Trading with the waiting-list: the justice of living donor list exchange.

Abstract:

:In a Living Donor List Exchange program, the donor makes his kidney available for allocation to patients on the postmortal waiting-list and receives in exchange a postmortal kidney, usually an O-kidney, to be given to the recipient he favours. The program can be a solution for a candidate donor who is unable to donate directly or to participate in a paired kidney exchange because of blood group incompatibility or a positive cross-match. Each donation within an LDLE program makes an additional organ available for transplantation. But because most of the pairs making use of the program will be A/O incompatible, it will also tend to increase the waiting time for patients with blood group O, who already have the longest waiting time. It has therefore been objected that the program is materially unjust, because it further disadvantages the least advantaged. This objection appeals to John Rawls' difference principle. However, the context for which Rawls proposed that difference principle, is significantly different from the present one. Applying the principle here amounts to a lop-sided trade-off between considerations of need and considerations of overall utility. Considerations of formal justice, however, may lead to a stronger objection to LDLE programs. Such a program means that one O-patient on the waiting list is exempted from the application of the general criteria used in constructing the list because he has a special bargaining advantage. This objection is spelled out and weighed against the obvious attraction of LDLE in a situation of (extreme) organ scarcity.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

den Hartogh G

doi

10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00684.x

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2010-05-01 00:00:00

pages

190-8

issue

4

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

journal_volume

24

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?

    abstract::In 2017 and 2019, two research teams claimed 'proof of principle' for artificial womb technology (AWT). AWT has long been a subject of speculation in bioethical literature, with broad consensus that it is a welcome development. Despite this, little attention is afforded to more immediate ethical problems in the develo...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12701

    authors: Romanis EC

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Justification for conscience exemptions in health care.

    abstract::Some bioethicists argue that conscientious objectors in health care should have to justify themselves, just as objectors in the military do. They should have to provide reasons that explain why they should be exempt from offering the services that they find offensive. There are two versions of this view in the literat...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12055

    authors: Kantymir L,McLeod C

    更新日期:2014-01-01 00:00:00

  • Family refusal of emergency medical treatment in China: An investigation from legal, empirical and ethical perspectives.

    abstract::This paper is an analysis of the limits of family authority to refuse life saving treatment for a family member (in the Chinese medical context). Family consent has long been praised and practiced in many non-Western cultural settings such as China and Japan. In contrast, the controversy of family refusal remains less...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12728

    authors: Jin P,Zhang X

    更新日期:2020-03-01 00:00:00

  • The ongoing charity of organ donation. Contemporary English Sunni fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Empirical studies in Muslim communities on organ donation and blood transfusion show that Muslim counsellors play an important role in the decision process. Despite the emerging importance of online English Sunni fatwas, these fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion have hardly been studied, thus crea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01782.x

    authors: Van den Branden S,Broeckaert B

    更新日期:2011-03-01 00:00:00

  • Privacy and disclosure in medical genetics examined in an ethics of care.

    abstract::The progress of genetic knowledge magnifies existing ethical problems in medical genetics. Among the most troubling types of problems -- for medicine, patients, and the larger society -- are those of privacy and disclosure. Examples of the range of problems involving privacy and disclosure are: 1) disclosure of fals...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00161.x

    authors: Wertz DC,Fletcher JC

    更新日期:1991-07-01 00:00:00

  • Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy.

    abstract::The purpose of this paper is to describe the scientific background to the current ethical and legislative debates about the generation and use of human stem cells, and to give an overview of the ethical issues underlying these debates. The ethical issues discussed are 1) stem cells and the status of the embryo, 2) wom...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307

    authors: Holm S

    更新日期:2002-11-01 00:00:00

  • Two puzzles for Marquis's conservative view on abortion.

    abstract::Don Marquis argues that abortion is morally wrong in most cases since it deprives the fetus of the value of its future. I criticize Marquis's argument for the modified conservative view by adopting an argumentative strategy in which I work within his basic account: if it is granted that his fundamental idea is sound, ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00503.x

    authors: Card RF

    更新日期:2006-09-01 00:00:00

  • AIDS, gays, and state coercion.

