New Benchmarks Characterizing Growth in Protocol Design Complexity.

abstract：:Data quality is critical for clinical trials to obtain robust conclusions about drug safety and efficacy evaluation. Effective data quality evaluation has been one of the major obstacles to new drug approvals in China, which hinders innovation in drug discovery and development ultimately. To improve the data quality s...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Wang J,Wang G,Li M,Han J,Zeng X,Pan J,Yang J

更新日期：2019-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:The influence of patient advocates on FDA regulatory decision making has increased. Despite enhanced engagement with FDA, there remain challenges to achieving the regulatory goals of patients within FDA's regulatory framework. Gaps exist between patient advocates' knowledge of the agency's processes and FDA'...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Kuehn CM

更新日期：2018-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Obtaining assent from children participating in clinical trials acknowledges autonomy and developmental ability to contribute to the consent process. This critical step in pediatric drug development remains poorly understood, with significant room for improving the clarity, efficiency, and implementation of ...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Lombardi D,Squires L,Sjostedt P,Eichler I,Turner MA,Thompson C

更新日期：2018-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Much has changed in a relatively short period of time. There is a raging debate over the level of evidence expected to first introduce a treatment to patients based on smaller, more adaptive data sets. Some argue for less data followed by postapproval follow-up, others for more adaptive clinical trial designs and end-...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Pitts PJ,Le Louet H

更新日期：2018-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Medical information (MI) departments across pharmaceutical companies respond to medical inquiries about a company's products to healthcare providers, payors, patients, and caregivers. Responses provided are constructed to be relevant, accurate, scientifically balanced and delivered in a timely manner. Benchm...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Byun J,Jong JA,Gangat A,Flowers T,Gazo A,Shah I

更新日期：2020-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：:The product pipeline for diseases that disproportionately affect the developing world has considerably expanded over the last decade. Indeed, there are about 134 products for these diseases in the pipeline, including vaccines, drugs, diagnostics, microbicides, and vector control tools, and dozens of these products are...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Saidu Y,De Angelis D,Aiolli S,Stefano G,Georges AM

更新日期：2013-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Meta-analyses are increasingly influencing clinical practice, but significant methodological flaws have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of search strategies utilized by anti-infective meta-analyses. The Embase database was searched for meta-analyses evaluating anti-infective drug t...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Marler JL,Curry KY,Suda KJ

更新日期：2014-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Recently, it is becoming increasingly difficult to develop innovative drugs. Thus, the role of regulatory science research in drug development and postmarketing settings has become more important. In this article, the authors discuss the roles of regulatory science research at the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices A...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Asahina Y,Tanaka A,Uyama Y,Kuramochi K,Maruyama H

更新日期：2013-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：:The DIA Study Endpoints Community Working Group on Mobile Sensor Technology (MST) series addresses considerations that may be useful for selecting MST for use in a clinical trial. This article describes considerations regarding the selection of MST for clinical trials including expectations around technology specifica...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Russell C,McCarthy M,Cappelleri JC,Wong S

更新日期：2021-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Lack of adherence to study protocol and missing data are often unavoidable in clinical trials, and both increase the need to differentiate between the ideal treatment effect if the medication is taken as directed and the treatment effect in presence of the actual adherence pattern. In this regard, estimands have becom...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Leuchs AK,Zinserling J,Brandt A,Wirtz D,Benda N

更新日期：2015-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:This study compared the timing, regulatory marketing authorization decisions, and the final labeling for products submitted to Swissmedic to those submitted to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS:The Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS) conducte...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Dörr P,Wadworth A,Wang T,McAuslane N,Liberti L

更新日期：2016-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Probability of success in phase II dominates the drug development cost calculus, with phase I/II as the critical juncture for proof of concept. Failure to address fundamental pharmacologic questions in early development is alarmingly frequent and a strong predictor of failure. Safety, manufacture, formulation, and com...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Cohen O,Sax F

更新日期：2014-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：OBJECTIVE:To identify, evaluate, and characterize the variety, quality, and intent of the health economics and outcomes research studies being conducted in SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) nations. METHODS:Studies published in English language between 1990 and 2015 were retrieved from Medline d...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Mehta M,Nerurkar R

更新日期：2018-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Communicating the clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeling is important for safe and effective use of certain prescription products. Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance does not provide comprehensive recommendations on the communication of clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeli...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Guinn D,Madabushi R,Wang YM,Brodsky E,Zineh I,Maxfield K

更新日期：2020-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Risk-based monitoring (RBM) has disrupted the clinical trial industry, challenging conventional monitoring norms, business processes, and organizational structures. Endorsed by regulators and leading industry forums, and further driven by escalating drug development costs and enabling technology shifts making data ava...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Limaye N,Jaguste V

