Regulatory Trends in Drug Development in Asia Pacific.

abstract：BACKGROUND:According to 21 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 211, Over-the-Counter (OTC) drug manufacturers must establish and follow current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) to produce quality products while meeting regulatory standards. The warning letters issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Bai HK,Ahearn JD,Bartlett MG

更新日期：2020-10-23 00:00:00

abstract：:Confirmation of efficacy in pediatric drug development has traditionally required large, fully powered efficacy studies that have proven to have major feasibility and ethical challenges. Extrapolation of efficacy in the framework provided by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency is an appro...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Leil TA,Zee P,Suryawanshi S,Male C,Portman R

更新日期：2013-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Access and use of historical control data was identified as a top stakeholder concern across organizations according to results of a survey of needs and challenges related to nonclinical data conducted by the FDA/PhUSE Nonclinical Working Group in 2011. There is a perception there may be additional ways to c...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Mihalcik LM,Bausman M,Brown P,Everds N,Feldmann J,Henck J,Potenta D,Sims J,Zandee J

更新日期：2016-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobiological disorder in children, with a prevalence of ~6-7%1,2 that has remained stable for decades2. The social and economic burden associated with patients3, families, and broader systems (healthcare/educational) is substantial, with the annual ...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Connolly JJ,Glessner JT,Elia J,Hakonarson H

更新日期：2015-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Several articles showed that statistical efficiency of multi-arm randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is much better than conventional two-arm RCTs. Multi-arm RCTs attract interest mainly when the experimental treatment regimen is not optimized or several pipelines under development exist. Breast cancer is a po...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Nomura S,Miyauchi Y,Ajisawa Y,Isogaya K,Sozu T

更新日期：2020-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:The coherence between the relationship of QTc and drug plasma concentration (this relationship is measured through the slope) and ICH E14 findings based on hundreds of QT study reports was studied. RESULTS:Based on ICH E14 analysis, our findings indicate that if the slope was not positive, in most cases (86...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Zhang J,Chen H,Tsong Y,Stockbridge N

更新日期：2015-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：OBJECTIVE:To identify, evaluate, and characterize the variety, quality, and intent of the health economics and outcomes research studies being conducted in SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) nations. METHODS:Studies published in English language between 1990 and 2015 were retrieved from Medline d...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Mehta M,Nerurkar R

更新日期：2018-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Efficient use of limited pharmaceutical product development resources requires integrating multiple attributes, such as efficacy, safety, pharmacology, and so on, to decide at any stage whether the development of a product should proceed aggressively or slowly or be terminated. The decision process proceeds most effec...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Gould AL,Krishna R,Khan A,Saltzman J

更新日期：2015-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Since 1992 many changes have occurred in the regulations, guidelines, and processes governing the FDA, the biomedical industry, other stakeholders, and their interactions. Of particular importance, the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 made public advisory committee meetings mandatory for new molecular entities and devices r...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： McIntyre TD,Pappas M,DiBiasi JJ

更新日期：2013-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Japan's rapidly aging population has prompted a change in the country's pharmaceutical care framework from a drug-oriented to a patient-oriented approach. Pharmacies and pharmacists are expected to play central roles in this new patient-oriented approach by reconciling medication and managing polypharmacy, conducting ...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Takamura K,Tachibana K,Kihira T,Nakai K,Tsutsumi Y,Kondoh M

更新日期：2020-09-11 00:00:00

abstract：:Much has changed in a relatively short period of time. There is a raging debate over the level of evidence expected to first introduce a treatment to patients based on smaller, more adaptive data sets. Some argue for less data followed by postapproval follow-up, others for more adaptive clinical trial designs and end-...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Pitts PJ,Le Louet H

更新日期：2018-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Large electronic health care databases can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of regulatory action. Designing and interpreting such studies can be challenging. We demonstrate using case studies on modafinil, benzodiazepines, dosulepin, and piroxicam that measuring the impact of regulatory action is possible and can...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Thomson A,Meeraus WH,Wong J,Suvarna R

更新日期：2015-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Self-management can be considered a way of dealing with oneself and relates to actions undertaken to create order, discipline, and control. The concept is closely linked to concepts of self-efficacy and self-regulation but can be distinguished from these. The Self-Management Self-Test (SMST) is a 5-item asse...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Wehmeier PM,Fox T,Doerr JM,Schnierer N,Bender M,Nater UM

更新日期：2019-07-14 00:00:00

abstract：:Expanded access is a regulatory mechanism by which an investigational drug can be made available outside of a clinical trial to treat patients with serious or life-threatening conditions for which there are no satisfactory treatment options. An expanded access program (EAP) is the formal plan under which preapproval a...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Klopfenstein M,Van Campen LE,Garnett T

更新日期：2015-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Time progression models provide a significant advantage in developing clinical trials and can also be used to elicit comparisons among therapeutic agents. The authors performed a meta-analysis to construct a time progression model for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an area of significant interest for pharmaceutical develo...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Reeve R,Pang L,Ferguson B,O'Kelly M,Berry S,Xiao W

