Differences in medical students' attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behaviour across the years--a questionnaire study.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES:This study aimed to determine attitudinal and self reported behavioural variations between medical students in different years to scenarios involving academic misconduct. DESIGN:A cross-sectional study where students were given an anonymous questionnaire that asked about their attitudes to 14 scenarios describing a fictitious student engaging in acts of academic misconduct and asked them to report their own potential behaviour. SETTING:Dundee Medical School. PARTICIPANTS:Undergraduate medical students from all five years of the course. METHOD:Questionnaire survey. MAIN MEASUREMENTS:Differences in medical students' attitudes to the 14 scenarios and their reported potential behaviour with regards to the scenarios in each of the years. RESULTS:For most of the scenarios there was no significant difference in the response between the years. Significant differences in the responses were found for some of the scenarios across the years, where a larger proportion of year one students regarded the scenario as wrong and would not engage in the behaviour, compared to other years. These scenarios included forging signatures, resubmitting work already completed for another part of the course, and falsifying patient information. CONCLUSION:Observed differences between the years for some scenarios may reflect a change in students' attitudes and behaviour as they progress though the course. The results may be influenced by the educational experience of the students, both in terms of the learning environment and assessment methods used. These differences may draw attention to the potential but unintentional pressures placed on medical students to engage in academic misconduct. The importance of developing strategies to engender appropriate attitudes and behaviours at the undergraduate level must be recognised.

journal_name

J Med Ethics

authors

Rennie SC,Rudland JR

doi

10.1136/jme.29.2.97

keywords:

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2003-04-01 00:00:00

pages

97-102

issue

2

eissn

0306-6800

issn

1473-4257

journal_volume

29

pub_type

杂志文章
  • True and false concerns about neuroenhancement: a response to 'Neuroenhancers, addiction and research ethics', by D M Shaw.

    abstract::In his critical comment on our paper in this journal, Shaw argues that 'false assumptions' which we have criticised are in fact correct ('Neuroenhancers, addiction and research ethics'). He suggests that the risk of addiction to neuroenhancers may not be relevant, and that safety and research in regard to neuroenhance...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101317

    authors: Heinz A,Kipke R,Müller S,Wiesing U

    更新日期:2014-04-01 00:00:00

  • Autonomy in medical ethics after O'Neill.

    abstract::Following the influential Gifford and Reith lectures by Onora O'Neill, this paper explores further the paradigm of individual autonomy which has been so dominant in bioethics until recently and concurs that it is an aberrant application and that conceptions of individual autonomy cannot provide a sufficient and convin...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2004.008292

    authors: Stirrat GM,Gill R

    更新日期:2005-03-01 00:00:00

  • Genetic privacy: orthodoxy or oxymoron?

    abstract::In this paper we question whether the concept of "genetic privacy" is a contradiction in terms. And, if so, whether the implications of such a conclusion, inevitably impact on how society comes to perceive privacy and responsibility generally. Current law and ethical discourse place a high value on self-determination ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.25.2.144

    authors: Sommerville A,English V

    更新日期:1999-04-01 00:00:00

  • Altruism, blood donation and public policy: a reply to Keown.

    abstract::This is a continuation of and a development of a debate between John Keown and me. The issue discussed is whether, in Britain, an unpaid system of blood donation promotes and is justified by its promotion of altruism. Doubt is cast on the notions that public policies can, and, if they can, that they should, be aimed a...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.25.6.532

    authors: McLachlan HV

    更新日期:1999-12-01 00:00:00

  • Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting.

    abstract::Two principles form the basis for much priority setting in health. According to the greater benefit principle, resources should be directed toward the intervention with the greater health benefit. According to the worse off principle, resources should be directed toward the intervention benefiting those initially wors...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100740

    authors: Ottersen T

    更新日期:2013-03-01 00:00:00

  • What about the dentist-patient relationship in dental tourism?

    abstract::Dental tourism is patients travelling across international borders with the intention of receiving dental care. It is a growing phenomenon that raises many ethical issues, particularly regarding the dentist-patient relationship. We discuss various issues related to this phenomenon, including patient autonomy over prac...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101415

    authors: Conti A,Delbon P,Laffranchi L,Paganelli C

    更新日期:2014-03-01 00:00:00

  • What does 'quality' add? Towards an ethics of healthcare improvement.

    abstract::In this paper, we argue that there are important ethical questions about healthcare improvement which are underexplored. We start by drawing on two existing literatures: first, the prevailing, primarily governance-oriented, application of ethics to healthcare 'quality improvement' (QI), and second, the application of ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105635

    authors: Cribb A,Entwistle V,Mitchell P

    更新日期:2020-02-01 00:00:00

  • Surgery to quieten the yelling of a demented old man.

