当前位置： SCI文献检索 > MATURITAS期刊下所有文献 > Efficacy and effectiveness of bulking agents in the treatment of stress and mixed urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Efficacy and effectiveness of bulking agents in the treatment of stress and mixed urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract：

:The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and the effectiveness, as well as the safety and tolerability, of urethral bulking agents (UBAs) in women with mixed or stress urinary incontinence. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were used to identify relevant articles. In total, 3510 records were found. A total of 42 full texts were evaluated but only 21 (48.8 %) were selected for the qualitative and quantitative analysis. The pooled improvement rate in studies with a follow-up of ≤1 and >1 year was 46.0 % (95 % CI: 37.0 %-57.0 %; I2: 88.9 %) and 57.0 % (95 % CI: 39.0 %-74.0 %; I2: 89.6 %), respectively. The outcome 'cure/dryness' ranged from 9.1 % to 56.7 %. The pooled cure rate was 26.0 % (95 % CI: 21.0 %-32.0 %; I2: 89.9 %) and 21.0 % (95 % CI: 16.0 %-27.0 %; I2: 34.2 %) in females with a follow-up of ≤1 and >1 year, respectively. The treatment success rate ranged from 32.7 % to 93.3 % in 12 studies; it was objectively assessed with different tools (e.g., the Stamey scale in 5 studies). The pooled objective treatment success rate was 7.0 % (95 % CI: 59.0.0 %-75.0 %; I2: 82.4 %) and 46.0 % (95 % CI: 37.0 %-55.0 %; I2: 55.3 %) in women with a follow-up of ≤12 and >12 months, respectively. The percentage of adverse events was 0.4 % (vaginal infection, irritation, lichen sclerosus, worsening urinary incontinence). However, the use of UBAs as the first-line therapy should be demonstrated in more comparative studies (randomized studies MUSs vs. UBAs). UBAs should be considered a first-line surgical therapy only for women with SUI and mixed UI with high anaesthesia risk, elderly patients, or patients reluctant to undergo surgery. Thus, UBAs should not be offered as first-line therapy for those women desiring a "one-time" durable solution for primary or recurrent SUI.

journal_name

Maturitas

journal_title

Maturitas

authors

Capobianco G,Saderi L,Dessole F,Petrillo M,Dessole M,Piana A,Cherchi PL,Dessole S,Sotgiu G

doi

10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.12.007

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2020-03-01 00:00:00

pages

13-31

eissn

0378-5122

issn

1873-4111

pii

S0378-5122(19)30890-4

journal_volume

133

pub_type

杂志文章,meta分析

在线工具

Efficacy and effectiveness of bulking agents in the treatment of stress and mixed urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.