On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar's 'Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine'.

Abstract:

:Nigel Biggar (2015) argues that religion deserves a place in secular medicine. Biggar suggests we abandon the standard rationalistic conception of the secular realm and see it rather as "a forum for the negotiation of rival reasonings". Religious reasoning is one among a number of ways of thinking that must vie for acceptance. Medical ethics, says Biggar, is characterised by "spiritual and moral mixture and ambiguity". We acknowledge this uncertainty by recognising rival viewpoints and agreeing to provisional compromises.In this response, I object to Biggar's characterisation of medical ethics as "morally ambiguous" and "provisional". I argue that Biggar has failed to provide adequate support for his conception of ethics as a "forum for negotiation and compromise". I criticise Biggar's attempt to 'pluralise' rationality, and assert that if religion is to play a role in secular medicine, it must be ready to defend itself against a universal standard of reason. In the second section of my response, I argue that 'theistic natural law' gives us the resources to defend using reason alone ostensibly faith-based positions in healthcare ethics. In doing so, we retain a univocal conception of rationality, while at the same time leaving space for 'theism' in healthcare ethics.

journal_name

J Med Ethics

authors

Symons X

doi

10.1136/medethics-2015-102805

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2015-11-01 00:00:00

pages

870-2

issue

11

eissn

0306-6800

issn

1473-4257

pii

medethics-2015-102805

journal_volume

41

pub_type

评论,杂志文章
  • Resuscitation and senility: a study of patients' opinions.

    abstract::In the context of 'Do-not-resuscitate' (DNR) decisions, there is a lack of information in the UK on the opinions of patients and prospective patients. Written anonymous responses to questionnaires issued to 322 out-patient subjects showed that 97 per cent would opt for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in their curr...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.19.2.104

    authors: Robertson GS

    更新日期:1993-06-01 00:00:00

  • Embryonic life and human life.

    abstract::A new human life comes into being not when there is mere cellular life in a human embryo, but when the newly developing body organs and systems begin to function as a whole, the author argues. This is symmetrical with the dealth of an existing human life, which occurs when its organs and systems have permanently cease...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.11.4.205

    authors: Shea MC

    更新日期:1985-12-01 00:00:00

  • Sexual rights puzzle: re-solved?

    abstract::My sexual rights puzzle according to which positive sexual rights are not compatible with negative sexual rights has been recently criticised in the Journal of Medical Ethics by Steven J Firth, who has put forward three objections to the puzzle. In this brief response, I analyse and reject each of these three objectio...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105642

    authors: Di Nucci E

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Evolution of hospital clinical ethics committees in Canada.

    abstract::To investigate the current status of hospital clinical ethics committees (CEC) and how they have evolved in Canada over the past 20 years, this paper presents an overview of the findings from a 2008 survey and compares these findings with two previous Canadian surveys conducted in 1989 and 1984. All Canadian hospitals...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2009.032607

    authors: Gaudine A,Thorne L,LeFort SM,Lamb M

    更新日期:2010-03-01 00:00:00

  • The subtle politics of organ donation: a proposal.

    abstract::Organs available for transplantation are scarce and valuable medical resources and decisions about who is to receive them should not be made more difficult by complicated calculations of desert. Consideration of likely clinical outcome must always take priority when allocating such a precious resource otherwise there ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.24.3.166

    authors: Eaton S

    更新日期:1998-06-01 00:00:00

  • Woman wants dead fiancé's baby: who owns a dead man's sperm.

    abstract::The Brisbane Supreme Court has denied an Australian woman's request to harvest and freeze her dead fiancé's sperm for future impregnation. After she was denied access to the sperm, the woman learnt that her fiancé may have been a sperm donor and she began checking to find out if his sperm was still available. Given wh...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2003.004432

    authors: Spriggs M

    更新日期:2004-08-01 00:00:00

  • Coercive offers and research participation: a comment on Wertheimer and Miller.

    abstract::Concepts such as 'coercion' and 'inducement' are often used within bioethics without much reflection upon what they mean. This is particularly so in research ethics where they are assumed to imply that payment for research participation is unethical. Wertheimer and Miller advance our thinking about these concepts and ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.035931

    authors: McMillan J

    更新日期:2010-07-01 00:00:00

  • Contributory injustice in psychiatry.

    abstract::I explain the notion of contributory injustice, a kind of epistemic injustice, and argue that it occurs within psychiatric services, affecting (at least) those who hear voices. I argue that individual effort on the part of clinicians to avoid perpetrating this injustice is an insufficient response to the problem; miti...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-104761

    authors: Miller Tate AJ

    更新日期:2019-02-01 00:00:00

  • Advance directives are the solution to Dr Campbell's problem for voluntary euthanasia.

    abstract::Dr Neil Campbell suggests that when patients suffering extremes of protracted pain ask for help to end their lives, their requests should be discounted as made under compulsion. I contend that the doctors concerned should be referred to and then act upon advance directives made by those patients when of sound and calm...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.25.3.245

    authors: Flew A

    更新日期:1999-06-01 00:00:00

  • Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity.

    abstract::In this paper, I explore the ethics of subject selection in the context of biomedical research. I reject a key principle of what I shall refer to as the standard view According to this principle, investigators should select participants so as to minimise aggregate risk to participants and maximise aggregate benefits t...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103311

    authors: MacKay D

    更新日期:2016-10-01 00:00:00

  • A reply to McLachlan.

    abstract::In an earlier article in this journal, I advanced five ethical arguments in favour of a voluntary, unpaid system of blood donation. In his reply to my article, Hugh McLachlan criticised one of those arguments, namely, the argument that an unpaid system promotes altruism and social solidarity. In this reply to Dr. McLa...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.24.4.255

    authors: Keown J

    更新日期:1998-08-01 00:00:00

  • Developing a culturally relevant bioethics for Asian people.

    abstract::Because of cultural differences between East and West, any attempt at outright adaptation of Western ideas in Asia will undoubtedly encounter problems, if not rejection. Transferring an idea from one place to another is just like transplanting an organ from a donor to a recipient--rejection is to be expected. Human cu...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.27.1.51

    authors: Tai MC,Lin CS

    更新日期:2001-02-01 00:00:00

  • Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:The objective of this research is to analyse the evolution and nature of published empirical research in the fields of medical ethics and bioethics. DESIGN:Retrospective quantitative study of nine peer reviewed journals in the field of bioethics and medical ethics (Bioethics, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthca...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2004.011478

    authors: Borry P,Schotsmans P,Dierickx K

    更新日期:2006-04-01 00:00:00

  • Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: a survey of the Irish general public.

    abstract:INTRODUCTION:Understanding the views of the public is essential if generally acceptable policies are to be devised that balance research access to general practice patient records with protection of patients' privacy. However, few large studies have been conducted about public attitudes to research access to personal h...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.037903

    authors: Buckley BS,Murphy AW,MacFarlane AE

    更新日期:2011-01-01 00:00:00

  • The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law.

    abstract::It is argued that the current policy of the British Medical Association (BMA) on conscientious objection is not aligned with recent human rights developments. These grant a right to conscientious objection to doctors in many more circumstances than the very few recognised by the BMA. However, this wide-ranging right m...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103222

    authors: Adenitire JO

    更新日期:2017-04-01 00:00:00

  • Approaches to suffering at the end of life: the use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Studies describing physicians' experiences with sedation at the end of life are indispensible for informed palliative care practice, but they are scarce. We describe the accounts of physicians from the USA and the Netherlands, two countries with different regulations on end-of-life decisions regarding their ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100561

    authors: Rietjens JA,Voorhees JR,van der Heide A,Drickamer MA

    更新日期:2014-04-01 00:00:00

  • Primary care confidentiality for Spanish adolescents: fact or fiction?

    abstract:BACKGROUND:By providing healthcare to adolescents, a major opportunity is created to help them cope with the challenges in their lives, develop healthy behaviour and become responsible healthcare consumers. Confidentiality is a major issue in adolescent healthcare, and its perceived absence may be the main barrier to a...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2005.011932

    authors: Pérez-Cárceles MD,Pereñiguez JE,Osuna E,Pérez-Flores D,Luna A

    更新日期:2006-06-01 00:00:00

  • Unit 731 and moral repair.

    abstract::Unit 731, a biological warfare research organisation that operated under the authority of the Imperial Japanese Army in the 1930s and 1940s, conducted brutal experiments on thousands of unconsenting subjects. Because of the US interest in the data from these experiments, the perpetrators were not prosecuted and the at...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 历史文章,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103177

    authors: Hickey D,Li SS,Morrison C,Schulz R,Thiry M,Sorensen K

    更新日期:2017-04-01 00:00:00

  • Professional ethics.

    abstract::Downie comments on Sieghart's article, "Professions as the conscience of society" (Journal of Medical Ethics 1985 Sep; 11(3): 117-122). He charges that Sieghart is blurring empirical, conceptual, and moral claims when he contends that the professional relationship is unique in that "altruism is paramount and self-int...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.12.2.64

    authors: Downie RS

    更新日期:1986-06-01 00:00:00

  • Autonomy in medical ethics after O'Neill.

    abstract::Following the influential Gifford and Reith lectures by Onora O'Neill, this paper explores further the paradigm of individual autonomy which has been so dominant in bioethics until recently and concurs that it is an aberrant application and that conceptions of individual autonomy cannot provide a sufficient and convin...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2004.008292

    authors: Stirrat GM,Gill R

    更新日期:2005-03-01 00:00:00

  • Device representatives in hospitals: are commercial imperatives driving clinical decision-making?

    abstract::Despite concerns about the relationships between health professionals and the medical device industry, the issue has received relatively little attention. Prevalence data are lacking; however, qualitative and survey research suggest device industry representatives, who are commonly present in clinical settings, play a...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-104804

    authors: Grundy Q,Hutchison K,Johnson J,Blakely B,Clay-Wlliams R,Richards B,Rogers WA

    更新日期:2018-09-01 00:00:00

  • Compensation and hazard pay for key workers during an epidemic: an argument from analogy.

    abstract::The COVID-19 pandemic has created unusually challenging and dangerous workplace conditions for key workers. This has prompted calls for key workers to receive a variety of special benefits over and above their normal pay. Here, we consider whether two such benefits are justified: a no-fault compensation scheme for har...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106389

    authors: McConnell D,Wilkinson D

    更新日期:2020-05-28 00:00:00

  • Good and not so good medical ethics.

    abstract::In this paper, I provide a brief sketch of the purposes that medical ethics serves and what makes for good medical ethics. Medical ethics can guide clinical practice and biomedical research, contribute to the education of clinicians, advance thinking in the field, and direct healthcare policy. Although these are disti...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102312

    authors: Rhodes R

    更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00

  • Danish ethics council rejects brain death as the criterion of death -- commentary 2: return to Elsinore.

    abstract::No discussion of when an individual is dead is meaningful in the absence of a definition of death. If human death is defined as the irreversible loss of the capacity for consciousness combined with the irreversible loss of the capacity to breathe spontaneously (and hence to maintain a spontaneous heart beat) the deat...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.16.1.10

    authors: Pallis C

    更新日期:1990-03-01 00:00:00

  • The morality of risks in research: reflections on Kumar.

    abstract::Reflecting on the contribution by Rahul Kumar to the symposium, I consider the following topics in relation to risks in research: (1) treating someone as a mere means; (2) aggregation; (3) different conceptions of contractualism; (4) uncertainty; (5) paternalism and complicity. ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-103416

    authors: Kamm FM

    更新日期:2017-02-01 00:00:00

  • 'If you pay, we'll operate immediately'.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:To study the attitudes of health care staff in four postcommunist countries towards taking gifts from their clients--and their confessed experience of actually taking such gifts. DESIGN:Survey questionnaire administered to officials including health care staff, supplemented by focus-group discussions with t...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.26.5.305

    authors: Miller WL,Grødeland AB,Koshechkina TY

    更新日期:2000-10-01 00:00:00

  • Testing relationships: ethical arguments for screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus with HbA1C.

    abstract::Since the 1990s, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) has been the gold standard for monitoring glycaemic control in people diagnosed as having either type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Discussions are underway about diagnosing diabetes mellitus on the basis of HbA1C titres and using HbA1C tes...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100086

    authors: Degeling C,Rock M,Rogers WA

    更新日期:2012-03-01 00:00:00

  • "Why aren't you doing what we want?" Cultivating collegiality and communication between specialist and generalist physicians and residents.

    abstract::Developing residents' communication skills has been a goal of residency training programmes since the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education codified it as a core competency. In this article, a case that features problematic communication between a generalist and specialist physician is drawn upon, and i...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.016162

    authors: Rentmeester CA

    更新日期:2007-05-01 00:00:00

  • Terminal sedation and the "imminence condition".

    abstract::"Terminal sedation" refers to the use of sedation as palliation in dying patients with a terminal diagnosis. Although terminal sedation has received widespread legal and ethical justification, the practice remains ethically contentious, particularly as some hold that it foreseeably hastens death. It has been proposed ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019224

    authors: Cellarius V

    更新日期:2008-02-01 00:00:00

  • The turn for ultimate harm: a reply to Fenton.

    abstract::Elizabeth Fenton has criticised an earlier article by the authors in which the claim was made that, by providing humankind with means of causing its destruction, the advance of science and technology has put it in a perilous condition that might take the development of genetic or biomedical techniques of moral enhance...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.036962

    authors: Persson I,Savulescu J

    更新日期:2011-07-01 00:00:00