The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued.

Abstract:

:Ancell and Sinnott-Armstrong argue that medical providers possess wide freedoms to determine the scope of their practice, and therefore, prohibiting almost any conscientious objections is a bad idea. They maintain that we could create an acceptable system on the whole which even grants accommodations to discriminatory refusals by healthcare professionals. Their argument is premised upon applying a free market mechanism to conscientious objections in medicine, yet I argue their Market View possesses a number of absurd and troubling implications. Furthermore, I demonstrate that the fundamental logic of their main argument is flawed. Thinkers who wish to address the issues raised in this debate in general or by discriminatory conscience objections in particular should avoid the Market View and instead envisage theories that assess the reasons underlying conscientious refusals in medicine.

journal_name

J Med Ethics

authors

Card RF

doi

10.1136/medethics-2018-105173

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2019-03-01 00:00:00

pages

168-172

issue

3

eissn

0306-6800

issn

1473-4257

pii

medethics-2018-105173

journal_volume

45

pub_type

杂志文章
  • Moral intuition, good deaths and ordinary medical practitioners.

    abstract::Debate continues over the acts/omissions doctrine, and over the concepts of duty and charity. Such issues inform the debate over the moral permissibility of euthanasia. Recent papers have emphasised moral sensitivity, medical intuitions, and sub-standard palliative care as some of the factors which should persuade us ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.16.1.28

    authors: Parker M

    更新日期:1990-03-01 00:00:00

  • The demise of UKXIRA and the regulation of solid-organ xenotransplantation in the UK.

    abstract::The new regulations on xenotransplantation pay insufficient attention to the broad ethical (and legal) problems raised by this technique and that the abandonment of a national body with overall regulatory authority in this area is a mistake. ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 社论,评审

    doi:10.1136/jme.2007.020768

    authors: McLean S,Williamson L

    更新日期:2007-07-01 00:00:00

  • When should conscientious objection be accepted?

    abstract::This paper makes two main claims: first, that the need to protect health professionals' moral integrity is what grounds the right to conscientious objection in health care; and second, that for a given claim of conscientious objection to be acceptable to society, a certain set of criteria should be fulfilled. The impo...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2011.043646

    authors: Magelssen M

    更新日期:2012-01-01 00:00:00

  • Changing practice on confidentiality: a cause for concern. Commentary 2: Confidentially speaking.

    abstract::Elaborating on the concept of confidentiality of medical records and interdisciplinary communication discussed in earlier articles by D.J. Kenny and Derek F.H. Pheby, the author expresses concern about written communications to professional colleagues and verbal revelations to colleagues or to persons outside the ther...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.8.1.21

    authors: Green M

    更新日期:1982-03-01 00:00:00

  • "Allow natural death" versus "do not resuscitate": three words that can change a life.

    abstract::Physician-written "do not resuscitate" DNR orders elicit negative reactions from stakeholders that may decrease appropriate end-of-life care. The semantic significance of the phrase has led to a proposed replacement of DNR with "allow natural death" (AND). Prior to this investigation, no scientific papers address the ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018317

    authors: Venneman SS,Narnor-Harris P,Perish M,Hamilton M

    更新日期:2008-01-01 00:00:00

  • Moral distress and moral residue experienced by transplant coordinators.

    abstract::Transplant coordinators play a pivotal role in the process of obtaining consent for live or dead donation of organs. The objective of the project is to unveil emotional experiences and ethical conduct of transplant coordinators using a qualitative research methodology. Ten transplant coordinators who have worked for m...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105593

    authors: Tarabeih M,Bokek-Cohen Y

    更新日期:2020-07-28 00:00:00

  • Danish ethics council rejects brain death as the criterion of death -- commentary 2: return to Elsinore.

    abstract::No discussion of when an individual is dead is meaningful in the absence of a definition of death. If human death is defined as the irreversible loss of the capacity for consciousness combined with the irreversible loss of the capacity to breathe spontaneously (and hence to maintain a spontaneous heart beat) the deat...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.16.1.10

    authors: Pallis C

    更新日期:1990-03-01 00:00:00

  • Surgical consent: the world's largest Chinese Whisper? A review of current surgical consent practices.

    abstract::As the law around surgical consent continues to evolve, surgeons and those in training risk being caught red-faced and defenceless. Despite repeated concerns regarding surgical consent being raised by the General Medical Council of the UK, how much is changing on the National Health Service shop floor? This report inv...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章,评审

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101931

    authors: Loughran D

    更新日期:2015-02-01 00:00:00

  • On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar's 'Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine'.

