当前位置： SCI文献检索 > WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY期刊下所有文献 > Tenofovir vs lamivudine plus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B: TENOSIMP-B study.

Tenofovir vs lamivudine plus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B: TENOSIMP-B study.

Abstract：

AIM:To demonstrate the non-inferiority (15% non-inferiority limit) of monotherapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs the combination of lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in the maintenance of virologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and prior failure with LAM. METHODS:This study was a Phase IV prospective, randomized, open, controlled study with 2 parallel groups (TDF and LAM+ADV) of adult patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative CHB, prior failure with LAM, on treatment with LAM+ADV for at least 6 mo, without prior resistance to ADV and with an undetectable viral load at the start of the study, in 14 Spanish hospitals. The follow-up time for each patient was 48 wk after randomization, with quarterly visits in which the viral load, biochemical and serological parameters, adverse effects, adherence to treatment and consumption of hospital resources were analysed. RESULTS:Forty-six patients were evaluated [median age: 55.4 years (30.2-75.2); 84.8% male], including 22 patients with TDF and 24 with LAM+ADV. During study development, hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV-DNA) remained undetectable, all patients remained HBeAg negative, and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values at the end of the study were similar in the 2 groups (25.1 ± 7.65, TDF vs 24.22 ± 8.38, LAM+ADV, P = 0.646). No significant changes were observed in creatinine or serum phosphorus values in either group. No significant differences between the 2 groups were noted in the identification of adverse effects (AEs) (53.8%, TDF vs 37.5%, LAM+ADV, P = 0.170), and none of the AEs which occurred were serious. Treatment adherence was 95.5% and 83.3% in the TDF and the LAM+ADV groups, respectively (P = 0.488). The costs associated with hospital resource consumption were significantly lower with the TDF treatment than the LAM+ADV treatment (€4943 ± 1059 vs €5811 ± 1538, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION:TDF monotherapy proved to be safe and not inferior to the LAM+ADV combination therapy in maintaining virologic response in patients with CHB and previous LAM failure. In addition, the use of TDF generated a significant savings in hospital costs.

journal_name

World J Gastroenterol

journal_title

World journal of gastroenterology

authors

Rodríguez M,Pascasio JM,Fraga E,Fuentes J,Prieto M,Sánchez-Antolín G,Calleja JL,Molina E,García-Buey ML,Blanco MÁ,Salmerón J,Bonet ML,Pons JA,González JM,Casado MÁ,Jorquera F,TENOSIMP-B Research Group.

doi

10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7459

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2017-11-07 00:00:00

pages

7459-7469

issue

eissn

1007-9327

issn

2219-2840

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Tenofovir vs lamivudine plus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B: TENOSIMP-B study.