The ongoing charity of organ donation. Contemporary English Sunni fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion.

Abstract:

BACKGROUND:Empirical studies in Muslim communities on organ donation and blood transfusion show that Muslim counsellors play an important role in the decision process. Despite the emerging importance of online English Sunni fatwas, these fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion have hardly been studied, thus creating a gap in our knowledge of contemporary Islamic views on the subject. METHOD:We analysed 70 English Sunni e-fatwas and subjected them to an in-depth text analysis in order to reveal the key concepts in the Islamic ethical framework regarding organ donation and blood transfusion. RESULTS:All 70 fatwas allow for organ donation and blood transfusion. Autotransplantation is no problem at all if done for medical reasons. Allotransplantation, both from a living and a dead donor, appears to be possible though only in quite restricted ways. Xenotransplantation is less often mentioned but can be allowed in case of necessity. Transplantation in general is seen as an ongoing form of charity. Nearly half of the fatwas allowing blood transfusion do so without mentioning any restriction or problem whatsoever. The other half of the fatwas on transfusion contain the same conditional approval as found in the arguments pro organ transplantation. CONCLUSION:Our findings are very much in line with the international literature on the subject. We found two new elements: debates on the definition of the moment of death are hardly mentioned in the English Sunni fatwas and organ donation and blood transfusion are presented as an ongoing form of charity.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

Van den Branden S,Broeckaert B

doi

10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01782.x

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2011-03-01 00:00:00

pages

167-75

issue

3

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

pii

BIOT1782

journal_volume

25

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Racist organ donors and saving lives.

    abstract::This paper considers what should be done about offers of organs for transplant that come with racist strings attached. Saving lives or improving their quality seem powerful reasons to accept the offer. Fairness, justice, and rejecting racism seem like powerful reasons against. This paper argues that conditional alloca...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00526.x

    authors: Wilkinson TM

    更新日期:2007-02-01 00:00:00

  • In vitro fertilization and the right to reproduce.

    abstract::The assumption that people have a right to have children is considered in relation to the question of whether society has an obligation to allocate resources to make clinical in vitro fertilization available, at least to married couples where the woman is infertile and the couple provides the ovum and sperm. The auth...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00010.x

    authors: Uniacke S

    更新日期:1987-07-01 00:00:00

  • Genetic therapy, identity and the person-regarding reasons.

    abstract::It has been argued that there can be no person-regarding reasons for practising genetic therapy, since it affects identity and causes to exist an individual who would not otherwise have existed. And there can be no such reasons for causing somebody to exist because existing cannot be better for an individual than neve...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00298.x

    authors: Persson I

    更新日期:1995-01-01 00:00:00

  • A new approach to regulating the use of animals in science.

    abstract::Anderson was a member of the writing group for the recent revision of Australia's national Code of Practice for the use of animals in scientific research. Here he outlines the major features of the Code. These deal with animal experimentation ethics committees, with levels of pain and distress in subjects, with stan...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1990.tb00065.x

    authors: Anderson W

    更新日期:1990-01-01 00:00:00

  • Monological versus dialogical consciousness: two epistemological views on the use of theory in clinical ethical practice.

    abstract::In this article, we argue that a critical examination of epistemological and anthropological presuppositions might lead to a more fruitful use of theory in clinical-ethical practice. We differentiate between two views of conceptualizing ethics, referring to Charles Taylors' two epistemological models: 'monological' ve...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01912.x

    authors: Ohnsorge K,Widdershoven G

    更新日期:2011-09-01 00:00:00

  • Ought we to enhance our cognitive capacities?

    abstract::Ought we to improve our cognitive capacities beyond the normal human range? It might be a good idea to level out differences between peoples cognitive capacities; and some people's reaching beyond normal capacities may have some good side-effects on society at large (but also bad side-effects, of course). But is there...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00721.x

    authors: Tännsjö T

    更新日期:2009-09-01 00:00:00

  • Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?

    abstract::In 2017 and 2019, two research teams claimed 'proof of principle' for artificial womb technology (AWT). AWT has long been a subject of speculation in bioethical literature, with broad consensus that it is a welcome development. Despite this, little attention is afforded to more immediate ethical problems in the develo...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12701

    authors: Romanis EC

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Bystanders and ethical review of research: Proceed with caution.

