当前位置： SCI文献检索 > PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases期刊下所有文献 > The cost-effectiveness of an eradication programme in the end game: Evidence from guinea worm disease.

The cost-effectiveness of an eradication programme in the end game: Evidence from guinea worm disease.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Of the three diseases targeted for eradication by WHO, two are so-called Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs)-guinea worm disease (GWD) and yaws. The Guinea Worm Eradication Programme (GWEP) is in its final stages, with only 25 reported in 2016. However, global eradication still requires certification by WHO of the absence of transmission in all countries. We analyze the cost-effectiveness of the GWEP in the end game, when the number of cases is lower and the cost per case is higher than at any other time. Ours is the first economic evaluation of the GWEP since a World Bank study in 1997. METHODS:Using data from the GWEP, we estimate the cost of the implementation, pre-certification and certification stages. We model cost-effectiveness in the period 1986-2030. We compare the GWEP to two alternative scenarios: doing nothing (no intervention since 1986) and control (only surveillance and outbreak response during 2016-2030). We report the cost per case averted, cost per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted and cost per at-risk life year averted. We assess cost-effectiveness against a threshold of about one half GDP per capita (less than US$ 500 in low income countries). All costs are expressed in US$ of 2015. RESULTS:The GWEP cost an estimated US$ 11 (95% uncertainty interval, 4.70-12.49) per case averted in the period 1986-2030. The pre-certification and certification phases can cost as much as US$ 0.0041 and US$ 0.0015 per capita per year. The cost per DALY averted by the GWEP relative to doing nothing is estimated at US$ 222 (118-372) in 1986-2030. The GWEP is probably more cost-effective than control by the year 2030. The GWEP is certainly more cost-effective than control if willingness to pay for one year of life lived without the risk of GWD exceeds US$ 0.10. DISCUSSION:Even if economic costs are two times as high as the financial costs estimated for the period to 2020, the GWEP will still be cost-effective relative to doing nothing. Whether the GWEP turns out to be the most cost-effective alternative in the period beyond 2015 depends on the time horizon. When framed in terms of the number of years of life lived without the risk of GWD, a case can be made more easily for finishing the end game, including certification of the absence of transmission.

journal_name

PLoS Negl Trop Dis

journal_title

PLoS neglected tropical diseases

authors

Fitzpatrick C,Sankara DP,Agua JF,Jonnalagedda L,Rumi F,Weiss A,Braden M,Ruiz-Tiben E,Kruse N,Braband K,Biswas G

doi

10.1371/journal.pntd.0005922

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2017-10-05 00:00:00

pages

e0005922

issue

eissn

1935-2727

issn

1935-2735

pii

PNTD-D-17-00886

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

The cost-effectiveness of an eradication programme in the end game: Evidence from guinea worm disease.