当前位置： SCI文献检索 > FREE RADICAL RESEARCH期刊下所有文献 > Comparison of LDL trap assay to other tests of antioxidant capacity; effect of vitamin E and lovastatin treatment.

Comparison of LDL trap assay to other tests of antioxidant capacity; effect of vitamin E and lovastatin treatment.

Abstract：

:Oxidized low density lipoprotein (LDL) has a major impact in the development of atherosclerosis. Risk for oxidative modification of LDL is usually determined indirectly by measuring the capability of LDL to resist radical insult. We compared three different methods quantifying the antioxidative capacity of LDL ex vivo in dyslipidemic patients with coronary heart disease. Plasma samples were obtained from two double-blinded cross-over trials. The duration of all interventions (placebo, lovastatin 60 mg/day, RRR-alpha-tocopherol 300 mg/day and lovastatin + RRR-alpha-tocopherol combined) was 6 weeks. The total radical capturing capacity of LDL (TRAP) in plasma was determined using 2,2-azo-bis(2,4-dimethyl-valeronitrile) (AMVN) -induced oxidation, and measuring the extinction time of chemiluminescence. TRAP was compared to the variables characterizing formation of conjugated dienes in copper-induced oxidation. Also the initial concentrations and consumption times of reduced alpha-tocopherol (alpha-TOH) and ubiquinol in AMVN-induced oxidation were determined. Repeatability of TRAP was comparable to that of the lag time in conjugated diene formation. Coefficient of variation within TRAP assay was 4.4% and between TRAP assays 5.9%. Tocopherol supplementation produced statistically significant changes in all antioxidant variables except those related to LDL ubiquinol. TRAP increased by 57%, the lag time in conjugated diene formation by 34% and consumption time of alpha-TOH by 88%. When data of all interventions were included in the analyses, TRAP correlated with the lag time (r = 0.75, p < 10(-6)), with LDL alpha-TOH (r = 0.50, p < 0.001) and with the consumption time of alpha-TOH (r = 0.58, p < 0.0001). In the baseline data, the associations between different antioxidant variables were weaker. TRAP correlated with the lag time (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and alpha-TOH consumption time (r = 0.48, p < 0.05), and inversely with apolipoprotein Al (r = -0.51, p < 0.05). Lag time at the baseline did not correlate with ubiquinol or tocopherol parameters, or with any plasma lipid or lipoprotein levels analyzed. Lovastatin treatment did not significantly affect the antioxidant capacity of LDL. In conclusion, TRAP reflects slightly different properties of LDL compared to the lag time. Thus, LDL TRAP assay may complement the other methods used to quantify the antioxidant capacity of LDL. However, TRAP and the lag time react similarly to vitamin E supplementation.

journal_name

Free Radic Res

journal_title

Free radical research

authors

Malminiemi K,Palomäki A,Malminiemi O

doi

10.1080/10715760000301111

keywords:

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2000-11-01 00:00:00

pages

581-93

issue

eissn

1071-5762

issn

1029-2470

journal_volume

pub_type

临床试验,杂志文章

在线工具

Comparison of LDL trap assay to other tests of antioxidant capacity; effect of vitamin E and lovastatin treatment.