    abstract::Nigel Biggar (2015) argues that religion deserves a place in secular medicine. Biggar suggests we abandon the standard rationalistic conception of the secular realm and see it rather as "a forum for the negotiation of rival reasonings". Religious reasoning is one among a number of ways of thinking that must vie for ac...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102805

    authors: Symons X

    更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00

  • Patients' rights--why the Australian courts have rejected 'Bolam'.

    abstract::This point of view compares the issue of informed patient consent primarily as it operates in Australia and the United Kingdom. It affords an overview, also, of the applicable law in the United States and Canada. It particularly focuses on the legal test to be applied to patient consent as established in the Bolam cas...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.21.1.5

    authors: Kirby M

    更新日期:1995-02-01 00:00:00

  • The placebo effect in psychiatry: problem or solution?

    abstract::This opinion piece aims to situate the placebo effect within the field of psychiatric treatment. To accomplish this, the placebo is explored at the centre of an often heated debate between three discrete perspectives: the clinical trial researcher, the placebo researcher and the clinician. Each occupational perspectiv...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101410

    authors: Huculak S

    更新日期:2014-06-01 00:00:00

  • Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor-patient relationship.

    abstract:AIM:Facebook is an increasingly popular online social networking site. The purpose of this study was to describe the Facebook activity of residents and fellows and their opinions regarding the impact of Facebook on the doctor-patient relationship. METHODS:An anonymous questionnaire was emailed to 405 residents and fel...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2010.036293

    authors: Moubarak G,Guiot A,Benhamou Y,Benhamou A,Hariri S

    更新日期:2011-02-01 00:00:00

  • The costs and benefits of a cigarette ban.

    abstract::The death toll from tobacco is staggering: it might contribute to one billion premature deaths over the course of the 21st century. In 'The case for banning cigarettes', Kalle Grill and Kristin Voigt argue that the well-being and equality benefits of a complete ban on cigarettes more than justify the restrictions on a...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104172

    authors: Doucet M

    更新日期:2017-06-01 00:00:00

  • Mutilation, deception, and sex changes.

    abstract::The paper considers and rejects two arguments against the performance of sexual reassignment surgery. First, it is argued that the operation is not mutilating, but functionally enabling. Second, it is argued that the operation is not objectionably deceptive, since, if there is such a thing as our 'real sex', we do not...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.13.2.86

    authors: Lavin M

    更新日期:1987-06-01 00:00:00

  • After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?

    abstract::Non-therapeutic circumcision violates boys' right to bodily integrity as well as to self-determination. There is neither any verifiable medical advantage connected with the intervention nor is it painless nor without significant risks. Possible negative consequences for the psychosexual development of circumcised boys...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101284

    authors: Merkel R,Putzke H

    更新日期:2013-07-01 00:00:00

  • The burden of normality: from 'chronically ill' to 'symptom free'. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment.

    abstract::Although an invasive medical intervention, Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been regarded as an efficient and safe treatment of Parkinson's disease for the last 20 years. In terms of clinical ethics, it is worth asking whether the use of DBS may have unanticipated negative effects similar to those associated with othe...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100044

    authors: Gilbert F

    更新日期:2012-07-01 00:00:00

  • Limits of confidentiality.

    abstract::A patient is described, a woman of 60, who at that age was diagnosed as having Huntington's chorea, a genetic disease which is transmitted as an autosomal dominant. She had one daughter, who was married and lived abroad. The patient's mother and maternal aunt, it emerged during the consultations, had had the disease, ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:

    authors:

    更新日期:1976-03-01 00:00:00

  • Medical futility, treatment withdrawal and the persistent vegetative state.

    abstract::Why do we persist in the relentless pursuit of artificial nourishment and other treatments to maintain a permanently unconscious existence? In facing the future, if not the present world-wide reality of a huge number of persistent vegetative state (PVS) patients, will they be treated because of our ethical commitment ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.19.2.71

    authors: Mitchell KR,Kerridge IH,Lovat TJ

    更新日期:1993-06-01 00:00:00

  • Communication with the seriously ill: physicians' attitudes in Saudi Arabia.

    abstract:OBJECTIVES:To study some ethical problems created by accession of a previously nomadic and traditional society to modern invasive medicine, by assessment of physicians' attitudes towards sharing information and decision-making with patients in the setting of a serious illness. DESIGN:Self-completion questionnaire admi...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.22.5.282

    authors: Mobeireek AF,al-Kassimi FA,al-Majid SA,al-Shimemry A

    更新日期:1996-10-01 00:00:00

  • The healthcare worker at risk during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Jewish ethical perspective.

