Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Patients and health care professionals receive information about pharmaceutical companies through various sources, including but not limited to print media, social media, and electronic media. The objective of this research was to benchmark the sentiment of electronic newspaper media coverage between 2014 and 2016 and investigate the potential relationship to the public perception of the select pharmaceutical companies. METHODS:Reputation Institute's RepTrak System report was used for selection of 5 highly rated pharmaceutical companies (A-E). Electronic newspapers were selected based on US circulation within the selected time period. Lexalytics sentiment analysis software was used for analysis of relevant articles appearing in the selected newspapers. RESULTS:A total of 797 articles were analyzed; 63% were assessed as neutral, 24% as negative, and 14% as positive. The overall median sentiment scores (scale ranging from -2 through [Formula: see text]2) for companies A through E across all newspapers were determined to be [Formula: see text]0.026, [Formula: see text]0.03, [Formula: see text]0.028, [Formula: see text]0.034, and [Formula: see text]0.033, respectively. The most frequent topics were merger/acquisition/ re-structuring, finances/stocks/profits, and other, which included topics such as transparency of pharmaceutical industry data, lack of drug efficacy, and innovation. CONCLUSION:Overall, pharmaceutical companies were represented similarly across newspapers and most articles were assessed as neutral. However, on analysis of all nonneutral articles, all categories were assessed as negative with the exception of finances/stocks/profits.
journal_name
Ther Innov Regul Scijournal_title
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory scienceauthors
Pampulevski V,Giaquinto JR,Rametta M,Toscani M,Barone J,Nadal JCdoi
10.1007/s43441-019-00048-8subject
Has Abstractpub_date
2020-01-01 00:00:00pages
220-225issue
1eissn
2168-4790issn
2168-4804pii
10.1007/s43441-019-00048-8journal_volume
54pub_type
杂志文章abstract:BACKGROUND:(1) A growing number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology organizations are engaging patients, their support networks, and clinical trial site staff at various touchpoints along the clinical research development spectrum to solicit feedback on how to reduce the burden of clinical trial participation and admin...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479019849875
更新日期:2019-05-22 00:00:00
abstract::Expanded access is a regulatory mechanism by which an investigational drug can be made available outside of a clinical trial to treat patients with serious or life-threatening conditions for which there are no satisfactory treatment options. An expanded access program (EAP) is the formal plan under which preapproval a...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015578154
更新日期:2015-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Meta-analyses are increasingly influencing clinical practice, but significant methodological flaws have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of search strategies utilized by anti-infective meta-analyses. The Embase database was searched for meta-analyses evaluating anti-infective drug t...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013516774
更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Data quality is critical for clinical trials to obtain robust conclusions about drug safety and efficacy evaluation. Effective data quality evaluation has been one of the major obstacles to new drug approvals in China, which hinders innovation in drug discovery and development ultimately. To improve the data quality s...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018778528
更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Several articles showed that statistical efficiency of multi-arm randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is much better than conventional two-arm RCTs. Multi-arm RCTs attract interest mainly when the experimental treatment regimen is not optimized or several pipelines under development exist. Breast cancer is a po...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00141-3
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The coherence between the relationship of QTc and drug plasma concentration (this relationship is measured through the slope) and ICH E14 findings based on hundreds of QT study reports was studied. RESULTS:Based on ICH E14 analysis, our findings indicate that if the slope was not positive, in most cases (86...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014563549
更新日期:2015-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::The volume and diversity of data collected to support each clinical study has increased dramatically in response to the rising scope and complexity of global drug development programs. The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted an online survey of 257 unique global companies-77% drug development spon...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018769292
更新日期:2019-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Increasing generic drug price competition by facilitating abbreviated new drug applications (ANDA) submission may help patients have access to affordable care. This study examined factors associated with first ANDA submission for the brand drug to be copied [the "reference listed drug" (RLD)]. METHODS:This ...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00163-x
更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Quality and safety tests are required for regulatory approval of drugs and pharmaceuticals in the country to guarantee minimum safety standards, and most of these tests include animal usage. In the case of biological medicines, these safety and quality tests have to be performed on a batch-to-batch basis and require a...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015572371
更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::The U.S. and Japan have preapproval access systems for patients who have exhausted approved treatment options. We compare the systems of both countries and discuss some ethical concerns surrounding non-trial access to investigational drugs. Notable points of comparison of the two countries' systems include cost of non...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00228-x
更新日期:2020-10-23 00:00:00
abstract::Source data verification (SDV) is the process of confirming that reliable, accurate information collected from participants during a clinical trial has been reported successfully to the trial's sponsor by investigators conducting the study. Over the past 15 years or so, there has been considerable discussion in the li...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013496245
更新日期:2014-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 gave the FDA the authority to require drug sponsors to submit a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program for those medicines with serious risks such that failure to effectively manage these risks would tip the benefit-risk balance. As of August 8,...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014527749
更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Communicating the clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeling is important for safe and effective use of certain prescription products. Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance does not provide comprehensive recommendations on the communication of clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeli...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00161-z
