A Novel Collaborative Approach to Building Better Clinical Trials: New Insights From a Patient Engagement Workshop to Propel Patient-Centricity Forward.

Abstract:

BACKGROUND:(1) A growing number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology organizations are engaging patients, their support networks, and clinical trial site staff at various touchpoints along the clinical research development spectrum to solicit feedback on how to reduce the burden of clinical trial participation and administration. (2) However, many organizations are still evaluating how to best implement such engagement initiatives in a manner that will evoke meaningful, sustainable results and change. METHODS:In an effort to support meaningful engagement in a novel way, Janssen organized a 2-day innovative workshop designed to promote collaboration and foster mutual understanding among a cross-functional group of clinical research stakeholders. Over the course of the workshop, patients, sponsor team members, and clinical trial site staff each leveraged their unique experiences to address the challenges of today's clinical trials, and collectively envision the ideal clinical trial of the future. RESULTS:The workshop design created a level playing field for the stakeholders to interact with one another as partners with the shared goal of building better clinical trials. A significant number of transformative ideas were generated as a result of the innovative workshop exercises. Participants agreed that future clinical trials must be convenient and customizable and truly put the patient at the center of research. CONCLUSION:Creating a comfortable atmosphere and engaging environment for patients, site staff, and pharmaceutical companies to discuss current challenges of clinical trial participation and potential solutions together as partners in real time is critical and has proven to be a valuable novel engagement option for other organizations to consider adopting.

journal_name

Ther Innov Regul Sci

authors

Gregg A,Getz N,Benger J,Anderson A

doi

10.1177/2168479019849875

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2019-05-22 00:00:00

pages

2168479019849875

eissn

2168-4790

issn

2168-4804

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Complex Generic Products: Insight of Current Regulatory Frameworks in US, EU and Canada and the Need of Harmonisation.

    abstract::The regulatory agencies all over the world have defined the pathway and regulations for the approval of simple small-molecule generics. In addition, the agencies are striving to form perspicuous regulatory frameworks for the approval of biosimilars. In this view, there are no defined regulations for the approval of co...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00114-6

    authors: Lunawat S,Bhat K

    更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00

  • ADHD & Pharmacotherapy: Past, Present and Future: A Review of the Changing Landscape of Drug Therapy for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

    abstract::Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobiological disorder in children, with a prevalence of ~6-7%1,2 that has remained stable for decades2. The social and economic burden associated with patients3, families, and broader systems (healthcare/educational) is substantial, with the annual ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015599811

    authors: Connolly JJ,Glessner JT,Elia J,Hakonarson H

    更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00

  • Lessons Learned From Hundreds of Thorough QT Studies.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The coherence between the relationship of QTc and drug plasma concentration (this relationship is measured through the slope) and ICH E14 findings based on hundreds of QT study reports was studied. RESULTS:Based on ICH E14 analysis, our findings indicate that if the slope was not positive, in most cases (86...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014563549

    authors: Zhang J,Chen H,Tsong Y,Stockbridge N

    更新日期:2015-05-01 00:00:00

  • Choosing Appropriate Estimands in Clinical Trials.

    abstract::Lack of adherence to study protocol and missing data are often unavoidable in clinical trials, and both increase the need to differentiate between the ideal treatment effect if the medication is taken as directed and the treatment effect in presence of the actual adherence pattern. In this regard, estimands have becom...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014567317

    authors: Leuchs AK,Zinserling J,Brandt A,Wirtz D,Benda N

    更新日期:2015-07-01 00:00:00

  • Methods for Employing Information About Uncertainty of Ascertainment of Events in Clinical Trials.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Uncertain ascertainment of events in clinical trials has been noted for decades. To correct possible bias, Clinical Endpoint Committees (CECs) have been employed as a critical element of trials to ensure consistent and high-quality endpoint evaluation, especially for cardiovascular endpoints. However, the ef...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00206-3

    authors: Chen Y,Lawrence J,Hung HMJ,Stockbridge N

    更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • Characteristics of Drug Intervention Clinical Trials and Scientific Impact of the Trial Outcome: A Bibliometric Analysis Using the Relative Citation Ratio in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer from 2007 to 2016.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Although a large number of clinical trials have been conducted, the types of clinical trials that are scientifically influential, frequently utilized by society, and contribute to the progress of evidence-based medicine (EBM) have not been studied. Thus, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the c...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00177-5

    authors: Noguchi Y,Kaneko M,Narukawa M

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Insights and Best Practices for Planning and Implementing Patient Advisory Boards.

