Community Opinions on the Collection and Use of Historical Control Data in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies.

Abstract:

BACKGROUND:Access and use of historical control data was identified as a top stakeholder concern across organizations according to results of a survey of needs and challenges related to nonclinical data conducted by the FDA/PhUSE Nonclinical Working Group in 2011. There is a perception there may be additional ways to capitalize on historical control data to enhance studies or submissions across industry, academia, and government. During the working sessions of the FDA/PhUSE Computational Sciences Symposium in March 2012, a Historical Control subgroup of the FDA/PhUSE Nonclinical Working Group was formed to investigate how the industry might more effectively harness the vast amount of data from untreated/vehicle control animals. The subgroup includes broad representation of stakeholders with interest in nonclinical data. METHODS:This paper describes progress to date and includes results of a second survey to determine how organizations use and would like to use historical control data. RESULTS:Respondents to the survey strongly support that historical control data are useful and should be in an accessible format. Four potential project options were posed in the survey, with an overall positive response; also, several write-in options were suggested by respondents. CONCLUSIONS:Community-supported projects to increase the availability of well-annotated and scientifically curated collections of historical control data appear to be of most interest.

journal_name

Ther Innov Regul Sci

authors

Mihalcik LM,Bausman M,Brown P,Everds N,Feldmann J,Henck J,Potenta D,Sims J,Zandee J

doi

10.1177/2168479015600203

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2016-03-01 00:00:00

pages

174-187

issue

2

eissn

2168-4790

issn

2168-4804

journal_volume

50

pub_type

杂志文章
  • An Assessment of Concerns Regarding New Regulatory Guidance for Combination Products: A Review of the Submissions Made to the FDA Regarding Their Proposed Draft New Guidance on Human Factors Studies for a Combination Product in an Abbreviated New Drug App

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put out a call for comments on new draft guidance for industry "Comparative Analyses and Related Comparative Use Human Factors Studies for a Drug-Device Combination Product Submitted in an ANDA." This call for comments elicited 7 submissions from various organization...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1177/2168479018775659

    authors: Lance PT,Greenaway RV,Edwards B

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Statistical Considerations on Clinical Efficacy Studies of Biosimilar for PMDA Submission.

    abstract::In general, similar to FDA and other health authorities, the PMDA requires clinical efficacy study(ies) to evaluate equivalence between a reference biological product and a Biosimilar product for new drug applications. Even if an identical clinical efficacy study is included in both of PMDA and FDA submissions, the co...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00133-3

    authors: Asami Y,Pan J,Oh M,Sato A

    更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Regulatory Perspective of International Agencies for Development of Biosimilar Products (Monoclonal Antibodies): An Overview.

    abstract::Biopharmaceutical medicines are complex molecules obtained from a living organism (plant or animal cells) and may contain components of a living organism using biotechnology. Biosimilars are closely similar to already approved biopharmaceutical products that could form a new generation of medicines that are available ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00112-8

    authors: Sharma A,Khante S,Mahadik KR,Gaikwad VL

    更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Patient Experience Data in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulatory Decision Making:: A Policy Process Perspective.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The influence of patient advocates on FDA regulatory decision making has increased. Despite enhanced engagement with FDA, there remain challenges to achieving the regulatory goals of patients within FDA's regulatory framework. Gaps exist between patient advocates' knowledge of the agency's processes and FDA'...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479017753390

    authors: Kuehn CM

    更新日期:2018-09-01 00:00:00

  • Predicting Regulatory Product Approvals Using a Proposed Quantitative Version of FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework to Calculate Net-Benefit Score and Benefit-Risk Ratio.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Approval of regulated medical products in the USA is based upon a rigorous review of the benefits and risks as performed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff of scientists and is summarized in a descriptive and qualitative format called the FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework (BRF). This present metho...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00197-1

    authors: Sun S,Heske S,Mercadel M,Wimmer J

    更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • Complex Generic Products: Insight of Current Regulatory Frameworks in US, EU and Canada and the Need of Harmonisation.

    abstract::The regulatory agencies all over the world have defined the pathway and regulations for the approval of simple small-molecule generics. In addition, the agencies are striving to form perspicuous regulatory frameworks for the approval of biosimilars. In this view, there are no defined regulations for the approval of co...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00114-6

    authors: Lunawat S,Bhat K

    更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Single-Study Approvals: Quantum of Evidence Required.

