A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES:To compare 2005 and 1995 ethics guidelines from journal editors to authors regarding requirements for institutional review board (IRB) approval and conflict-of-interest (COI) disclosure. DESIGN:A descriptive study of the ethics guidelines published in 103 English-language biomedical journals listed in the Abridged Index Medicus in 1995 and 2005. Each journal was reviewed by the principal author and one of four independent reviewers. RESULTS:During the period, the proportion of journals requiring IRB approval increased from 42% (95% CI 32.2% to 51.2%, p<0.001) to 76% (95% CI 66.4% to 83.1%, p<0.001). In 2005, an additional 9% referred to the Declaration of Helsinki or the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' Uniform requirements for ethical guidelines; 15% (95% CI 8.5% to 22.5%, p<0.01) provided ambiguous or no requirements. The proportion of journals requiring COI disclosure increased from 75% (95% CI 66.6% to 83.3%, p<0.05) to 94% (95% CI 89.4% to 98.6%, p<0.05); 41% had comprehensive requirements, while some addressed only funding source (6%), were vague (10%) or both (14%). Criteria for authorship rose from 40% (95% CI 30.5% to 49.5%, p<0.05) to 72% (95% CI 63.3% to 80.7%, p<0.05). Journals with higher impact factors were more likely to require IRB approval (p<0.01). Journals in anaesthesia and radiology all required IRB approval; requirements in other disciplines varied. CONCLUSIONS:Instructions to authors regarding ethical standards have improved. Some remain incomplete, especially regarding the scope of disclosure of COI. The ethical guidelines presented to authors need further clarification and standardisation.

journal_name

J Med Ethics

authors

Rowan-Legg A,Weijer C,Gao J,Fernandez C

doi

10.1136/jme.2008.024299

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2009-01-01 00:00:00

pages

74-8

issue

1

eissn

0306-6800

issn

1473-4257

pii

35/1/74

journal_volume

35

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Training healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators: evaluation of a Dutch training programme.

    abstract::Until recently, moral case deliberation (MCD) sessions have mostly been facilitated by external experts, mainly professional ethicists. We have developed a train the facilitator programme for healthcare professionals aimed at providing them with the competences needed for being an MCD facilitator. In this paper, we pr...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100546

    authors: Plantinga M,Molewijk B,de Bree M,Moraal M,Verkerk M,Widdershoven GA

    更新日期:2012-10-01 00:00:00

  • Ethics, organ donation and tax: a proposal.

    abstract::Five arguments are presented in favour of the proposal that people who opt in as organ donors should receive a tax break. These arguments appeal to welfare, autonomy, fairness, distributive justice and self-ownership, respectively. Eight worries about the proposal are considered in this paper. These objections focus u...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100163

    authors: Søbirk Petersen T,Lippert-Rasmussen K

    更新日期:2012-08-01 00:00:00

  • Misled and confused? Telling the public about MMR vaccine safety. Measles, mumps, and rubella.

    abstract::The extraordinary events surrounding the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in the United Kingdom have not only placed in jeopardy the use of this triple vaccine but have also spread concern to other parts of the world. Examination of the public's worry about MMR vaccine reveals they have been exposed to a rang...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.29.1.22

    authors: Clements CJ,Ratzan S

    更新日期:2003-02-01 00:00:00

  • Parental procreative obligation and the categorisation of disease: the case of cystic fibrosis.

    abstract::The advent of prenatal genetic diagnosis has sparked debates among ethicists and philosophers regarding parental responsibility towards potential offspring. Some have attempted to place moral obligations on parents to not bring about children with certain diseases in order to prevent harm to such children. There has b...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.039230

    authors: Bosslet GT

    更新日期:2011-05-01 00:00:00

  • Doctors' and nurses' attitudes towards and experiences of voluntary euthanasia: survey of members of the Japanese Association of Palliative Medicine.

    abstract:OBJECTIVE:To demonstrate Japanese doctors' and nurses' attitudes towards and practices of voluntary euthanasia (VE) and to compare their attitudes and practices in this regard. DESIGN:Postal survey, conducted between October and December 1999, using a self-administered questionnaire. PARTCIPANTS: All doctor members an...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.27.5.324

    authors: Asai A,Ohnishi M,Nagata SK,Tanida N,Yamazaki Y

    更新日期:2001-10-01 00:00:00

  • Responding to Simkulet's objections to the two tragedies argument.

    abstract::The two tragedies argument (2TA) has been raised as a response to the argument against abortion from spontaneous abortion (or miscarriages). According to this argument against the antiabortion position (AAP), miscarriages should be of great concern for proponents of this position since they result in a greater amount ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105770

    authors: Friberg-Fernros H

    更新日期:2020-03-01 00:00:00

  • Experiment on identical siblings separated at birth: ethical implications for researchers, universities, and archives today.

