Bystanders and ethical review of research: Proceed with caution.

Abstract:

:Scientists seeking to conduct research with human subjects must first submit their proposals to research ethics committees (Institutional Review Boards [IRBs], in the United States). Some of these studies pose risks to "bystanders," i.e., people who may be affected by the research but who are not enrolled as study subjects. Should IRBs expand their scope to include oversight over possible harms to bystanders as well as research subjects? This paper presents arguments against this step. Prior review of research with human subjects, despite its evident burden on the research enterprise, is a necessary caution, because the tension between the objectives of humane treatment of research subjects and sound scientific design and procedure has in the past led to serious abuses. This rationale is inapplicable in the case of bystanders. Moreover, in view of the many and varied effects of both research practices and scientific advances on the broader public over time, those who may be considered to be "bystanders" may potentially expand without limit; requiring IRBs to anticipate these distant and long-term effects as part of prior ethical review could greatly increase its burden and its deterrent effect on research. While conducting research without concern for serious potential harm to bystanders may be irresponsible and unethical, expanding the scope of prior review by IRBs to include risks to bystanders is not required by the principles governing human subjects research, and the costs and burdens of this expansion may outweigh any expected gains.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

Wikler D

doi

10.1111/bioe.12823

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-11-01 00:00:00

pages

937-940

issue

9

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

journal_volume

34

pub_type

杂志文章
  • A Defence of the Counterfactual Account of Harm.

    abstract::In order to determine whether a particular course of conduct is ethically permissible it is important to have a concept of what it means to be harmed. The dominant theory of harm is the counterfactual account, most famously proposed by Joel Feinberg. This determines whether harm is caused by comparing what actually ha...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12207

    authors: Purshouse C

    更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00

  • Reinterpreting Responsiveness for Health Systems Research in Low and Middle-Income Countries.

    abstract::The ethical concept of responsiveness has largely been interpreted in the context of international clinical research. In light of the increasing conduct of externally funded health systems research (HSR) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), this article examines how responsiveness might be understood for such ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12138

    authors: Pratt B,Hyder AA

    更新日期:2015-07-01 00:00:00

  • Knowledge and power in the clinical setting.

    abstract::In this paper we consider the three categories offered by Howard Brody for understanding power in medicine. In his book The Healer's Power, Brody separates out power in medicine into the categories of Aesculapian, Social, and Charismatic power. We examine these three categories and then apply them to a case. In this c...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00065

    authors: McMillan J,Anderson L

    更新日期:1997-07-01 00:00:00

  • Language barriers and epistemic injustice in healthcare settings.

    abstract::Contemporary realities of global population movement increasingly bring to the fore the challenge of quality and equitable health provision across language barriers. While this linguistic challenge is not unique to immigration contexts and is likewise shared by health systems responding to the needs of aboriginal peop...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12435

    authors: Peled Y

    更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • Consequentialism, reasons, value and justice.

    abstract::Over the past 10 years, John Harris has made important contributions to thinking about distributive justice in health care. In his latest work, Harris controversially argues that clinicians should stop prioritising patients according to prognosis. He argues that the good or benefit of health care is providing each ind...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00109

    authors: Savulescu J

    更新日期:1998-07-01 00:00:00

  • Privacy and disclosure in medical genetics examined in an ethics of care.

    abstract::The progress of genetic knowledge magnifies existing ethical problems in medical genetics. Among the most troubling types of problems -- for medicine, patients, and the larger society -- are those of privacy and disclosure. Examples of the range of problems involving privacy and disclosure are: 1) disclosure of fals...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00161.x

    authors: Wertz DC,Fletcher JC

    更新日期:1991-07-01 00:00:00

  • Killing, letting die and moral perception: a reply to Grant Gillett.

    abstract::A number of philosophers in recent times have employed arguments to show that there is no morally relevant difference between killing a patient and allowing that patient to die in those circumstances where the outcome is virtually identical and where death is preventable, at least for a significant time. From his per...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00169

    authors: Thornton J

    更新日期:1999-10-01 00:00:00

  • Autonomy and social influence in predictive genetic testing decision-making: A qualitative interview study.

    abstract::Beauchamp and Childress' definition of autonomous decision-making includes the conditions of intentionality, understanding, and non-control. In genetics, however, a relational conception of autonomy has been increasingly recognized. This article aims to empirically assess aspects of social influence in genetic testing...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12816

    authors: Zimmermann BM,Koné I,Shaw D,Elger B

    更新日期:2021-02-01 00:00:00

  • Addiction, Heroin-Assisted Treatment and the Idea of Abstinence: A reply to Henden.

