当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science期刊下所有文献 > Patient Experience Data in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulatory Decision Making:: A Policy Process Perspective.

Patient Experience Data in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulatory Decision Making:: A Policy Process Perspective.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:The influence of patient advocates on FDA regulatory decision making has increased. Despite enhanced engagement with FDA, there remain challenges to achieving the regulatory goals of patients within FDA's regulatory framework. Gaps exist between patient advocates' knowledge of the agency's processes and FDA's need for rigorous, clinically meaningful patient experience data. This study examined the policy process in which patient experience data are collected by patient advocates and provided to FDA for regulatory decision making. METHODS:Semistructured, narrative interviews were conducted with 14 professionals working in patient advocacy or at FDA. The purpose was to examine, in depth, participants' perceptions and experiences regarding this new regulatory process. Interviews were coded and examined for themes. RESULTS:The use of patient experience data by FDA is an evolving regulatory process. Participants identified a number of barriers and contributors to regulatory success. Well-organized and sophisticated patient advocacy groups with access to scientific and policy expertise are more likely to find success meeting FDA's patient experience data requirements. A conceptual model of this regulatory process was developed. CONCLUSIONS:Use of patient experience data by FDA has the potential to positively influence the regulation of medical products in the United States. Success within this new regulatory process will depend on clear guidance from FDA regarding the collection, analysis, and use of patient experience data. Patient advocacy groups must enhance internal capacity and expertise while engaging in substantive collaborations with FDA and other stakeholders in order to meaningfully contribute to the regulatory review of new therapeutics.

journal_name

Ther Innov Regul Sci

journal_title

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors

Kuehn CM

doi

10.1177/2168479017753390

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2018-09-01 00:00:00

pages

661-668

issue

5

eissn

2168-4790

issn

2168-4804

journal_volume

52

pub_type

杂志文章

相关文献

Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science文献大全
  • A Novel Collaborative Approach to Building Better Clinical Trials: New Insights From a Patient Engagement Workshop to Propel Patient-Centricity Forward.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:(1) A growing number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology organizations are engaging patients, their support networks, and clinical trial site staff at various touchpoints along the clinical research development spectrum to solicit feedback on how to reduce the burden of clinical trial participation and admin...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479019849875

    authors： Gregg A,Getz N,Benger J,Anderson A

    更新日期：2019-05-22 00:00:00

  • How is the Pharmaceutical Industry Structured to Optimize Pediatric Drug Development? Existing Pediatric Structure Models and Proposed Recommendations for Structural Enhancement.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Pediatric regulations enacted in both Europe and the USA have disrupted the pharmaceutical industry, challenging business and drug development processes, and organizational structures. Over the last decade, with science and innovation evolving, industry has moved from a reactive to a proactive mode, investin...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00116-4

    authors： Severin T,Corriol-Rohou S,Bucci-Rechtweg C,An Haack K,Fuerst-Recktenwald S,Lepola P,Norjavaara E,Dehlinger-Kremer M,EFGCP Children’s Medicines Working Party.,Haertter S,Cheung SYA,IQ Pediatric Working Group.

    更新日期：2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Predicting Regulatory Product Approvals Using a Proposed Quantitative Version of FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework to Calculate Net-Benefit Score and Benefit-Risk Ratio.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Approval of regulated medical products in the USA is based upon a rigorous review of the benefits and risks as performed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff of scientists and is summarized in a descriptive and qualitative format called the FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework (BRF). This present metho...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00197-1

    authors： Sun S,Heske S,Mercadel M,Wimmer J

    更新日期：2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • Interdisciplinary Safety Evaluation and Quantitative Safety Monitoring: Introduction to a Series of Papers.

    abstract：:The American Statistical Association and DIA have created an interdisciplinary working group of drug safety experts from academia, industry and regulatory backgrounds to explore the future direction for safety monitoring. This introduction to the series explains the background and rationale for this special section. ...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479018793130

    authors： Seltzer JH,Li J,Wang W

    更新日期：2019-03-29 00:00:00

  • Methods for Employing Information About Uncertainty of Ascertainment of Events in Clinical Trials.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Uncertain ascertainment of events in clinical trials has been noted for decades. To correct possible bias, Clinical Endpoint Committees (CECs) have been employed as a critical element of trials to ensure consistent and high-quality endpoint evaluation, especially for cardiovascular endpoints. However, the ef...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00206-3

    authors： Chen Y,Lawrence J,Hung HMJ,Stockbridge N

    更新日期：2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • Choosing a Mobile Sensor Technology for a Clinical Trial: Statistical Considerations, Developments and Learnings.