    abstract::Robertson comments on a case presented by Gafner in the same issue of the Journal of Medical Ethics. A proposal to crush a laryngeal nerve to halt the incessant yelling of an elderly demented patient is disapproved by a medical center's surgery department for risk and ethical reasons. Robertson, an anesthesiologist,...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.13.4.198

    authors: Robertson GS

    更新日期:1987-12-01 00:00:00

  • Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration.

    abstract::The International Bioethics Committee (IBC) of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) is currently drafting a Universal Bioethics Declaration ("the declaration"). The content and even the name of the declaration has yet to be finalized, but it is expected to range widely over hum...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2004.006502

    authors: Faunce TA

    更新日期:2005-03-01 00:00:00

  • Interests.

    abstract::Explorations of bioethical issues frequently raise the question of an entity's "moral standing," or its right to moral consideration by rational agents. Many contemporary philosophers subscribe to Leonard Nelson's view that only beings that have interests have moral standing. Kuhse attempts to define interests and t...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.11.3.146

    authors: Kuhse H

    更新日期:1985-09-01 00:00:00

  • A reply to McLachlan.

    abstract::In an earlier article in this journal, I advanced five ethical arguments in favour of a voluntary, unpaid system of blood donation. In his reply to my article, Hugh McLachlan criticised one of those arguments, namely, the argument that an unpaid system promotes altruism and social solidarity. In this reply to Dr. McLa...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.24.4.255

    authors: Keown J

    更新日期:1998-08-01 00:00:00

  • On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar's 'Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine'.

    abstract::Nigel Biggar (2015) argues that religion deserves a place in secular medicine. Biggar suggests we abandon the standard rationalistic conception of the secular realm and see it rather as "a forum for the negotiation of rival reasonings". Religious reasoning is one among a number of ways of thinking that must vie for ac...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102805

    authors: Symons X

    更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • The retention of forensic DNA samples: a socio-ethical evaluation of current practices in the EU.

    abstract::Since the mid-1990s most EU Member States have established a national forensic DNA database. These mass repositories of DNA profiles enable the police to identify DNA stains which are found at crime scenes and are invaluable in criminal investigation. Governments have always brushed aside privacy objections by stressi...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2007.022012

    authors: Van Camp N,Dierickx K

    更新日期:2008-08-01 00:00:00

  • Sustainability principle for the ethics of healthcare resource allocation.

    abstract::We propose a principle of sustainability to complement established principles used for justifying healthcare resource allocation. We argue that the application of established principles of equal treatment, need, prognosis and cost-effectiveness gives rise to what we call negative dynamics: a gradual depletion of the v...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106644

    authors: Munthe C,Fumagalli D,Malmqvist E

    更新日期:2021-02-01 00:00:00

  • Disclosures of funding sources and conflicts of interest in published HIV/AIDS research conducted in developing countries.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:Disclosures of funding sources and conflicts of interests (COI) in published peer-reviewed journal articles have recently begun to receive some attention, but many critical questions remain, for example, how often such reporting occurs concerning research conducted in the developing world and what factors ma...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.035394

    authors: Klitzman R,Chin LJ,Rifai-Bishjawish H,Kleinert K,Leu CS

    更新日期:2010-08-01 00:00:00

  • Publish or be damned: Individual Funding Requests and the publicity condition.

    abstract::Many jurisdictions have processes to consider Individual Funding Requests but, with few exceptions, the decisions made with respect to these are not made public. Drawing upon Daniels and Sabin's account of the requirements of procedural justice, Accountability for Reasonableness, this paper considers several arguments...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101578

    authors: Jonas M,Kolbe A,Warin B

    更新日期:2014-12-01 00:00:00

  • Notes on substantance in orthodox theory: a reply to Badano.

    abstract::Gabriele Badano offers three criticisms of my challenge to the orthodox family of theories of legitimacy in bioethics. First, I assumed an 'oversimplified version of the orthodoxy'. Second, I failed to appreciate its domain of application. Third, I only addressed the ways in which orthodox theorists incorporate substa...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105030

    authors: Smith WR

    更新日期:2019-04-01 00:00:00

  • Implementation of a consent for chart review and contact and its impact in one clinical centre.

    abstract:OBJECTIVE:Informed consent and protection of patient confidentiality are central to the conduction of clinical research. Consent for chart review and contact (CCRC) allows a patient chart to be screened for research by persons outside the direct circle-of-care and for the patient to be contacted regarding potential stu...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101765

    authors: Druce I,Ooi TC,McGuire D,Sorisky A,Malcolm J

    更新日期:2015-05-01 00:00:00

  • Health and disease: what can medicine do for philosophy?

    abstract::Philosophical discussions about health and disease often refer to a 'medical model' of bodily disease, in which diseases are regarded as causes of illness; diagnosis consists in identifying the disease affecting the patient, and this determines the appropriate treatment. This view is plausible only for diseases whose ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.14.3.118

    authors: Scadding JG

    更新日期:1988-09-01 00:00:00

  • Direct-to-consumer genomics on the scales of autonomy.

