当前位置： SCI文献检索 > BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE期刊下所有文献 > Logical limitations to the "catastrophe" models of fatigue during exercise in humans.

Logical limitations to the "catastrophe" models of fatigue during exercise in humans.

Abstract：

:A central debate in the exercise sciences is the cause of the fatigue that develops especially during high intensity exercise of short duration. The most popular theory holds that this form of exercise is limited by a peripherally based, metabolite induced failure of skeletal muscle contractile function, independent of reduced muscle activation by the central nervous system; so-called peripheral fatigue. This theory arose originally from studies undertaken by Nobel Laureate Sir Archibald Vivian Hill and colleagues in Manchester, UK in the 1920s. In turn, their interpretations were crucially influenced by the earlier 1907 findings of Sir Frederick Gowland Hopkins, Nobel Laureate for his discovery of the vitamins, and Walter Morley Fletcher. The original model of Hill and his colleagues proposed that performance during exercise of high intensity was limited by skeletal muscle anaerobiosis that developed as the result of a limiting skeletal muscle blood flow, following the onset of myocardial ischaemia. Such skeletal muscle anaerobiosis ultimately prevented the neutralization of the lactic acid that, Hill believed, initiated muscle contraction. The resulting lactic acid accumulation impaired skeletal muscle relaxation, causing the (involuntary) termination of exercise. The evolutionary progression of this model led to the "catastrophe theory" of Richard Edwards, which posits that exercise terminates when the physiological and biochemical limits of the body are exceeded, causing a catastrophic failure of intracellular homeostasis. This paper addresses six hallmark physiological requirements that must be correct if Hill's cardiovascular/ anaerobic/catastrophic model is the exclusive explanation for the fatigue that develops during maximum exercise to exhaustion. This leads to a review of the evidence supporting other, related "catastrophe" models that have been developed to explain fatigue during exercise of lower intensities and longer durations. It is concluded that there is little published evidence supporting the theory that fatigue occurs only after physiological homeostasis fails according to the prediction of these catastrophe models. Rather, it is proposed that fatigue in any form of exercise may form part of a regulated, anticipatory response co-ordinated in the subconscious brain. The ultimate goal of this regulation is to preserve homeostasis in all physiological systems during exercise, regardless of intensity or duration or the environmental conditions in which it is undertaken.

journal_name

Br J Sports Med

journal_title

British journal of sports medicine

authors

Noakes TD,St Clair Gibson A

doi

10.1136/bjsm.2003.009761

keywords:

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2004-10-01 00:00:00

pages

648-9

issue

eissn

0306-3674

issn

1473-0480

pii

38/5/648

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Logical limitations to the "catastrophe" models of fatigue during exercise in humans.