fair shared decision-making as a minimum standard for global health research. Using two hypothetical case examples, the paper will demonstrate that global health research practice is often inconsistent with ideal shared decision-making. In such instances, it can be difficult to decide whether shared decision-making within collaborations is fair. The paper describes how the two cases do not meet criteria for unfair or non-ideal shared decision-making, despite having potentially morally troubling features. The nuances of these examples of research practice help to generate clearer ideas about how to judge fairness in shared decision-making. The paper concludes by presenting ideas about when soft power can be fairly employed between high-income-country and low- and middle-income-country partners and what fair compromise agreements may look like in shared decision-making.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

Pratt B

doi

10.1111/bioe.12793

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-11-01 00:00:00

pages

984-993

issue

9

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

journal_volume

34

pub_type

杂志文章
  • The debate over risk-related standards of competence.

    abstract::This discussion paper continues the debate over risk-related standards of mental competence which appears in Bioethics 5. Dan Brock there defends an approach to mental competence in patients which defines it as being relative to differing standards, more or less rigorous depending on the degree of risk involved in pro...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00081

    authors: Wilks I

    更新日期:1997-10-01 00:00:00

  • Duties to stakeholders amidst pressures from shareholders: lessons from an advisory panel on transplant policy.

    abstract::The distinction between stakeholders and shareholders frequently employed in business ethics can illuminate challenges faced by a bioethics advisory panel. I use the distinction to reflect back on the work of an advisory panel on which I served, a panel on US transplant policy. The panel hearings were akin to a shareh...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00348

    authors: Mongoven AM

    更新日期:2003-08-01 00:00:00

  • Two puzzles for Marquis's conservative view on abortion.

    abstract::Don Marquis argues that abortion is morally wrong in most cases since it deprives the fetus of the value of its future. I criticize Marquis's argument for the modified conservative view by adopting an argumentative strategy in which I work within his basic account: if it is granted that his fundamental idea is sound, ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00503.x

    authors: Card RF

    更新日期:2006-09-01 00:00:00

  • Beneficence, determinism and justice: an engagement with the argument for the genetic selection of intelligence.

    abstract::In 2001, Julian Savulescu wrote an article entitled 'Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children', in which he argued for the genetic selection of intelligence in children. That article contributes to a debate on whether genetic research on intelligence should be undertaken at all and, if so, shoul...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00422.x

    authors: Birch K

    更新日期:2005-02-01 00:00:00

  • Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy.

    abstract::The purpose of this paper is to describe the scientific background to the current ethical and legislative debates about the generation and use of human stem cells, and to give an overview of the ethical issues underlying these debates. The ethical issues discussed are 1) stem cells and the status of the embryo, 2) wom...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307

    authors: Holm S

    更新日期:2002-11-01 00:00:00

  • Monological versus dialogical consciousness: two epistemological views on the use of theory in clinical ethical practice.

    abstract::In this article, we argue that a critical examination of epistemological and anthropological presuppositions might lead to a more fruitful use of theory in clinical-ethical practice. We differentiate between two views of conceptualizing ethics, referring to Charles Taylors' two epistemological models: 'monological' ve...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01912.x

    authors: Ohnsorge K,Widdershoven G

    更新日期:2011-09-01 00:00:00

  • Finding A Seat at the Table Together: Recommendations for Improving Collaboration between Social Work and Bioethics.

    abstract::Social work and bioethics are fields deeply committed to cross-disciplinary collaboration to do their respective work. While scholars and practitioners from both fields share a commitment to social justice and to respecting the dignity, integrity and the worth of all persons, the overlap between the fields, including ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12106

    authors: Brazg T,Dotolo D,Blacksher E

    更新日期:2015-06-01 00:00:00

  • What Justifies a Future with Humans in It?

    abstract::Antinatalist commentators recommend that humanity bring itself to a close, on the theory that pain and suffering override the value of any possible life. Other commentators do not require the voluntary extinction of human beings, but they defend that outcome if people were to choose against having children. Against su...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12290

    authors: Murphy TF

    更新日期:2016-11-01 00:00:00

  • Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement.

