Factors that have an Impact on Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Submissions.

abstract：:Adaptive designs are increasingly used in clinical trials. The Drug Information Association's Adaptive Design Scientific Working Group (ADSWG) works to foster collaboration among regulatory agencies, academia, and pharmaceutical and biotech companies to further the science of adaptive clinical development. The ADSWG S...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Morgan CC,Huyck S,Jenkins M,Chen L,Bedding A,Coffey CS,Gaydos B,Wathen JK

更新日期：2014-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Using a measure of agreement that does not distinguish the "positive" outcome from the "negative" outcome can be sometimes misleading in assessing resemblance. To alleviate this concern, some new indices, including the "positive" and "negative" conditional synchrony measures (CSM) (or the conditional discordant measur...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Lui KJ

更新日期：2020-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：:The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 gave the FDA the authority to require drug sponsors to submit a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program for those medicines with serious risks such that failure to effectively manage these risks would tip the benefit-risk balance. As of August 8,...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Cronin M,Berger S,Seligman PJ

更新日期：2014-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:(1) A growing number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology organizations are engaging patients, their support networks, and clinical trial site staff at various touchpoints along the clinical research development spectrum to solicit feedback on how to reduce the burden of clinical trial participation and admin...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Gregg A,Getz N,Benger J,Anderson A

更新日期：2019-05-22 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Medical information (MI) departments across pharmaceutical companies respond to medical inquiries about a company's products to healthcare providers, payors, patients, and caregivers. Responses provided are constructed to be relevant, accurate, scientifically balanced and delivered in a timely manner. Benchm...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Byun J,Jong JA,Gangat A,Flowers T,Gazo A,Shah I

更新日期：2020-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Although much information is already available publically from information-sharing initiatives such as ClinicalTrials.gov, information about clinical programs is unstructured, inconsistent, and incomplete. Clinical research within bioscience companies, health care, academia, and governmental agencies could benefit fro...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Vasko L,Sundgren M,Bachmann P,Balinski K,Bleich N,Blom T,Eriksson H,Ferendo R,Forsberg K,King D,Mordiva A,Proeve J,Thomas L,Witch E,Simán M

更新日期：2015-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:According to 21 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 211, Over-the-Counter (OTC) drug manufacturers must establish and follow current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) to produce quality products while meeting regulatory standards. The warning letters issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Bai HK,Ahearn JD,Bartlett MG

更新日期：2020-10-23 00:00:00

abstract：:In general, similar to FDA and other health authorities, the PMDA requires clinical efficacy study(ies) to evaluate equivalence between a reference biological product and a Biosimilar product for new drug applications. Even if an identical clinical efficacy study is included in both of PMDA and FDA submissions, the co...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Asami Y,Pan J,Oh M,Sato A

更新日期：2020-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Patients and health care professionals receive information about pharmaceutical companies through various sources, including but not limited to print media, social media, and electronic media. The objective of this research was to benchmark the sentiment of electronic newspaper media coverage between 2014 an...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Pampulevski V,Giaquinto JR,Rametta M,Toscani M,Barone J,Nadal JC

更新日期：2020-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Communicating the clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeling is important for safe and effective use of certain prescription products. Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance does not provide comprehensive recommendations on the communication of clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeli...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Guinn D,Madabushi R,Wang YM,Brodsky E,Zineh I,Maxfield K

更新日期：2020-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Obtaining assent from children participating in clinical trials acknowledges autonomy and developmental ability to contribute to the consent process. This critical step in pediatric drug development remains poorly understood, with significant room for improving the clarity, efficiency, and implementation of ...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Lombardi D,Squires L,Sjostedt P,Eichler I,Turner MA,Thompson C

更新日期：2018-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Meta-analyses are increasingly influencing clinical practice, but significant methodological flaws have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of search strategies utilized by anti-infective meta-analyses. The Embase database was searched for meta-analyses evaluating anti-infective drug t...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Marler JL,Curry KY,Suda KJ

更新日期：2014-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Large electronic health care databases can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of regulatory action. Designing and interpreting such studies can be challenging. We demonstrate using case studies on modafinil, benzodiazepines, dosulepin, and piroxicam that measuring the impact of regulatory action is possible and can...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Thomson A,Meeraus WH,Wong J,Suvarna R

更新日期：2015-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Uncertain ascertainment of events in clinical trials has been noted for decades. To correct possible bias, Clinical Endpoint Committees (CECs) have been employed as a critical element of trials to ensure consistent and high-quality endpoint evaluation, especially for cardiovascular endpoints. However, the ef...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Chen Y,Lawrence J,Hung HMJ,Stockbridge N

更新日期：2021-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：:A universal framework for the evaluation of the benefit-risk assessment of medicines during development by pharmaceutical companies and in the regulatory review by regulatory authorities is considered of value, as it would result in the systematic structured approach to support transparency in decision making. Several...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Walker S,McAuslane N,Liberti L,Leong J,Salek S