    abstract：:The DIA Study Endpoints Community Working Group on Mobile Sensor Technology (MST) series addresses considerations that may be useful for selecting MST for use in a clinical trial. This article describes considerations regarding the selection of MST for clinical trials including expectations around technology specifica...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00188-2

    authors： Russell C,McCarthy M,Cappelleri JC,Wong S

    更新日期：2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • Lessons Learned From Hundreds of Thorough QT Studies.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:The coherence between the relationship of QTc and drug plasma concentration (this relationship is measured through the slope) and ICH E14 findings based on hundreds of QT study reports was studied. RESULTS:Based on ICH E14 analysis, our findings indicate that if the slope was not positive, in most cases (86...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479014563549

    authors： Zhang J,Chen H,Tsong Y,Stockbridge N

    更新日期：2015-05-01 00:00:00

  • Regulatory Definitions and Good Pharmacovigilance Practices in Social Media: Challenges and Recommendations.

    abstract：:Social media presents new challenges to the biopharmaceutical industry for conducting pharmacovigilance activities. The authors reviewed worldwide regulatory guidance documents related to monitoring of adverse events posted on social media sites and identified gaps in current regulatory definitions for pharmacovigilan...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015587362

    authors： Naik P,Umrath T,van Stekelenborg J,Ruben R,Abdul-Karim N,Boland R,Ibara M,Ekuta J,Washburn D,Stergiopoulos S

    更新日期：2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Improving Drug Development and Patient Access With the Right People, Processes, and Culture: What Needs to Happen Right Now to Bring Better Medicines to the Patients Who Need Them.

    abstract：:In a global environment where health care costs are soaring, R&D efforts are flatlining. Meanwhile, payers are demanding more value for their money. In this environment, the traditional siloed drug development model is not sustainable. Yet innovations such as adaptive trial designs, real-world data collection, precisi...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479018814224

    authors： Grignolo A,Siu A

    更新日期：2019-05-01 00:00:00

  • Insights and Best Practices for Planning and Implementing Patient Advisory Boards.

    abstract：:A growing number of organizations-including pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, foundations and associations-are routinely implementing patient advisory boards (PAB) given their high reported value for minimal relative investment. Organizations are typically implementing PABs to solicit patient voices and pers...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479017720475

    authors： Anderson A,Getz KA

    更新日期：2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • An Overview and Analysis Regarding the Use of Adjudication Methods in EU and US Drug Approvals.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Several regulatory guidelines recommend that assessments of endpoints supporting drug approval should be verifiable by applicants and the regulatory agencies to minimize the potential for bias. This becomes especially critical when assessments are not based on measurable data but are derived from the interpr...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015580382

    authors： Krumholz-Bahner S,Garibbo M,Getz KA,Widler BE

    更新日期：2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Principled Structured Incorporation of Clinical Knowledge Into Strategic Development Decisions.

    abstract：:Efficient use of limited pharmaceutical product development resources requires integrating multiple attributes, such as efficacy, safety, pharmacology, and so on, to decide at any stage whether the development of a product should proceed aggressively or slowly or be terminated. The decision process proceeds most effec...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479014558273

    authors： Gould AL,Krishna R,Khan A,Saltzman J

    更新日期：2015-03-01 00:00:00

  • Exact Confidence Limits on Some New Measures of Concordance and Discordance in Binary Outcomes.