更新日期：2013-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:In the breakthrough therapy designation (BTD) and Sakigake designation programs, rolling submission and close communication between applicants and regulatory authorities enable the timely access of patients to innovative medicines. However, challenges in the quality development, including chemistry, manufact...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Kajiwara E,Shikano M

更新日期：2020-07-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put out a call for comments on new draft guidance for industry "Comparative Analyses and Related Comparative Use Human Factors Studies for a Drug-Device Combination Product Submitted in an ANDA." This call for comments elicited 7 submissions from various organization...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Lance PT,Greenaway RV,Edwards B

更新日期：2019-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Data quality is critical for clinical trials to obtain robust conclusions about drug safety and efficacy evaluation. Effective data quality evaluation has been one of the major obstacles to new drug approvals in China, which hinders innovation in drug discovery and development ultimately. To improve the data quality s...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Wang J,Wang G,Li M,Han J,Zeng X,Pan J,Yang J

更新日期：2019-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Communicating the clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeling is important for safe and effective use of certain prescription products. Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance does not provide comprehensive recommendations on the communication of clinical impact of immunogenicity in labeli...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Guinn D,Madabushi R,Wang YM,Brodsky E,Zineh I,Maxfield K

更新日期：2020-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Probability of success in phase II dominates the drug development cost calculus, with phase I/II as the critical juncture for proof of concept. Failure to address fundamental pharmacologic questions in early development is alarmingly frequent and a strong predictor of failure. Safety, manufacture, formulation, and com...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Cohen O,Sax F

更新日期：2014-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：:The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 gave the FDA the authority to require drug sponsors to submit a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program for those medicines with serious risks such that failure to effectively manage these risks would tip the benefit-risk balance. As of August 8,...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Cronin M,Berger S,Seligman PJ

更新日期：2014-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Approval of regulated medical products in the USA is based upon a rigorous review of the benefits and risks as performed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff of scientists and is summarized in a descriptive and qualitative format called the FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework (BRF). This present metho...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Sun S,Heske S,Mercadel M,Wimmer J

更新日期：2021-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:A new incentive program, "Premium Rewards for the Promotion of Innovative Drug Discovery and Resolution of Off-Label Use, etc," was introduced in Japan in 2010 and subsequently applied in 2010, 2012, and 2014. In our previous study, we reported statistical evidence regarding the attributes of drugs for which...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Shibata S,Uemura R,Suzuki T

更新日期：2016-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:This study compared the timing, regulatory marketing authorization decisions, and the final labeling for products submitted to Swissmedic to those submitted to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS:The Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS) conducte...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Dörr P,Wadworth A,Wang T,McAuslane N,Liberti L

更新日期：2016-11-01 00:00:00

abstract：:In the current pharmaceutical regulatory environment, patients continue to benefit from great advances in medical care. Sophisticated regulatory review systems have also evolved to ensure that safe and effective medicines are approved. However, these systems are not optimized in all countries. Gaps in individual regul...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： O'Brien J,Lumsden RS,Diehl DH,Macdonald JC

更新日期：2020-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：:After nearly a decade of discussion, analysis, and development, the Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) initiative is beginning to see acceptance from regulators, industry, patients, and payers, with the first live pilot project initiated under the guidance of the European Medicines Agency in 2014. Althoug...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Schulthess D,Baird LG,Trusheim M,Unger TF,Lumpkin M,Hoos A,Garner S,Gavin P,Goldman M,Seigneuret N,Chlebus M,Van Baelen K,Bergstrom R,Hirsch G

更新日期：2016-05-01 00:00:00

abstract：:Risk-based monitoring (RBM) has disrupted the clinical trial industry, challenging conventional monitoring norms, business processes, and organizational structures. Endorsed by regulators and leading industry forums, and further driven by escalating drug development costs and enabling technology shifts making data ava...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Limaye N,Jaguste V

更新日期：2019-03-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Uncertain ascertainment of events in clinical trials has been noted for decades. To correct possible bias, Clinical Endpoint Committees (CECs) have been employed as a critical element of trials to ensure consistent and high-quality endpoint evaluation, especially for cardiovascular endpoints. However, the ef...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Chen Y,Lawrence J,Hung HMJ,Stockbridge N

更新日期：2021-01-01 00:00:00

abstract：:TransCelerate BioPharma Inc developed a methodology based on the notion that shifting monitoring processes from an excessive concentration on source data verification to comprehensive risk-driven monitoring will increase efficiencies and enhance patient safety and data integrity while maintaining adherence to good cli...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Barnes S,Katta N,Sanford N,Staigers T,Verish T

更新日期：2014-09-01 00:00:00

abstract：BACKGROUND:Several regulatory guidelines recommend that assessments of endpoints supporting drug approval should be verifiable by applicants and the regulatory agencies to minimize the potential for bias. This becomes especially critical when assessments are not based on measurable data but are derived from the interpr...

journal_title：Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

authors： Krumholz-Bahner S,Garibbo M,Getz KA,Widler BE

更新日期：2015-11-01 00:00:00