    abstract::A growing number of organizations-including pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, foundations and associations-are routinely implementing patient advisory boards (PAB) given their high reported value for minimal relative investment. Organizations are typically implementing PABs to solicit patient voices and pers...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479017720475

    authors: Anderson A,Getz KA

    更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • Comparative Assessment of Non-trial Access to Investigational Medical Products in the U.S. and Japan.

    abstract::The U.S. and Japan have preapproval access systems for patients who have exhausted approved treatment options. We compare the systems of both countries and discuss some ethical concerns surrounding non-trial access to investigational drugs. Notable points of comparison of the two countries' systems include cost of non...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00228-x

    authors: Nakada H,Folkers KM,Takashima K

    更新日期:2020-10-23 00:00:00

  • Building an Integrated Early Clinical Development Platform to Improve the Path to Proof of Concept.

    abstract::Probability of success in phase II dominates the drug development cost calculus, with phase I/II as the critical juncture for proof of concept. Failure to address fundamental pharmacologic questions in early development is alarmingly frequent and a strong predictor of failure. Safety, manufacture, formulation, and com...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014526600

    authors: Cohen O,Sax F

    更新日期:2014-09-01 00:00:00

  • Outdated Prescription Drug Labeling: How FDA-Approved Prescribing Information Lags Behind Real-World Clinical Practice.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Prescription drug labeling is an authoritative source of information that guides the safe and effective use of approved medications. In many instances, however, labeling may fail to be updated as new information about drug efficacy emerges in the postmarket setting. When labeling becomes outdated, it loses i...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018759662

    authors: Shea MB,Stewart M,Van Dyke H,Ostermann L,Allen J,Sigal E

    更新日期:2018-11-01 00:00:00

  • An Analysis of Regulatory Timing and Outcomes for New Drug Applications Submitted to Swissmedic: Comparison With the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:This study compared the timing, regulatory marketing authorization decisions, and the final labeling for products submitted to Swissmedic to those submitted to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS:The Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS) conducte...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479016655841

    authors: Dörr P,Wadworth A,Wang T,McAuslane N,Liberti L

    更新日期:2016-11-01 00:00:00

  • A Universal Framework for the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Is This the Way Forward?

    abstract::A universal framework for the evaluation of the benefit-risk assessment of medicines during development by pharmaceutical companies and in the regulatory review by regulatory authorities is considered of value, as it would result in the systematic structured approach to support transparency in decision making. Several...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014547421

    authors: Walker S,McAuslane N,Liberti L,Leong J,Salek S

    更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00

  • Effective Partnering in Conducting Benefit-Risk Patient Preference Studies: Perspectives From a Patient Advocacy Organization, a Pharmaceutical Company, and Academic Stated-Preference Researchers.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Formal incorporation of patients' perspectives is becoming increasingly important in medical product development and decision making. This article shares practical advice regarding how patient advocacy organizations, the pharmaceutical industry, and academic experts in stated-preference research can effectiv...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479017746404

    authors: Wolka AM,Fairchild AO,Reed SD,Anglin G,Johnson FR,Siegel M,Noel R

    更新日期:2018-07-01 00:00:00

  • Differences in Clinical Research Perceptions and Experiences by Age Subgroup.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:(1) To assess the differing viewpoints of actual and potential adult clinical trial participants in 5 age cohorts, (2) identify misperceptions and opportunities to reduce unnecessary burdens on volunteers, and (3) provide age-specific feedback to study sponsors on their current engagement efforts. METHODS:B...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00033-1

    authors: Anderson A,Borfitz D,Getz K

    更新日期:2020-01-01 00:00:00

  • Exact Confidence Limits on Some New Measures of Concordance and Discordance in Binary Outcomes.