    abstract::Mohr argues that coercive government policies in response to the AIDS crisis are unjustified and pose a serious threat to the rights of homosexuals. AIDS presently can be transmitted only to those whose actions place them at risk. Paternalistic state coercion is warranted only when a person has diminished capacity o...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00003.x

    authors: Mohr RD

    更新日期:1987-01-01 00:00:00

  • Beyond accountability for reasonableness.

    abstract::This paper is a critique of Norman Daniels' and James Sabin's 'Accountability for Reasonableness' framework for making priority-setting decisions in health care in the face of widespread disagreement about values. Accountability for Reasonableness has been rapidly gaining worldwide acceptance, arguably to the point of...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00605.x

    authors: Friedman A

    更新日期:2008-02-01 00:00:00

  • Reciprocity-based reasons for benefiting research participants: most fail, the most plausible is problematic.

    abstract::A common reason for giving research participants post-trial access (PTA) to the trial intervention appeals to reciprocity, the principle, stated most generally, that if one person benefits a second, the second should reciprocate: benefit the first in return. Many authors consider it obvious that reciprocity supports P...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12039

    authors: Sofaer N

    更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00

  • Symbiotic empirical ethics: a practical methodology.

    abstract::Like any discipline, bioethics is a developing field of academic inquiry; and recent trends in scholarship have been towards more engagement with empirical research. This 'empirical turn' has provoked extensive debate over how such 'descriptive' research carried out in the social sciences contributes to the distinctiv...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01843.x

    authors: Frith L

    更新日期:2012-05-01 00:00:00

  • Slipping on slippery slope arguments.

    abstract::Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) are used in a wide range of philosophical debates, but are often dismissed as empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious. In particular, leading authors put forward a meta-SSA which points to instances of empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious SSAs and to the alleged exi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12727

    authors: Fumagalli R

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Vaccine mandates, value pluralism, and policy diversity.

    abstract::Political communities across the world have recently sought to tackle rising rates of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, by implementing coercive immunization programs, or by making existing immunization programs more coercive. Many academics and advocates of public health have applauded these policy developments, and the...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12645

    authors: Navin MC,Attwell K

    更新日期:2019-11-01 00:00:00

  • Compensation for cures: Why we should pay a premium for participation in 'challenge studies'.

    abstract::Antibiotic resistance is one of the most pressing public health problems humanity faces. Research into new classes of antibiotics and new kinds of treatments - including risky experimental treatments such as phage therapy and vaccines - is an important part of improving our ability to treat infectious diseases. In ord...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12596

    authors: Anomaly J,Savulescu J

    更新日期:2019-09-01 00:00:00

  • The injustice of fat stigma.

    abstract::Fatness stigma is pervasive. Being fat is widely regarded a bad thing, and fat persons suffer numerous social and material disadvantages in virtue of their weight being regarded that way. Despite the seriousness of this problem, it has received relatively little attention from analytic philosophers. In this paper, I s...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12560

    authors: Nath R

    更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00

  • Incentivizing Patient Choices: The Ethics of Inclusive Shared Savings.

    abstract::Is it ethical to pay patients for selecting cheaper medical treatments? The healthcare system in the United States is notoriously profligate, at least in part because when insurers foot the bill, patients have little incentive to avoid wasteful treatments. One familiar means for dealing with this problem is for insure...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12267

    authors: Chappell RY

    更新日期:2016-10-01 00:00:00

  • Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity?

    abstract::Germline genome editing is often disapproved of at the international policy level because of its possible threats to human dignity. However, from a critical perspective the relationship between this emerging technology and human dignity is relatively understudied. We explore the main principles that are referred to wh...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12607

    authors: Segers S,Mertes H

    更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00

  • The vulnerable and the susceptible.

    abstract::Human beings are essentially vulnerable in the view that their existence qua humans is not given but constructed. This vulnerability received basic protection from the State, expressed in the form of the universal rights all citizens are meant to enjoy. In addition, many individuals fall prey to destitution and depriv...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00361

    authors: Kottow MH

    更新日期:2003-10-01 00:00:00

  • In vitro fertilization and the right to reproduce.

    abstract::The assumption that people have a right to have children is considered in relation to the question of whether society has an obligation to allocate resources to make clinical in vitro fertilization available, at least to married couples where the woman is infertile and the couple provides the ovum and sperm. The auth...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00010.x

    authors: Uniacke S

    更新日期:1987-07-01 00:00:00

  • Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement.