    abstract::When does a single positive adequate and well-controlled study of a new drug meet the statutory requirement to demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness? The answer to this question, particularly with respect to new molecular entities, has been of considerable debate since 1962 when the requirement that new dr...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00103-4

    authors: Sasinowski FJ,Butler ML

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Considerations and Regulatory Challenges for Innovative Medicines in Expedited Approval Programs: Breakthrough Therapy and Sakigake Designation.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:In the breakthrough therapy designation (BTD) and Sakigake designation programs, rolling submission and close communication between applicants and regulatory authorities enable the timely access of patients to innovative medicines. However, challenges in the quality development, including chemistry, manufact...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00019-z

    authors: Kajiwara E,Shikano M

    更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00

  • An Overview and Analysis Regarding the Use of Adjudication Methods in EU and US Drug Approvals.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Several regulatory guidelines recommend that assessments of endpoints supporting drug approval should be verifiable by applicants and the regulatory agencies to minimize the potential for bias. This becomes especially critical when assessments are not based on measurable data but are derived from the interpr...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015580382

    authors: Krumholz-Bahner S,Garibbo M,Getz KA,Widler BE

    更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Evolving Clinical Data Strategies and Tactics in Response to Digital Transformation.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Contending with a continuously expanding volume and variety of clinical data poses challenges and opportunities for the industry and clinical data management organizations. METHODS:Tufts CSDD conducted an online survey aimed at further quantifying and understanding the magnitude and impact that expanded dat...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00213-4

    authors: Harper B,Wilkinson M,Indupuri R,Rocchio S,Getz K

    更新日期:2020-09-14 00:00:00

  • Implementation of the European QRD Template in Package Leaflets of Centralized Approved Medicines.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Package leaflets of medicines distributed within the European Union should use the template headings and standard texts created by the Working Group on the Quality Review of Documents (QRD). The following study investigated how the QRD template is implemented in this patient information. METHODS:All English...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015620247

    authors: Wolf A,Fuchs J,Schweim HG

    更新日期:2016-01-01 00:00:00

  • Optimal Decision Criteria for the Study Design and Sample Size of a Biomarker-Driven Phase III Trial.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The design and sample size of a phase III study for new medical technologies were historically determined within the framework of frequentist hypothesis testing. Recently, drug development using predictive biomarkers, which can predict efficacy based on the status of biomarkers, has attracted attention, and ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00119-1

    authors: Takazawa A,Morita S

    更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Regulatory Issues of Voluntary Certification of Food Supplements in Russia.

    abstract::When registering food supplements in Russia, restrictions on the labeling and consumer leaflet contents are tightly controlled by the regulatory agencies. Thus, misleading advertising is the most difficult problem with the turnover of these products if information in the commercials does not correspond to the informat...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00043-z

    authors: Lozda R

    更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00

  • phactMI Benchmarking Survey on Content Development and Inquiry Management.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Medical information (MI) departments across pharmaceutical companies respond to medical inquiries about a company's products to healthcare providers, payors, patients, and caregivers. Responses provided are constructed to be relevant, accurate, scientifically balanced and delivered in a timely manner. Benchm...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00137-z

    authors: Byun J,Jong JA,Gangat A,Flowers T,Gazo A,Shah I

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Expediting Drug Development: FDA's New Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy Designation.

    abstract::In March 2017, the US FDA introduced the new Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation thus recognizing the enormous potential of these medicines and the need for efficient regulatory tools to accelerate their development and their commercial availability. The development of regenerative medicines is v...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018779373

    authors: Vaggelas A,Seimetz D

    更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00

  • Expanded Access Programs: Ethical and Practical Considerations for Biopharmaceutical Sponsors.

    abstract::Expanded access is a regulatory mechanism by which an investigational drug can be made available outside of a clinical trial to treat patients with serious or life-threatening conditions for which there are no satisfactory treatment options. An expanded access program (EAP) is the formal plan under which preapproval a...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015578154

    authors: Klopfenstein M,Van Campen LE,Garnett T

    更新日期:2015-05-01 00:00:00

  • Evaluation and Characterization of Health Economics and Outcomes Research in SAARC Nations.

    abstract:OBJECTIVE:To identify, evaluate, and characterize the variety, quality, and intent of the health economics and outcomes research studies being conducted in SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) nations. METHODS:Studies published in English language between 1990 and 2015 were retrieved from Medline d...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1177/2168479017731583

    authors: Mehta M,Nerurkar R

    更新日期:2018-05-01 00:00:00

  • Bowel Preparations for Colonoscopy: A Regulatory Perspective.

    abstract::Agents indicated for cleansing of the colon as a preparation for colonoscopy (bowel preps) are among the most frequently prescribed drugs for otherwise healthy patients. Better bowel preparation has been shown to translate into higher adenoma detection rates. Therefore, safety and efficacy standards need to be high. C...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015577868

    authors: Gottlieb K,Turner JR,Gillespie BS,Hussain F

    更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00

  • Legislation on the Roles of the Pharmacist and Pharmacy in the Revision of the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Act and the Pharmacists Act in Japan.

    abstract::Japan's rapidly aging population has prompted a change in the country's pharmaceutical care framework from a drug-oriented to a patient-oriented approach. Pharmacies and pharmacists are expected to play central roles in this new patient-oriented approach by reconciling medication and managing polypharmacy, conducting ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00215-2

    authors: Takamura K,Tachibana K,Kihira T,Nakai K,Tsutsumi Y,Kondoh M

    更新日期:2020-09-11 00:00:00

  • Lessons Learned From Hundreds of Thorough QT Studies.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The coherence between the relationship of QTc and drug plasma concentration (this relationship is measured through the slope) and ICH E14 findings based on hundreds of QT study reports was studied. RESULTS:Based on ICH E14 analysis, our findings indicate that if the slope was not positive, in most cases (86...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014563549

    authors: Zhang J,Chen H,Tsong Y,Stockbridge N

    更新日期:2015-05-01 00:00:00

  • Choosing Appropriate Estimands in Clinical Trials.

