Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Empirical studies in Muslim communities on organ donation and blood transfusion show that Muslim counsellors play an important role in the decision process. Despite the emerging importance of online English Sunni fatwas, these fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion have hardly been studied, thus creating a gap in our knowledge of contemporary Islamic views on the subject. METHOD:We analysed 70 English Sunni e-fatwas and subjected them to an in-depth text analysis in order to reveal the key concepts in the Islamic ethical framework regarding organ donation and blood transfusion. RESULTS:All 70 fatwas allow for organ donation and blood transfusion. Autotransplantation is no problem at all if done for medical reasons. Allotransplantation, both from a living and a dead donor, appears to be possible though only in quite restricted ways. Xenotransplantation is less often mentioned but can be allowed in case of necessity. Transplantation in general is seen as an ongoing form of charity. Nearly half of the fatwas allowing blood transfusion do so without mentioning any restriction or problem whatsoever. The other half of the fatwas on transfusion contain the same conditional approval as found in the arguments pro organ transplantation. CONCLUSION:Our findings are very much in line with the international literature on the subject. We found two new elements: debates on the definition of the moment of death are hardly mentioned in the English Sunni fatwas and organ donation and blood transfusion are presented as an ongoing form of charity.
journal_name
Bioethicsjournal_title
Bioethicsauthors
Van den Branden S,Broeckaert Bdoi
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01782.xsubject
Has Abstractpub_date
2011-03-01 00:00:00pages
167-75issue
3eissn
0269-9702issn
1467-8519pii
BIOT1782journal_volume
25pub_type
杂志文章相关文献
BIOETHICS文献大全abstract::This paper considers what should be done about offers of organs for transplant that come with racist strings attached. Saving lives or improving their quality seem powerful reasons to accept the offer. Fairness, justice, and rejecting racism seem like powerful reasons against. This paper argues that conditional alloca...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00526.x
更新日期:2007-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::The assumption that people have a right to have children is considered in relation to the question of whether society has an obligation to allocate resources to make clinical in vitro fertilization available, at least to married couples where the woman is infertile and the couple provides the ovum and sperm. The auth...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00010.x
更新日期:1987-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::It has been argued that there can be no person-regarding reasons for practising genetic therapy, since it affects identity and causes to exist an individual who would not otherwise have existed. And there can be no such reasons for causing somebody to exist because existing cannot be better for an individual than neve...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00298.x
更新日期:1995-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Anderson was a member of the writing group for the recent revision of Australia's national Code of Practice for the use of animals in scientific research. Here he outlines the major features of the Code. These deal with animal experimentation ethics committees, with levels of pain and distress in subjects, with stan...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1990.tb00065.x
更新日期:1990-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::In this article, we argue that a critical examination of epistemological and anthropological presuppositions might lead to a more fruitful use of theory in clinical-ethical practice. We differentiate between two views of conceptualizing ethics, referring to Charles Taylors' two epistemological models: 'monological' ve...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01912.x
更新日期:2011-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Ought we to improve our cognitive capacities beyond the normal human range? It might be a good idea to level out differences between peoples cognitive capacities; and some people's reaching beyond normal capacities may have some good side-effects on society at large (but also bad side-effects, of course). But is there...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00721.x
更新日期:2009-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::In 2017 and 2019, two research teams claimed 'proof of principle' for artificial womb technology (AWT). AWT has long been a subject of speculation in bioethical literature, with broad consensus that it is a welcome development. Despite this, little attention is afforded to more immediate ethical problems in the develo...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12701
更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Scientists seeking to conduct research with human subjects must first submit their proposals to research ethics committees (Institutional Review Boards [IRBs], in the United States). Some of these studies pose risks to "bystanders," i.e., people who may be affected by the research but who are not enrolled as study sub...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12823
更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Acts of helping others are often based on mixed motivations. Based on this claim, it has been argued that the use of a financial reward to incentivize organ donation is compatible with promoting altruism in organ donation. In its report Human Bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research, the Nuffield Council on Bioethic...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12078
更新日期:2015-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Incompetent patients need to have someone else make decisions on their behalf. According to the Substituted Judgment Standard the surrogate decision maker ought to make the decision that the patient would have made, had he or she been competent. Objections have been raised against this traditional construal of the sta...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01768.x
更新日期:2011-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::Much of the debate about the ethics of abortion has centered on whether the fetus is a person. In an attempt to sidestep this complex issue, I argue that, even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral. To arrive at this conclusion, I argue that giving a fetus fetal alcohol syndrome is immoral, and that if thi...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12533
更新日期:2019-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::CIOMS has been criticised for not adequately consulting stakeholders about its revised ethical guidelines regarding medical research. Political and logistical issues that arise in democratic processes and open exchange of information probably contributed to this exclusion. What might CIOMS have done to be more inclusi...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00395.x
更新日期:2004-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::Germline genome editing is often disapproved of at the international policy level because of its possible threats to human dignity. However, from a critical perspective the relationship between this emerging technology and human dignity is relatively understudied. We explore the main principles that are referred to wh...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12607