    abstract::Several recent articles have weighed in on the question of whether moral philosophers can be counted as moral experts. One argument denying this has been rejected by both sides of the debate. According to this argument, the extent of disagreement in modern moral philosophy prevents moral philosophers from being classi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12173

    authors: Cross B

    更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00

  • Mass-vaccination programmes and the value of respect for autonomy.

    abstract::Respect for autonomy is problematic in relation to public health programmes such as vaccination, as the success of such programmes depends on widespread compliance. European countries have different policies for dealing with objectors to vaccination programmes. In some countries compliance is compulsory, while in othe...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00630.x

    authors: Asveld L

    更新日期:2008-06-01 00:00:00

  • Beyond accountability for reasonableness.

    abstract::This paper is a critique of Norman Daniels' and James Sabin's 'Accountability for Reasonableness' framework for making priority-setting decisions in health care in the face of widespread disagreement about values. Accountability for Reasonableness has been rapidly gaining worldwide acceptance, arguably to the point of...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00605.x

    authors: Friedman A

    更新日期:2008-02-01 00:00:00

  • Incentivizing Patient Choices: The Ethics of Inclusive Shared Savings.

    abstract::Is it ethical to pay patients for selecting cheaper medical treatments? The healthcare system in the United States is notoriously profligate, at least in part because when insurers foot the bill, patients have little incentive to avoid wasteful treatments. One familiar means for dealing with this problem is for insure...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12267

    authors: Chappell RY

    更新日期:2016-10-01 00:00:00

  • Gestation as mothering.

    abstract::Some commentators maintain that gestational surrogates are not 'mothers' in a way capable of grounding a claim to motherhood. These commentators find that the practices that constitute motherhood do not extend to gestational surrogates. We argue that gestational surrogates should be construed as mothers of the childre...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12808

    authors: Murphy TF,Parks JA

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • AIDS, gays, and state coercion.

    abstract::Mohr argues that coercive government policies in response to the AIDS crisis are unjustified and pose a serious threat to the rights of homosexuals. AIDS presently can be transmitted only to those whose actions place them at risk. Paternalistic state coercion is warranted only when a person has diminished capacity o...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00003.x

    authors: Mohr RD

    更新日期:1987-01-01 00:00:00

  • The ongoing charity of organ donation. Contemporary English Sunni fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Empirical studies in Muslim communities on organ donation and blood transfusion show that Muslim counsellors play an important role in the decision process. Despite the emerging importance of online English Sunni fatwas, these fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion have hardly been studied, thus crea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01782.x

    authors: Van den Branden S,Broeckaert B

    更新日期:2011-03-01 00:00:00

  • Felicitometry: measuring the 'quality' in quality of life.

    abstract::Following Bernheim,(1) we examine aspects of 'felicitometrics,'(2) the measurement of the 'quality' term in Quality of Life (QOL). Bernheim argued that overall QOL is best captured as the Gestalt(3) of a global self-assessment and suggested that the Anamnestic Comparative Self Assessment (ACSA) approach, in which subj...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00642.x

    authors: Kowalski C,Pennell S,Vinokur A

    更新日期:2008-07-01 00:00:00

  • Moral philosophers are moral experts! A reply to David Archard.

    abstract::In his article 'Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts' David Archard attempts to show that his argument from common-sense morality is more convincing than other competing arguments in the debate. I examine his main line of argumentation and eventually refute his main argument in my reply. ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02004.x

    authors: Gordon JS

    更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00

  • Commentary on "Genetic harm: bitten by the body that keeps you?

    abstract::Several important issues are raised and illuminated in "Genetic Harm"; not least, in its detailed discussion of specific genetic disorders. In particular, it focuses on a type of disorder whose ill effects are not manifested at birth, but only at a later stage in life. The conclusion, with its significant implicatio...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00170.x

    authors: Zohar NJ

    更新日期:1991-10-01 00:00:00

  • Unmanaged care: the need to regulate new reproductive technologies in the United States.

    abstract::In the aftermath of allegations of the misuse of human eggs in the United States, questions are being raised about whether profitable reproductive services should continue to function in a free market under the aegis of physicians or should be regulated. Other countries in which reproductive technologies are employed ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00075

    authors: Cohen CB

    更新日期:1997-07-01 00:00:00

  • Trading with the waiting-list: the justice of living donor list exchange.

