当前位置： SCI文献检索 > JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA期刊下所有文献 > Comparison of neuroretinal rim area measurements made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II.

Comparison of neuroretinal rim area measurements made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II.

Abstract：

PURPOSE:To investigate the agreement between neuroretinal rim area (RA) measurements using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I (HRT Classic) and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II). To compare apparent RA changes in follow-up series of HRT II topographies when using either an HRT Classic or HRT II mean topography as baseline. DESIGN:Cross-sectional study and "no-change," short time series study. PARTICIPANTS:Forty-three ocular hypertensive and 31 primary open angle glaucoma subjects. METHODS:Five HRT Classic and 5 HRT II examinations were acquired from 1 eye of each subject, across 2 visits within 6 weeks. For the cross-sectional study, follow-up RA measurements from HRT Classic and HRT II were compared, using the same HRT Classic mean topography as the baseline. The linear rates of RA change were compared in 2 short time series with either an HRT Classic or an HRT II mean topography as baseline, and 4 follow-up HRT II mean topographies. Intervals between topographies were arbitrarily set at 1 year for meaningful comparisons of rates. Rates of RA change over time were calculated by linear regression. Separate analyses were performed using 3 available reference planes (RP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Global and sectoral RA measurements in HRT Classic and HRT II mean topographies; linear rates of RA change. RESULTS:HRT Classic minus HRT II mean differences (95% limits of agreement) were 0.09 (-0.17, 0.35) mm, 0.09 (-0.13, 0.32) mm, and 0.11 (-0.24, 0.46) mm for the Moorfields, 320 µm, and standard RPs, respectively (P<0.001 for all RPs, Wilcoxon rank sum test). In the time series, the mean differences (95% limits of agreement) of RA rates of change (HRT Classic baseline minus HRT II baseline) were -0.01 (-0.06, 0.03) mm/y, -0.01 (-0.06, 0.04) mm/y, and -0.0 (-0.09, 0.05) mm/y using the Moorfields, 320 µm, and standard RPs, respectively. CONCLUSION:Although HRT software is backward-compatible, follow-up RA measurements made in the same eye using HRT Classic and HRT II devices display statistically and clinically meaningful systematic differences when HRT Classic topographies are used as a baseline.

journal_name

J Glaucoma

journal_title

Journal of glaucoma

authors

Wang YX,O'Leary N,Strouthidis NG,White ET,Ho TA,Garway-Heath DF

doi

10.1097/IJG.0b013e318255da30

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2013-10-01 00:00:00

pages

652-8

issue

eissn

1057-0829

issn

1536-481X

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Comparison of neuroretinal rim area measurements made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II.