    abstract::Using a measure of agreement that does not distinguish the "positive" outcome from the "negative" outcome can be sometimes misleading in assessing resemblance. To alleviate this concern, some new indices, including the "positive" and "negative" conditional synchrony measures (CSM) (or the conditional discordant measur...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00074-6

    authors: Lui KJ

    更新日期:2020-03-01 00:00:00

  • A Multifaceted Perspective of Pharmaceutical Innovation: A Consideration of the Regulatory Role.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The pace of innovation, the creative engine of the pharmaceutical industry, has been variably described as stagnant, stable, or accelerating depending on the metric used for assessment or the quality of evidence. If the predominant perception holds that the speed of innovation is sluggish, pressure for chang...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00210-7

    authors: Robberson M,Breder CD

    更新日期:2020-08-31 00:00:00

  • Evaluation of the Performance of the South Africa Regulatory Agency: Recommendations for Improved Patients' Access to Medicines.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Timely access to new medicines may be addressed through strengthening of registration efficiencies and timelines by establishing and refining value-added registration processes, resources, and systems. The aims of this study were to evaluate the timelines of the milestones of the South African review process...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00013-5

    authors: Keyter A,Salek S,Gouws J,Banoo S,Walker S

    更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00

  • phactMI Benchmarking Survey on Content Development and Inquiry Management.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Medical information (MI) departments across pharmaceutical companies respond to medical inquiries about a company's products to healthcare providers, payors, patients, and caregivers. Responses provided are constructed to be relevant, accurate, scientifically balanced and delivered in a timely manner. Benchm...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00137-z

    authors: Byun J,Jong JA,Gangat A,Flowers T,Gazo A,Shah I

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Impact of Premium Rewards for the Promotion of Innovative Drug Discovery on the Japanese Pharmaceutical Market: An Analysis by Therapeutic Area.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:A new incentive program, "Premium Rewards for the Promotion of Innovative Drug Discovery and Resolution of Off-Label Use, etc," was introduced in Japan in 2010 and subsequently applied in 2010, 2012, and 2014. In our previous study, we reported statistical evidence regarding the attributes of drugs for which...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015600205

    authors: Shibata S,Uemura R,Suzuki T

    更新日期:2016-01-01 00:00:00

  • Community Opinions on the Collection and Use of Historical Control Data in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Access and use of historical control data was identified as a top stakeholder concern across organizations according to results of a survey of needs and challenges related to nonclinical data conducted by the FDA/PhUSE Nonclinical Working Group in 2011. There is a perception there may be additional ways to c...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015600203

    authors: Mihalcik LM,Bausman M,Brown P,Everds N,Feldmann J,Henck J,Potenta D,Sims J,Zandee J

    更新日期:2016-03-01 00:00:00

  • An Overview and Analysis Regarding the Use of Adjudication Methods in EU and US Drug Approvals.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Several regulatory guidelines recommend that assessments of endpoints supporting drug approval should be verifiable by applicants and the regulatory agencies to minimize the potential for bias. This becomes especially critical when assessments are not based on measurable data but are derived from the interpr...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015580382

    authors: Krumholz-Bahner S,Garibbo M,Getz KA,Widler BE

    更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Principled Structured Incorporation of Clinical Knowledge Into Strategic Development Decisions.

    abstract::Efficient use of limited pharmaceutical product development resources requires integrating multiple attributes, such as efficacy, safety, pharmacology, and so on, to decide at any stage whether the development of a product should proceed aggressively or slowly or be terminated. The decision process proceeds most effec...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014558273

    authors: Gould AL,Krishna R,Khan A,Saltzman J

    更新日期:2015-03-01 00:00:00

  • Strategic Shift of Statistical Review on Data Quality Assessment for New Drug Applications in China.

