A new approach to regulating the use of animals in science.

Abstract:

:Anderson was a member of the writing group for the recent revision of Australia's national Code of Practice for the use of animals in scientific research. Here he outlines the major features of the Code. These deal with animal experimentation ethics committees, with levels of pain and distress in subjects, with standards of care, and with the delineation of responsibilities among researchers, institutions, ethics committees, and caretakers. Anderson also describes how the Code is updated, and discusses its legal status, scientists' concerns, and the Code's future.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

Anderson W

doi

10.1111/j.1467-8519.1990.tb00065.x

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

1990-01-01 00:00:00

pages

45-54

issue

1

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

journal_volume

4

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Is it time for bioethics to go empirical?

    abstract::Observers who note the increasing popularity of bioethics discussions often complain that the social sciences are poorly represented in discussions about things like abortion and stem-cell research. Critics say that bioethicists should be incorporating the methods and findings of social scientists, and should move tow...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00621.x

    authors: Herrera C

    更新日期:2008-03-01 00:00:00

  • Why a right to life rules out infanticide: A final reply to Räsänen.

    abstract::Joona Räsänen has argued that pro-life arguments against the permissibility of infanticide are not persuasive, and fail to show it to be immoral. We responded to Räsänen's arguments, concluding that his critique of pro-life arguments was misplaced. Räsänen has recently replied in 'Why pro-life arguments still are not ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12646

    authors: Blackshaw BP,Rodger D

    更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00

  • Moral qualms, future persons, and embryo research.

    abstract::Many people have moral qualms about embryo research, feeling that embryos must deserve some kind of protection, if not so much as is afforded to persons. This paper will show that these qualms serve to camouflage motives that are really prudential, at the cost of also obscuring the real ethical issues at play in the d...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00639.x

    authors: Shaw DM

    更新日期:2008-05-01 00:00:00

  • Equality and the treatment-enhancement distinction.

    abstract::In From Chance to Choice, Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels and Daniel Wikler propose a new way of defending the moral significance of the distinction between genetic treatments and enhancements. They develop what they call a 'normal function model' of equality of opportunity and argue that it offers a 'limite...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01750.x

    authors: Holtug N

    更新日期:2011-03-01 00:00:00

  • Racist organ donors and saving lives.

    abstract::This paper considers what should be done about offers of organs for transplant that come with racist strings attached. Saving lives or improving their quality seem powerful reasons to accept the offer. Fairness, justice, and rejecting racism seem like powerful reasons against. This paper argues that conditional alloca...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00526.x

    authors: Wilkinson TM

    更新日期:2007-02-01 00:00:00

  • Hit but not down. The substance view in light of the criticism of Lovering and Simkulet.

    abstract::In his article 'The substance view: A critique', Rob Lovering argues that the substance view -according to which a human person comes into existence at the moment of conception - leads to such implausible implications that this view should be abandoned. I responded to his reductio arguments in 'A critique of Rob Lover...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12450

    authors: Friberg-Fernros H

    更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • Reciprocity-based reasons for benefiting research participants: most fail, the most plausible is problematic.

    abstract::A common reason for giving research participants post-trial access (PTA) to the trial intervention appeals to reciprocity, the principle, stated most generally, that if one person benefits a second, the second should reciprocate: benefit the first in return. Many authors consider it obvious that reciprocity supports P...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12039

    authors: Sofaer N

    更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00

  • Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement.

    abstract::Several recent articles have weighed in on the question of whether moral philosophers can be counted as moral experts. One argument denying this has been rejected by both sides of the debate. According to this argument, the extent of disagreement in modern moral philosophy prevents moral philosophers from being classi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12173

    authors: Cross B

    更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00

  • Regret, shame, and denials of women's voluntary sterilization.

    abstract::Women face extraordinary difficulty in seeking sterilization as physicians routinely deny them the procedure. Physicians defend such denials by citing the possibility of future regret, a well-studied phenomenon in women's sterilization literature. Regret is, however, a problematic emotion upon which to deny reproducti...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12431

    authors: Lalonde D

    更新日期:2018-06-01 00:00:00

  • Wrongs, preferences, and the selection of children: a critique of Rebecca Bennett's argument against the principle of procreative beneficence.