    abstract::In our previous article on the question whether heroin addicts are able to give informed consent voluntarily to research on heroin-assisted treatment, we criticized the ongoing bioethical discussion of a flawed conceptualization of heroin addicts' options. As a participant in this discussion, Edmund Henden defends the...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12276

    authors: Uusitalo S,Broers B

    更新日期:2016-11-01 00:00:00

  • Toward a gender-sensitive assisted reproduction policy.

    abstract::The recent case of the UK woman who lost her legal struggle to be impregnated with her own frozen embryos, raises critical issues about the meaning of reproductive autonomy and the scope of regulatory practices. I revisit this case within the context of contemporary debate about the moral and legal dimensions of assis...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00676.x

    authors: Donchin A

    更新日期:2009-01-01 00:00:00

  • The Ties that Undermine.

    abstract::Do biological relations ground responsibilities between biological fathers and their offspring? Few think biological relations ground either necessary or sufficient conditions for responsibility. Nevertheless, many think biological relations ground responsibility at least partially. Various scenarios, such as cases co...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12213

    authors: Beverley J

    更新日期:2016-06-01 00:00:00

  • Advance directives in the Netherlands: an empirical contribution to the exploration of a cross-cultural perspective on advance directives.

    abstract:RESEARCH OBJECTIVE:This study focuses on ADs in the Netherlands and introduces a cross-cultural perspective by comparing it with other countries. METHODS:A questionnaire was sent to a panel comprising 1621 people representative of the Dutch population. The response was 86%. RESULTS:95% of the respondents didn't have ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01788.x

    authors: van Wijmen MP,Rurup ML,Pasman HR,Kaspers PJ,Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD

    更新日期:2010-03-01 00:00:00

  • Objection to Conscience: An Argument Against Conscience Exemptions in Healthcare.

    abstract::I argue that appeals to conscience do not constitute reasons for granting healthcare professionals exemptions from providing services they consider immoral (e.g. abortion). My argument is based on a comparison between a type of objection that many people think should be granted, i.e. to abortion, and one that most peo...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12333

    authors: Giubilini A

    更新日期:2017-06-01 00:00:00

  • Overstating values: medical facts, diverse values, bioethics and values-based medicine.

    abstract::Fulford has argued that (1) the medical concepts illness, disease and dysfunction are inescapably evaluative terms, (2) illness is conceptually prior to disease, and (3) a model conforming to (2) has greater explanatory power and practical utility than the conventional value-free medical model. This 'reverse' model em...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01902.x

    authors: Parker M

    更新日期:2013-02-01 00:00:00

  • Administrative gatekeeping - a third way between unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing.

    abstract::The inevitable need for rationing of healthcare has apparently presented the medical profession with the dilemma of choosing the lesser of two evils. Physicians appear to be obliged to adopt either an implausible version of traditional professional ethics or an equally problematic ethics of bedside rationing. The form...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00652.x

    authors: Lauridsen S

    更新日期:2009-06-01 00:00:00

  • Competence and risk-relativity.

    abstract::In this paper I discuss the view that the appropriate concept of competence is a decision-relative one: that a person may be competent to make one decision but not another. The argument that I present is that neither of the two competing theories supporting the decision-relative approach, internalism and externalism, ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00218

    authors: Buller T

    更新日期:2001-04-01 00:00:00

  • Acculturation and end-of-life decision making: comparison of Japanese and Japanese-American focus groups.

    abstract::Variation in decision-making about end-of-life care among ethnic groups creates clinical conflicts. In order to understand changes in preferences for end-of-life care among Japanese who immigrate to the United States, we conducted 18 focus groups with 122 participants: 65 English-speaking Japanese Americans, 29 Japane...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00551.x

    authors: Bito S,Matsumura S,Singer MK,Meredith LS,Fukuhara S,Wenger NS

    更新日期:2007-06-01 00:00:00

  • Duties to stakeholders amidst pressures from shareholders: lessons from an advisory panel on transplant policy.

    abstract::The distinction between stakeholders and shareholders frequently employed in business ethics can illuminate challenges faced by a bioethics advisory panel. I use the distinction to reflect back on the work of an advisory panel on which I served, a panel on US transplant policy. The panel hearings were akin to a shareh...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00348

    authors: Mongoven AM

    更新日期:2003-08-01 00:00:00

  • Microethics in action.

