Insights and Best Practices for Planning and Implementing Patient Advisory Boards.

Abstract:

:A growing number of organizations-including pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, foundations and associations-are routinely implementing patient advisory boards (PAB) given their high reported value for minimal relative investment. Organizations are typically implementing PABs to solicit patient voices and perspectives on a variety of areas such as protocol designs, clinical trial medicine kit designs, informed consent form designs, technology solutions, and patient communication materials. The Center for Information and Study on Clinical Research Participation (CISCRP) has planned, executed, and facilitated more than 30 PABs. In this article, the authors share lessons learned and best practices with regard to structure, format, and process for organizations wishing to adopt and implement PABs. The authors also provide metrics on the adoption and impact of PABs.

journal_name

Ther Innov Regul Sci

authors

Anderson A,Getz KA

doi

10.1177/2168479017720475

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2018-07-01 00:00:00

pages

469-473

issue

4

eissn

2168-4790

issn

2168-4804

journal_volume

52

pub_type

杂志文章
  • An Analysis of Regulatory Timing and Outcomes for New Drug Applications Submitted to Swissmedic: Comparison With the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:This study compared the timing, regulatory marketing authorization decisions, and the final labeling for products submitted to Swissmedic to those submitted to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS:The Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS) conducte...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479016655841

    authors: Dörr P,Wadworth A,Wang T,McAuslane N,Liberti L

    更新日期:2016-11-01 00:00:00

  • Differences in Clinical Research Perceptions and Experiences by Age Subgroup.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:(1) To assess the differing viewpoints of actual and potential adult clinical trial participants in 5 age cohorts, (2) identify misperceptions and opportunities to reduce unnecessary burdens on volunteers, and (3) provide age-specific feedback to study sponsors on their current engagement efforts. METHODS:B...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00033-1

    authors: Anderson A,Borfitz D,Getz K

    更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00

  • New Benchmarks Characterizing Growth in Protocol Design Complexity.

    abstract::The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development and Medidata Solutions Inc analyzed data from 9737 protocols and 130,601 investigative site contracts associated with these protocols to derive updated benchmarks characterizing protocol complexity. The results of the study indicate that protocol design complexity con...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479017713039

    authors: Getz KA,Campo RA

    更新日期:2018-01-01 00:00:00

  • Single-Study Approvals: Quantum of Evidence Required.

    abstract::When does a single positive adequate and well-controlled study of a new drug meet the statutory requirement to demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness? The answer to this question, particularly with respect to new molecular entities, has been of considerable debate since 1962 when the requirement that new dr...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00103-4

    authors: Sasinowski FJ,Butler ML

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Characteristics of Drug Intervention Clinical Trials and Scientific Impact of the Trial Outcome: A Bibliometric Analysis Using the Relative Citation Ratio in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer from 2007 to 2016.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Although a large number of clinical trials have been conducted, the types of clinical trials that are scientifically influential, frequently utilized by society, and contribute to the progress of evidence-based medicine (EBM) have not been studied. Thus, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the c...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00177-5

    authors: Noguchi Y,Kaneko M,Narukawa M

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • ADHD & Pharmacotherapy: Past, Present and Future: A Review of the Changing Landscape of Drug Therapy for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

    abstract::Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobiological disorder in children, with a prevalence of ~6-7%1,2 that has remained stable for decades2. The social and economic burden associated with patients3, families, and broader systems (healthcare/educational) is substantial, with the annual ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015599811

    authors: Connolly JJ,Glessner JT,Elia J,Hakonarson H

    更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00

  • Global Pediatric Regulations: An Overview.

    abstract::The purpose of the present review is to summarize the current pediatric regulatory requirements and also the regulatory efforts that need to be taken for the potential benefits of safety and efficacy to the pediatric patients. The importance of pediatric regulations came into existence as adult physiological condition...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00087-1

    authors: Gadge PM,Kenjale PP,Pokharkar VB,Gaikwad VL

    更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00

  • Future Perspectives for the Treatment of Diabetes: Importance of a Regulatory Framework.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The number of diabetes patients is steadily increasing worldwide. Consequently, the social burden of diabetes is huge, requiring urgent countermeasures. We performed an intensive survey of antidiabetic drugs approved in Japan, the United States, and the European Union. METHODS:Information about approved ant...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018795854

    authors: Tsukamoto K,Cnop M,Mori D,Kume S,Anazawa T,Doi M,Chikazawa K,Matsumaru N

    更新日期:2019-07-01 00:00:00

  • Evolving Clinical Data Strategies and Tactics in Response to Digital Transformation.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Contending with a continuously expanding volume and variety of clinical data poses challenges and opportunities for the industry and clinical data management organizations. METHODS:Tufts CSDD conducted an online survey aimed at further quantifying and understanding the magnitude and impact that expanded dat...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00213-4

    authors: Harper B,Wilkinson M,Indupuri R,Rocchio S,Getz K

    更新日期:2020-09-14 00:00:00

  • The Competence and Willingness to Consent to Research Among Patients with Heroin Dependence.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Substance abuse research can raise ethical concerns about the comprehension and decision-making capacities of participants with drug dependence. In this study, the competence and willingness to consent to research participation were examined among patients with heroin dependence. METHODS:Twenty patients wit...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00127-1

    authors: Zhao L,Shi H,Ying B,Li Q

    更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs): A Story of International Collaboration Leading to Implementation.

