Hastening death and the boundaries of the self.

Abstract:

:When applying moral principles to concrete cases, we assume a background shared understanding of the boundaries of the persons to whom the principles apply. In most contexts, this assumption is unproblematic. However, in end-of-life contexts, when patients are receiving 'artificial' life-support, judgments about where a person's self begins and ends can become controversial. To illustrate this possibility, this paper presents a case in which a decision must be made whether to deactivate a patient's pacemaker as a means to hasten his death. After discussing some common moral principles that are often applied to resolve ethical problems at the end of life and after explaining why they are of no help here, the paper argues that the correct analysis of this case, and of cases of this sort, turns on considerations that relate to the constitution of the self. These considerations, the paper further argues, sometimes resist resolution. The constitution of the self is fixed in large measure by our concepts and social conventions, and these do not always provide determinate grounds for delimiting the boundaries of the self.

journal_name

Bioethics

journal_title

Bioethics

authors

Jansen LA

doi

10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00481.x

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2006-04-01 00:00:00

pages

105-11

issue

2

eissn

0269-9702

issn

1467-8519

journal_volume

20

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Equality and the treatment-enhancement distinction.

    abstract::In From Chance to Choice, Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels and Daniel Wikler propose a new way of defending the moral significance of the distinction between genetic treatments and enhancements. They develop what they call a 'normal function model' of equality of opportunity and argue that it offers a 'limite...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01750.x

    authors: Holtug N

    更新日期:2011-03-01 00:00:00

  • Monological versus dialogical consciousness: two epistemological views on the use of theory in clinical ethical practice.

    abstract::In this article, we argue that a critical examination of epistemological and anthropological presuppositions might lead to a more fruitful use of theory in clinical-ethical practice. We differentiate between two views of conceptualizing ethics, referring to Charles Taylors' two epistemological models: 'monological' ve...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01912.x

    authors: Ohnsorge K,Widdershoven G

    更新日期:2011-09-01 00:00:00

  • Regret, shame, and denials of women's voluntary sterilization.

    abstract::Women face extraordinary difficulty in seeking sterilization as physicians routinely deny them the procedure. Physicians defend such denials by citing the possibility of future regret, a well-studied phenomenon in women's sterilization literature. Regret is, however, a problematic emotion upon which to deny reproducti...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12431

    authors: Lalonde D

    更新日期:2018-06-01 00:00:00

  • A pain in the fetus: toward ending confusion about fetal pain.

    abstract::Are fetuses, at any stage of their development, capable of feeling pain? In his paper, "Locating the Beginnings of Pain," Stuart Derbyshire argues that they are not. We argue that he reaches this conclusion by way of conceptual confusion, a misreading of the available scientific data and the inclusion of irrelevant da...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00212

    authors: Benatar D,Benatar M

    更新日期:2001-02-01 00:00:00

  • Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?

    abstract::In 2017 and 2019, two research teams claimed 'proof of principle' for artificial womb technology (AWT). AWT has long been a subject of speculation in bioethical literature, with broad consensus that it is a welcome development. Despite this, little attention is afforded to more immediate ethical problems in the develo...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12701

    authors: Romanis EC

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • A critical approach to the current understanding of Islamic scholars on using cadaver organs without prior permission.

    abstract::Chronic organ diseases and the increasing demand for organ transplantation have become an important health care problem within the last few decades. Campaigns and regulations to encourage people to donate organs after death have not met with much success. This article discusses the subject from an Islamic perspective....

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00254

    authors: Aksoy S

    更新日期:2001-10-01 00:00:00

  • Misplaced Paternalism and other Mistakes in the Debate over Kidney Sales.

    abstract::Erik Malmqvist defends the prohibition on kidney sales as a justifiable measure to protect individuals from harms they have not autonomously chosen. This appeal to 'group soft paternalism' requires that three conditions be met. It must be shown that some vendors will be harmed, that some will be subject to undue press...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12303

    authors: Semrau L

    更新日期:2017-03-01 00:00:00

  • Reciprocity-based reasons for benefiting research participants: most fail, the most plausible is problematic.

    abstract::A common reason for giving research participants post-trial access (PTA) to the trial intervention appeals to reciprocity, the principle, stated most generally, that if one person benefits a second, the second should reciprocate: benefit the first in return. Many authors consider it obvious that reciprocity supports P...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12039

    authors: Sofaer N

    更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00

  • Genetic therapy, identity and the person-regarding reasons.