    abstract：:Using a measure of agreement that does not distinguish the "positive" outcome from the "negative" outcome can be sometimes misleading in assessing resemblance. To alleviate this concern, some new indices, including the "positive" and "negative" conditional synchrony measures (CSM) (or the conditional discordant measur...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-019-00074-6

    authors： Lui KJ

    更新日期：2020-03-01 00:00:00

  • Study Designs in Multi-arm Trials for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review of Major Journals.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Several articles showed that statistical efficiency of multi-arm randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is much better than conventional two-arm RCTs. Multi-arm RCTs attract interest mainly when the experimental treatment regimen is not optimized or several pipelines under development exist. Breast cancer is a po...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00141-3

    authors： Nomura S,Miyauchi Y,Ajisawa Y,Isogaya K,Sozu T

    更新日期：2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Complex Generic Products: Insight of Current Regulatory Frameworks in US, EU and Canada and the Need of Harmonisation.

    abstract：:The regulatory agencies all over the world have defined the pathway and regulations for the approval of simple small-molecule generics. In addition, the agencies are striving to form perspicuous regulatory frameworks for the approval of biosimilars. In this view, there are no defined regulations for the approval of co...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章,评审

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00114-6

    authors： Lunawat S,Bhat K

    更新日期：2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • An Assessment of Concerns Regarding New Regulatory Guidance for Combination Products: A Review of the Submissions Made to the FDA Regarding Their Proposed Draft New Guidance on Human Factors Studies for a Combination Product in an Abbreviated New Drug App

    abstract：BACKGROUND:The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put out a call for comments on new draft guidance for industry "Comparative Analyses and Related Comparative Use Human Factors Studies for a Drug-Device Combination Product Submitted in an ANDA." This call for comments elicited 7 submissions from various organization...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章,评审

    doi：10.1177/2168479018775659

    authors： Lance PT,Greenaway RV,Edwards B

    更新日期：2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Sentiment of Media Coverage and Reputation of the Pharmaceutical Industry.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Patients and health care professionals receive information about pharmaceutical companies through various sources, including but not limited to print media, social media, and electronic media. The objective of this research was to benchmark the sentiment of electronic newspaper media coverage between 2014 an...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-019-00048-8

    authors： Pampulevski V,Giaquinto JR,Rametta M,Toscani M,Barone J,Nadal JC

    更新日期：2020-01-01 00:00:00

  • Community Opinions on the Collection and Use of Historical Control Data in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Access and use of historical control data was identified as a top stakeholder concern across organizations according to results of a survey of needs and challenges related to nonclinical data conducted by the FDA/PhUSE Nonclinical Working Group in 2011. There is a perception there may be additional ways to c...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015600203

    authors： Mihalcik LM,Bausman M,Brown P,Everds N,Feldmann J,Henck J,Potenta D,Sims J,Zandee J

    更新日期：2016-03-01 00:00:00

  • A Universal Framework for the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Is This the Way Forward?

    abstract：:A universal framework for the evaluation of the benefit-risk assessment of medicines during development by pharmaceutical companies and in the regulatory review by regulatory authorities is considered of value, as it would result in the systematic structured approach to support transparency in decision making. Several...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479014547421

    authors： Walker S,McAuslane N,Liberti L,Leong J,Salek S

    更新日期：2015-01-01 00:00:00

  • Expanded Access Programs: Ethical and Practical Considerations for Biopharmaceutical Sponsors.

    abstract：:Expanded access is a regulatory mechanism by which an investigational drug can be made available outside of a clinical trial to treat patients with serious or life-threatening conditions for which there are no satisfactory treatment options. An expanded access program (EAP) is the formal plan under which preapproval a...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015578154

    authors： Klopfenstein M,Van Campen LE,Garnett T

    更新日期：2015-05-01 00:00:00

  • An Analysis of Regulatory Timing and Outcomes for New Drug Applications Submitted to Swissmedic: Comparison With the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:This study compared the timing, regulatory marketing authorization decisions, and the final labeling for products submitted to Swissmedic to those submitted to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS:The Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS) conducte...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479016655841

    authors： Dörr P,Wadworth A,Wang T,McAuslane N,Liberti L

    更新日期：2016-11-01 00:00:00

  • The Roles of Regulatory Science Research in Drug Development at the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency of Japan.