    abstract::After nearly a decade of discussion, analysis, and development, the Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) initiative is beginning to see acceptance from regulators, industry, patients, and payers, with the first live pilot project initiated under the guidance of the European Medicines Agency in 2014. Althoug...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015618697

    authors: Schulthess D,Baird LG,Trusheim M,Unger TF,Lumpkin M,Hoos A,Garner S,Gavin P,Goldman M,Seigneuret N,Chlebus M,Van Baelen K,Bergstrom R,Hirsch G

    更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00

  • Effective Partnering in Conducting Benefit-Risk Patient Preference Studies: Perspectives From a Patient Advocacy Organization, a Pharmaceutical Company, and Academic Stated-Preference Researchers.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Formal incorporation of patients' perspectives is becoming increasingly important in medical product development and decision making. This article shares practical advice regarding how patient advocacy organizations, the pharmaceutical industry, and academic experts in stated-preference research can effectiv...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479017746404

    authors: Wolka AM,Fairchild AO,Reed SD,Anglin G,Johnson FR,Siegel M,Noel R

    更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • A Practical Estimation Method for Analyzing Adverse Drug Reactions Using Data Mining.

    abstract::This study aimed to determine the potentially severe chemical properties of drugs that can cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) by using a data mining method. The study data were extracted from the Adverse Event Repor...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/0092861512460759

    authors: Shirakuni Y,Okamoto K,Uejima E,Inui S,Takahara JI,Ohgaru T,Yamasaki H,Tian Y,Kawashita N,Inoue R,Yasunaga T,Takagi T

    更新日期:2013-03-01 00:00:00

  • Monitoring and Evaluating the Effect of Regulatory Action: Some Recent Case Studies.

    abstract::Large electronic health care databases can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of regulatory action. Designing and interpreting such studies can be challenging. We demonstrate using case studies on modafinil, benzodiazepines, dosulepin, and piroxicam that measuring the impact of regulatory action is possible and can...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015570333

    authors: Thomson A,Meeraus WH,Wong J,Suvarna R

    更新日期:2015-07-01 00:00:00

  • phactMI Benchmarking Survey on Content Development and Inquiry Management.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Medical information (MI) departments across pharmaceutical companies respond to medical inquiries about a company's products to healthcare providers, payors, patients, and caregivers. Responses provided are constructed to be relevant, accurate, scientifically balanced and delivered in a timely manner. Benchm...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00137-z

    authors: Byun J,Jong JA,Gangat A,Flowers T,Gazo A,Shah I

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Advancing Drug Safety Through Prospective Pharmacovigilance.

    abstract::Much has changed in a relatively short period of time. There is a raging debate over the level of evidence expected to first introduce a treatment to patients based on smaller, more adaptive data sets. Some argue for less data followed by postapproval follow-up, others for more adaptive clinical trial designs and end-...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 社论

    doi:10.1177/2168479018766887

    authors: Pitts PJ,Le Louet H

    更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • Technology Considerations to Enable the Risk-Based Monitoring Methodology.

    abstract::TransCelerate BioPharma Inc developed a methodology based on the notion that shifting monitoring processes from an excessive concentration on source data verification to comprehensive risk-driven monitoring will increase efficiencies and enhance patient safety and data integrity while maintaining adherence to good cli...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014546336

    authors: Barnes S,Katta N,Sanford N,Staigers T,Verish T

    更新日期:2014-09-01 00:00:00

  • Study Designs in Multi-arm Trials for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review of Major Journals.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Several articles showed that statistical efficiency of multi-arm randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is much better than conventional two-arm RCTs. Multi-arm RCTs attract interest mainly when the experimental treatment regimen is not optimized or several pipelines under development exist. Breast cancer is a po...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00141-3

    authors: Nomura S,Miyauchi Y,Ajisawa Y,Isogaya K,Sozu T

    更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • Outdated Prescription Drug Labeling: How FDA-Approved Prescribing Information Lags Behind Real-World Clinical Practice.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Prescription drug labeling is an authoritative source of information that guides the safe and effective use of approved medications. In many instances, however, labeling may fail to be updated as new information about drug efficacy emerges in the postmarket setting. When labeling becomes outdated, it loses i...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018759662

    authors: Shea MB,Stewart M,Van Dyke H,Ostermann L,Allen J,Sigal E

    更新日期:2018-11-01 00:00:00

  • Risk-Based Monitoring (RBM) Implementation: Challenges and Potential Solutions.