    abstract::Several films, including Three Identical Strangers, examined ethical problems in an experiment that involved identical siblings who were adopted as infants and separated into different families to examine the effects of nature versus nurture. The study was primarily designed and directed by Dr Peter Neubauer. The expe...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105983

    authors: Klitzman RL,Kelmenson AM

    更新日期:2020-05-04 00:00:00

  • Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:To analyse the decision making for end of life care for patients with cancer at a teaching hospital in Japan at two periods 10 years apart. DESIGN AND SETTING:Retrospective study conducted in a 550 bed community teaching hospital in Okinawa, Japan. PATIENTS:There were 124 terminally ill cancer patients (45...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2003.000125

    authors: Tokuda Y,Nakazato N,Tamaki K

    更新日期:2004-06-01 00:00:00

  • Am I my brother's gatekeeper? Professional ethics and the prioritisation of healthcare.

    abstract::At the 5th International Conference on Priorities in Health Care in Wellington, New Zealand, 2004, one resonating theme was that for priority setting to be effective, it has to include clinicians in both decision making and the enforcement of those decisions. There was, however, a disturbing undertone to this theme, n...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.017871

    authors: Hunter D

    更新日期:2007-09-01 00:00:00

  • Ethical allocation of future COVID-19 vaccines.

    abstract::The COVID-19 pandemic will likely recede only through development and distribution of an effective vaccine. Although there are many unknowns surrounding COVID-19 vaccine development, vaccine demand will likely outstrip early supply, making prospective planning for vaccine allocation critical for ensuring the ethical d...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106850

    authors: Gupta R,Morain SR

    更新日期:2020-12-17 00:00:00

  • The best argument against kidney sales fails.

    abstract::Simon Rippon has recently argued against kidney markets on the grounds that introducing the option to vend will result in many people, especially the poor, being subject to harmful pressure to vend. Though compelling, Rippon's argument fails. What he takes to be a single phenomenon-social and legal pressure to vend-is...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102390

    authors: Semrau L

    更新日期:2015-06-01 00:00:00

  • The deadly business of an unregulated global stem cell industry.

    abstract::In 2016, the Office of the State Coroner of New South Wales released its report into the death of an Australian woman, Sheila Drysdale, who had died from complications of an autologous stem cell procedure at a Sydney clinic. In this report, we argue that Mrs Drysdale's death was avoidable, and it was the result of a p...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-104046

    authors: Lysaght T,Lipworth W,Hendl T,Kerridge I,Lee TL,Munsie M,Waldby C,Stewart C

    更新日期:2017-11-01 00:00:00

  • Who should consent for research in adult intensive care? Preferences of patients and their relatives: a pilot study.

    abstract:INTRODUCTION:Research in intensive care is necessary for the continuing advancement of patient care. In research, informed consent is considered essential for patient protection. In intensive care, the modalities of informed consent are currently being debated by both lawyers and the medical community. The preferences ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2008.028068

    authors: Chenaud C,Merlani P,Verdon M,Ricou B

    更新日期:2009-11-01 00:00:00

  • NHS constitution values for values-based recruitment: a virtue ethics perspective.

    abstract::Values-based recruitment is used in England to select healthcare staff, trainees and students on the basis that their values align with those stated in the Constitution of the UK National Health Service (NHS). However, it is unclear whether the extensive body of existing literature within the field of moral philosophy...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104503

    authors: Groothuizen JE,Callwood A,Gallagher A

    更新日期:2018-08-01 00:00:00

  • Low risk research using routinely collected identifiable health information without informed consent: encounters with the Patient Information Advisory Group.

    abstract::Current UK legislation is impacting upon the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of medical record-based research aimed at benefiting the NHS and the public heath. Whereas previous commentators have focused on the Data Protection Act 1998, the Health and Social Care Act 2001 is the key legislation for public health res...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019661

    authors: Metcalfe C,Martin RM,Noble S,Lane JA,Hamdy FC,Neal DE,Donovan JL

    更新日期:2008-01-01 00:00:00

  • Should HIV discordant couples have access to assisted reproductive technologies?

    abstract::In this paper we identify and evaluate arguments for and against offering assisted reproductive technologies (ART), specifically IVF, to HIV discordant couples (male partner HIV positive, female partner HIV negative). The idea of offering ART to HIV discordant couples generates concerns about safety and public health ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1136/jme.29.6.325

    authors: Spriggs M,Charles T

    更新日期:2003-12-01 00:00:00

  • Paternalism versus autonomy: medical opinion and ethical questions in the treatment of defective neonates.

    abstract::The paternalistic view that decisions on whether to treat defective newborns are best made by physicians is rejected. It is contended that society should serve as the infant's protector by providing legal standards to govern treatment decisions. ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.9.1.16

    authors: Ferguson P

    更新日期:1983-03-01 00:00:00

  • Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics.

    abstract::This paper argues that the four prima facie principles-beneficence, non-maleficence, respect for autonomy and justice-afford a good and widely acceptable basis for 'doing good medical ethics'. It confronts objections that the approach is simplistic, incompatible with a virtue-based approach to medicine, that it requir...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102282

    authors: Gillon R

    更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00

  • Medicine as an essentially contested concept.