    abstract::Rebecca Bennett, in a recent paper dismissing Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence, advances both a negative and a positive thesis. The negative thesis holds that the principle's theoretical foundation - the notion of impersonal harm or non-person-affecting wrong - is indefensible. Therefore, there ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x

    authors: Herissone-Kelly P

    更新日期:2012-10-01 00:00:00

  • Defining core health services: the New Zealand experience.

    abstract::The New Zealand health service has been extensively changed over the past four years, with the introduction of four new Regional Health Authorities, required to purchase services on behalf of the Government from a range of providers. In order to ensure fairness across the four regions a Core Services Committee has bee...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00359.x

    authors: Campbell AV

    更新日期:1995-07-01 00:00:00

  • The injustice of fat stigma.

    abstract::Fatness stigma is pervasive. Being fat is widely regarded a bad thing, and fat persons suffer numerous social and material disadvantages in virtue of their weight being regarded that way. Despite the seriousness of this problem, it has received relatively little attention from analytic philosophers. In this paper, I s...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12560

    authors: Nath R

    更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00

  • Toward a gender-sensitive assisted reproduction policy.

    abstract::The recent case of the UK woman who lost her legal struggle to be impregnated with her own frozen embryos, raises critical issues about the meaning of reproductive autonomy and the scope of regulatory practices. I revisit this case within the context of contemporary debate about the moral and legal dimensions of assis...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00676.x

    authors: Donchin A

    更新日期:2009-01-01 00:00:00

  • Prescribing Posttraumatic Growth.

    abstract::This article introduces questions in psychiatric ethics regarding the substantial field of qualitative and quantitative research into 'posttraumatic growth', which investigates how, after devastating experiences, individuals can come to feel that they have developed warmer relationships, increased spirituality, or a c...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12164

    authors: Harbin A

    更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Administrative gatekeeping - a third way between unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing.

    abstract::The inevitable need for rationing of healthcare has apparently presented the medical profession with the dilemma of choosing the lesser of two evils. Physicians appear to be obliged to adopt either an implausible version of traditional professional ethics or an equally problematic ethics of bedside rationing. The form...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00652.x

    authors: Lauridsen S

    更新日期:2009-06-01 00:00:00

  • Adjusting the focus: A public health ethics approach to data research.

    abstract::This paper contends that a research ethics approach to the regulation of health data research is unhelpful in the era of population-level research and big data because it results in a primary focus on consent (meta-, broad, dynamic and/or specific consent). Two recent guidelines - the 2016 WMA Declaration of Taipei on...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12551

    authors: Ballantyne A

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Conflicting demands on a modern healthcare service: Can Rawlsian justice provide a guiding philosophy for the NHS and other socialized health services?

    abstract::We explore whether a Rawlsian approach might provide a guiding philosophy for the development of a healthcare system, in particular with regard to resolving tensions between different groups within it. We argue that an approach developed from some of Rawls' principles - using his 'veil of ignorance' and both the 'diff...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12568

    authors: Fritz Z,Cox C

    更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00

  • Suffering at the end of life.

    abstract::In the end-of-life context, alleviation of the suffering of a distressed patient is usually seen as a, if not the, central goal for the medical personnel treating her. Yet it has also been argued that suffering should be seen as a part of good dying. More precisely, it has been maintained that alleviating a dying pati...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12513

    authors: Varelius J

    更新日期:2019-01-01 00:00:00

  • Are patients' decisions to refuse treatment binding on health care professionals?

    abstract::When patients refuse to receive medical treatment, the consequences of honouring their decisions can be tragic. This is no less true of patients who autonomously decide to refuse treatment. I distinguish three possible implications of these autonomous decisions. According to the Permissibility Claim, such a decision i...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00436.x

    authors: Murphy P

    更新日期:2005-06-01 00:00:00

  • Supporting irrational suicide.

