当前位置： SCI文献检索 > GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY期刊下所有文献 > Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

Abstract：

OBJECTIVE:To compare surgical morbidity and clinical-pathologic factors for patients with endometrial cancer (EC) undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with aortic and/or pelvic lymphadenectomy (LA). METHODS:During the first 14 months of a robotics surgical program, 56 patients with EC were scheduled to undergo RALH with LA. Cases were analyzed for operative (op) time, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion, intra- and post-op complications, surgical-pathologic data, patient demographics and length of stay (LOS). Data was compared to 106 serially treated patients with EC who underwent TAH with LA immediately prior to initiation of our robotics program. RESULTS:Three robotic cases (5.4%) were converted to TAH secondary to intra-op factors. FIGO stages for RALH vs. TAH were: stage I (82 vs. 69%), stage II (7 vs. 7.5%) and stage III (11 vs. 21.5%). Patients' mean age was 59+/-10 vs. 63+/-11 years (p=0.05) and body mass index (BMI) was 29+/-6.5 vs. 34+/-9 kg/m(2) (p=0.0001) for the robotic and open groups, respectively. Severe medical co-morbidities affected 5.4% of robotic patients compared to 8.5% of open cases (p>0.05). Comparing RALH and TAH, mean op time was 177+/-55 vs.79+/-17 min (p=0.0001), EBL was 105+/-77 vs. 241+/-115 ml (p<0.0001), transfusion was 0 vs. 8.5% (p=0.005), and LOS was 1.0+/-0.5 vs. 3.2+/-1.0 days (p<0.0001). Robotic patients incurred a 3.6% major peri-operative complication rate while women undergoing open procedures had an incidence of 20.8% (p=0.007). Total lymph node count was 19+/-13 nodes for robotic cases vs. 18+/-10 nodes obtained from open hysterectomy patients. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with EC who underwent RALH with LA during the first year of our robotics program were younger, thinner and had less cardio-pulmonary illness than patients previously treated with TAH and LA. LOS, EBL and peri-op complication rates were significantly lower for the robotic cohort.

journal_name

Gynecol Oncol

journal_title

Gynecologic oncology

authors

DeNardis SA,Holloway RW,Bigsby GE 4th,Pikaart DP,Ahmad S,Finkler NJ

doi

10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.025

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2008-12-01 00:00:00

pages

412-7

issue

eissn

0090-8258

issn

1095-6859

pii

S0090-8258(08)00678-1

journal_volume

111

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.