    abstract::It has been argued that there can be no person-regarding reasons for practising genetic therapy, since it affects identity and causes to exist an individual who would not otherwise have existed. And there can be no such reasons for causing somebody to exist because existing cannot be better for an individual than neve...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00298.x

    authors: Persson I

    更新日期:1995-01-01 00:00:00

  • Competence and risk-relativity.

    abstract::In this paper I discuss the view that the appropriate concept of competence is a decision-relative one: that a person may be competent to make one decision but not another. The argument that I present is that neither of the two competing theories supporting the decision-relative approach, internalism and externalism, ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00218

    authors: Buller T

    更新日期:2001-04-01 00:00:00

  • Consequentialism, reasons, value and justice.

    abstract::Over the past 10 years, John Harris has made important contributions to thinking about distributive justice in health care. In his latest work, Harris controversially argues that clinicians should stop prioritising patients according to prognosis. He argues that the good or benefit of health care is providing each ind...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00109

    authors: Savulescu J

    更新日期:1998-07-01 00:00:00

  • Who gets the gametes? An argument for a points system for fertility patients.

    abstract::This paper argues that the convention of allocating donated gametes on a 'first come, first served' basis should be replaced with an allocation system that takes into account more morally relevant criteria than waiting time. This conclusion was developed using an empirical bioethics methodology, which involved a study...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12411

    authors: Jenkins S,Ives J,Avery S,Draper H

    更新日期:2018-01-01 00:00:00

  • Our brains are not us.

    abstract::Many neuroscientists have claimed that our minds are just a function of and thus reducible to our brains. I challenge neuroreductionism by arguing that the mind emerges from and is shaped by interaction among the brain, body, and environment. The mind is not located in the brain but is distributed among these three en...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01727.x

    authors: Glannon W

    更新日期:2009-07-01 00:00:00

  • Slipping on slippery slope arguments.

    abstract::Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) are used in a wide range of philosophical debates, but are often dismissed as empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious. In particular, leading authors put forward a meta-SSA which points to instances of empirically ill-founded and logically fallacious SSAs and to the alleged exi...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12727

    authors: Fumagalli R

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Genetic research and consent: On the crossroads of human and data research.

    abstract::This paper explores the legal and ethical concept of human subject research in order to determine whether genetic research with already available biosamples and data falls within this concept. Although the ethical concept seems to have evolved to recognize research based on data as human research, from a supranational...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12475

    authors: Pormeister K

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Report from China social and ethical influence of some pain: the causes of lower incidences of some pain syndromes in Chinese people.

    abstract::Western studies of national differences in pain have indicated that pain tolerance is higher in white than in Asian patients. The authors' clinical experiences in China seem to contradict this conclusion, and they have investigated the incidence or prevalence of some pain syndromes and have made comparisons with West...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1989.tb00343.x

    authors: Hu YH,Fang NY

    更新日期:1989-07-01 00:00:00

  • What constitutes fair shared decision-making in global health research collaborations?

    abstract::Funders (located primarily in high-income countries) and high-income country researchers have historically dominated decision-making within global health research collaborations: from setting agendas and research design to determining how data are collected and analysed and what happens with findings and outputs. The ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12793

    authors: Pratt B

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Compensation for cures: Why we should pay a premium for participation in 'challenge studies'.

    abstract::Antibiotic resistance is one of the most pressing public health problems humanity faces. Research into new classes of antibiotics and new kinds of treatments - including risky experimental treatments such as phage therapy and vaccines - is an important part of improving our ability to treat infectious diseases. In ord...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12596

    authors: Anomaly J,Savulescu J

    更新日期:2019-09-01 00:00:00

  • Humanity and Justice in Global Health: Problems with Venkatapuram's Justification of the Global Health Duty.

    abstract::One of the most ambitious and sophisticated recent approaches to provide a theory of global health justice is Sridhar Venkatapuram's recent work. In this commentary, we first outline the core idea of Venkatapuram's approach to global health justice. We then argue that one of the most important elements of the account,...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/bioe.12224

    authors: Kollar E,Laukötter S,Buyx A

    更新日期:2016-01-01 00:00:00

  • Wrongs, preferences, and the selection of children: a critique of Rebecca Bennett's argument against the principle of procreative beneficence.

