Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Predictions of drug sales play an important role in setting drug prices in Japan, where drug prices are highly regulated. One of 2 primary Japanese drug-pricing methodologies-the cost calculation method- refers extensively to the prediction of drug sales in establishing drug prices. Deviations from predicted sales can induce disproportionate drug prices and unexpected pharmaceutical expenditures. This study aimed to estimate the upward deviation of actual sales from predicted sales and to explore the predictors of such upward deviation. METHODS:Estimates of upward deviation in 2015 were produced for new molecular entities (NMEs) approved in 2006-2015. To identify the predictors associated with upward deviation through binary logistic regression analyses, sales within 3 years of launch and in the predicted year in which peak sales would be reached were used. RESULTS:Estimated upward deviation was more than 1220 billion yen in 2015 for the targeted drugs. Drugs priced by the cost calculation method or by obtaining additional indications were significantly more likely to show an upward deviation from predicted peak sales. CONCLUSION:There is substantial upward deviation between actual and predicted drug sales in Japan. So long as drug sales predictions are used in drug price calculations, a flexible repricing system is needed to buffer unexpected pharmaceutical expenditures.
journal_name
Ther Innov Regul Scijournal_title
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory scienceauthors
Shibata S,Fukumoto D,Suzuki T,Ozaki Kdoi
10.1177/2168479019860123subject
Has Abstractpub_date
2019-07-16 00:00:00pages
2168479019860123eissn
2168-4790issn
2168-4804pub_type
杂志文章abstract:BACKGROUND:In the breakthrough therapy designation (BTD) and Sakigake designation programs, rolling submission and close communication between applicants and regulatory authorities enable the timely access of patients to innovative medicines. However, challenges in the quality development, including chemistry, manufact...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00019-z
更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The pace of innovation, the creative engine of the pharmaceutical industry, has been variably described as stagnant, stable, or accelerating depending on the metric used for assessment or the quality of evidence. If the predominant perception holds that the speed of innovation is sluggish, pressure for chang...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00210-7
更新日期:2020-08-31 00:00:00
abstract::Although much information is already available publically from information-sharing initiatives such as ClinicalTrials.gov, information about clinical programs is unstructured, inconsistent, and incomplete. Clinical research within bioscience companies, health care, academia, and governmental agencies could benefit fro...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014539158
更新日期:2015-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::The authors consider a statistically valid method that has little concern caused by down weighting in stage 2 or slight loss in efficiency and possibly improves power performance for a trial design that allows for adaptation of statistical information. In addition to the need for a priori sound data-based planning tha...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013513891
更新日期:2014-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:According to 21 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 211, Over-the-Counter (OTC) drug manufacturers must establish and follow current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) to produce quality products while meeting regulatory standards. The warning letters issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00231-2
更新日期:2020-10-23 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Although a large number of clinical trials have been conducted, the types of clinical trials that are scientifically influential, frequently utilized by society, and contribute to the progress of evidence-based medicine (EBM) have not been studied. Thus, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the c...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00177-5
更新日期:2020-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Substance abuse research can raise ethical concerns about the comprehension and decision-making capacities of participants with drug dependence. In this study, the competence and willingness to consent to research participation were examined among patients with heroin dependence. METHODS:Twenty patients wit...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00127-1
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::The product pipeline for diseases that disproportionately affect the developing world has considerably expanded over the last decade. Indeed, there are about 134 products for these diseases in the pipeline, including vaccines, drugs, diagnostics, microbicides, and vector control tools, and dozens of these products are...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013478952
更新日期:2013-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::In 2010 Congress established a regulatory pathway for the approval of biosimilar products in the United States. FDA has embarked on developing the implementation framework for this pathway which includes creating guidance to assist biosimilar manufacturers in the development of these products. However, to date, the gu...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013515249
更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::There is a long history of discussions about what is a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and how this term applies to clinical research. This paper deals with a practical framework for MCID and its applicability to clinical trials. A literature review on the topic confirmed the fundamental role of MCID fo...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013487541
更新日期:2013-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::This study aimed to determine the potentially severe chemical properties of drugs that can cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) by using a data mining method. The study data were extracted from the Adverse Event Repor...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/0092861512460759
更新日期:2013-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Agents indicated for cleansing of the colon as a preparation for colonoscopy (bowel preps) are among the most frequently prescribed drugs for otherwise healthy patients. Better bowel preparation has been shown to translate into higher adenoma detection rates. Therefore, safety and efficacy standards need to be high. C...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015577868
更新日期:2015-09-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Obtaining assent from children participating in clinical trials acknowledges autonomy and developmental ability to contribute to the consent process. This critical step in pediatric drug development remains poorly understood, with significant room for improving the clarity, efficiency, and implementation of ...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479017716490