    abstract::Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic services have generated enormous controversy from their first emergence. A dramatic recent manifestation of this is the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) cease and desist order against 23andMe, the leading provider in the market. Critics have argued for the restrictive regulation of...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102026

    authors: Vayena E

    更新日期:2015-04-01 00:00:00

  • Why patients should keep their own records.

    abstract::Too many people now have access to confidential medical information. Patients are becoming justifiably wary and the doctor-patient relationship is deteriorating. We can avert the developing crisis by allowing patients to keep their own medical records at home. This will ensure that confidentiality is respected and tha...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.10.1.27

    authors: Coleman V

    更新日期:1984-03-01 00:00:00

  • Potential research participants' views regarding researcher and institutional financial conflicts of interest.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Financial conflict of interest in clinical research is an area of active debate. While data exist on the perspectives and roles of academic institutions, investigators, industry sponsors, and scientific journals, little is known about the perspectives of potential research participants. METHODS:The authors ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2002.001461

    authors: Kim SY,Millard RW,Nisbet P,Cox C,Caine ED

    更新日期:2004-02-01 00:00:00

  • The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices.

    abstract::Among bioethicists and members of the public, genetics is often regarded as unique in its ethical challenges. As medical researchers and clinicians increasingly combine genetic information with a range of non-genetic information in the study and clinical management of patients with common diseases, the unique ethical ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1136/jme.2005.013532

    authors: Foster MW,Royal CD,Sharp RR

    更新日期:2006-11-01 00:00:00

  • Women's preferences for information and complication seriousness ratings related to elective medical procedures.

    abstract:OBJECTIVE:To study the preferences of patients for information related to elective procedures. METHODS:A survey was carried out using a sample of 187 women. The majority of whom were on a low-income, who obtained obstetric or gynaecological services at St Joseph Regional Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, while t...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2005.014274

    authors: Coleman PK,Reardon DC,Lee MB

    更新日期:2006-08-01 00:00:00

  • Further clarity on cooperation and morality.

    abstract::I explore the increasingly important issue of cooperation in immoral actions, particularly in connection with healthcare. Conscientious objection, especially as pertains to religious freedom in healthcare, has become a pressing issue in the light of the US Supreme Court judgement in Hobby Lobby Section 'Moral evaluati...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-103476

    authors: Oderberg DS

    更新日期:2017-04-01 00:00:00

  • Lost property? Legal compensation for destroyed sperm: a reflection and comparison drawing on UK and French perspectives.

    abstract::In a recent case in the UK, six men stored their sperm before undergoing chemotherapy treatment for cancer in case they proved to be infertile after the treatment. The sperm was not properly stored and as a result was inadvertently destroyed. The men sued the NHS Trust that stored the sperm and were in the end success...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.042036

    authors: Cordell S,Bellivier F,Widdows H,Noiville C

    更新日期:2011-12-01 00:00:00

  • Evidence of broad-based family support for the use of archival childhood tumour samples in future research.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:This study aimed to determine the ability to successfully contact past paediatric patients and their families to request participation in research, to assess familial views on the use of previously collected archival clinical samples for research purposes, and to highlight the ethical and practical issues in...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103141

    authors: Sexton-Oates A,Dodgshun A,MacGregor D,Ludlow LE,Sullivan M,Saffery R

    更新日期:2016-07-01 00:00:00

  • Ancillary care duties: the demands of justice.

    abstract::Ancillary care is care that research participants need that is not essential to make the research safe or scientifically valid and is not needed to remedy injuries that eventuate as a result of the research project itself. Ancillary care duties have recently been defended on the grounds of beneficence, entrustment, ut...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.035758

    authors: Hooper CR

    更新日期:2010-11-01 00:00:00

  • Decision-making in the critically ill neonate: cultural background v individual life experiences.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:In treating critically ill neonates, situations occasionally arise in which aggressive medical treatment prolongs the inevitable death rather than prolonging life. Decisions as to limitation of neonatal medical intervention remain controversial and the primary responsibility of the generally unprepared famil...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.23.3.164

    authors: Hammerman C,Kornbluth E,Lavie O,Zadka P,Aboulafia Y,Eidelman AI

    更新日期:1997-06-01 00:00:00

  • Communication with the seriously ill: physicians' attitudes in Saudi Arabia.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:To study some ethical problems created by accession of a previously nomadic and traditional society to modern invasive medicine, by assessment of physicians' attitudes towards sharing information and decision-making with patients in the setting of a serious illness. DESIGN:Self-completion questionnaire admi...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.22.5.282

    authors: Mobeireek AF,al-Kassimi FA,al-Majid SA,al-Shimemry A

    更新日期:1996-10-01 00:00:00