Abstract:
:Aim: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer among women. Because guidelines on screening for breast cancer for certain ages are controversial, many experts advocate the use of shared decision making (SDM) using validated decision aids (DAs). Recent studies have concluded that DAs are beneficial; however, the results have great heterogeneity. Therefore, further studies are needed to improve understanding of these tools. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of using web-based DAs in women aged 50 years and below facing the decision to be screened for breast cancer in comparison with usual care. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up to February 2020 for studies assessing web-based DAs for women making a breast cancer screening decision and reported quality of decision-making outcomes. Using a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model, meta-analyses were conducted pooling results using mean differences (MD), standardized mean differences (SMD) and relative risks (RR). Results: Of 1097 unique citations, three randomized controlled trials and two before-after studies met the study eligibility criteria. Compared with usual care, web-based DAs increased knowledge (SMD = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57-0.80; p < 0.00001), reduced decision conflict and increased the proportion of women who made an informed choice (RR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.38 to 2.50; p < 0.0001), but did not change the intention of women deciding to be screened or affect decision regret. Conclusion: This analysis showed the positive effect of web-based DAs on patient-centered outcomes in breast cancer screening. In the future, more internet devices and free or larger discount WI-FI should be established to ensure more women can benefit from this effective tool.
journal_name
J Comp Eff Resjournal_title
Journal of comparative effectiveness researchauthors
Yu L,Li P,Yang S,Guo P,Zhang X,Liu N,Wang J,Zhang Wdoi
10.2217/cer-2020-0052subject
Has Abstractpub_date
2020-10-01 00:00:00pages
985-1002issue
14eissn
2042-6305issn
2042-6313journal_volume
9pub_type
杂志文章abstract::The 11 big health data networks participating in the AcademyHealth Electronic Data Methods Forum represent cutting-edge efforts to harness the power of big health data for research and quality improvement. This paper is a comparative case study based on site visits conducted with a subset of these large infrastructure...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.14.72
更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:The importance of adjusting for cross-study heterogeneity when conducting network meta-analyses (NMAs) was demonstrated using a case study of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS:Bayesian NMAs were conducted for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 response. Several covariates were c...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0065
更新日期:2018-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Studies on multiple sclerosis in Saudi Arabia remain scant, particularly studies on the psychological aspects. This study measures severities of depression, anxiety and stress, and compares them to the used disease-modifying treatment. MATERIALS & METHODS:Cross-sectional study using a phone questionnaire targeting...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0087
更新日期:2017-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Rationale, aim & objective: The goal of this study was to examine the health and economic impacts related to increased utilization of the Duke Smoking Cessation Program resulting from the addition of two relatively new referral methods - Best Practice Advisory and Population Outreach. Materials & methods: In a compani...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0005
更新日期:2020-08-01 00:00:00
abstract::Concerted efforts are underway to improve healthcare decision-making through patient-centered outcomes research. These efforts are supported by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund, which was established within the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This article focuses on describing national dat...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.14.54
更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIMS:The potential of dedicated Breast-CT is evaluated by simulating its impact onto the performance of the German breast cancer screening program. Attendance rates, cancer detection and economic implications are quantified. METHODS:Based on a prospective health technology assessment approach, we simulated screening i...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.15.42
更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Laboratory test (lab) results may be useful to detect incident diabetes in electronic health record and claims-based studies. RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODS:Using the Mini-Sentinel distributed database, we assessed the value of lab results added to diagnosis codes and dispensing claims to identify incident diabetes. R...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0033
更新日期:2017-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Choice-based conjoint (CBC) is used to understand how individuals develop preferences for decision alternatives. When decision alternatives can be described in terms of attributes, researchers want to determine the value respondents attach to various attribute levels. Popular in psychology, marketing, economics and ot...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0115
更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Translation of medical evidence into practice has not kept pace with the growth of medical technology and knowledge. We present three case studies--statins, drug eluting stents and bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer--to propose a framework for describing five factors that may influence the rate of adoption....
