Abstract:
:Comparative effectiveness research (CER) calls for substantial changes in the way clinical research is conducted, interpreted and practically applied in the USA, in order to produce useful clinical evidence. Departing from classic efficacy and effectiveness research, the evolving CER paradigm requires structural and substantive innovations that address three basic questions: what works? for whom? and in whose hands? Addressing these questions will require fundamental changes in the approach to clinical research that include: the use of active treatments (or comparators) versus placebos in the comparisons of treatments, innovative or 'alternative' research methods, the specification and a priori design of studies to account for important subgroups, accounting for the nested nature of healthcare delivery in design and analysis of CER, the simultaneous study of multiple treatments or treatment modalities, the study of multiple outcomes (benefits and harms) for each treatment compared, and the reassessment of the value of different study designs in the hierarchy of collective 'evidence'. In order to aid individual providers and patients in making informed, personalized treatment decisions, guided by the best evidence possible, CER studies must generalize to a broad range of subgroups reflecting the spectrum of patients, providers and health systems that populate real-world practice settings. Without expansion in the scope, conduct and subsequent interpretation of clinical research reflected in the issues outlined above, CER will fall short of its potential for informing evidence-based practice and personalized medicine. The current paradigm for conducting, interpreting and applying clinical research does not meet the needs of optimal generalizability and application to individual physician-patient efforts to identify the most effective treatment, and therefore does not support the basic requirements of CER. The proposed changes should neither require decades nor exorbitant budgets to achieve. Using two examples, prostate cancer, and comparisons of single medications, we illustrated how the proposed changes in clinical research, matching strategy to each application, might be addressed.
journal_name
J Comp Eff Resjournal_title
Journal of comparative effectiveness researchauthors
Greenfield S,Kaplan SHdoi
10.2217/CER.12.23subject
Has Abstractpub_date
2012-05-01 00:00:00pages
263-70issue
3eissn
2042-6305issn
2042-6313journal_volume
1pub_type
杂志文章,评审abstract::Aim: To perform cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and budget impact analysis (BIA) comparing stenting to standard medical treatment (SMT) for the management of deep venous outflow obstruction and leg ulcers from the Italian Healthcare Service perspective. Materials & methods: A Markov model was developed to project co...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0030
更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::The intense competition that accompanied the growth of internet-based companies ushered in the era of 'big data' characterized by major innovations in processing of very large amounts of data and the application of advanced analytics including data mining and machine learning. Healthcare is on the cusp of its own era ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.14.2
更新日期:2014-03-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:The importance of adjusting for cross-study heterogeneity when conducting network meta-analyses (NMAs) was demonstrated using a case study of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS:Bayesian NMAs were conducted for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 response. Several covariates were c...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0065
更新日期:2018-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Degenerative spine disorders are a significant cause of patient morbidity and are a prominent factor in healthcare costs in many countries. Pressure for healthcare cost control and the desire for improved outcomes have led to an expanding emphasis on evidence-based medicine methodologies in spine research. Determinati...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.2217/cer.12.73
更新日期:2013-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Current stroke severity scales cannot be used for archival data. We develop and validate a measure of stroke severity at hospital discharge (Stroke Administrative Severity Index [SASI]) for use in billing data. METHODS:We used the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) as the theoretical framework and identified 285 relevant In...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0058
更新日期:2018-04-01 00:00:00
abstract::Since 2010, four oral anticoagulants have been approved for marketing in addition to warfarin for treatment of thromboembolic disease. Limited head-to-head data exist comparing these treatments, leaving patients and clinicians with little guidance for selecting a strategy that balances recurrence reduction with bleedi...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0053
更新日期:2018-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::The 11 big health data networks participating in the AcademyHealth Electronic Data Methods Forum represent cutting-edge efforts to harness the power of big health data for research and quality improvement. This paper is a comparative case study based on site visits conducted with a subset of these large infrastructure...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.14.72
更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To understand researcher capability for and interest in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (PC-CER), particularly related to engaging with patients/caregivers. MATERIALS & METHODS:Web-based survey of 508 health researchers recruited via professional health research organizations. RESULTS:Most res...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0063
更新日期:2017-05-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:GNE myopathy, a rare, severe, progressive myopathy, presents with lower extremity distal muscle weakness. The GNE myopathy functional activity scale (GNEM-FAS) evaluates the impact of GNE myopathy on functioning in adults. This paper presents the psychometric validation of the GNEM-FAS. PATIENTS & METHODS:Validati...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0062
更新日期:2018-04-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To estimate healthcare utilization and costs in amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. PATIENTS & METHODS:AL amyloidosis patients were identified in 2007-2015 claims databases if they had ≥1 inpatient/≥2 outpatient claims consistent with AL amyloidosis and received ≥1 AL-specific treatment. Descriptive statistics w...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0100
更新日期:2018-06-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Explore perspectives of adolescent and young adult (AYA) and parent stakeholders regarding their engagement in comparative effectiveness research (CER) evaluating cholesterol screening and treatment strategies for 17-21 year olds. METHODS:All nine AYAs and parent stakeholders participating in a 20-member panel of ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0025
更新日期:2016-08-01 00:00:00
abstract::AIMS: Stakeholder engagement is fundamental to comparative effectiveness research (CER), but lacks consistent terminology. This paper aims to define stakeholder engagement and present a conceptual model for involving stakeholders in CER. MATERIALS #ENTITYSTARTX00026; METHODS: The definitions and model were developed f...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.12.7