    abstract::W B Gallie's notion of essentially contested concepts remains of philosophical interest. I argue that medicine is one such concept and look at the consequences of this as regards the inappropriateness of looking for definitions and necessary and sufficient conditions to settle debates about what medicine is and is not...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.29.4.261

    authors: McKnight C

    更新日期:2003-08-01 00:00:00

  • Covert video surveillance: the Staffordshire Protocol--a response to Dr Shinebourne.

    abstract::This paper is a response to Dr Shinebourne's response to my recent paper assessing the relative merits of the Staffordshire Protocol on covert video surveillance. Dr Shinebourne does not take the opportunity to rebut the criticisms made of the text of the protocol. It is further suggested that judicial oversight of th...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.22.6.349

    authors: Thomas T

    更新日期:1996-12-01 00:00:00

  • Decision-making in the critically ill neonate: cultural background v individual life experiences.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:In treating critically ill neonates, situations occasionally arise in which aggressive medical treatment prolongs the inevitable death rather than prolonging life. Decisions as to limitation of neonatal medical intervention remain controversial and the primary responsibility of the generally unprepared famil...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.23.3.164

    authors: Hammerman C,Kornbluth E,Lavie O,Zadka P,Aboulafia Y,Eidelman AI

    更新日期:1997-06-01 00:00:00

  • Preventive misconception and adolescents' knowledge about HIV vaccine trials.

    abstract:OBJECTIVE:Adolescents have had very limited access to research on biomedical prevention interventions despite high rates of HIV acquisition. One concern is that adolescents are a vulnerable population, and trials carry a possibility of harm, requiring investigators to take additional precautions. Of particular concern ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100821

    authors: Ott MA,Alexander AB,Lally M,Steever JB,Zimet GD,Adolescent Medicine Trials Network (ATN) for HIV\/AIDS Interventions.

    更新日期:2013-12-01 00:00:00

  • The criminalisation of HIV transmission.

    abstract::Since Bennett, Draper, and Frith published a paper in this journal in 2000 considering the possible criminalisation of HIV transmission, an important legal development has taken place. February 2001 saw the first successful United Kingdom prosecution for the sexual transmission of disease for over a century, when Step...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.28.3.160

    authors: Chalmers J

    更新日期:2002-06-01 00:00:00

  • Professional ethics.

    abstract::Downie comments on Sieghart's article, "Professions as the conscience of society" (Journal of Medical Ethics 1985 Sep; 11(3): 117-122). He charges that Sieghart is blurring empirical, conceptual, and moral claims when he contends that the professional relationship is unique in that "altruism is paramount and self-int...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.12.2.64

    authors: Downie RS

    更新日期:1986-06-01 00:00:00

  • Scientific evidence and best patient care practices should guide the ethics of Lyme disease activism.

    abstract::Johnson and Stricker published an opinion piece in the Journal of Medical Ethics presenting their perspective on the 2008 agreement between the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the Connecticut Attorney General with regard to the 2006 IDSA treatment guideline for Lyme disease. Their writings indicate t...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2009.032896

    authors: Auwaerter PG,Bakken JS,Dattwyler RJ,Dumler JS,Halperin JJ,McSweegan E,Nadelman RB,O'Connell S,Sood SK,Weinstein A,Wormser GP

    更新日期:2011-02-01 00:00:00

  • Tell me what's wrong with me: a discourse analysis approach to the concept of patient autonomy.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Patient autonomy has gradually replaced physician paternalism as an ethical ideal. However, in a medical context, the principle of individual autonomy has different meanings. More knowledge is needed about what is and should be an appropriate understanding of the concept of patient autonomy in clinical pract...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.24.6.394

    authors: Nessa J,Malterud K

    更新日期:1998-12-01 00:00:00

  • American biofutures: ideology and utopia in the Fukuyama/Stock debate.

    abstract::Francis Fukuyama, in his Our Posthuman Future, and Gregory Stock, in his Redesigning Humans, present competing versions of the biomedical future of human beings, and debate the merits of more or less stringent regimes of regulation for biomedical innovation. In this article, these positions are shown to depend on a sh...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.29.1.59

    authors: Ashcroft RE

    更新日期:2003-02-01 00:00:00

  • The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures.

    abstract::In an influential essay entitled Why abortion is wrong, Donald Marquis argues that killing actual persons is wrong because it unjustly deprives victims of their future; that the fetus has a future similar in morally relevant respects to the future lost by competent adult homicide victims, and that, as consequence, abo...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.26.2.103

    authors: Brown MT

    更新日期:2000-04-01 00:00:00

  • Just caring: screening needs limits.

    abstract::This personal narrative tugs at the heart strings. However, personal narratives are not sufficient to justify public funding for any screening policy. We have to take seriously the 'just caring' problem. We have only limited resources to meet virtually unlimited health care needs. No doubt, screening tests often save ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105884

    authors: Fleck LM

    更新日期:2020-04-01 00:00:00

  • Towards a bioethics of innovation.

    abstract::In recent years, it has become almost axiomatic that biomedical research and clinical practice should be 'innovative'-that is, that they should be always evolving and directed towards the production, translation and implementation of new technologies and practices. While this drive towards innovation in biomedicine mi...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103048

    authors: Lipworth W,Axler R

    更新日期:2016-07-01 00:00:00