当前位置： SCI文献检索 > JAMA Pediatrics期刊下所有文献 > Comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure.

Comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure.

Abstract：

IMPORTANCE:Outcomes associated with use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in children with acute respiratory failure have not been established. OBJECTIVE:To compare the outcomes of HFOV with those of conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in children with acute respiratory failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:We performed a retrospective, observational study using deidentified data obtained from all consecutive patients receiving mechanical ventilation aged 1 month to 18 years in the Virtual PICU System database from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2011. The study population was divided into 2 groups: HFOV and CMV. The HFOV group was further divided into early and late HFOV. Propensity score matching was performed as a 1-to-1 match of HFOV and CMV patients. A similar matching process was performed for early HFOV and CMV patients. EXPOSURE:High-frequency oscillatory ventilation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:Length of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, ICU mortality, and standardized mortality ratio (SMR). RESULTS:A total of 9177 patients from 98 hospitals qualified for inclusion. Of these, 902 (9.8%) received HFOV, whereas 8275 (90.2%) received CMV. A total of 1764 patients were matched to compare HFOV and CMV, whereas 942 patients were matched to compare early HFOV and CMV. Length of mechanical ventilation (CMV vs HFOV: 14.6 vs 20.3 days, P < .001; CMV vs early HFOV: 14.6 vs 15.9 days, P < .001), ICU length of stay (19.1 vs 24.9 days, P < .001; 19.3 vs 19.5 days, P = .03), and mortality (8.4% vs 17.3%, P < .001; 8.3% vs 18.1%, P < .001) were significantly higher in HFOV and early HFOV patients compared with CMV patients. The SMR in the HFOV group was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.71-2.35) compared with an SMR in the CMV group of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.68-1.07). The SMR in the early HFOV group was 1.62 (95% CI, 1.31-2.01) compared with an SMR in the CMV group of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62-1.16). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:Application of HFOV and early HFOV compared with CMV in children with acute respiratory failure is associated with worse outcomes. The results of our study are similar to recently published studies in adults comparing these 2 modalities of ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome.

journal_name

JAMA Pediatr

journal_title

JAMA pediatrics

authors

Gupta P,Green JW,Tang X,Gall CM,Gossett JM,Rice TB,Kacmarek RM,Wetzel RC

doi

10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4463

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2014-03-01 00:00:00

pages

243-9

issue

eissn

2168-6203

issn

2168-6211

pii

1812614

journal_volume

168

pub_type

杂志文章,多中心研究

在线工具

Comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure.