Abstract:
BACKGROUND:This study compared the timing, regulatory marketing authorization decisions, and the final labeling for products submitted to Swissmedic to those submitted to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS:The Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS) conducted an analysis of a representative cohort of 63 new molecular entities (NMEs) that were submitted to Swissmedic from 2006 through 2010 and that were also submitted to, and approved by, the EMA centralized procedure and FDA. Parameters considered included the outcome and timing of regulatory marketing authorization decisions and the comparison of each product's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) from the 3 agencies. The results were presented at the Swissmedic 10th Anniversary Symposium, "The Challenges of Regulation and Changing Regulations Paradigms," and they form the basis of this article. RESULTS:The median approval times for these NMEs were longer for Swissmedic (480 days) compared with FDA (303 days) and EMA (416 days). However, if an expedited application review procedure (a "priority review" [FDA], "accelerated assessment" [EMA], or "accelerated review" [Swissmedic]) was applied, Swissmedic was faster (207 days) than EMA (300 days) and essentially as fast as FDA (229 days). The main differences were in the nature of the wording of parts of the initial SPC, particularly the "Contraindications" and "Special warnings and precautions" for FDA and "Special warnings and precautions" for EMA. CONCLUSIONS:Results suggest there is no clear evidence that Swissmedic was substantially different in its initial regulatory decisions or SPC recommendations compared with the EMA or FDA.
journal_name
Ther Innov Regul Scijournal_title
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory scienceauthors
Dörr P,Wadworth A,Wang T,McAuslane N,Liberti Ldoi
10.1177/2168479016655841subject
Has Abstractpub_date
2016-11-01 00:00:00pages
734-742issue
6eissn
2168-4790issn
2168-4804journal_volume
50pub_type
杂志文章abstract::Although much information is already available publically from information-sharing initiatives such as ClinicalTrials.gov, information about clinical programs is unstructured, inconsistent, and incomplete. Clinical research within bioscience companies, health care, academia, and governmental agencies could benefit fro...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014539158
更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The FDA Patient-Focused Drug Development Initiative was launched to ensure the incorporation of the patient voice into drug development and evaluation. Since 2017, the FDA must publish a statement outlining patient experience data (PED) considered in the approval of new drugs. This study investigated the pre...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00244-x
更新日期:2020-11-23 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The design and sample size of a phase III study for new medical technologies were historically determined within the framework of frequentist hypothesis testing. Recently, drug development using predictive biomarkers, which can predict efficacy based on the status of biomarkers, has attracted attention, and ...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00119-1
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Agents indicated for cleansing of the colon as a preparation for colonoscopy (bowel preps) are among the most frequently prescribed drugs for otherwise healthy patients. Better bowel preparation has been shown to translate into higher adenoma detection rates. Therefore, safety and efficacy standards need to be high. C...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015577868
更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage is very low in Japan since the government suspended the active encouragement of the vaccination. We aimed to conduct a benefit-risk assessment of HPV vaccination and explore different consequent scenarios to identify potential improvements to the current Japane...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00189-1
更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Formal incorporation of patients' perspectives is becoming increasingly important in medical product development and decision making. This article shares practical advice regarding how patient advocacy organizations, the pharmaceutical industry, and academic experts in stated-preference research can effectiv...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479017746404
更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The influence of patient advocates on FDA regulatory decision making has increased. Despite enhanced engagement with FDA, there remain challenges to achieving the regulatory goals of patients within FDA's regulatory framework. Gaps exist between patient advocates' knowledge of the agency's processes and FDA'...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479017753390
更新日期:2018-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::The purpose of the present review is to summarize the current pediatric regulatory requirements and also the regulatory efforts that need to be taken for the potential benefits of safety and efficacy to the pediatric patients. The importance of pediatric regulations came into existence as adult physiological condition...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00087-1
更新日期:2020-05-01 00:00:00
abstract:OBJECTIVE:To identify, evaluate, and characterize the variety, quality, and intent of the health economics and outcomes research studies being conducted in SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) nations. METHODS:Studies published in English language between 1990 and 2015 were retrieved from Medline d...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1177/2168479017731583
更新日期:2018-05-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The number of original and supplemental ANDAs, BLAs, NDAs, and Biosimilars FDA drug/biologic approvals (Approvals) has risen dramatically in the recent years, incidentally, so has the number of issued FDA guidances (Guidances). It is hypothesized that if the structures of the two timeseries are similar and/o...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00123-5
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Much has changed in a relatively short period of time. There is a raging debate over the level of evidence expected to first introduce a treatment to patients based on smaller, more adaptive data sets. Some argue for less data followed by postapproval follow-up, others for more adaptive clinical trial designs and end-...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 社论
doi:10.1177/2168479018766887
更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Approval of regulated medical products in the USA is based upon a rigorous review of the benefits and risks as performed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff of scientists and is summarized in a descriptive and qualitative format called the FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework (BRF). This present metho...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00197-1
更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::After nearly a decade of discussion, analysis, and development, the Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) initiative is beginning to see acceptance from regulators, industry, patients, and payers, with the first live pilot project initiated under the guidance of the European Medicines Agency in 2014. Althoug...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015618697
更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Communicating the clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeling is important for safe and effective use of certain prescription products. Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance does not provide comprehensive recommendations on the communication of clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeli...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00161-z
更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Time progression models provide a significant advantage in developing clinical trials and can also be used to elicit comparisons among therapeutic agents. The authors performed a meta-analysis to construct a time progression model for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an area of significant interest for pharmaceutical develo...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013499571
更新日期:2013-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::The DIA Study Endpoints Community Working Group on Mobile Sensor Technology (MST) series addresses considerations that may be useful for selecting MST for use in a clinical trial. This article describes considerations regarding the selection of MST for clinical trials including expectations around technology specifica...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00188-2
更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Substance abuse research can raise ethical concerns about the comprehension and decision-making capacities of participants with drug dependence. In this study, the competence and willingness to consent to research participation were examined among patients with heroin dependence. METHODS:Twenty patients wit...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00127-1
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The pace of innovation, the creative engine of the pharmaceutical industry, has been variably described as stagnant, stable, or accelerating depending on the metric used for assessment or the quality of evidence. If the predominant perception holds that the speed of innovation is sluggish, pressure for chang...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00210-7
更新日期:2020-08-31 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Package leaflets of medicines distributed within the European Union should use the template headings and standard texts created by the Working Group on the Quality Review of Documents (QRD). The following study investigated how the QRD template is implemented in this patient information. METHODS:All English...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015620247
更新日期:2016-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Social media presents new challenges to the biopharmaceutical industry for conducting pharmacovigilance activities. The authors reviewed worldwide regulatory guidance documents related to monitoring of adverse events posted on social media sites and identified gaps in current regulatory definitions for pharmacovigilan...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015587362
更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development and Medidata Solutions Inc analyzed data from 9737 protocols and 130,601 investigative site contracts associated with these protocols to derive updated benchmarks characterizing protocol complexity. The results of the study indicate that protocol design complexity con...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479017713039
更新日期:2018-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Pediatric regulations enacted in both Europe and the USA have disrupted the pharmaceutical industry, challenging business and drug development processes, and organizational structures. Over the last decade, with science and innovation evolving, industry has moved from a reactive to a proactive mode, investin...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00116-4
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:In the breakthrough therapy designation (BTD) and Sakigake designation programs, rolling submission and close communication between applicants and regulatory authorities enable the timely access of patients to innovative medicines. However, challenges in the quality development, including chemistry, manufact...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00019-z
更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::In March 2017, the US FDA introduced the new Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation thus recognizing the enormous potential of these medicines and the need for efficient regulatory tools to accelerate their development and their commercial availability. The development of regenerative medicines is v...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018779373
更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Quality and safety tests are required for regulatory approval of drugs and pharmaceuticals in the country to guarantee minimum safety standards, and most of these tests include animal usage. In the case of biological medicines, these safety and quality tests have to be performed on a batch-to-batch basis and require a...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015572371
更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Access and use of historical control data was identified as a top stakeholder concern across organizations according to results of a survey of needs and challenges related to nonclinical data conducted by the FDA/PhUSE Nonclinical Working Group in 2011. There is a perception there may be additional ways to c...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015600203
更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Prescription drug labeling is an authoritative source of information that guides the safe and effective use of approved medications. In many instances, however, labeling may fail to be updated as new information about drug efficacy emerges in the postmarket setting. When labeling becomes outdated, it loses i...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018759662
更新日期:2018-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:A data monitoring committee (DMC) has special responsibilities for protecting the safety of clinical trial participants. Few guidance documents are available that address the operations and mechanics of establishing, serving on, or reporting to a DMC. This article provides a practical guide to sponsors, inst...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479016646812
更新日期:2016-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::In the current pharmaceutical regulatory environment, patients continue to benefit from great advances in medical care. Sophisticated regulatory review systems have also evolved to ensure that safe and effective medicines are approved. However, these systems are not optimized in all countries. Gaps in individual regul...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00055-9
更新日期:2020-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::The product pipeline for diseases that disproportionately affect the developing world has considerably expanded over the last decade. Indeed, there are about 134 products for these diseases in the pipeline, including vaccines, drugs, diagnostics, microbicides, and vector control tools, and dozens of these products are...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013478952
更新日期:2013-05-01 00:00:00