    abstract::The future development of bioethics has been discussed in a number of articles in recent years, principally with regard to the trend towards empirical studies. However, what is meant by empirical studies in this context and how it is to be used concretely have been subject to varying interpretations. The purpose of th...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00492.x

    authors: Nikku N,Eriksson BE

    更新日期:2006-08-01 00:00:00

  • Health, vital goals, and central human capabilities.

    abstract::I argue for a conception of health as a person's ability to achieve or exercise a cluster of basic human activities. These basic activities are in turn specified through free-standing ethical reasoning about what constitutes a minimal conception of a human life with equal human dignity in the modern world. I arrive at...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01953.x

    authors: Venkatapuram S

    更新日期:2013-06-01 00:00:00

  • Political legitimacy and research ethics.

    abstract::In democratic theory, "legitimacy" refers to the set of conditions that must be in place in order for the claims to authority of somebody to be deemed appropriate, and for their claims to compliance to be warranted. Though criteria of legitimacy have been elaborated in the context of democratic states, there is no rea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12489

    authors: Smith MJ,Weinstock D

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Looking backwards, looking forward: hopes for bioethics' next twenty-five years.

    abstract::I reflect on the past, present, and future of the field of bioethics. In so doing, I offer a very situated overview of where bioethics has been, where it now is, where it seems to be going, where I think we could do better, and where I dearly hope the field will be heading. I also propose three ways of re-orienting ou...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01866.x

    authors: Sherwin S

    更新日期:2011-02-01 00:00:00

  • Altruistic surrogacy and informed consent.

    abstract::A crucial premise in many recent arguments against the moral permissibility of surrogate motherhood arrangements is the claim that a woman cannot autonomously consent to gestating and relinquishing a child to another couple, because she cannot be fully informed about what her future emotional responses will be to the ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1992.tb00206.x

    authors: Oakley J

    更新日期:1992-10-01 00:00:00

  • The genesis of public health ethics.

    abstract::As bioethics emerged in the 1960s and 1970s and began to have enormous impacts on the practice of medicine and research--fuelled, by broad socio-political changes that gave rise to the struggles of women, African Americans, gay men and lesbians, and the antiauthoritarianism impulse that characterised the New Left in d...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00412.x

    authors: Bayer R,Fairchild AL

    更新日期:2004-11-01 00:00:00

  • Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity?

    abstract::Germline genome editing is often disapproved of at the international policy level because of its possible threats to human dignity. However, from a critical perspective the relationship between this emerging technology and human dignity is relatively understudied. We explore the main principles that are referred to wh...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12607

    authors: Segers S,Mertes H

    更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00

  • Gestation as mothering.

    abstract::Some commentators maintain that gestational surrogates are not 'mothers' in a way capable of grounding a claim to motherhood. These commentators find that the practices that constitute motherhood do not extend to gestational surrogates. We argue that gestational surrogates should be construed as mothers of the childre...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12808

    authors: Murphy TF,Parks JA

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Human cloning: category, dignity, and the role of bioethics.

    abstract::Human cloning has been simultaneously a running joke for massive worldwide publicity of fringe groups like the Raelians, and the core issue of an international movement at the United Nations in support of a treaty to ban the use of cloning techniques to produce a child (so called reproductive cloning). Yet, even thoug...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00365

    authors: Shuster E

    更新日期:2003-10-01 00:00:00

  • Enhancing evolution and enhancing evolution.

    abstract::It has been claimed in several places that the new genetic technologies allow humanity to achieve in a generation or two what might take natural selection hundreds of millennia in respect of the elimination of certain diseases and an increase in traits such as intelligence. More radically, it has been suggested that t...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.01703.x

    authors: Brassington I

    更新日期:2010-10-01 00:00:00

  • Is it time for bioethics to go empirical?

    abstract::Observers who note the increasing popularity of bioethics discussions often complain that the social sciences are poorly represented in discussions about things like abortion and stem-cell research. Critics say that bioethicists should be incorporating the methods and findings of social scientists, and should move tow...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00621.x

    authors: Herrera C

    更新日期:2008-03-01 00:00:00

  • AIDS, gays, and state coercion.

    abstract::Mohr argues that coercive government policies in response to the AIDS crisis are unjustified and pose a serious threat to the rights of homosexuals. AIDS presently can be transmitted only to those whose actions place them at risk. Paternalistic state coercion is warranted only when a person has diminished capacity o...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00003.x

    authors: Mohr RD

    更新日期:1987-01-01 00:00:00