Misused honorary authorship is no excuse for quantifying the unquantifiable.

Abstract:

:Kovacs argues that honorary authorship and regarding each co-author of multi-authored papers as if they were sole authors when the performance of researchers is being evaluated by their publications mean that we should require authors to identify what proportion of each publication should be attributed to each co-author. Even if such attributions could be made reliably, such a change should not be made. Contributions to authorship cannot be validly quantified, and the relative merits of different publications are also neither equal nor validly quantifiable. Research administrators need to recognise that whatever criteria they adopt to evaluate the performance of researchers, researchers will find a way to game the system in order to maximise their personal benefit.

journal_name

J Med Ethics

authors

Dyck MJ

doi

10.1136/medethics-2012-100939

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2013-08-01 00:00:00

pages

514

issue

8

eissn

0306-6800

issn

1473-4257

pii

medethics-2012-100939

journal_volume

39

pub_type

评论,杂志文章
  • Professional ethics.

    abstract::Downie comments on Sieghart's article, "Professions as the conscience of society" (Journal of Medical Ethics 1985 Sep; 11(3): 117-122). He charges that Sieghart is blurring empirical, conceptual, and moral claims when he contends that the professional relationship is unique in that "altruism is paramount and self-int...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.12.2.64

    authors: Downie RS

    更新日期:1986-06-01 00:00:00

  • When caesarean section operations imposed by a court are justified.

    abstract::Court-ordered caesarean sections against the explicit wishes of the pregnant woman have been criticised as violations of the woman's fundamental right to autonomy and to the inviolability of the person--particularly, so it is argued, because the fetus in utero is not yet a person. This paper examines the logic of this...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.14.4.206

    authors: Kluge EH

    更新日期:1988-12-01 00:00:00

  • Notes on substantance in orthodox theory: a reply to Badano.

    abstract::Gabriele Badano offers three criticisms of my challenge to the orthodox family of theories of legitimacy in bioethics. First, I assumed an 'oversimplified version of the orthodoxy'. Second, I failed to appreciate its domain of application. Third, I only addressed the ways in which orthodox theorists incorporate substa...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105030

    authors: Smith WR

    更新日期:2019-04-01 00:00:00

  • US primary care physicians' opinions about conscientious refusal: a national vignette experiment.

    abstract:OBJECTIVE:Previous research has found that physicians are divided on whether they are obligated to provide a treatment to which they object and whether they should refer patients in such cases. The present study compares several possible scenarios in which a physician objects to a treatment that a patient requests, in ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102782

    authors: Brauer SG,Yoon JD,Curlin FA

    更新日期:2016-02-01 00:00:00

  • Killing or letting die? Proposal of a (somewhat) new answer to a perennial question.

    abstract::There is as yet no widely agreed-upon solution to the standard textbook problem whether actively shutting off a life-sustaining medical device, e.g. a respirator, and thus bringing about a patient's death amounts to active killing or just to an omission of further treatment. Apart from a range of astutely contrived ca...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-103495

    authors: Merkel R

    更新日期:2016-06-01 00:00:00

  • Should we genetically test everyone for haemochromatosis?

    abstract::The increasing availability of DNA-based diagnostic tests has raised issues about whether these should be applied to the population at large in order to identify, treat or prevent a range of diseases. DNA tests raise concerns in the community for several reasons. There is the possibility of stigmatisation and discrimi...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.25.2.209

    authors: Allen K,Williamson R

    更新日期:1999-04-01 00:00:00

  • Internal morality of medicine and physician autonomy.

    abstract::Robert Veatch and others have questioned whether there are internal moral rules of medicine. This paper examines the legal regulatory model for governing professions as the autonomous exercise of professional skills and asks whether there is a theoretical basis for this model. Taking John Rawls's distinction between t...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105069

    authors: McAndrew S

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Meaningful futility: requests for resuscitation against medical recommendation.

    abstract::'Futility' is a contentious term that has eluded clear definition, with proposed descriptions either too strict or too vague to encompass the many facets of medical care. Requests for futile care are often surrogates for requests of a more existential character, covering the whole range of personal, emotional, cultura...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106232

    authors: Vivas L,Carpenter T

    更新日期:2020-04-24 00:00:00

  • The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued.