    abstract::The current COVID-19 pandemic has raised many questions and dilemmas for modern day ethicists and healthcare providers. Are physicians, nurses and other healthcare workers morally obligated to put themselves in harm's way and treat patients during a pandemic, occurring a great risk to themselves, their families and po...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106294

    authors: Solnica A,Barski L,Jotkowitz A

    更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00

  • Perimortem gamete retrieval: should we worry about consent?

    abstract::Perimortem gamete retrieval has been a possibility for several decades. It involves the surgical extraction of gametes which can then be cryo-preserved and stored for future use. Usually, the request for perimortem gamete retrieval is made by the patient's partner after the patient himself, or herself, has lost the ca...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101727

    authors: Smajdor A

    更新日期:2015-06-01 00:00:00

  • Fear of a female planet: how John Harris came to endorse eugenic social engineering.

    abstract::In this paper, I respond to criticisms by John Harris, contained in a commentary on my article "Harris, harmed states, and sexed bodies", which appeared in the Journal of Medical Ethics, volume 37, number 5. I argue that Harris's response to my criticisms exposes the strong eugenic tendencies in his own thought, when ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.2011.045021

    authors: Sparrow R

    更新日期:2012-01-01 00:00:00

  • Misused honorary authorship is no excuse for quantifying the unquantifiable.

    abstract::Kovacs argues that honorary authorship and regarding each co-author of multi-authored papers as if they were sole authors when the performance of researchers is being evaluated by their publications mean that we should require authors to identify what proportion of each publication should be attributed to each co-auth...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100939

    authors: Dyck MJ

    更新日期:2013-08-01 00:00:00

  • Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting.

    abstract::Two principles form the basis for much priority setting in health. According to the greater benefit principle, resources should be directed toward the intervention with the greater health benefit. According to the worse off principle, resources should be directed toward the intervention benefiting those initially wors...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100740

    authors: Ottersen T

    更新日期:2013-03-01 00:00:00

  • Examining consent within the patient-doctor relationship.

    abstract::The notion of consent which rose to the forefront in biomedical ethics as an attempt to safeguard patients' autonomy, is relatively new. The notion itself requires qualification, for it precludes neither duress nor ignorance. More seriously, I argue here that consent is redundant except in situations where paternalism...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/jme.26.3.183

    authors: Habiba MA

    更新日期:2000-06-01 00:00:00

  • Limits of trust in medical AI.

    abstract::Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to revolutionise the practice of medicine. Recent advancements in the field of deep learning have demonstrated success in variety of clinical tasks: detecting diabetic retinopathy from images, predicting hospital readmissions, aiding in the discovery of new drugs, etc. AI's pro...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105935

    authors: Hatherley JJ

    更新日期:2020-07-01 00:00:00

  • Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy.

    abstract::The use of charged-particle radiation therapy (CPRT) is an increasingly important development in the treatment of cancer. One of the most pressing controversies about the use of this technology is whether randomised controlled trials are required before this form of treatment can be considered to be the treatment of c...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101290

    authors: Sheehan M,Timlin C,Peach K,Binik A,Puthenparampil W,Lodge M,Kehoe S,Brada M,Burnet N,Clarke S,Crellin A,Dunn M,Fossati P,Harris S,Hocken M,Hope T,Ives J,Kamada T,London AJ,Miller R,Parker M,Pijls-Johannesma M,

    更新日期:2014-08-01 00:00:00

  • Response to: 'Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies' by Schuklenk and Smalling.

    abstract::The recent essay by Schuklenk and Smalling opposing respect for physicians' conscientious objections to providing patients with medical services that are legally permitted in liberal democracies is based on several erroneous assumptions. Acting in this manner would have serious harmful effects on the ethos of medicine...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 评论,杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-103670

    authors: Glick SM,Jotkowitz A

    更新日期:2017-04-01 00:00:00

  • A plea for end-of-life discussions with patients suffering from Huntington's disease: the role of the physician.

    abstract::Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) by request and/or based on an advance directive are legal in The Netherlands under strict conditions, thus providing options for patients with Huntington's disease (HD) and other neurodegenerative diseases to stay in control and choose their end of life. HD is an inherit...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100369

    authors: Booij SJ,Engberts DP,Rödig V,Tibben A,Roos RA

    更新日期:2013-10-01 00:00:00

  • The dead donor rule: effect on the virtuous practice of medicine.

    abstract:OBJECTIVE:The President's Council on Bioethics in 2008 reaffirmed the necessity of the dead donor rule and the legitimacy of the current criteria for diagnosing both neurological and cardiac death. In spite of this report,many have continued to express concerns about the ethics of donation after circulatory death, the ...

    journal_title:Journal of medical ethics

    pub_type: 杂志文章

    doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101333

    authors: Chaten FC

    更新日期:2014-07-01 00:00:00