Single-Study Approvals: Quantum of Evidence Required.

Abstract:

:When does a single positive adequate and well-controlled study of a new drug meet the statutory requirement to demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness? The answer to this question, particularly with respect to new molecular entities, has been of considerable debate since 1962 when the requirement that new drugs prove their benefit to patients became law. A 1997 revision to the statute provided one pathway to a single-study approval (a single adequate and well-controlled study plus confirmatory evidence), while a 1998 guidance issued by FDA provided additional pathways, one of which is the one that is most frequently cited by FDA (a single statistically very persuasive study). This paper explains these 2 distinct pathways and provides illustrative examples of how FDA uses each of these 2 pathways. Regulators, industry, patients, and investors should each find this exegesis of these 2 independent, yet equally viable and valuable, pathways to an FDA approval both illuminating and invaluable.

journal_name

Ther Innov Regul Sci

authors

Sasinowski FJ,Butler ML

doi

10.1007/s43441-019-00103-4

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-05-01 00:00:00

pages

687-692

issue

3

eissn

2168-4790

issn

2168-4804

pii

10.1007/s43441-019-00103-4

journal_volume

54

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies With Elements to Assure Safe Use: Alignment of the Goals With the Tools to Manage Risk.

    abstract::The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 gave the FDA the authority to require drug sponsors to submit a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program for those medicines with serious risks such that failure to effectively manage these risks would tip the benefit-risk balance. As of August 8,...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014527749

    authors: Cronin M,Berger S,Seligman PJ

    更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00

  • Over-the-Counter Drugs: Regulatory Analysis of Warning Letters Between Fiscal Years 2015-2019.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:According to 21 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 211, Over-the-Counter (OTC) drug manufacturers must establish and follow current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) to produce quality products while meeting regulatory standards. The warning letters issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00231-2

    authors: Bai HK,Ahearn JD,Bartlett MG

    更新日期:2020-10-23 00:00:00

  • Regulatory Trends in Drug Development in Asia Pacific.

    abstract::The Asia Pacific (AP) region is diverse and dynamic. It comprises over 40 economies, with about 24 markets that are relatively more active in terms of promulgating and implementing regulations that impact the biopharmaceutical industry and advance drug development. Although many country- and territory-specific regulat...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018791539

    authors: Han FV,Weiss K

    更新日期:2019-07-01 00:00:00

  • Baseline Assessment of the Evolving 2017 eClinical Landscape.

    abstract::The volume and diversity of data collected to support each clinical study has increased dramatically in response to the rising scope and complexity of global drug development programs. The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted an online survey of 257 unique global companies-77% drug development spon...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018769292

    authors: Wilkinson M,Young R,Harper B,Machion B,Getz K

    更新日期:2019-01-01 00:00:00

  • Comparative Assessment of Non-trial Access to Investigational Medical Products in the U.S. and Japan.

    abstract::The U.S. and Japan have preapproval access systems for patients who have exhausted approved treatment options. We compare the systems of both countries and discuss some ethical concerns surrounding non-trial access to investigational drugs. Notable points of comparison of the two countries' systems include cost of non...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00228-x

    authors: Nakada H,Folkers KM,Takashima K

    更新日期:2020-10-23 00:00:00

  • Evaluation and Characterization of Health Economics and Outcomes Research in SAARC Nations.

    abstract:OBJECTIVE:To identify, evaluate, and characterize the variety, quality, and intent of the health economics and outcomes research studies being conducted in SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) nations. METHODS:Studies published in English language between 1990 and 2015 were retrieved from Medline d...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1177/2168479017731583

    authors: Mehta M,Nerurkar R

    更新日期:2018-05-01 00:00:00

  • A Framework for Managing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Clinical Trials.

    abstract::There is a long history of discussions about what is a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and how this term applies to clinical research. This paper deals with a practical framework for MCID and its applicability to clinical trials. A literature review on the topic confirmed the fundamental role of MCID fo...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479013487541

    authors: Koynova D,Lühmann R,Fischer R

    更新日期:2013-07-01 00:00:00

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Progression Modeling.

    abstract::Time progression models provide a significant advantage in developing clinical trials and can also be used to elicit comparisons among therapeutic agents. The authors performed a meta-analysis to construct a time progression model for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an area of significant interest for pharmaceutical develo...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479013499571

    authors: Reeve R,Pang L,Ferguson B,O'Kelly M,Berry S,Xiao W

    更新日期:2013-11-01 00:00:00

  • Community Opinions on the Collection and Use of Historical Control Data in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Access and use of historical control data was identified as a top stakeholder concern across organizations according to results of a survey of needs and challenges related to nonclinical data conducted by the FDA/PhUSE Nonclinical Working Group in 2011. There is a perception there may be additional ways to c...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015600203

    authors: Mihalcik LM,Bausman M,Brown P,Everds N,Feldmann J,Henck J,Potenta D,Sims J,Zandee J

    更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00

  • Outdated Prescription Drug Labeling: How FDA-Approved Prescribing Information Lags Behind Real-World Clinical Practice.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Prescription drug labeling is an authoritative source of information that guides the safe and effective use of approved medications. In many instances, however, labeling may fail to be updated as new information about drug efficacy emerges in the postmarket setting. When labeling becomes outdated, it loses i...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018759662

    authors: Shea MB,Stewart M,Van Dyke H,Ostermann L,Allen J,Sigal E

    更新日期:2018-11-01 00:00:00

  • Development and Validation of a Brief Measure of Self-Management Competence: The Self-Management Self-Test (SMST).