更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Access and use of historical control data was identified as a top stakeholder concern across organizations according to results of a survey of needs and challenges related to nonclinical data conducted by the FDA/PhUSE Nonclinical Working Group in 2011. There is a perception there may be additional ways to c...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015600203
更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::The Asia Pacific (AP) region is diverse and dynamic. It comprises over 40 economies, with about 24 markets that are relatively more active in terms of promulgating and implementing regulations that impact the biopharmaceutical industry and advance drug development. Although many country- and territory-specific regulat...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018791539
更新日期:2019-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The design and sample size of a phase III study for new medical technologies were historically determined within the framework of frequentist hypothesis testing. Recently, drug development using predictive biomarkers, which can predict efficacy based on the status of biomarkers, has attracted attention, and ...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00119-1
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Adaptive designs are increasingly used in clinical trials. The Drug Information Association's Adaptive Design Scientific Working Group (ADSWG) works to foster collaboration among regulatory agencies, academia, and pharmaceutical and biotech companies to further the science of adaptive clinical development. The ADSWG S...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014522468
更新日期:2014-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Pediatric regulations enacted in both Europe and the USA have disrupted the pharmaceutical industry, challenging business and drug development processes, and organizational structures. Over the last decade, with science and innovation evolving, industry has moved from a reactive to a proactive mode, investin...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00116-4
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Although much information is already available publically from information-sharing initiatives such as ClinicalTrials.gov, information about clinical programs is unstructured, inconsistent, and incomplete. Clinical research within bioscience companies, health care, academia, and governmental agencies could benefit fro...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014539158
更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::A growing number of organizations-including pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, foundations and associations-are routinely implementing patient advisory boards (PAB) given their high reported value for minimal relative investment. Organizations are typically implementing PABs to solicit patient voices and pers...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479017720475
更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:With the pharmaceutical industry's increased attention on enhancing patient experiences during their participation in clinical trials, the use of mobile nurse (MN) services to support the conduct of clinical trial assessments in the home (or in alternative locations other than in investigational sites) has b...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015625712
更新日期:2016-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Safety data are continuously evaluated throughout the life cycle of a medical product to accurately assess and characterize the risks associated with the product. The knowledge about a medical product's safety profile continually evolves as safety data accumulate. METHODS:This paper discusses data sources a...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1177/2168479017741112
更新日期:2018-03-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Approval of regulated medical products in the USA is based upon a rigorous review of the benefits and risks as performed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff of scientists and is summarized in a descriptive and qualitative format called the FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework (BRF). This present metho...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00197-1
更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:According to 21 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 211, Over-the-Counter (OTC) drug manufacturers must establish and follow current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) to produce quality products while meeting regulatory standards. The warning letters issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00231-2
更新日期:2020-10-23 00:00:00
abstract::After nearly a decade of discussion, analysis, and development, the Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) initiative is beginning to see acceptance from regulators, industry, patients, and payers, with the first live pilot project initiated under the guidance of the European Medicines Agency in 2014. Althoug...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015618697
更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::When registering food supplements in Russia, restrictions on the labeling and consumer leaflet contents are tightly controlled by the regulatory agencies. Thus, misleading advertising is the most difficult problem with the turnover of these products if information in the commercials does not correspond to the informat...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00043-z
更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::A universal framework for the evaluation of the benefit-risk assessment of medicines during development by pharmaceutical companies and in the regulatory review by regulatory authorities is considered of value, as it would result in the systematic structured approach to support transparency in decision making. Several...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014547421
更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The number of diabetes patients is steadily increasing worldwide. Consequently, the social burden of diabetes is huge, requiring urgent countermeasures. We performed an intensive survey of antidiabetic drugs approved in Japan, the United States, and the European Union. METHODS:Information about approved ant...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018795854
更新日期:2019-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Timely access to new medicines may be addressed through strengthening of registration efficiencies and timelines by establishing and refining value-added registration processes, resources, and systems. The aims of this study were to evaluate the timelines of the milestones of the South African review process...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00013-5
更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Package leaflets of medicines distributed within the European Union should use the template headings and standard texts created by the Working Group on the Quality Review of Documents (QRD). The following study investigated how the QRD template is implemented in this patient information. METHODS:All English...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015620247
更新日期:2016-01-01 00:00:00