Experiment on identical siblings separated at birth: ethical implications for researchers, universities, and archives today.

Abstract:

:Several films, including Three Identical Strangers, examined ethical problems in an experiment that involved identical siblings who were adopted as infants and separated into different families to examine the effects of nature versus nurture. The study was primarily designed and directed by Dr Peter Neubauer. The experiment, conducted in the 1960's through 1980's, serves as an important cautionary case study, raising several critical and ongoing ethical issues faced by researchers, universities and archives today. The organisation coordinating the study donated the research records to Yale University under the condition that they remain sealed until 2065, and has impeded study participants' full access to research material. This case raises questions of what investigators, their descendants, research ethics committees or institutional review boards (IRBs), universities and archives should do with study records when researchers retire or die-whether universities should accept researchers' donations of archival records that may contain patient or participant data, and if so, under what conditions. This study also poses crucial issues for IRBs-for example, whether researchers themselves or their designates should control all access to study records, particularly if controversy or lawsuits ensue. These questions will become increasingly crucial since the amount of research has burgeoned over recent decades, and investigators, on retirement or death, may want to donate their archives to universities. This experiment thus highlights ethical questions to which researchers, IRBs, universities, healthcare institutions, archivists and libraries should attend.

journal_name

J Med Ethics

authors

Klitzman RL,Kelmenson AM

doi

10.1136/medethics-2019-105983

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-05-04 00:00:00

eissn

0306-6800

issn

1473-4257

pii

medethics-2019-105983

pub_type

杂志文章
  • The convention on human rights and biomedicine and the use of coercion in psychiatry.

    abstract::According to a recent convention on human rights and biomedicine, coercive treatment of psychiatric patients may only be given if, without such treatment, serious harm is likely to result to the health of the patient; it must not be given in the interest of other people. In the present article a discussion is undertak...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2002.000703

    authors: Tannsjo T

    更新日期:2004-10-01 00:00:00

  • Doctor's views on disclosing or withholding information on low risks of complication.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:More and more quantitative information is becoming available about the risks of complications arising from medical treatment. In everyday practice, this raises the question whether each and every risk, however low, should be disclosed to patients. What could be good reasons for doing or not doing so? This wi...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2005.014936

    authors: Palmboom GG,Willems DL,Janssen NB,de Haes JC

    更新日期:2007-02-01 00:00:00

  • Children, Gillick competency and consent for involvement in research.

    abstract::This paper looks at the issue of consent from children and whether the test of Gillick competency, applied in medical and healthcare practice, ought to extend to participation in research. It is argued that the relatively broad usage of the test of Gillick competency in the medical context should not be considered app...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018853

    authors: Hunter D,Pierscionek BK

    更新日期:2007-11-01 00:00:00

  • What are we to make of the charge that human biological enhancement technologies are 'unnatural'?

    abstract::In popular lay discourse, objections to human biological enhancement technologies are sometimes expressed in terms of the charge that they are unnatural. This paper critiques the literal claim that seems to be presented here, namely that such technologies are in some ordinary sense 'unnatural' and that it follows from...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-104991

    authors: Miller PR

    更新日期:2019-02-01 00:00:00

  • Developing ethics guidance for HIV prevention research: the HIV Prevention Trials Network approach.

    abstract::More than 25 years into the HIV epidemic, in excess of 2 million new infections continue to occur each year. HIV prevention research is crucial for groups at heightened risk for HIV, but the design and conduct of HIV prevention research with vulnerable populations worldwide raises considerable ethical challenge...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.035444

    authors: Rennie S,Sugarman J

    更新日期:2010-12-01 00:00:00

  • Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:to assess physicians' and patients' views in Saudi Arabia (KSA) towards involving the patient versus the family in the process of diagnosis disclosure and decision-making, and to compare them with views from the USA and Japan. DESIGN:A self-completion questionnaire (used previously to study these issues in ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019638

    authors: Mobeireek AF,Al-Kassimi F,Al-Zahrani K,Al-Shimemeri A,al-Damegh S,Al-Amoudi O,Al-Eithan S,Al-Ghamdi B,Gamal-Eldin M

    更新日期:2008-04-01 00:00:00

  • 'Serious' science: a response to Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers.

    abstract::In their paper 'The "serious" factor in germline modification', Kleiderman, Ravitsky and Knoppers rightly highlight the ambiguity in the oft-utilised term 'serious' in legal discussions of human germline genome modification.1 They suggest interpretation of this term may benefit from a framework based on human rights r...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105764

    authors: Kalsi S

    更新日期:2020-02-01 00:00:00

  • Ancillary care duties: the demands of justice.