    abstract::Risk-based monitoring (RBM) has disrupted the clinical trial industry, challenging conventional monitoring norms, business processes, and organizational structures. Endorsed by regulators and leading industry forums, and further driven by escalating drug development costs and enabling technology shifts making data ava...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018769284

    authors: Limaye N,Jaguste V

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Sources of Safety Data and Statistical Strategies for Design and Analysis: Postmarket Surveillance.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Safety data are continuously evaluated throughout the life cycle of a medical product to accurately assess and characterize the risks associated with the product. The knowledge about a medical product's safety profile continually evolves as safety data accumulate. METHODS:This paper discusses data sources a...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1177/2168479017741112

    authors: Izem R,Sanchez-Kam M,Ma H,Zink R,Zhao Y

    更新日期:2018-03-01 00:00:00

  • Building a Better Approach for the Benefit of Patients: 10 Pillars to Strengthen Regulatory Review Systems Globally.

    abstract::In the current pharmaceutical regulatory environment, patients continue to benefit from great advances in medical care. Sophisticated regulatory review systems have also evolved to ensure that safe and effective medicines are approved. However, these systems are not optimized in all countries. Gaps in individual regul...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00055-9

    authors: O'Brien J,Lumsden RS,Diehl DH,Macdonald JC

    更新日期:2020-03-01 00:00:00

  • Alternative New Mono-scaled Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Japan.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage is very low in Japan since the government suspended the active encouragement of the vaccination. We aimed to conduct a benefit-risk assessment of HPV vaccination and explore different consequent scenarios to identify potential improvements to the current Japane...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00189-1

    authors: Matsumoto T,Matsumaru N,Scuffham P,Neels P,Tsukamoto K

    更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • Legislation on the Roles of the Pharmacist and Pharmacy in the Revision of the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Act and the Pharmacists Act in Japan.

    abstract::Japan's rapidly aging population has prompted a change in the country's pharmaceutical care framework from a drug-oriented to a patient-oriented approach. Pharmacies and pharmacists are expected to play central roles in this new patient-oriented approach by reconciling medication and managing polypharmacy, conducting ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00215-2

    authors: Takamura K,Tachibana K,Kihira T,Nakai K,Tsutsumi Y,Kondoh M

    更新日期:2020-09-11 00:00:00

  • A Novel Collaborative Approach to Building Better Clinical Trials: New Insights From a Patient Engagement Workshop to Propel Patient-Centricity Forward.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:(1) A growing number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology organizations are engaging patients, their support networks, and clinical trial site staff at various touchpoints along the clinical research development spectrum to solicit feedback on how to reduce the burden of clinical trial participation and admin...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479019849875

    authors: Gregg A,Getz N,Benger J,Anderson A

    更新日期:2019-05-22 00:00:00

  • Baseline Assessment of the Evolving 2017 eClinical Landscape.

    abstract::The volume and diversity of data collected to support each clinical study has increased dramatically in response to the rising scope and complexity of global drug development programs. The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted an online survey of 257 unique global companies-77% drug development spon...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018769292

    authors: Wilkinson M,Young R,Harper B,Machion B,Getz K

    更新日期:2019-01-01 00:00:00

  • Smart Program Design Through a Common Information Model.

    abstract::Although much information is already available publically from information-sharing initiatives such as ClinicalTrials.gov, information about clinical programs is unstructured, inconsistent, and incomplete. Clinical research within bioscience companies, health care, academia, and governmental agencies could benefit fro...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014539158

    authors: Vasko L,Sundgren M,Bachmann P,Balinski K,Bleich N,Blom T,Eriksson H,Ferendo R,Forsberg K,King D,Mordiva A,Proeve J,Thomas L,Witch E,Simán M

    更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00

  • Implementing the Principle of the 3 Rs Through the Indian Pharmacopoeia.

    abstract::Quality and safety tests are required for regulatory approval of drugs and pharmaceuticals in the country to guarantee minimum safety standards, and most of these tests include animal usage. In the case of biological medicines, these safety and quality tests have to be performed on a batch-to-batch basis and require a...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015572371

    authors: Rastogi S,Kalaivani M,Bhatia AK,Prakash J,Singh GN

    更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00

  • Choosing a Mobile Sensor Technology for a Clinical Trial: Statistical Considerations, Developments and Learnings.

    abstract::The DIA Study Endpoints Community Working Group on Mobile Sensor Technology (MST) series addresses considerations that may be useful for selecting MST for use in a clinical trial. This article describes considerations regarding the selection of MST for clinical trials including expectations around technology specifica...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00188-2

    authors: Russell C,McCarthy M,Cappelleri JC,Wong S

    更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • An Overview and Analysis Regarding the Use of Adjudication Methods in EU and US Drug Approvals.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Several regulatory guidelines recommend that assessments of endpoints supporting drug approval should be verifiable by applicants and the regulatory agencies to minimize the potential for bias. This becomes especially critical when assessments are not based on measurable data but are derived from the interpr...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015580382

    authors: Krumholz-Bahner S,Garibbo M,Getz KA,Widler BE

    更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00