    abstract::Rebecca Bennett, in a recent paper dismissing Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence, advances both a negative and a positive thesis. The negative thesis holds that the principle's theoretical foundation - the notion of impersonal harm or non-person-affecting wrong - is indefensible. Therefore, there ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01870.x

    authors: Herissone-Kelly P

    更新日期:2012-10-01 00:00:00

  • Symbiotic empirical ethics: a practical methodology.

    abstract::Like any discipline, bioethics is a developing field of academic inquiry; and recent trends in scholarship have been towards more engagement with empirical research. This 'empirical turn' has provoked extensive debate over how such 'descriptive' research carried out in the social sciences contributes to the distinctiv...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01843.x

    authors: Frith L

    更新日期:2012-05-01 00:00:00

  • Gender and ethics committees: where's the 'different voice'?

    abstract::Prominent international and national ethics commissions such as the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee rarely achieve anything remotely resembling gender equality, although local research and ethics committees are somewhat more egalitarian. Under-representation of women is particularly troubling when the subject...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00485.x

    authors: Dickenson D

    更新日期:2006-06-01 00:00:00

  • Trading with the waiting-list: the justice of living donor list exchange.

    abstract::In a Living Donor List Exchange program, the donor makes his kidney available for allocation to patients on the postmortal waiting-list and receives in exchange a postmortal kidney, usually an O-kidney, to be given to the recipient he favours. The program can be a solution for a candidate donor who is unable to donate...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00684.x

    authors: den Hartogh G

    更新日期:2010-05-01 00:00:00

  • Administrative gatekeeping - a third way between unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing.

    abstract::The inevitable need for rationing of healthcare has apparently presented the medical profession with the dilemma of choosing the lesser of two evils. Physicians appear to be obliged to adopt either an implausible version of traditional professional ethics or an equally problematic ethics of bedside rationing. The form...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00652.x

    authors: Lauridsen S

    更新日期:2009-06-01 00:00:00

  • Moral philosophers are moral experts! A reply to David Archard.

    abstract::In his article 'Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts' David Archard attempts to show that his argument from common-sense morality is more convincing than other competing arguments in the debate. I examine his main line of argumentation and eventually refute his main argument in my reply. ...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02004.x

    authors: Gordon JS

    更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00

  • Enhancing evolution and enhancing evolution.

    abstract::It has been claimed in several places that the new genetic technologies allow humanity to achieve in a generation or two what might take natural selection hundreds of millennia in respect of the elimination of certain diseases and an increase in traits such as intelligence. More radically, it has been suggested that t...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.01703.x

    authors: Brassington I

    更新日期:2010-10-01 00:00:00

  • Frozen embryos, genetic information and reproductive rights.

    abstract::Recent ethical and legal challenges have arisen concerning the rights of individuals over their IVF embryos, leading to questions about how, when the wishes of parents regarding their embryos conflict, such situations ought to be resolved. A notion commonly invoked in relation to frozen embryo disputes is that of repr...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00581.x

    authors: Chan S,Quigley M

    更新日期:2007-10-01 00:00:00

  • Artificial reproductive technologies: the Israeli scene.

    abstract::In 1991, the Israeli Minister of Health and the Minister of Justice jointly nominated a commission to consider the subject of IVF in all its aspects. Heyd summarizes the commission's recommendations on the following issues as put forth in an interim report: access to fertility treatments, financing of treatment, couns...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00293.x

    authors: Heyd D

    更新日期:1993-04-01 00:00:00

  • Human cloning: category, dignity, and the role of bioethics.

    abstract::Human cloning has been simultaneously a running joke for massive worldwide publicity of fringe groups like the Raelians, and the core issue of an international movement at the United Nations in support of a treaty to ban the use of cloning techniques to produce a child (so called reproductive cloning). Yet, even thoug...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00365

    authors: Shuster E

    更新日期:2003-10-01 00:00:00

  • Mass-vaccination programmes and the value of respect for autonomy.

    abstract::Respect for autonomy is problematic in relation to public health programmes such as vaccination, as the success of such programmes depends on widespread compliance. European countries have different policies for dealing with objectors to vaccination programmes. In some countries compliance is compulsory, while in othe...

    journal_title:Bioethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00630.x

    authors: Asveld L

    更新日期:2008-06-01 00:00:00