    abstract::Lack of adherence to study protocol and missing data are often unavoidable in clinical trials, and both increase the need to differentiate between the ideal treatment effect if the medication is taken as directed and the treatment effect in presence of the actual adherence pattern. In this regard, estimands have becom...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014567317

    authors: Leuchs AK,Zinserling J,Brandt A,Wirtz D,Benda N

    更新日期:2015-07-01 00:00:00

  • Development and Validation of a Brief Measure of Self-Management Competence: The Self-Management Self-Test (SMST).

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Self-management can be considered a way of dealing with oneself and relates to actions undertaken to create order, discipline, and control. The concept is closely linked to concepts of self-efficacy and self-regulation but can be distinguished from these. The Self-Management Self-Test (SMST) is a 5-item asse...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479019849879

    authors: Wehmeier PM,Fox T,Doerr JM,Schnierer N,Bender M,Nater UM

    更新日期:2019-07-14 00:00:00

  • Sources of Safety Data and Statistical Strategies for Design and Analysis: Postmarket Surveillance.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Safety data are continuously evaluated throughout the life cycle of a medical product to accurately assess and characterize the risks associated with the product. The knowledge about a medical product's safety profile continually evolves as safety data accumulate. METHODS:This paper discusses data sources a...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1177/2168479017741112

    authors: Izem R,Sanchez-Kam M,Ma H,Zink R,Zhao Y

    更新日期:2018-03-01 00:00:00

  • Monitoring and Evaluating the Effect of Regulatory Action: Some Recent Case Studies.

    abstract::Large electronic health care databases can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of regulatory action. Designing and interpreting such studies can be challenging. We demonstrate using case studies on modafinil, benzodiazepines, dosulepin, and piroxicam that measuring the impact of regulatory action is possible and can...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015570333

    authors: Thomson A,Meeraus WH,Wong J,Suvarna R

    更新日期:2015-07-01 00:00:00

  • How FDA Advisory Committee Members Prepare and What Influences Them.

    abstract::Since 1992 many changes have occurred in the regulations, guidelines, and processes governing the FDA, the biomedical industry, other stakeholders, and their interactions. Of particular importance, the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 made public advisory committee meetings mandatory for new molecular entities and devices r...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/0092861512458096

    authors: McIntyre TD,Pappas M,DiBiasi JJ

    更新日期:2013-01-01 00:00:00

  • Impact of Premium Rewards for the Promotion of Innovative Drug Discovery on the Japanese Pharmaceutical Market: An Analysis by Therapeutic Area.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:A new incentive program, "Premium Rewards for the Promotion of Innovative Drug Discovery and Resolution of Off-Label Use, etc," was introduced in Japan in 2010 and subsequently applied in 2010, 2012, and 2014. In our previous study, we reported statistical evidence regarding the attributes of drugs for which...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015600205

    authors: Shibata S,Uemura R,Suzuki T

    更新日期:2016-01-01 00:00:00

  • Regulatory Definitions and Good Pharmacovigilance Practices in Social Media: Challenges and Recommendations.

    abstract::Social media presents new challenges to the biopharmaceutical industry for conducting pharmacovigilance activities. The authors reviewed worldwide regulatory guidance documents related to monitoring of adverse events posted on social media sites and identified gaps in current regulatory definitions for pharmacovigilan...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015587362

    authors: Naik P,Umrath T,van Stekelenborg J,Ruben R,Abdul-Karim N,Boland R,Ibara M,Ekuta J,Washburn D,Stergiopoulos S

    更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Factors that have an Impact on Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Submissions.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Increasing generic drug price competition by facilitating abbreviated new drug applications (ANDA) submission may help patients have access to affordable care. This study examined factors associated with first ANDA submission for the brand drug to be copied [the "reference listed drug" (RLD)]. METHODS:This ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00163-x

    authors: Wittayanukorn S,Rosenberg M,Schick A,Hu M,Wang Z,Babiskin A,Lionberger R,Zhao L

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Global Pediatric Regulations: An Overview.

    abstract::The purpose of the present review is to summarize the current pediatric regulatory requirements and also the regulatory efforts that need to be taken for the potential benefits of safety and efficacy to the pediatric patients. The importance of pediatric regulations came into existence as adult physiological condition...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00087-1

    authors: Gadge PM,Kenjale PP,Pokharkar VB,Gaikwad VL

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • A Novel Collaborative Approach to Building Better Clinical Trials: New Insights From a Patient Engagement Workshop to Propel Patient-Centricity Forward.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:(1) A growing number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology organizations are engaging patients, their support networks, and clinical trial site staff at various touchpoints along the clinical research development spectrum to solicit feedback on how to reduce the burden of clinical trial participation and admin...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479019849875

    authors: Gregg A,Getz N,Benger J,Anderson A

    更新日期:2019-05-22 00:00:00