    abstract::In a Living Donor List Exchange program, the donor makes his kidney available for allocation to patients on the postmortal waiting-list and receives in exchange a postmortal kidney, usually an O-kidney, to be given to the recipient he favours. The program can be a solution for a candidate donor who is unable to donate...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00684.x

    authors: den Hartogh G

    更新日期:2010-05-01 00:00:00

  • Presuming patient autonomy in the face of therapeutic misconception.

    abstract::Therapeutic misconception involves the failure of subjects either to understand or to incorporate into their own expectations the distinctions in nature and purpose of personally responsive therapeutic care, and the generic relationship between subject and investigator which is constrained by research protocols. Resea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12384

    authors: McConville P

    更新日期:2017-11-01 00:00:00

  • Burden of Proof in Bioethics.

    abstract::A common strategy in bioethics is to posit a prima facie case in favour of one policy, and to then claim that the burden of proof (that this policy should be rejected) falls on those with opposing views. If the burden of proof is not met, it is claimed, then the policy in question should be accepted. This article illu...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12194

    authors: Koplin JJ,Selgelid MJ

    更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Positioning uterus transplantation as a 'more ethical' alternative to surrogacy: Exploring symmetries between uterus transplantation and surrogacy through analysis of a Swedish government white paper.

    abstract::Within the ethics and science literature surrounding uterus transplantation (UTx), emphasis is often placed on the extent to which UTx might improve upon, or offer additional benefits when compared to, existing 'treatment options' for women with absolute uterine factor infertility, such as adoption and gestational sur...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12469

    authors: Guntram L,Williams NJ

    更新日期:2018-10-01 00:00:00

  • Harming the non-conscious.

    abstract::Peter Singer has argued that nothing done to a fetus before it acquires consciousness can harm it. At the same time, he concedes that a child can be harmed by something done to it when it was a non-conscious fetus. But this implies that the non-conscious fetus can be harmed. The mistake lies in thinking that, since ex...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00158

    authors: Persson I

    更新日期:1999-07-01 00:00:00

  • Rethinking parenthood within assisted reproductive technology: The need for regulation in Nigeria.

    abstract::In Nigeria, reproduction is highly valued, with many people desiring to produce a child 'in their own image and likeness'. Previously, aspiring parents often resorted to adoption. Today, the availability of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) has provided options other than adoption for those desiring to procrea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12759

    authors: Egbokhare OO,Akintola SO

    更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00

  • Is gene therapy a form of eugenics?

    abstract::If, as I believe, gene therapy is in principle ethically sound except for its possible connection with eugenics then there are two obvious ways of giving a simple and straightforward answer to a question such as this. The first is to say "yes it is, and so what?" The second is to say "no it isn't so we shouldn't worry...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00283.x

    authors: Harris J

    更新日期:1993-04-01 00:00:00

  • Literature, history and the humanization of bioethics.

    abstract::This paper considers the disciplines of literature and history and the contributions each makes to the discourse of bioethics. In each case I note the pedagogic ends that can be enacted though the appropriate use of the each of these disciplines in the sphere of medical education, particularly in the medical ethics cl...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01818.x

    authors: Emmerich N

    更新日期:2011-02-01 00:00:00

  • No ethical bypass of moral status in stem cell research.

    abstract::Recent advances in reprogramming technology do not bypass the ethical challenge of embryo sacrifice. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPS) research has been and almost certainly will continue to be conducted within the context of embryo sacrifice. If human embryos have moral status as human beings, then participation in...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01891.x

    authors: Brown M

    更新日期:2013-01-01 00:00:00

  • Gender and ethics committees: where's the 'different voice'?

    abstract::Prominent international and national ethics commissions such as the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee rarely achieve anything remotely resembling gender equality, although local research and ethics committees are somewhat more egalitarian. Under-representation of women is particularly troubling when the subject...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00485.x

    authors: Dickenson D

    更新日期:2006-06-01 00:00:00

  • Toward a gender-sensitive assisted reproduction policy.

    abstract::The recent case of the UK woman who lost her legal struggle to be impregnated with her own frozen embryos, raises critical issues about the meaning of reproductive autonomy and the scope of regulatory practices. I revisit this case within the context of contemporary debate about the moral and legal dimensions of assis...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00676.x

    authors: Donchin A

    更新日期:2009-01-01 00:00:00