    abstract：:Recently, it is becoming increasingly difficult to develop innovative drugs. Thus, the role of regulatory science research in drug development and postmarketing settings has become more important. In this article, the authors discuss the roles of regulatory science research at the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices A...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479012469950

    authors： Asahina Y,Tanaka A,Uyama Y,Kuramochi K,Maruyama H

    更新日期：2013-01-01 00:00:00

  • ADHD & Pharmacotherapy: Past, Present and Future: A Review of the Changing Landscape of Drug Therapy for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

    abstract：:Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobiological disorder in children, with a prevalence of ~6-7%1,2 that has remained stable for decades2. The social and economic burden associated with patients3, families, and broader systems (healthcare/educational) is substantial, with the annual ...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015599811

    authors： Connolly JJ,Glessner JT,Elia J,Hakonarson H

    更新日期：2015-09-01 00:00:00

  • Industry and Patient Perspectives on Child Participation in Clinical Trials: The Pediatric Assent Initiative Survey Report.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:Obtaining assent from children participating in clinical trials acknowledges autonomy and developmental ability to contribute to the consent process. This critical step in pediatric drug development remains poorly understood, with significant room for improving the clarity, efficiency, and implementation of ...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479017716490

    authors： Lombardi D,Squires L,Sjostedt P,Eichler I,Turner MA,Thompson C

    更新日期：2018-01-01 00:00:00

  • Comparative Assessment of Non-trial Access to Investigational Medical Products in the U.S. and Japan.

    abstract：:The U.S. and Japan have preapproval access systems for patients who have exhausted approved treatment options. We compare the systems of both countries and discuss some ethical concerns surrounding non-trial access to investigational drugs. Notable points of comparison of the two countries' systems include cost of non...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00228-x

    authors： Nakada H,Folkers KM,Takashima K

    更新日期：2020-10-23 00:00:00

  • Assessing the Quality of Database Search Strategies Utilized by Meta-analyses That Evaluate Infectious Disease Drug Therapy.

    abstract：:Meta-analyses are increasingly influencing clinical practice, but significant methodological flaws have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of search strategies utilized by anti-infective meta-analyses. The Embase database was searched for meta-analyses evaluating anti-infective drug t...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479013516774

    authors： Marler JL,Curry KY,Suda KJ

    更新日期：2014-05-01 00:00:00

  • Implementing the Principle of the 3 Rs Through the Indian Pharmacopoeia.

    abstract：:Quality and safety tests are required for regulatory approval of drugs and pharmaceuticals in the country to guarantee minimum safety standards, and most of these tests include animal usage. In the case of biological medicines, these safety and quality tests have to be performed on a batch-to-batch basis and require a...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015572371

    authors： Rastogi S,Kalaivani M,Bhatia AK,Prakash J,Singh GN

    更新日期：2015-09-01 00:00:00

  • Bowel Preparations for Colonoscopy: A Regulatory Perspective.

    abstract：:Agents indicated for cleansing of the colon as a preparation for colonoscopy (bowel preps) are among the most frequently prescribed drugs for otherwise healthy patients. Better bowel preparation has been shown to translate into higher adenoma detection rates. Therefore, safety and efficacy standards need to be high. C...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015577868

    authors： Gottlieb K,Turner JR,Gillespie BS,Hussain F

    更新日期：2015-09-01 00:00:00

  • Monitoring and Evaluating the Effect of Regulatory Action: Some Recent Case Studies.

    abstract：:Large electronic health care databases can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of regulatory action. Designing and interpreting such studies can be challenging. We demonstrate using case studies on modafinil, benzodiazepines, dosulepin, and piroxicam that measuring the impact of regulatory action is possible and can...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1177/2168479015570333

    authors： Thomson A,Meeraus WH,Wong J,Suvarna R

    更新日期：2015-07-01 00:00:00

  • Alternative New Mono-scaled Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Japan.

    abstract：BACKGROUND:The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage is very low in Japan since the government suspended the active encouragement of the vaccination. We aimed to conduct a benefit-risk assessment of HPV vaccination and explore different consequent scenarios to identify potential improvements to the current Japane...

    journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type： 杂志文章

    doi：10.1007/s43441-020-00189-1

    authors： Matsumoto T,Matsumaru N,Scuffham P,Neels P,Tsukamoto K

    更新日期：2021-01-01 00:00:00