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Self-management can be considered a way of dealing with oneself and relates to actions undertaken to create order, discipline, and control. The concept is closely linked to concepts of self-efficacy and self-regulation but can be distinguished from these. The Self-Management Self-Test (SMST) is a 5-item asse...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479019849879

    authors: Wehmeier PM,Fox T,Doerr JM,Schnierer N,Bender M,Nater UM

    更新日期:2019-07-14 00:00:00

  • Responsibilities of Data Monitoring Committees: Consensus Recommendations.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:A data monitoring committee (DMC) has special responsibilities for protecting the safety of clinical trial participants. Few guidance documents are available that address the operations and mechanics of establishing, serving on, or reporting to a DMC. This article provides a practical guide to sponsors, inst...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479016646812

    authors: Bierer BE,Li R,Seltzer J,Sleeper LA,Frank E,Knirsch C,Aldinger CE,Levine RJ,Massaro J,Shah A,Barnes M,Snapinn S,Wittes J

    更新日期:2016-09-01 00:00:00

  • Sentiment of Media Coverage and Reputation of the Pharmaceutical Industry.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Patients and health care professionals receive information about pharmaceutical companies through various sources, including but not limited to print media, social media, and electronic media. The objective of this research was to benchmark the sentiment of electronic newspaper media coverage between 2014 an...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00048-8

    authors: Pampulevski V,Giaquinto JR,Rametta M,Toscani M,Barone J,Nadal JC

    更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00

  • phactMI Benchmarking Survey on Content Development and Inquiry Management.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Medical information (MI) departments across pharmaceutical companies respond to medical inquiries about a company's products to healthcare providers, payors, patients, and caregivers. Responses provided are constructed to be relevant, accurate, scientifically balanced and delivered in a timely manner. Benchm...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00137-z

    authors: Byun J,Jong JA,Gangat A,Flowers T,Gazo A,Shah I

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Regulatory Issues of Voluntary Certification of Food Supplements in Russia.

    abstract::When registering food supplements in Russia, restrictions on the labeling and consumer leaflet contents are tightly controlled by the regulatory agencies. Thus, misleading advertising is the most difficult problem with the turnover of these products if information in the commercials does not correspond to the informat...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00043-z

    authors: Lozda R

    更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00

  • Insights and Best Practices for Planning and Implementing Patient Advisory Boards.

    abstract::A growing number of organizations-including pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, foundations and associations-are routinely implementing patient advisory boards (PAB) given their high reported value for minimal relative investment. Organizations are typically implementing PABs to solicit patient voices and pers...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479017720475

    authors: Anderson A,Getz KA

    更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • An Assessment of Concerns Regarding New Regulatory Guidance for Combination Products: A Review of the Submissions Made to the FDA Regarding Their Proposed Draft New Guidance on Human Factors Studies for a Combination Product in an Abbreviated New Drug App

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put out a call for comments on new draft guidance for industry "Comparative Analyses and Related Comparative Use Human Factors Studies for a Drug-Device Combination Product Submitted in an ANDA." This call for comments elicited 7 submissions from various organization...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1177/2168479018775659

    authors: Lance PT,Greenaway RV,Edwards B

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Interdisciplinary Safety Evaluation and Quantitative Safety Monitoring: Introduction to a Series of Papers.

    abstract::The American Statistical Association and DIA have created an interdisciplinary working group of drug safety experts from academia, industry and regulatory backgrounds to explore the future direction for safety monitoring. This introduction to the series explains the background and rationale for this special section. ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018793130

    authors: Seltzer JH,Li J,Wang W

    更新日期:2019-03-29 00:00:00

  • ADHD & Pharmacotherapy: Past, Present and Future: A Review of the Changing Landscape of Drug Therapy for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

    abstract::Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobiological disorder in children, with a prevalence of ~6-7%1,2 that has remained stable for decades2. The social and economic burden associated with patients3, families, and broader systems (healthcare/educational) is substantial, with the annual ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015599811

    authors: Connolly JJ,Glessner JT,Elia J,Hakonarson H

    更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00

  • Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs): A Story of International Collaboration Leading to Implementation.

    abstract::After nearly a decade of discussion, analysis, and development, the Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) initiative is beginning to see acceptance from regulators, industry, patients, and payers, with the first live pilot project initiated under the guidance of the European Medicines Agency in 2014. Althoug...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015618697

    authors: Schulthess D,Baird LG,Trusheim M,Unger TF,Lumpkin M,Hoos A,Garner S,Gavin P,Goldman M,Seigneuret N,Chlebus M,Van Baelen K,Bergstrom R,Hirsch G