更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::It is widely assumed that it is ethical to conduct research with human subjects only if the research has social value. There are two standard arguments for this view. The allocation argument claims that public funds should not be devoted to research that lacks social value. The exploitation avoidance argument claims t...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12128
更新日期:2015-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::In controlled human infection (CHI) studies, investigators deliberately infect healthy individuals with pathogens in order to study mechanisms of disease or obtain preliminary efficacy data on investigational vaccines and medicines. CHI studies offer a fast and cost-effective way of generating new scientific insights,...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12794
更新日期:2020-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::Observers who note the increasing popularity of bioethics discussions often complain that the social sciences are poorly represented in discussions about things like abortion and stem-cell research. Critics say that bioethicists should be incorporating the methods and findings of social scientists, and should move tow...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00621.x
更新日期:2008-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::This paper contends that a research ethics approach to the regulation of health data research is unhelpful in the era of population-level research and big data because it results in a primary focus on consent (meta-, broad, dynamic and/or specific consent). Two recent guidelines - the 2016 WMA Declaration of Taipei on...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12551
更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::A number of philosophers in recent times have employed arguments to show that there is no morally relevant difference between killing a patient and allowing that patient to die in those circumstances where the outcome is virtually identical and where death is preventable, at least for a significant time. From his per...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00169
更新日期:1999-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) are used in a wide range of philosophical debates, but are often dismissed as empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious. In particular, leading authors put forward a meta-SSA which points to instances of empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious SSAs and to the alleged exi...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12727
更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Is it ethical to pay patients for selecting cheaper medical treatments? The healthcare system in the United States is notoriously profligate, at least in part because when insurers foot the bill, patients have little incentive to avoid wasteful treatments. One familiar means for dealing with this problem is for insure...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12267
更新日期:2016-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::This paper is a critique of Norman Daniels' and James Sabin's 'Accountability for Reasonableness' framework for making priority-setting decisions in health care in the face of widespread disagreement about values. Accountability for Reasonableness has been rapidly gaining worldwide acceptance, arguably to the point of...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00605.x
更新日期:2008-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::Peter Singer has argued that nothing done to a fetus before it acquires consciousness can harm it. At the same time, he concedes that a child can be harmed by something done to it when it was a non-conscious fetus. But this implies that the non-conscious fetus can be harmed. The mistake lies in thinking that, since ex...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00158
更新日期:1999-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::When applying moral principles to concrete cases, we assume a background shared understanding of the boundaries of the persons to whom the principles apply. In most contexts, this assumption is unproblematic. However, in end-of-life contexts, when patients are receiving 'artificial' life-support, judgments about where...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00481.x
更新日期:2006-04-01 00:00:00
abstract::In the end-of-life context, alleviation of the suffering of a distressed patient is usually seen as a, if not the, central goal for the medical personnel treating her. Yet it has also been argued that suffering should be seen as a part of good dying. More precisely, it has been maintained that alleviating a dying pati...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12513
更新日期:2019-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Human cloning has been simultaneously a running joke for massive worldwide publicity of fringe groups like the Raelians, and the core issue of an international movement at the United Nations in support of a treaty to ban the use of cloning techniques to produce a child (so called reproductive cloning). Yet, even thoug...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00365
更新日期:2003-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::I reflect on the past, present, and future of the field of bioethics. In so doing, I offer a very situated overview of where bioethics has been, where it now is, where it seems to be going, where I think we could do better, and where I dearly hope the field will be heading. I also propose three ways of re-orienting ou...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01866.x
更新日期:2011-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::The concept of 'intimate citizenship' stresses the right of people to choose how they organize their personal lives and claim identities. Support and interest groups are seen as playing an important role in the pursuit of recognition for these intimate choices, by elaborating visible and positive cultures that invade ...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01830.x
更新日期:2010-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::In his article 'The substance view: A critique', Rob Lovering argues that the substance view -according to which a human person comes into existence at the moment of conception - leads to such implausible implications that this view should be abandoned. I responded to his reductio arguments in 'A critique of Rob Lover...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/bioe.12450
更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::If, as I believe, gene therapy is in principle ethically sound except for its possible connection with eugenics then there are two obvious ways of giving a simple and straightforward answer to a question such as this. The first is to say "yes it is, and so what?" The second is to say "no it isn't so we shouldn't worry...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00283.x
更新日期:1993-04-01 00:00:00
abstract::The purpose of this paper is to describe the scientific background to the current ethical and legislative debates about the generation and use of human stem cells, and to give an overview of the ethical issues underlying these debates. The ethical issues discussed are 1) stem cells and the status of the embryo, 2) wom...
journal_title:Bioethics
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307
更新日期:2002-11-01 00:00:00