    abstract::Ancillary care is care that research participants need that is not essential to make the research safe or scientifically valid and is not needed to remedy injuries that eventuate as a result of the research project itself. Ancillary care duties have recently been defended on the grounds of beneficence, entrustment, ut...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.035758

    authors: Hooper CR

    更新日期:2010-11-01 00:00:00

  • Medical students' attitudes towards abortion: a UK study.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:There is little research into medical students' or doctors' attitudes to abortion, yet knowing this is important, as policy makers should be aware of the views held by professionals directly involved in abortion provision and changing views may have practical implications for the provision of abortion in the...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2007.023416

    authors: Gleeson R,Forde E,Bates E,Powell S,Eadon-Jones E,Draper H

    更新日期:2008-11-01 00:00:00

  • The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law.

    abstract::It is argued that the current policy of the British Medical Association (BMA) on conscientious objection is not aligned with recent human rights developments. These grant a right to conscientious objection to doctors in many more circumstances than the very few recognised by the BMA. However, this wide-ranging right m...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103222

    authors: Adenitire JO

    更新日期:2017-04-01 00:00:00

  • Why the Kantian ideal survives medical learning curves, and why it matters.

    abstract::The "Kantian ideal" is often misunderstood as invoking individual autonomy rather than rational self legislation. Le Morvan and Stock's otherwise insightful discussion of "Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal"--for example--draws the mistaken inference that that ideal is inconsistent with the realities of med...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2005.014704

    authors: Brecher B

    更新日期:2006-09-01 00:00:00

  • Left of bang interventions in trauma: some legal implications of military medical prophylaxis.

    abstract::In the context of military medical care, Eisenstein and colleagues have introduced the notion 'left of bang intervention in trauma', which refers to interventions administered before trauma to reduce morbidity and mortality after injury. This paper responds to Eisenstein and colleagues' ethical analysis of such interv...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104584

    authors: Liivoja R

    更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • Instruments of health and harm: how the procurement of healthcare goods contributes to global health inequality.

    abstract::Many healthcare goods, such as surgical instruments, textiles and gloves, are manufactured in unregulated factories and sweatshops where, amongst other labour rights violations, workers are subject to considerable occupational health risks. In this paper we undertake an ethical analysis of the supply of sweatshop-prod...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106286

    authors: Trueba ML,Bhutta MF,Shahvisi A

    更新日期:2020-08-24 00:00:00

  • When they believe in miracles.

    abstract::Brierley et al argue that in cases where it is medically futile to continue providing life-sustaining therapies to children in intensive care, medical professionals should be allowed to withdraw such therapies, even when the parents of these children believe that there is a chance of a miracle cure taking place. In re...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100677

    authors: Clarke S

    更新日期:2013-09-01 00:00:00

  • The turn for ultimate harm: a reply to Fenton.

    abstract::Elizabeth Fenton has criticised an earlier article by the authors in which the claim was made that, by providing humankind with means of causing its destruction, the advance of science and technology has put it in a perilous condition that might take the development of genetic or biomedical techniques of moral enhance...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.036962

    authors: Persson I,Savulescu J

    更新日期:2011-07-01 00:00:00

  • Fair and equitable subject selection in concurrent COVID-19 clinical trials.

    abstract::Clinical trials emerged in rapid succession as the COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented need for life-saving therapies. Fair and equitable subject selection in clinical trials offering investigational therapies ought to be an urgent moral concern. Subject selection determines the distribution of risks and benefi...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106590

    authors: Jansen MO,Angelos P,Schrantz SJ,Donington JS,Madariaga MLL,Zakrison TL

    更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • Whatever happened to medical politics?

    abstract::This paper argues the case for coming to see 'medical politics' as a topic or subject within medical education. First, its absence is noted from the wide array of paramedical subjects (medical ethics, history of medicine, the medical humanities, etc) currently given attention in both the medical education literature a...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.041277

    authors: Emmerich N

    更新日期:2011-10-01 00:00:00

  • Am I my brother's gatekeeper? Professional ethics and the prioritisation of healthcare.

    abstract::At the 5th International Conference on Priorities in Health Care in Wellington, New Zealand, 2004, one resonating theme was that for priority setting to be effective, it has to include clinicians in both decision making and the enforcement of those decisions. There was, however, a disturbing undertone to this theme, n...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.017871

    authors: Hunter D

    更新日期:2007-09-01 00:00:00

  • A reply to McLachlan.

    abstract::In an earlier article in this journal, I advanced five ethical arguments in favour of a voluntary, unpaid system of blood donation. In his reply to my article, Hugh McLachlan criticised one of those arguments, namely, the argument that an unpaid system promotes altruism and social solidarity. In this reply to Dr. McLa...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.24.4.255

    authors: Keown J

    更新日期:1998-08-01 00:00:00

  • Agency, duties and the "Ashley treatment".