    更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00

  • How FDA Advisory Committee Members Prepare and What Influences Them.

    abstract::Since 1992 many changes have occurred in the regulations, guidelines, and processes governing the FDA, the biomedical industry, other stakeholders, and their interactions. Of particular importance, the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 made public advisory committee meetings mandatory for new molecular entities and devices r...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/0092861512458096

    authors: McIntyre TD,Pappas M,DiBiasi JJ

    更新日期:2013-01-01 00:00:00

  • Adaptive Design: Results of 2012 Survey on Perception and Use.

    abstract::Adaptive designs are increasingly used in clinical trials. The Drug Information Association's Adaptive Design Scientific Working Group (ADSWG) works to foster collaboration among regulatory agencies, academia, and pharmaceutical and biotech companies to further the science of adaptive clinical development. The ADSWG S...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014522468

    authors: Morgan CC,Huyck S,Jenkins M,Chen L,Bedding A,Coffey CS,Gaydos B,Wathen JK

    更新日期:2014-07-01 00:00:00

  • Smart Program Design Through a Common Information Model.

    abstract::Although much information is already available publically from information-sharing initiatives such as ClinicalTrials.gov, information about clinical programs is unstructured, inconsistent, and incomplete. Clinical research within bioscience companies, health care, academia, and governmental agencies could benefit fro...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014539158

    authors: Vasko L,Sundgren M,Bachmann P,Balinski K,Bleich N,Blom T,Eriksson H,Ferendo R,Forsberg K,King D,Mordiva A,Proeve J,Thomas L,Witch E,Simán M

    更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00

  • Study Designs in Multi-arm Trials for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review of Major Journals.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Several articles showed that statistical efficiency of multi-arm randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is much better than conventional two-arm RCTs. Multi-arm RCTs attract interest mainly when the experimental treatment regimen is not optimized or several pipelines under development exist. Breast cancer is a po...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00141-3

    authors: Nomura S,Miyauchi Y,Ajisawa Y,Isogaya K,Sozu T

    更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Legislation on the Roles of the Pharmacist and Pharmacy in the Revision of the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Act and the Pharmacists Act in Japan.

    abstract::Japan's rapidly aging population has prompted a change in the country's pharmaceutical care framework from a drug-oriented to a patient-oriented approach. Pharmacies and pharmacists are expected to play central roles in this new patient-oriented approach by reconciling medication and managing polypharmacy, conducting ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00215-2

    authors: Takamura K,Tachibana K,Kihira T,Nakai K,Tsutsumi Y,Kondoh M

    更新日期:2020-09-11 00:00:00

  • A Multifaceted Perspective of Pharmaceutical Innovation: A Consideration of the Regulatory Role.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The pace of innovation, the creative engine of the pharmaceutical industry, has been variably described as stagnant, stable, or accelerating depending on the metric used for assessment or the quality of evidence. If the predominant perception holds that the speed of innovation is sluggish, pressure for chang...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00210-7

    authors: Robberson M,Breder CD

    更新日期:2020-08-31 00:00:00

  • Sources of Safety Data and Statistical Strategies for Design and Analysis: Postmarket Surveillance.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Safety data are continuously evaluated throughout the life cycle of a medical product to accurately assess and characterize the risks associated with the product. The knowledge about a medical product's safety profile continually evolves as safety data accumulate. METHODS:This paper discusses data sources a...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1177/2168479017741112

    authors: Izem R,Sanchez-Kam M,Ma H,Zink R,Zhao Y

    更新日期:2018-03-01 00:00:00

  • Factors that have an Impact on Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Submissions.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Increasing generic drug price competition by facilitating abbreviated new drug applications (ANDA) submission may help patients have access to affordable care. This study examined factors associated with first ANDA submission for the brand drug to be copied [the "reference listed drug" (RLD)]. METHODS:This ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00163-x

    authors: Wittayanukorn S,Rosenberg M,Schick A,Hu M,Wang Z,Babiskin A,Lionberger R,Zhao L

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Complex Generic Products: Insight of Current Regulatory Frameworks in US, EU and Canada and the Need of Harmonisation.

    abstract::The regulatory agencies all over the world have defined the pathway and regulations for the approval of simple small-molecule generics. In addition, the agencies are striving to form perspicuous regulatory frameworks for the approval of biosimilars. In this view, there are no defined regulations for the approval of co...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00114-6

    authors: Lunawat S,Bhat K

    更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Differences in Clinical Research Perceptions and Experiences by Age Subgroup.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:(1) To assess the differing viewpoints of actual and potential adult clinical trial participants in 5 age cohorts, (2) identify misperceptions and opportunities to reduce unnecessary burdens on volunteers, and (3) provide age-specific feedback to study sponsors on their current engagement efforts. METHODS:B...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00033-1

    authors: Anderson A,Borfitz D,Getz K

    更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00