当前位置： SCI文献检索 > Parasites & Vectors期刊下所有文献 > Ticks are more suitable than red foxes for monitoring zoonotic tick-borne pathogens in northeastern Italy.

Ticks are more suitable than red foxes for monitoring zoonotic tick-borne pathogens in northeastern Italy.

Abstract：

BACKGROUND:Northeastern Italy is a hotspot for several tick-borne pathogens, transmitted to animals and humans mainly by Ixodes ricinus. Here we compare the results of molecular monitoring of ticks and zoonotic TBPs over a six-year period, with the monitoring of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in an endemic area. RESULTS:In the period 2011-2016, 2,578 ticks were collected in 38 sites of 20 municipalities of Belluno Province. Individual adults (264), pooled larvae (n = 330) and nymphs (n = 1984) were screened for tick-borne encephalitis virus, Borrelia burgdorferi (s.l.), Rickettsia spp., Babesia spp., Anaplasma phagocytophilum and "Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis" by specific SYBR green real-time PCR assays and sequencing. The spleens of 97 foxes, culled in the period 2015-2017 during sport hunting or population control programs, were also screened. Overall, nine different pathogens were found in I. ricinus nymph and adult ticks: Rickettsia helvetica (3.69%); R. monacensis (0.49%); four species of the B. burgdorferi (s.l.) complex [B. afzelii (1.51%); B. burgdorferi (s.s.) (1.25%); B. garinii (0.18%); and B. valaisiana (0.18%)]; A. phagocytophilum (3.29%); "Candidatus N. mikurensis" (1.73%); and Babesia venatorum (0.04%). Larvae were collected and screened in the first year only and two pools (0.6%) were positive for R. helvetica. Tick-borne encephalitis virus was not found in ticks although human cases do occur in the area. The rate of infection in ticks varied widely according to tick developmental stage, site and year of collection. As expected, adults were the most infected, with 27.6% harboring at least one pathogen compared to 7.3% of nymphs. Pathogens with a minimum infection rate above 1% were recorded every year. None of the pathogens found in ticks were detectable in the foxes, 52 (54%) of which were instead positive for Babesia cf. microti (also referred to as Babesia microti-like, "Theileria annae", "Babesia annae" and "Babesia vulpes"). CONCLUSIONS:The results show that foxes cannot be used as sentinel animals to monitor tick-borne pathogens in the specific epidemiological context of northeastern Italy. The high prevalence of Babesia cf. microti in foxes and its absence in ticks strongly suggests that I. ricinus is not the vector of this pathogen.

journal_name

Parasit Vectors

journal_title

Parasites & vectors

authors

Da Rold G,Ravagnan S,Soppelsa F,Porcellato E,Soppelsa M,Obber F,Citterio CV,Carlin S,Danesi P,Montarsi F,Capelli G

doi

10.1186/s13071-018-2726-7

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2018-03-20 00:00:00

pages

137

issue

issn

1756-3305

pii

10.1186/s13071-018-2726-7

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Ticks are more suitable than red foxes for monitoring zoonotic tick-borne pathogens in northeastern Italy.