Abstract:
:Don Marquis argues that abortion is morally wrong in most cases since it deprives the fetus of the value of its future. I criticize Marquis's argument for the modified conservative view by adopting an argumentative strategy in which I work within his basic account: if it is granted that his fundamental idea is sound, what follows about the morality of abortion? I conclude that Marquis is faced with a dilemma: either his position must shift towards the extreme conservative view on which abortion is never morally permissible, or he must abandon any recognizably conservative view. This dilemma suggests that Marquis's view is either deeply implausible or that he cannot use this argument to successfully support his preferred position.
journal_name
Bioethicsjournal_title
Bioethicsauthors
Card RFdoi
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00503.xsubject
Has Abstractpub_date
2006-09-01 00:00:00pages
264-77issue
5eissn
0269-9702issn
1467-8519journal_volume
20pub_type
杂志文章相关文献
BIOETHICS文献大全abstract::This paper considers Habermas' model of a post-secular political order in the light of the debate on male circumcision that arose in Germany after a court ruled that male circumcision was an unjustifiable act of bodily harm. Central to this model is the idea that religious reasons can only become effective in central ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12526
更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::This article will explore whether the law should allow people with anorexia nervosa to refuse nutrition and hydration with special reference to the English decision in Re E (Medical Treatment: Anorexia). It argues that the judge in that case made the correct decision in holding that the patient, who suffered from seve...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12593
更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::The discussion on ethical issues, it is said, should not be confined to experts but should be extended to patients and local communities, because of the real need to engage stakeholders and non-stakeholders alike not only in carrying out any biomedical research project, but also in the drafting and legislation of bioe...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00464.x
更新日期:2005-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::I argue for a conception of health as a person's ability to achieve or exercise a cluster of basic human activities. These basic activities are in turn specified through free-standing ethical reasoning about what constitutes a minimal conception of a human life with equal human dignity in the modern world. I arrive at...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01953.x
更新日期:2013-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::A common strategy in bioethics is to posit a prima facie case in favour of one policy, and to then claim that the burden of proof (that this policy should be rejected) falls on those with opposing views. If the burden of proof is not met, it is claimed, then the policy in question should be accepted. This article illu...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12194
更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Antinatalist commentators recommend that humanity bring itself to a close, on the theory that pain and suffering override the value of any possible life. Other commentators do not require the voluntary extinction of human beings, but they defend that outcome if people were to choose against having children. Against su...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12290
更新日期:2016-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Fatness stigma is pervasive. Being fat is widely regarded a bad thing, and fat persons suffer numerous social and material disadvantages in virtue of their weight being regarded that way. Despite the seriousness of this problem, it has received relatively little attention from analytic philosophers. In this paper, I s...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12560
更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::Acts of helping others are often based on mixed motivations. Based on this claim, it has been argued that the use of a financial reward to incentivize organ donation is compatible with promoting altruism in organ donation. In its report Human Bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research, the Nuffield Council on Bioethic...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12078
更新日期:2015-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Like any discipline, bioethics is a developing field of academic inquiry; and recent trends in scholarship have been towards more engagement with empirical research. This 'empirical turn' has provoked extensive debate over how such 'descriptive' research carried out in the social sciences contributes to the distinctiv...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01843.x
更新日期:2012-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::In this essay, we present three case studies which suggest that sometimes we are better off supporting a so-called irrational suicide, and that emotional or psychological distress--even if medically controllable--might justify a suicide. We underscore how complicated these decisions are and how murky a physician's mor...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00300
更新日期:2002-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Intersexuality, particularly in the global South, remains an under-researched field of study. In my in-progress doctoral research project, I explore the cultural, social, and medical discourses that influence how key stakeholders such as healthcare providers make decisions about the sex and gender assignment of the in...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12750
更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::In this paper I discuss the view that the appropriate concept of competence is a decision-relative one: that a person may be competent to make one decision but not another. The argument that I present is that neither of the two competing theories supporting the decision-relative approach, internalism and externalism, ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00218
更新日期:2001-04-01 00:00:00
abstract::Rebecca Bennett, in a recent paper dismissing Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence, advances both a negative and a positive thesis. The negative thesis holds that the principle's theoretical foundation - the notion of impersonal harm or non-person-affecting wrong - is indefensible. Therefore, there ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x
更新日期:2012-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::In From Chance to Choice, Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels and Daniel Wikler propose a new way of defending the moral significance of the distinction between genetic treatments and enhancements. They develop what they call a 'normal function model' of equality of opportunity and argue that it offers a 'limite...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01750.x
