当前位置： SCI文献检索 > MEDICAL PHYSICS期刊下所有文献 > Use of local noise power spectrum and wavelet analysis in quantitative image quality assurance for EPIDs.

Use of local noise power spectrum and wavelet analysis in quantitative image quality assurance for EPIDs.

Abstract：

PURPOSE:To investigate the use of local noise power spectrum (NPS) to characterize image noise and wavelet analysis to isolate defective pixels and inter-subpanel flat-fielding artifacts for quantitative quality assurance (QA) of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). METHODS:A total of 93 image sets including custom-made bar-pattern images and open exposure images were collected from four iViewGT a-Si EPID systems over three years. Global quantitative metrics such as modulation transform function (MTF), NPS, and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) were computed for each image set. Local NPS was also calculated for individual subpanels by sampling region of interests within each subpanel of the EPID. The 1D NPS, obtained by radially averaging the 2D NPS, was fitted to a power-law function. The r-square value of the linear regression analysis was used as a singular metric to characterize the noise properties of individual subpanels of the EPID. The sensitivity of the local NPS was first compared with the global quantitative metrics using historical image sets. It was then compared with two commonly used commercial QA systems with images collected after applying two different EPID calibration methods (single-level gain and multilevel gain). To detect isolated defective pixels and inter-subpanel flat-fielding artifacts, Haar wavelet transform was applied on the images. RESULTS:Global quantitative metrics including MTF, NPS, and DQE showed little change over the period of data collection. On the contrary, a strong correlation between the local NPS (r-square values) and the variation of the EPID noise condition was observed. The local NPS analysis indicated image quality improvement with the r-square values increased from 0.80 ± 0.03 (before calibration) to 0.85 ± 0.03 (after single-level gain calibration) and to 0.96 ± 0.03 (after multilevel gain calibration), while the commercial QA systems failed to distinguish the image quality improvement between the two calibration methods. With wavelet analysis, defective pixels and inter-subpanel flat-fielding artifacts were clearly identified as spikes after thresholding the inversely transformed images. CONCLUSIONS:The proposed local NPS (r-square values) showed superior sensitivity to the noise level variations of individual subpanels compared with global quantitative metrics such as MTF, NPS, and DQE. Wavelet analysis was effective in detecting isolated defective pixels and inter-subpanel flat-fielding artifacts. The proposed methods are promising for the early detection of imaging artifacts of EPIDs.

journal_name

Med Phys

journal_title

Medical physics

authors

Lee S,Yan G,Bassett P,Gopal A,Samant S

doi

10.1118/1.4959541

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2016-09-01 00:00:00

pages

4996

issue

eissn

0094-2405

issn

2473-4209

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Use of local noise power spectrum and wavelet analysis in quantitative image quality assurance for EPIDs.