    abstract::Scientists seeking to conduct research with human subjects must first submit their proposals to research ethics committees (Institutional Review Boards [IRBs], in the United States). Some of these studies pose risks to "bystanders," i.e., people who may be affected by the research but who are not enrolled as study sub...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12823

    authors: Wikler D

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Altruism and reward: motivational compatibility in deceased organ donation.

    abstract::Acts of helping others are often based on mixed motivations. Based on this claim, it has been argued that the use of a financial reward to incentivize organ donation is compatible with promoting altruism in organ donation. In its report Human Bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research, the Nuffield Council on Bioethic...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12078

    authors: Voo TC

    更新日期:2015-03-01 00:00:00

  • Counterfactual reasoning in surrogate decision making -- another look.

    abstract::Incompetent patients need to have someone else make decisions on their behalf. According to the Substituted Judgment Standard the surrogate decision maker ought to make the decision that the patient would have made, had he or she been competent. Objections have been raised against this traditional construal of the sta...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01768.x

    authors: Johansson M,Broström L

    更新日期:2011-06-01 00:00:00

  • Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument.

    abstract::Much of the debate about the ethics of abortion has centered on whether the fetus is a person. In an attempt to sidestep this complex issue, I argue that, even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral. To arrive at this conclusion, I argue that giving a fetus fetal alcohol syndrome is immoral, and that if thi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12533

    authors: Hendricks P

    更新日期:2019-02-01 00:00:00

  • To strengthen consensus, consult the stakeholders.

    abstract::CIOMS has been criticised for not adequately consulting stakeholders about its revised ethical guidelines regarding medical research. Political and logistical issues that arise in democratic processes and open exchange of information probably contributed to this exclusion. What might CIOMS have done to be more inclusi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00395.x

    authors: Macpherson CC

    更新日期:2004-06-01 00:00:00

  • Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity?

    abstract::Germline genome editing is often disapproved of at the international policy level because of its possible threats to human dignity. However, from a critical perspective the relationship between this emerging technology and human dignity is relatively understudied. We explore the main principles that are referred to wh...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12607

    authors: Segers S,Mertes H

    更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00

  • The social value requirement reconsidered.

    abstract::It is widely assumed that it is ethical to conduct research with human subjects only if the research has social value. There are two standard arguments for this view. The allocation argument claims that public funds should not be devoted to research that lacks social value. The exploitation avoidance argument claims t...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12128

    authors: Wertheimer A

    更新日期:2015-06-01 00:00:00

  • Judging the social value of controlled human infection studies.

    abstract::In controlled human infection (CHI) studies, investigators deliberately infect healthy individuals with pathogens in order to study mechanisms of disease or obtain preliminary efficacy data on investigational vaccines and medicines. CHI studies offer a fast and cost-effective way of generating new scientific insights,...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12794

    authors: Rid A,Roestenberg M

    更新日期:2020-10-01 00:00:00

  • Is it time for bioethics to go empirical?

    abstract::Observers who note the increasing popularity of bioethics discussions often complain that the social sciences are poorly represented in discussions about things like abortion and stem-cell research. Critics say that bioethicists should be incorporating the methods and findings of social scientists, and should move tow...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00621.x

    authors: Herrera C

    更新日期:2008-03-01 00:00:00

  • Adjusting the focus: A public health ethics approach to data research.

    abstract::This paper contends that a research ethics approach to the regulation of health data research is unhelpful in the era of population-level research and big data because it results in a primary focus on consent (meta-, broad, dynamic and/or specific consent). Two recent guidelines - the 2016 WMA Declaration of Taipei on...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12551

    authors: Ballantyne A

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Killing, letting die and moral perception: a reply to Grant Gillett.

    abstract::A number of philosophers in recent times have employed arguments to show that there is no morally relevant difference between killing a patient and allowing that patient to die in those circumstances where the outcome is virtually identical and where death is preventable, at least for a significant time. From his per...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00169

    authors: Thornton J

    更新日期:1999-10-01 00:00:00

  • Slipping on slippery slope arguments.

    abstract::Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) are used in a wide range of philosophical debates, but are often dismissed as empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious. In particular, leading authors put forward a meta-SSA which points to instances of empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious SSAs and to the alleged exi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12727

    authors: Fumagalli R

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Incentivizing Patient Choices: The Ethics of Inclusive Shared Savings.