    abstract::In 2006, a paper in the journal Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine described a novel case of growth attenuation therapy and other treatments carried out on Ashley, a severely cognitively, neurologically and physically disabled 6-year-old girl. Some of the moral arguments that have sprung up in respect of th...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2009.029934

    authors: Tan N,Brassington I

    更新日期:2009-11-01 00:00:00

  • NHS constitution values for values-based recruitment: a virtue ethics perspective.

    abstract::Values-based recruitment is used in England to select healthcare staff, trainees and students on the basis that their values align with those stated in the Constitution of the UK National Health Service (NHS). However, it is unclear whether the extensive body of existing literature within the field of moral philosophy...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104503

    authors: Groothuizen JE,Callwood A,Gallagher A

    更新日期:2018-08-01 00:00:00

  • Mahātmā Gandhi's view on euthanasia and assisted suicide.

    abstract::To many in India and elsewhere, the life and thoughts of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi are a source of inspiration. The idea of non-violence was pivotal in his thinking. In this context, Gandhi reflected upon the possibility of what is now called 'euthanasia' and 'assisted suicide'. So far, his views on these practices h...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 传,历史文章,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100268

    authors: Gielen J

    更新日期:2012-07-01 00:00:00

  • Mutilation, deception, and sex changes.

    abstract::The paper considers and rejects two arguments against the performance of sexual reassignment surgery. First, it is argued that the operation is not mutilating, but functionally enabling. Second, it is argued that the operation is not objectionably deceptive, since, if there is such a thing as our 'real sex', we do not...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.13.2.86

    authors: Lavin M

    更新日期:1987-06-01 00:00:00

  • Dealing with the brain-damaged old--dignity before sanctity.

    abstract::The present and future rapid increase in the hospital population of geriatric patients is discussed with particular reference to the problem of advanced brain degeneration. The consequences of various clinical management options are outlined and it is suggested that extreme attempts either to preserve or terminate lif...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.8.4.173

    authors: Robertson GS

    更新日期:1982-12-01 00:00:00

  • Are therapeutic motivation and having one's own doctor as researcher sources of therapeutic misconception?

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Desire for improvement in one's illness and having one's own doctor functioning as a researcher are thought to promote therapeutic misconception (TM), a phenomenon in which research subjects are said to conflate research with treatment. PURPOSE:To examine whether subjects' therapeutic motivation and own doc...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101987

    authors: Kim SY,De Vries R,Parnami S,Wilson R,Kim HM,Frank S,Holloway RG,Kieburtz K

    更新日期:2015-05-01 00:00:00

  • Do private German health insurers invest their capital reserves of €353 billion according to environmental, social and governance criteria?

    abstract:BACKGROUND:To prevent the planet from catastrophic global warming a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to net zero is required. Thus, divestment from fossil fuels must be a strategic interest for health insurers. The aim of this study was to analyse the implementation of environmental, social and governance (ESG) cr...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106381

    authors: Schneider F,Gogolewska J,Ahrend KM,Hohendorf G,Schneider G,Busse R,Schulz CM

    更新日期:2020-10-13 00:00:00

  • Legitimate requests and indecent proposals: matters of justice in the ethical assessment of phase I trials involving competent patients.

    abstract::The death of Jesse Gelsinger in 1999 during a gene therapy trial raised many questions about the ethical review of medical research. Here, the author argues that the principle of justice is interpreted too narrowly and receives insufficient emphasis and that what we permit in terms of bodily invasion affects the value...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2003.006684

    authors: Kong WM

    更新日期:2005-04-01 00:00:00

  • The moral status of babies.

    abstract::In their controversial paper 'After-birth abortion', Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva argue that there is no rational basis for allowing abortion but prohibiting infanticide ('after-birth abortion'). We ought in all consistency either to allow both or prohibit both. This paper rejects their claim, arguing that ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100629

    authors: McGee A

    更新日期:2013-05-01 00:00:00

  • Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation.

    abstract::Opioid and sedative use are common 'active' practices in the provision of mainstream palliative care services, and are typically distinguished from euthanasia on the basis that they do not shorten survival time. Even supposing that they did, it is often argued that they are justified and distinguished from euthanasia ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105074

    authors: Riisfeldt TD

    更新日期:2019-02-01 00:00:00

  • Tell me what's wrong with me: a discourse analysis approach to the concept of patient autonomy.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Patient autonomy has gradually replaced physician paternalism as an ethical ideal. However, in a medical context, the principle of individual autonomy has different meanings. More knowledge is needed about what is and should be an appropriate understanding of the concept of patient autonomy in clinical pract...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.24.6.394

    authors: Nessa J,Malterud K

    更新日期:1998-12-01 00:00:00