    abstract::Several recent articles have weighed in on the question of whether moral philosophers can be counted as moral experts. One argument denying this has been rejected by both sides of the debate. According to this argument, the extent of disagreement in modern moral philosophy prevents moral philosophers from being classi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12173

    authors: Cross B

    更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00

  • Anorexia nervosa, advance directives, and the law: A British perspective.

    abstract::This article will explore whether the law should allow people with anorexia nervosa to refuse nutrition and hydration with special reference to the English decision in Re E (Medical Treatment: Anorexia). It argues that the judge in that case made the correct decision in holding that the patient, who suffered from seve...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12593

    authors: Ip EC

    更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00

  • Suffering at the end of life.

    abstract::In the end-of-life context, alleviation of the suffering of a distressed patient is usually seen as a, if not the, central goal for the medical personnel treating her. Yet it has also been argued that suffering should be seen as a part of good dying. More precisely, it has been maintained that alleviating a dying pati...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12513

    authors: Varelius J

    更新日期:2019-01-01 00:00:00

  • Narrative ARTifice and women's agency.

    abstract::The choice to pursue fertility treatments is a complex one. In this paper I explore the issues of choice, agency, and gender as they relate to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). I argue that narrative approaches to bioethics such as those by Arthur Frank and Hilde Lindemann Nelson clarify judgments about auton...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00428.x

    authors: Kalbian AH

    更新日期:2005-04-01 00:00:00

  • Hastening death and the boundaries of the self.

    abstract::When applying moral principles to concrete cases, we assume a background shared understanding of the boundaries of the persons to whom the principles apply. In most contexts, this assumption is unproblematic. However, in end-of-life contexts, when patients are receiving 'artificial' life-support, judgments about where...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00481.x

    authors: Jansen LA

    更新日期:2006-04-01 00:00:00

  • Finding A Seat at the Table Together: Recommendations for Improving Collaboration between Social Work and Bioethics.

    abstract::Social work and bioethics are fields deeply committed to cross-disciplinary collaboration to do their respective work. While scholars and practitioners from both fields share a commitment to social justice and to respecting the dignity, integrity and the worth of all persons, the overlap between the fields, including ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12106

    authors: Brazg T,Dotolo D,Blacksher E

    更新日期:2015-06-01 00:00:00

  • Language barriers and epistemic injustice in healthcare settings.

    abstract::Contemporary realities of global population movement increasingly bring to the fore the challenge of quality and equitable health provision across language barriers. While this linguistic challenge is not unique to immigration contexts and is likewise shared by health systems responding to the needs of aboriginal peop...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12435

    authors: Peled Y

    更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • International ethical regulations on placebo-use in clinical trials: a comparative analysis.

    abstract::The ethical aspects of placebo control in clinical trials have been extensively and controversially debated in the last decade. However, a thorough analytical comparison of the different existing international regulations, their terminologies and their ethical principles concerning placebo, is still missing. The centr...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00587.x

    authors: Ehni HJ,Wiesing U

    更新日期:2008-01-01 00:00:00

  • The doctor-patient relationship: a survey of attitudes and practices of doctors in Singapore.

    abstract::This article reports the results of a survey, by mailed questionnaire, of the attitudes, values and practices of doctors in Singapore with respect to the doctor-patient relationship. Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 475 doctors (261 general practitioners and 214 medical specialists), out of which 249 (52...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00180

    authors: Chan D,Goh LG

    更新日期:2000-01-01 00:00:00

  • Microethics in action.

    abstract::The future development of bioethics has been discussed in a number of articles in recent years, principally with regard to the trend towards empirical studies. However, what is meant by empirical studies in this context and how it is to be used concretely have been subject to varying interpretations. The purpose of th...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00492.x

    authors: Nikku N,Eriksson BE

    更新日期:2006-08-01 00:00:00

  • Felicitometry: measuring the 'quality' in quality of life.

    abstract::Following Bernheim,(1) we examine aspects of 'felicitometrics,'(2) the measurement of the 'quality' term in Quality of Life (QOL). Bernheim argued that overall QOL is best captured as the Gestalt(3) of a global self-assessment and suggested that the Anamnestic Comparative Self Assessment (ACSA) approach, in which subj...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00642.x

    authors: Kowalski C,Pennell S,Vinokur A

    更新日期:2008-07-01 00:00:00