更新日期:2018-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:OBJECTIVE:To identify, evaluate, and characterize the variety, quality, and intent of the health economics and outcomes research studies being conducted in SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) nations. METHODS:Studies published in English language between 1990 and 2015 were retrieved from Medline d...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1177/2168479017731583
更新日期:2018-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Data quality is critical for clinical trials to obtain robust conclusions about drug safety and efficacy evaluation. Effective data quality evaluation has been one of the major obstacles to new drug approvals in China, which hinders innovation in drug discovery and development ultimately. To improve the data quality s...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018778528
更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Since 1992 many changes have occurred in the regulations, guidelines, and processes governing the FDA, the biomedical industry, other stakeholders, and their interactions. Of particular importance, the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 made public advisory committee meetings mandatory for new molecular entities and devices r...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/0092861512458096
更新日期:2013-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:This study compared the timing, regulatory marketing authorization decisions, and the final labeling for products submitted to Swissmedic to those submitted to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS:The Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS) conducte...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479016655841
更新日期:2016-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Social media presents new challenges to the biopharmaceutical industry for conducting pharmacovigilance activities. The authors reviewed worldwide regulatory guidance documents related to monitoring of adverse events posted on social media sites and identified gaps in current regulatory definitions for pharmacovigilan...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015587362
更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Timely access to new medicines may be addressed through strengthening of registration efficiencies and timelines by establishing and refining value-added registration processes, resources, and systems. The aims of this study were to evaluate the timelines of the milestones of the South African review process...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00013-5
更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The number of original and supplemental ANDAs, BLAs, NDAs, and Biosimilars FDA drug/biologic approvals (Approvals) has risen dramatically in the recent years, incidentally, so has the number of issued FDA guidances (Guidances). It is hypothesized that if the structures of the two timeseries are similar and/o...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00123-5
更新日期:2020-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::In a global environment where health care costs are soaring, R&D efforts are flatlining. Meanwhile, payers are demanding more value for their money. In this environment, the traditional siloed drug development model is not sustainable. Yet innovations such as adaptive trial designs, real-world data collection, precisi...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018814224
更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Several regulatory guidelines recommend that assessments of endpoints supporting drug approval should be verifiable by applicants and the regulatory agencies to minimize the potential for bias. This becomes especially critical when assessments are not based on measurable data but are derived from the interpr...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015580382
更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Approval of regulated medical products in the USA is based upon a rigorous review of the benefits and risks as performed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff of scientists and is summarized in a descriptive and qualitative format called the FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework (BRF). This present metho...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00197-1
更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::After nearly a decade of discussion, analysis, and development, the Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) initiative is beginning to see acceptance from regulators, industry, patients, and payers, with the first live pilot project initiated under the guidance of the European Medicines Agency in 2014. Althoug...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479015618697
更新日期:2016-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 gave the FDA the authority to require drug sponsors to submit a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program for those medicines with serious risks such that failure to effectively manage these risks would tip the benefit-risk balance. As of August 8,...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479014527749
更新日期:2014-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Time progression models provide a significant advantage in developing clinical trials and can also be used to elicit comparisons among therapeutic agents. The authors performed a meta-analysis to construct a time progression model for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an area of significant interest for pharmaceutical develo...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013499571
更新日期:2013-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Meta-analyses are increasingly influencing clinical practice, but significant methodological flaws have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of search strategies utilized by anti-infective meta-analyses. The Embase database was searched for meta-analyses evaluating anti-infective drug t...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479013516774
更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::The U.S. and Japan have preapproval access systems for patients who have exhausted approved treatment options. We compare the systems of both countries and discuss some ethical concerns surrounding non-trial access to investigational drugs. Notable points of comparison of the two countries' systems include cost of non...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-020-00228-x
更新日期:2020-10-23 00:00:00
abstract::The Asia Pacific (AP) region is diverse and dynamic. It comprises over 40 economies, with about 24 markets that are relatively more active in terms of promulgating and implementing regulations that impact the biopharmaceutical industry and advance drug development. Although many country- and territory-specific regulat...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1177/2168479018791539
更新日期:2019-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::In the current pharmaceutical regulatory environment, patients continue to benefit from great advances in medical care. Sophisticated regulatory review systems have also evolved to ensure that safe and effective medicines are approved. However, these systems are not optimized in all countries. Gaps in individual regul...
journal_title:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1007/s43441-019-00055-9
更新日期:2020-03-01 00:00:00