更新日期:2011-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Within the ethics and science literature surrounding uterus transplantation (UTx), emphasis is often placed on the extent to which UTx might improve upon, or offer additional benefits when compared to, existing 'treatment options' for women with absolute uterine factor infertility, such as adoption and gestational sur...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12469
更新日期:2018-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) are used in a wide range of philosophical debates, but are often dismissed as empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious. In particular, leading authors put forward a meta-SSA which points to instances of empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious SSAs and to the alleged exi...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12727
更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::This article introduces questions in psychiatric ethics regarding the substantial field of qualitative and quantitative research into 'posttraumatic growth', which investigates how, after devastating experiences, individuals can come to feel that they have developed warmer relationships, increased spirituality, or a c...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12164
更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Several important issues are raised and illuminated in "Genetic Harm"; not least, in its detailed discussion of specific genetic disorders. In particular, it focuses on a type of disorder whose ill effects are not manifested at birth, but only at a later stage in life. The conclusion, with its significant implicatio...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00170.x
更新日期:1991-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::Women face extraordinary difficulty in seeking sterilization as physicians routinely deny them the procedure. Physicians defend such denials by citing the possibility of future regret, a well-studied phenomenon in women's sterilization literature. Regret is, however, a problematic emotion upon which to deny reproducti...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12431
更新日期:2018-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::The purpose of this paper is to describe the scientific background to the current ethical and legislative debates about the generation and use of human stem cells, and to give an overview of the ethical issues underlying these debates. The ethical issues discussed are 1) stem cells and the status of the embryo, 2) wom...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307
更新日期:2002-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Beauchamp and Childress' definition of autonomous decision-making includes the conditions of intentionality, understanding, and non-control. In genetics, however, a relational conception of autonomy has been increasingly recognized. This article aims to empirically assess aspects of social influence in genetic testing...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12816
更新日期:2021-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::This discussion paper continues the debate over risk-related standards of mental competence which appears in Bioethics 5. Dan Brock there defends an approach to mental competence in patients which defines it as being relative to differing standards, more or less rigorous depending on the degree of risk involved in pro...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00081
更新日期:1997-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::This paper considers the disciplines of literature and history and the contributions each makes to the discourse of bioethics. In each case I note the pedagogic ends that can be enacted though the appropriate use of the each of these disciplines in the sphere of medical education, particularly in the medical ethics cl...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01818.x
更新日期:2011-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::Current practices of identifying and treating small indolent thyroid cancers constitute an important but in some ways unusual form of overdiagnosis. Overdiagnosis refers to diagnoses that generally harm rather than benefit patients, primarily because the diagnosed condition is not a harmful form of disease. Patients w...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12383
更新日期:2017-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::Germline genome editing is often disapproved of at the international policy level because of its possible threats to human dignity. However, from a critical perspective the relationship between this emerging technology and human dignity is relatively understudied. We explore the main principles that are referred to wh...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12607
更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::This paper is an analysis of the limits of family authority to refuse life saving treatment for a family member (in the Chinese medical context). Family consent has long been praised and practiced in many non-Western cultural settings such as China and Japan. In contrast, the controversy of family refusal remains less...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12728
更新日期:2020-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::The distinction between stakeholders and shareholders frequently employed in business ethics can illuminate challenges faced by a bioethics advisory panel. I use the distinction to reflect back on the work of an advisory panel on which I served, a panel on US transplant policy. The panel hearings were akin to a shareh...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00348
更新日期:2003-08-01 00:00:00
abstract::It has been argued that there can be no person-regarding reasons for practising genetic therapy, since it affects identity and causes to exist an individual who would not otherwise have existed. And there can be no such reasons for causing somebody to exist because existing cannot be better for an individual than neve...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00298.x
更新日期:1995-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::An educated guess about the future of academic bioethics can only be made on the basis of the historical conditions of its success. According to its official history, which attributes its success primarily to the service it has done for the patient, it should be safe at least as long as the patient still needs its ser...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01807.x
更新日期:2010-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::Therapeutic misconception involves the failure of subjects either to understand or to incorporate into their own expectations the distinctions in nature and purpose of personally responsive therapeutic care, and the generic relationship between subject and investigator which is constrained by research protocols. Resea...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12384
更新日期:2017-11-01 00:00:00