更新日期：2019-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:A data monitoring committee (DMC) has special responsibilities for protecting the safety of clinical trial participants. Few guidance documents are available that address the operations and mechanics of establishing, serving on, or reporting to a DMC. This article provides a practical guide to sponsors, inst...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Bierer BE,Li R,Seltzer J,Sleeper LA,Frank E,Knirsch C,Aldinger CE,Levine RJ,Massaro J,Shah A,Barnes M,Snapinn S,Wittes J

更新日期：2016-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Approval of regulated medical products in the USA is based upon a rigorous review of the benefits and risks as performed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff of scientists and is summarized in a descriptive and qualitative format called the FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework (BRF). This present metho...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Sun S,Heske S,Mercadel M,Wimmer J

更新日期：2021-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Prescription drug labeling is an authoritative source of information that guides the safe and effective use of approved medications. In many instances, however, labeling may fail to be updated as new information about drug efficacy emerges in the postmarket setting. When labeling becomes outdated, it loses i...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Shea MB,Stewart M,Van Dyke H,Ostermann L,Allen J,Sigal E

更新日期：2018-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Using a measure of agreement that does not distinguish the "positive" outcome from the "negative" outcome can be sometimes misleading in assessing resemblance. To alleviate this concern, some new indices, including the "positive" and "negative" conditional synchrony measures (CSM) (or the conditional discordant measur...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Lui KJ

更新日期：2020-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Although much information is already available publically from information-sharing initiatives such as ClinicalTrials.gov, information about clinical programs is unstructured, inconsistent, and incomplete. Clinical research within bioscience companies, health care, academia, and governmental agencies could benefit fro...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Vasko L,Sundgren M,Bachmann P,Balinski K,Bleich N,Blom T,Eriksson H,Ferendo R,Forsberg K,King D,Mordiva A,Proeve J,Thomas L,Witch E,Simán M

更新日期：2015-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：:In general, similar to FDA and other health authorities, the PMDA requires clinical efficacy study(ies) to evaluate equivalence between a reference biological product and a Biosimilar product for new drug applications. Even if an identical clinical efficacy study is included in both of PMDA and FDA submissions, the co...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Asami Y,Pan J,Oh M,Sato A

更新日期：2020-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Timely access to new medicines may be addressed through strengthening of registration efficiencies and timelines by establishing and refining value-added registration processes, resources, and systems. The aims of this study were to evaluate the timelines of the milestones of the South African review process...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Keyter A,Salek S,Gouws J,Banoo S,Walker S

更新日期：2020-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：:The U.S. and Japan have preapproval access systems for patients who have exhausted approved treatment options. We compare the systems of both countries and discuss some ethical concerns surrounding non-trial access to investigational drugs. Notable points of comparison of the two countries' systems include cost of non...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Nakada H,Folkers KM,Takashima K

更新日期：2020-10-23 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Formal incorporation of patients' perspectives is becoming increasingly important in medical product development and decision making. This article shares practical advice regarding how patient advocacy organizations, the pharmaceutical industry, and academic experts in stated-preference research can effectiv...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Wolka AM,Fairchild AO,Reed SD,Anglin G,Johnson FR,Siegel M,Noel R

更新日期：2018-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：:The regulatory agencies all over the world have defined the pathway and regulations for the approval of simple small-molecule generics. In addition, the agencies are striving to form perspicuous regulatory frameworks for the approval of biosimilars. In this view, there are no defined regulations for the approval of co...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Lunawat S,Bhat K

更新日期：2020-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：:In March 2017, the US FDA introduced the new Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation thus recognizing the enormous potential of these medicines and the need for efficient regulatory tools to accelerate their development and their commercial availability. The development of regenerative medicines is v...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Vaggelas A,Seimetz D

更新日期：2019-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：:In the current pharmaceutical regulatory environment, patients continue to benefit from great advances in medical care. Sophisticated regulatory review systems have also evolved to ensure that safe and effective medicines are approved. However, these systems are not optimized in all countries. Gaps in individual regul...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： O'Brien J,Lumsden RS,Diehl DH,Macdonald JC

更新日期：2020-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Safety data are continuously evaluated throughout the life cycle of a medical product to accurately assess and characterize the risks associated with the product. The knowledge about a medical product's safety profile continually evolves as safety data accumulate. METHODS:This paper discusses data sources a...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Izem R,Sanchez-Kam M,Ma H,Zink R,Zhao Y

更新日期：2018-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Patients and health care professionals receive information about pharmaceutical companies through various sources, including but not limited to print media, social media, and electronic media. The objective of this research was to benchmark the sentiment of electronic newspaper media coverage between 2014 an...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Pampulevski V,Giaquinto JR,Rametta M,Toscani M,Barone J,Nadal JC

更新日期：2020-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:In the breakthrough therapy designation (BTD) and Sakigake designation programs, rolling submission and close communication between applicants and regulatory authorities enable the timely access of patients to innovative medicines. However, challenges in the quality development, including chemistry, manufact...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Kajiwara E,Shikano M

更新日期：2020-07-01 00:00:00