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.13.39
更新日期:2013-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Explore perspectives of adolescent and young adult (AYA) and parent stakeholders regarding their engagement in comparative effectiveness research (CER) evaluating cholesterol screening and treatment strategies for 17-21 year olds. METHODS:All nine AYAs and parent stakeholders participating in a 20-member panel of ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0025
更新日期:2016-08-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To provide an overview of thresholds for incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) representing willingness-to-pay (WTP) across multiple countries and insights into exemptions pertaining to the ICER (e.g., cancer). To compare ICER thresholds to individual country's estimated ability-to-pay. MATERIALS & METHODS...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.15.38
更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: Indirect treatment comparisons are used when no direct comparison is available. Comparison networks should satisfy the transitivity assumption, that is, equal likelihood of treatment assignment for a given patient based on comparability of studies. Materials & methods: Seven criteria were evaluated across 18 rand...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0064
更新日期:2019-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: To compare efficacy between total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for upper-third gastric cancer. Materials & methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched to select suitable researches. Stata was used for meta-analysis including 5-year overall survival rate, recurrence rate, complicat...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,meta分析
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0016
更新日期:2019-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To identify ongoing practices and opportunities for improving national comparative effectiveness research (CER) translation through dissemination and implementation (D&I) via NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institutions. MATERIALS & METHODS:Key informant interviews were conducted with 18...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.13.10
更新日期:2013-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Comparative effectiveness research (CER) calls for substantial changes in the way clinical research is conducted, interpreted and practically applied in the USA, in order to produce useful clinical evidence. Departing from classic efficacy and effectiveness research, the evolving CER paradigm requires structural and s...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.2217/CER.12.23
更新日期:2012-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::The intense competition that accompanied the growth of internet-based companies ushered in the era of 'big data' characterized by major innovations in processing of very large amounts of data and the application of advanced analytics including data mining and machine learning. Healthcare is on the cusp of its own era ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.14.2
更新日期:2014-03-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Many hepatitis C virus regimens are unlikely to be compared head to head. In more difficult to treat populations where there is no standard of care, trials are single arm. We describe a flexible meta-analysis platform in this setting. METHODS:Our meta-analysis is literature based. We illustrate our methodology and...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,meta分析,评审
doi:10.2217/cer.14.69
更新日期:2015-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::AIMS: Stakeholder engagement is fundamental to comparative effectiveness research (CER), but lacks consistent terminology. This paper aims to define stakeholder engagement and present a conceptual model for involving stakeholders in CER. MATERIALS #ENTITYSTARTX00026; METHODS: The definitions and model were developed f...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.12.7
更新日期:2012-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: To evaluate the patterns of cancer patients-assessed quality of outpatient care in the USA. Materials & methods: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey datasets for the years 2011, 2013, 2015 and 2017 were accessed and adult participants with a history of cancer diagnosis were reviewed. Participants' assessments of dif...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0124
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To estimate healthcare utilization and costs in amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. PATIENTS & METHODS:AL amyloidosis patients were identified in 2007-2015 claims databases if they had ≥1 inpatient/≥2 outpatient claims consistent with AL amyloidosis and received ≥1 AL-specific treatment. Descriptive statistics w...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0100
更新日期:2018-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::There is increasing attention in the US healthcare system on the delivery of high-quality care, an issue central to oncology. In the report 'Crossing the Quality Chasm', the Institute of Medicine identified six aims for improving healthcare quality: safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient and equitable. T...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2015-0021
更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Reducing the fluctuation of blood pressure has recently been recognized as a potential target for improving management of hypertension to prevent cardiovascular events, particularly for strokes. Some randomized controlled trials demonstrated that amlodipine can effectively reduce blood pressure as a well-establishe...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0063
更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Palliative cancer patients often require clinic or hospital follow-up after any treatment intervention they may have received. This is typically done in person at either a hospital or a clinic. In these advanced cancer patients, this may be burdensome and result in attrition. Telephone follow-up is becoming ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.2217/cer.12.63
更新日期:2012-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIMS:To develop principles for planning and conducting comparative effectiveness research (CER). METHODS:Beginning with a modified existing list of health technology assessment principles, we developed a set of CER principles using literature review, engagement of multiple experts and broad stakeholder feedback. RESU...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.12.41
更新日期:2012-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:GNE myopathy, a rare, severe, progressive myopathy, presents with lower extremity distal muscle weakness. The GNE myopathy functional activity scale (GNEM-FAS) evaluates the impact of GNE myopathy on functioning in adults. This paper presents the psychometric validation of the GNEM-FAS. PATIENTS & METHODS:Validati...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0062
更新日期:2018-04-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: Dedicated brain imaging is advocated by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for newly diagnosed non-small-cell cancer (NSCLC) patients beyond stage I. The current study assessed the performance characteristics of this recommendation. Methods: Through accessing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and E...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0148
更新日期:2019-06-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Quantify hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) costs in German patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). METHODS:The primary outcome was direct and indirect costs in patients with ALL/DLBCL/FL who received HSCT between 2010 and 20...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0100
更新日期:2019-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: The systematic review assessed the effect of mindfulness-based interventions on the quality of life among women with breast cancer. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched for studies published. Our review assessed the effect of mindfulness-based interventions ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0053
更新日期:2019-08-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To measure the private and social benefits of donor insemination (DI). METHODS:An empirical model investigates the general public and DI clients' willingness to pay (WTP) for DI, and the willingness of potential donors to become altruistic or paid sperm donors. RESULTS:The general public and DI clients value DI a...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0066
更新日期:2017-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Clinical trial designs often fail to deliver data that jointly satisfy evolving demands of both regulatory and reimbursement authorities. We propose a new multi-tiered trial design to integrate efficacy and effectiveness, and address the evolving needs of authorities. The mixed randomized trial allocates patients firs...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0034
更新日期:2016-11-01 00:00:00