    abstract::Ancell and Sinnott-Armstrong argue that medical providers possess wide freedoms to determine the scope of their practice, and therefore, prohibiting almost any conscientious objections is a bad idea. They maintain that we could create an acceptable system on the whole which even grants accommodations to discriminatory...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105173

    authors: Card RF

    更新日期:2019-03-01 00:00:00

  • Developing ethics guidance for HIV prevention research: the HIV Prevention Trials Network approach.

    abstract::More than 25 years into the HIV epidemic, in excess of 2 million new infections continue to occur each year. HIV prevention research is crucial for groups at heightened risk for HIV, but the design and conduct of HIV prevention research with vulnerable populations worldwide raises considerable ethical challenge...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.035444

    authors: Rennie S,Sugarman J

    更新日期:2010-12-01 00:00:00

  • Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the "perfect child" of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?

    abstract::On 9 May 2005, the Israeli Ministry of Health issued guidelines spelling out the conditions under which sex selection by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for social purposes is to be permitted in Israel. This article first reviews the available medical methods for sex selection, the preference for children of a...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2007.023226

    authors: Landau R

    更新日期:2008-09-01 00:00:00

  • Prepared for practice? UK Foundation doctors' confidence in dealing with ethical issues in the workplace.

    abstract::This paper investigates the medical law and ethics (MEL) learning needs of Foundation doctors (FYs) by means of a national survey developed in association with key stakeholders including the General Medical Council and Health Education England. Four hundred sevnty-nine doctors completed the survey. The average self-re...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105961

    authors: Corfield L,Williams RA,Lavelle C,Latcham N,Talash K,Machin L

    更新日期:2020-04-10 00:00:00

  • Differential payment to research participants in the same study: an ethical analysis.

    abstract::Recognising that offers of payment to research participants can serve various purposes-reimbursement, compensation and incentive-helps uncover differences between participants, which can justify differential payment of participants within the same study. Participants with different study-related expenses will need dif...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105140

    authors: Persad G,Fernandez Lynch H,Largent E

    更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00

  • Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providers.

    abstract::The ethics of the Flexibility In duty hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) trial have been vehemently debated. Views on the ethics of the FIRST trial range from it being completely unethical to wholly unproblematic. The FIRST trial illustrates the complex ethical challenges posed by cluster randomised trial...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104282

    authors: Horn AR,Weijer C,Hey SP,Brehaut J,Fergusson DA,Goldstein CE,Grimshaw J,Taljaard M

    更新日期:2018-09-01 00:00:00

  • The annual reports of Local Research Ethics Committees.

    abstract::Each Local Research Ethics Committee (LREC) is expected to produce an annual report for its establishing authority. Reports from 145 LRECs were examined with regard to (a) whether the committees were working within the terms of the most recent guidelines from the Department of Health and (b) observations on the role o...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.21.4.214

    authors: Foster CG,Marshall T,Moodie P

    更新日期:1995-08-01 00:00:00

  • Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting.

    abstract::Two principles form the basis for much priority setting in health. According to the greater benefit principle, resources should be directed toward the intervention with the greater health benefit. According to the worse off principle, resources should be directed toward the intervention benefiting those initially wors...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100740

    authors: Ottersen T

    更新日期:2013-03-01 00:00:00

  • Lost property? Legal compensation for destroyed sperm: a reflection and comparison drawing on UK and French perspectives.

    abstract::In a recent case in the UK, six men stored their sperm before undergoing chemotherapy treatment for cancer in case they proved to be infertile after the treatment. The sperm was not properly stored and as a result was inadvertently destroyed. The men sued the NHS Trust that stored the sperm and were in the end success...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.042036

    authors: Cordell S,Bellivier F,Widdows H,Noiville C

    更新日期:2011-12-01 00:00:00

  • Enhancing patient well-being: advocacy or negotiation?

    abstract::The United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visitors (UKCC) document, Exercising Accountability, states that the role of patient's advocate is an essential aspect of good professional nursing practice (1). The author examines the case for and against the nurse being the best person to act as a...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.20.3.152

    authors: Bird AW

    更新日期:1994-09-01 00:00:00

  • Lesbian couple create a child who is deaf like them.

    abstract::A deaf lesbian couple who sought a sperm donor with a family history of deafness in order to have a child they hoped would be deaf have attracted a lot of criticism. They have been criticised for deliberately creating a deaf child, for denying their child a hearing aid, and for raising the child in a homosexual househ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.28.5.283

    authors: Spriggs M

    更新日期:2002-10-01 00:00:00

  • The impact of physician denial upon patient autonomy and well-being.

