当前位置： SCI文献检索 > BMC Medical Research Methodology期刊下所有文献 > Evaluating treatments in health care: the instability of a one-legged stool.

Evaluating treatments in health care: the instability of a one-legged stool.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Both scientists and the public routinely refer to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as being the 'gold standard' of scientific evidence. Although there is no question that placebo-controlled RCTs play a significant role in the evaluation of new pharmaceutical treatments, especially when it is important to rule out placebo effects, they have many inherent limitations which constrain their ability to inform medical decision making. The purpose of this paper is to raise questions about over-reliance on RCTs and to point out an additional perspective for evaluating healthcare evidence, as embodied in the Hill criteria. The arguments presented here are generally relevant to all areas of health care, though mental health applications provide the primary context for this essay. DISCUSSION:This article first traces the history of RCTs, and then evaluates five of their major limitations: they often lack external validity, they have the potential for increasing health risk in the general population, they are no less likely to overestimate treatment effects than many other methods, they make a relatively weak contribution to clinical practice, and they are excessively expensive (leading to several additional vulnerabilities in the quality of evidence produced). Next, the nine Hill criteria are presented and discussed as a richer approach to the evaluation of health care treatments. Reliance on these multi-faceted criteria requires more analytical thinking than simply examining RCT data, but will also enhance confidence in the evaluation of novel treatments. SUMMARY:Excessive reliance on RCTs tends to stifle funding of other types of research, and publication of other forms of evidence. We call upon our research and clinical colleagues to consider additional methods of evaluating data, such as the Hill criteria. Over-reliance on RCTs is similar to resting all of health care evidence on a one-legged stool.

journal_name

BMC Med Res Methodol

journal_title

BMC medical research methodology

authors

Kaplan BJ,Giesbrecht G,Shannon S,McLeod K

doi

10.1186/1471-2288-11-65

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2011-05-11 00:00:00

pages

issn

1471-2288

pii

1471-2288-11-65

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Evaluating treatments in health care: the instability of a one-legged stool.