    abstract::Data quality is critical for clinical trials to obtain robust conclusions about drug safety and efficacy evaluation. Effective data quality evaluation has been one of the major obstacles to new drug approvals in China, which hinders innovation in drug discovery and development ultimately. To improve the data quality s...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479018778528

    authors: Wang J,Wang G,Li M,Han J,Zeng X,Pan J,Yang J

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Patient Experience Data in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulatory Decision Making:: A Policy Process Perspective.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:The influence of patient advocates on FDA regulatory decision making has increased. Despite enhanced engagement with FDA, there remain challenges to achieving the regulatory goals of patients within FDA's regulatory framework. Gaps exist between patient advocates' knowledge of the agency's processes and FDA'...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479017753390

    authors: Kuehn CM

    更新日期:2018-09-01 00:00:00

  • Choosing a Mobile Sensor Technology for a Clinical Trial: Statistical Considerations, Developments and Learnings.

    abstract::The DIA Study Endpoints Community Working Group on Mobile Sensor Technology (MST) series addresses considerations that may be useful for selecting MST for use in a clinical trial. This article describes considerations regarding the selection of MST for clinical trials including expectations around technology specifica...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00188-2

    authors: Russell C,McCarthy M,Cappelleri JC,Wong S

    更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies With Elements to Assure Safe Use: Alignment of the Goals With the Tools to Manage Risk.

    abstract::The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 gave the FDA the authority to require drug sponsors to submit a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program for those medicines with serious risks such that failure to effectively manage these risks would tip the benefit-risk balance. As of August 8,...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014527749

    authors: Cronin M,Berger S,Seligman PJ

    更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00

  • Adaptive Design: Results of 2012 Survey on Perception and Use.

    abstract::Adaptive designs are increasingly used in clinical trials. The Drug Information Association's Adaptive Design Scientific Working Group (ADSWG) works to foster collaboration among regulatory agencies, academia, and pharmaceutical and biotech companies to further the science of adaptive clinical development. The ADSWG S...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479014522468

    authors: Morgan CC,Huyck S,Jenkins M,Chen L,Bedding A,Coffey CS,Gaydos B,Wathen JK

    更新日期:2014-07-01 00:00:00

  • Factors that have an Impact on Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Submissions.

    abstract:BACKGROUND:Increasing generic drug price competition by facilitating abbreviated new drug applications (ANDA) submission may help patients have access to affordable care. This study examined factors associated with first ANDA submission for the brand drug to be copied [the "reference listed drug" (RLD)]. METHODS:This ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00163-x

    authors: Wittayanukorn S,Rosenberg M,Schick A,Hu M,Wang Z,Babiskin A,Lionberger R,Zhao L

    更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00

  • Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs): A Story of International Collaboration Leading to Implementation.

    abstract::After nearly a decade of discussion, analysis, and development, the Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) initiative is beginning to see acceptance from regulators, industry, patients, and payers, with the first live pilot project initiated under the guidance of the European Medicines Agency in 2014. Althoug...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1177/2168479015618697

    authors: Schulthess D,Baird LG,Trusheim M,Unger TF,Lumpkin M,Hoos A,Garner S,Gavin P,Goldman M,Seigneuret N,Chlebus M,Van Baelen K,Bergstrom R,Hirsch G

    更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00

  • Regulatory Perspective of International Agencies for Development of Biosimilar Products (Monoclonal Antibodies): An Overview.

    abstract::Biopharmaceutical medicines are complex molecules obtained from a living organism (plant or animal cells) and may contain components of a living organism using biotechnology. Biosimilars are closely similar to already approved biopharmaceutical products that could form a new generation of medicines that are available ...

    journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00112-8

    authors: Sharma A,Khante S,Mahadik KR,Gaikwad VL

    更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00