    abstract::It is now widely accepted that a patient's ability to engage in autonomous decision-making can be seriously threatened when she denies significant aspects of her medical condition. In this paper I use a true case to reveal the harmful effects of physician denial upon patient autonomy and well-being. I suggest further ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.18.3.135

    authors: Meyers C

    更新日期:1992-09-01 00:00:00

  • Routine antenatal HIV testing and informed consent: an unworkable marriage?

    abstract::This paper considers the ethics of routine antenatal HIV testing and the role of informed consent within such a policy in order to decide how we should proceed in this area--a decision that ultimately rests on the relative importance we give to public health goals on the one hand and respect for individual autonomy on...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018861

    authors: Bennett R

    更新日期:2007-08-01 00:00:00

  • The moral choice in prescribing barbiturates.

    abstract::Dr Wells, a general practitioner, looks at the problem of barbiturate dependence from the point of view of the prescribing doctor who has to choose for his patients - of all ages - the drug, usually a hypnotic, which is sought for insomnia or states of anxiety and stress. He argues that it is wise to prescribe non-bar...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:

    authors: Wells F

    更新日期:1976-06-01 00:00:00

  • Should we clone human beings? Cloning as a source of tissue for transplantation.

    abstract::The most publicly justifiable application of human cloning, if there is one at all, is to provide self-compatible cells or tissues for medical use, especially transplantation. Some have argued that this raises no new ethical issues above those raised by any form of embryo experimentation. I argue that this research is...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.25.2.87

    authors: Savulescu J

    更新日期:1999-04-01 00:00:00

  • Informed consent: what does it mean?

    abstract::The editorial in the September 1982 issue of this journal and many articles before and since have addressed the problem of informed consent. Is it possible? Is it a useful concept? Is there anything new to be said about it? In this article the basic rationale of the rule (patient autonomy) is explained and the extent ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.9.2.69

    authors: Kirby MD

    更新日期:1983-06-01 00:00:00

  • Responding to Simkulet's objections to the two tragedies argument.

    abstract::The two tragedies argument (2TA) has been raised as a response to the argument against abortion from spontaneous abortion (or miscarriages). According to this argument against the antiabortion position (AAP), miscarriages should be of great concern for proponents of this position since they result in a greater amount ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105770

    authors: Friberg-Fernros H

    更新日期:2020-03-01 00:00:00

  • Health and disease: what can medicine do for philosophy?

    abstract::Philosophical discussions about health and disease often refer to a 'medical model' of bodily disease, in which diseases are regarded as causes of illness; diagnosis consists in identifying the disease affecting the patient, and this determines the appropriate treatment. This view is plausible only for diseases whose ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.14.3.118

    authors: Scadding JG

    更新日期:1988-09-01 00:00:00

  • The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices.

    abstract::Among bioethicists and members of the public, genetics is often regarded as unique in its ethical challenges. As medical researchers and clinicians increasingly combine genetic information with a range of non-genetic information in the study and clinical management of patients with common diseases, the unique ethical ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1136/jme.2005.013532

    authors: Foster MW,Royal CD,Sharp RR

    更新日期:2006-11-01 00:00:00

  • Best interests and the sanctity of life after W v M.

    abstract::The case of W v M and Others, in which the court rejected an application to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a woman in a minimally conscious state, raises a number of profoundly important medico-legal issues. This article questions whether the requirement to respect the autonomy of incompetent patient...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100907

    authors: Mullock A

    更新日期:2013-09-01 00:00:00

  • How should the 'privilege' in therapeutic privilege be conceived when considering the decision-making process for patients with borderline capacity?

    abstract::Therapeutic privilege (TP) is a defence that may be available to doctors who fail to disclose to the patient relevant information when seeking informed consent for treatment if they have a reasonable belief that providing that information would likely cause the patient concerned serious physical or mental harm. In a l...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105792

    authors: Menon S,Entwistle V,Campbell AV,van Delden JJM

    更新日期:2021-01-01 00:00:00

  • Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?

    abstract::Whether to allow the presence of family members during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been a highly contentious topic in recent years. Even though a great deal of evidence and professional guidelines support the option of family presence during resuscitation (FPDR), many healthcare professionals still oppose ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100715

    authors: Lederman Z,Garasic M,Piperberg M

    更新日期:2014-05-01 00:00:00