    abstract::In this essay, we present three case studies which suggest that sometimes we are better off supporting a so-called irrational suicide, and that emotional or psychological distress--even if medically controllable--might justify a suicide. We underscore how complicated these decisions are and how murky a physician's mor...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00300

    authors: Hardcastle VG,Stewart RW

    更新日期:2002-09-01 00:00:00

  • The ongoing charity of organ donation. Contemporary English Sunni fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Empirical studies in Muslim communities on organ donation and blood transfusion show that Muslim counsellors play an important role in the decision process. Despite the emerging importance of online English Sunni fatwas, these fatwas on organ donation and blood transfusion have hardly been studied, thus crea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01782.x

    authors: Van den Branden S,Broeckaert B

    更新日期:2011-03-01 00:00:00

  • Our brains are not us.

    abstract::Many neuroscientists have claimed that our minds are just a function of and thus reducible to our brains. I challenge neuroreductionism by arguing that the mind emerges from and is shaped by interaction among the brain, body, and environment. The mind is not located in the brain but is distributed among these three en...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01727.x

    authors: Glannon W

    更新日期:2009-07-01 00:00:00

  • Obligatory precautions against infection.

    abstract::If we have a duty not to infect others, how far does it go? This question is often discussed with respect to HIV transmission, but reflection on other diseases like influenza raises a number of interesting theoretical issues. I argue that a duty to avoid infection not only yields requirements for persons who know they...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00446.x

    authors: Verweij M

    更新日期:2005-08-01 00:00:00

  • Presuming patient autonomy in the face of therapeutic misconception.

    abstract::Therapeutic misconception involves the failure of subjects either to understand or to incorporate into their own expectations the distinctions in nature and purpose of personally responsive therapeutic care, and the generic relationship between subject and investigator which is constrained by research protocols. Resea...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12384

    authors: McConville P

    更新日期:2017-11-01 00:00:00

  • Symbiotic empirical ethics: a practical methodology.

    abstract::Like any discipline, bioethics is a developing field of academic inquiry; and recent trends in scholarship have been towards more engagement with empirical research. This 'empirical turn' has provoked extensive debate over how such 'descriptive' research carried out in the social sciences contributes to the distinctiv...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01843.x

    authors: Frith L

    更新日期:2012-05-01 00:00:00

  • For your interest? The ethical acceptability of using non-invasive prenatal testing to test 'purely for information'.

    abstract::Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is an emerging form of prenatal genetic testing that provides information about the genetic constitution of a foetus without the risk of pregnancy loss as a direct result of the test procedure. As with other prenatal tests, information from NIPT can help to make a decision about te...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12125

    authors: Deans Z,Clarke AJ,Newson AJ

    更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00

  • Vaccine mandates, value pluralism, and policy diversity.

    abstract::Political communities across the world have recently sought to tackle rising rates of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, by implementing coercive immunization programs, or by making existing immunization programs more coercive. Many academics and advocates of public health have applauded these policy developments, and the...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12645

    authors: Navin MC,Attwell K

    更新日期:2019-11-01 00:00:00

  • Narrative ARTifice and women's agency.

    abstract::The choice to pursue fertility treatments is a complex one. In this paper I explore the issues of choice, agency, and gender as they relate to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). I argue that narrative approaches to bioethics such as those by Arthur Frank and Hilde Lindemann Nelson clarify judgments about auton...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00428.x

    authors: Kalbian AH

    更新日期:2005-04-01 00:00:00

  • Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument.

    abstract::Much of the debate about the ethics of abortion has centered on whether the fetus is a person. In an attempt to sidestep this complex issue, I argue that, even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral. To arrive at this conclusion, I argue that giving a fetus fetal alcohol syndrome is immoral, and that if thi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12533

    authors: Hendricks P

    更新日期:2019-02-01 00:00:00

  • No ethical bypass of moral status in stem cell research.

    abstract::Recent advances in reprogramming technology do not bypass the ethical challenge of embryo sacrifice. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPS) research has been and almost certainly will continue to be conducted within the context of embryo sacrifice. If human embryos have moral status as human beings, then participation in...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01891.x

    authors: Brown M

    更新日期:2013-01-01 00:00:00