    abstract::Is it ethical to pay patients for selecting cheaper medical treatments? The healthcare system in the United States is notoriously profligate, at least in part because when insurers foot the bill, patients have little incentive to avoid wasteful treatments. One familiar means for dealing with this problem is for insure...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12267

    authors: Chappell RY

    更新日期:2016-10-01 00:00:00

  • Beyond accountability for reasonableness.

    abstract::This paper is a critique of Norman Daniels' and James Sabin's 'Accountability for Reasonableness' framework for making priority-setting decisions in health care in the face of widespread disagreement about values. Accountability for Reasonableness has been rapidly gaining worldwide acceptance, arguably to the point of...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00605.x

    authors: Friedman A

    更新日期:2008-02-01 00:00:00

  • Harming the non-conscious.

    abstract::Peter Singer has argued that nothing done to a fetus before it acquires consciousness can harm it. At the same time, he concedes that a child can be harmed by something done to it when it was a non-conscious fetus. But this implies that the non-conscious fetus can be harmed. The mistake lies in thinking that, since ex...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00158

    authors: Persson I

    更新日期:1999-07-01 00:00:00

  • Hastening death and the boundaries of the self.

    abstract::When applying moral principles to concrete cases, we assume a background shared understanding of the boundaries of the persons to whom the principles apply. In most contexts, this assumption is unproblematic. However, in end-of-life contexts, when patients are receiving 'artificial' life-support, judgments about where...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00481.x

    authors: Jansen LA

    更新日期:2006-04-01 00:00:00

  • Suffering at the end of life.

    abstract::In the end-of-life context, alleviation of the suffering of a distressed patient is usually seen as a, if not the, central goal for the medical personnel treating her. Yet it has also been argued that suffering should be seen as a part of good dying. More precisely, it has been maintained that alleviating a dying pati...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12513

    authors: Varelius J

    更新日期:2019-01-01 00:00:00

  • Human cloning: category, dignity, and the role of bioethics.

    abstract::Human cloning has been simultaneously a running joke for massive worldwide publicity of fringe groups like the Raelians, and the core issue of an international movement at the United Nations in support of a treaty to ban the use of cloning techniques to produce a child (so called reproductive cloning). Yet, even thoug...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00365

    authors: Shuster E

    更新日期:2003-10-01 00:00:00

  • Looking backwards, looking forward: hopes for bioethics' next twenty-five years.

    abstract::I reflect on the past, present, and future of the field of bioethics. In so doing, I offer a very situated overview of where bioethics has been, where it now is, where it seems to be going, where I think we could do better, and where I dearly hope the field will be heading. I also propose three ways of re-orienting ou...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01866.x

    authors: Sherwin S

    更新日期:2011-02-01 00:00:00

  • The limits of intimate citizenship: reproduction of difference in Flemish-Ethiopian 'adoption cultures'.

    abstract::The concept of 'intimate citizenship' stresses the right of people to choose how they organize their personal lives and claim identities. Support and interest groups are seen as playing an important role in the pursuit of recognition for these intimate choices, by elaborating visible and positive cultures that invade ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01830.x

    authors: De Graeve K

    更新日期:2010-09-01 00:00:00

  • Hit but not down. The substance view in light of the criticism of Lovering and Simkulet.

    abstract::In his article 'The substance view: A critique', Rob Lovering argues that the substance view -according to which a human person comes into existence at the moment of conception - leads to such implausible implications that this view should be abandoned. I responded to his reductio arguments in 'A critique of Rob Lover...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12450

    authors: Friberg-Fernros H

    更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • Is gene therapy a form of eugenics?

    abstract::If, as I believe, gene therapy is in principle ethically sound except for its possible connection with eugenics then there are two obvious ways of giving a simple and straightforward answer to a question such as this. The first is to say "yes it is, and so what?" The second is to say "no it isn't so we shouldn't worry...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00283.x

    authors: Harris J

    更新日期:1993-04-01 00:00:00

  • Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy.

    abstract::The purpose of this paper is to describe the scientific background to the current ethical and legislative debates about the generation and use of human stem cells, and to give an overview of the ethical issues underlying these debates. The ethical issues discussed are 1) stem cells and the status of the embryo, 2) wom...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307

    authors: Holm S

    更新日期:2002-11-01 00:00:00