更新日期:2012-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: To evaluate the patterns of cancer patients-assessed quality of outpatient care in the USA. Materials & methods: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey datasets for the years 2011, 2013, 2015 and 2017 were accessed and adult participants with a history of cancer diagnosis were reviewed. Participants' assessments of dif...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0124
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Develop an accessible exercise to engage underserved populations about research funding priorities; analyze the criteria they use to prioritize research; contrast these criteria to those currently used by Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). MATERIALS & METHODS:Academic and community partners coll...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0008
更新日期:2017-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: Indirect treatment comparisons are used when no direct comparison is available. Comparison networks should satisfy the transitivity assumption, that is, equal likelihood of treatment assignment for a given patient based on comparability of studies. Materials & methods: Seven criteria were evaluated across 18 rand...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0064
更新日期:2019-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: Increasing use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in Scotland, coupled with safety concerns with some SSRIs, and the increasing availability of generic SSRIs, have resulted in multiple initiatives to improve the quality and efficiency of their prescribing in Scotland. Our aim is to assess their in...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0132
更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::As the Senior Editors of the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research (JCER) we are delighted to present you with the first issue of this exciting new publication, focusing on the socially and clinically impactful field of comparative effectiveness research (CER). ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type:
doi:10.2217/cer.11.13
更新日期:2012-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Alternative approaches to the current rebate system are being considered by policymakers and stakeholders in the private insurance market. This paper presents an analysis of three alternative options to the current rebate model: retaining retroactive rebates but requiring 100% pass-through of rebates and fees to plan ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0094
更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIMS:To analyze administrative claims data from Medicaid, Medicare and commercial insurance sources to estimate stroke risk, bleeding risk, and the use of antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS:Included patients were aged ≥18 years with a new or existing diagnosis of AF. Outcomes w...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.15.48
更新日期:2016-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Choice-based conjoint (CBC) is used to understand how individuals develop preferences for decision alternatives. When decision alternatives can be described in terms of attributes, researchers want to determine the value respondents attach to various attribute levels. Popular in psychology, marketing, economics and ot...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0115
更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To evaluate overall survival (OS) in unresectable American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I/II hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with drug-eluting-bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus best supportive care. MATERIALS & METHODS:OS in consecutive patients with AJCC stage I/II unresectab...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.15.54
更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Reducing the fluctuation of blood pressure has recently been recognized as a potential target for improving management of hypertension to prevent cardiovascular events, particularly for strokes. Some randomized controlled trials demonstrated that amlodipine can effectively reduce blood pressure as a well-establishe...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.2217/cer-2017-0063
更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Evaluation of: National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Church TR, Black WC, Aberle DR et al. Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 1980-1991 (2013). In 2011, the US NLST trial demonstrated that mortality from lung cancer can be reduced by using low-dose ...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 评论,杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.13.57
更新日期:2013-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Studies on multiple sclerosis in Saudi Arabia remain scant, particularly studies on the psychological aspects. This study measures severities of depression, anxiety and stress, and compares them to the used disease-modifying treatment. MATERIALS & METHODS:Cross-sectional study using a phone questionnaire targeting...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0087
更新日期:2017-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::The COVID-19 pandemic is revealing the unacceptable health disparities across New York City and in this country. The mortality rates of vulnerable and minority populations alone suggest a need to re-evaluate clinical decision making protocols, especially given the recently passed Emergency or Disaster Treatment Protec...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0090
更新日期:2020-08-01 00:00:00
abstract::Patients with acute coronary syndromes and severe multivessel or left main coronary artery disease have better outcomes when prompt revascularization is performed in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT). However, in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, randomized strategy trials have revealed equipoise be...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.2217/cer.15.37
更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Aim: Medicaid versus private primary insurance status may predict in-hospital mortality and morbidity after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials & methods: Regression models were used to test our hypothesis in patients in the State Inpatient Database (SID) from five states who underwent primary TKA from January 20...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0027
更新日期:2019-10-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:Quantify hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) costs in German patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). METHODS:The primary outcome was direct and indirect costs in patients with ALL/DLBCL/FL who received HSCT between 2010 and 20...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0100
更新日期:2019-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:AIM:To measure the private and social benefits of donor insemination (DI). METHODS:An empirical model investigates the general public and DI clients' willingness to pay (WTP) for DI, and the willingness of potential donors to become altruistic or paid sperm donors. RESULTS:The general public and DI clients value DI a...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0066
更新日期:2017-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Concerted efforts are underway to improve healthcare decision-making through patient-centered outcomes research. These efforts are supported by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund, which was established within the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This article focuses on describing national dat...
journal_title:Journal of comparative effectiveness research
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.2217/cer.14.54
更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00