更新日期：2015-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：:After nearly a decade of discussion, analysis, and development, the Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) initiative is beginning to see acceptance from regulators, industry, patients, and payers, with the first live pilot project initiated under the guidance of the European Medicines Agency in 2014. Althoug...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Schulthess D,Baird LG,Trusheim M,Unger TF,Lumpkin M,Hoos A,Garner S,Gavin P,Goldman M,Seigneuret N,Chlebus M,Van Baelen K,Bergstrom R,Hirsch G

更新日期：2016-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:In the breakthrough therapy designation (BTD) and Sakigake designation programs, rolling submission and close communication between applicants and regulatory authorities enable the timely access of patients to innovative medicines. However, challenges in the quality development, including chemistry, manufact...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Kajiwara E,Shikano M

更新日期：2020-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Source data verification (SDV) is the process of confirming that reliable, accurate information collected from participants during a clinical trial has been reported successfully to the trial's sponsor by investigators conducting the study. Over the past 15 years or so, there has been considerable discussion in the li...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Nielsen E,Hyder D,Deng C

更新日期：2014-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Timely access to new medicines may be addressed through strengthening of registration efficiencies and timelines by establishing and refining value-added registration processes, resources, and systems. The aims of this study were to evaluate the timelines of the milestones of the South African review process...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Keyter A,Salek S,Gouws J,Banoo S,Walker S

更新日期：2020-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Confirmation of efficacy in pediatric drug development has traditionally required large, fully powered efficacy studies that have proven to have major feasibility and ethical challenges. Extrapolation of efficacy in the framework provided by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency is an appro...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Leil TA,Zee P,Suryawanshi S,Male C,Portman R

更新日期：2013-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Substance abuse research can raise ethical concerns about the comprehension and decision-making capacities of participants with drug dependence. In this study, the competence and willingness to consent to research participation were examined among patients with heroin dependence. METHODS:Twenty patients wit...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Zhao L,Shi H,Ying B,Li Q

更新日期：2020-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：:A growing number of organizations-including pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, foundations and associations-are routinely implementing patient advisory boards (PAB) given their high reported value for minimal relative investment. Organizations are typically implementing PABs to solicit patient voices and pers...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Anderson A,Getz KA

更新日期：2018-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：:When does a single positive adequate and well-controlled study of a new drug meet the statutory requirement to demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness? The answer to this question, particularly with respect to new molecular entities, has been of considerable debate since 1962 when the requirement that new dr...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Sasinowski FJ,Butler ML

更新日期：2020-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：:The U.S. and Japan have preapproval access systems for patients who have exhausted approved treatment options. We compare the systems of both countries and discuss some ethical concerns surrounding non-trial access to investigational drugs. Notable points of comparison of the two countries' systems include cost of non...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Nakada H,Folkers KM,Takashima K

更新日期：2020-10-23 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put out a call for comments on new draft guidance for industry "Comparative Analyses and Related Comparative Use Human Factors Studies for a Drug-Device Combination Product Submitted in an ANDA." This call for comments elicited 7 submissions from various organization...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Lance PT,Greenaway RV,Edwards B

更新日期：2019-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Time progression models provide a significant advantage in developing clinical trials and can also be used to elicit comparisons among therapeutic agents. The authors performed a meta-analysis to construct a time progression model for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an area of significant interest for pharmaceutical develo...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Reeve R,Pang L,Ferguson B,O'Kelly M,Berry S,Xiao W

更新日期：2013-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Quality and safety tests are required for regulatory approval of drugs and pharmaceuticals in the country to guarantee minimum safety standards, and most of these tests include animal usage. In the case of biological medicines, these safety and quality tests have to be performed on a batch-to-batch basis and require a...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Rastogi S,Kalaivani M,Bhatia AK,Prakash J,Singh GN

更新日期：2015-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Risk-based monitoring (RBM) has disrupted the clinical trial industry, challenging conventional monitoring norms, business processes, and organizational structures. Endorsed by regulators and leading industry forums, and further driven by escalating drug development costs and enabling technology shifts making data ava...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Limaye N,Jaguste V

更新日期：2019-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：:The volume and diversity of data collected to support each clinical study has increased dramatically in response to the rising scope and complexity of global drug development programs. The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted an online survey of 257 unique global companies-77% drug development spon...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Wilkinson M,Young R,Harper B,Machion B,Getz K

更新日期：2019-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Efficient use of limited pharmaceutical product development resources requires integrating multiple attributes, such as efficacy, safety, pharmacology, and so on, to decide at any stage whether the development of a product should proceed aggressively or slowly or be terminated. The decision process proceeds most effec...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Gould AL,Krishna R,Khan A,Saltzman J

更新日期：2015-03-01 00:00:00