当前位置： SCI文献检索 > MEDICAL PHYSICS期刊下所有文献 > Validation and application of a fast Monte Carlo algorithm for assessing the clinical impact of approximations in analytical dose calculations for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Validation and application of a fast Monte Carlo algorithm for assessing the clinical impact of approximations in analytical dose calculations for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Abstract：

PURPOSE:Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation is generally superior to analytical dose calculation (ADC) used in commercial TPS to model the dose distribution especially for heterogeneous sites, such as lung and head/neck patients. The purpose of this study was to provide a validated, fast, and open-source MC code, MCsquare, to assess the impact of approximations in ADC on clinical pencil beam scanning (PBS) plans covering various sites. METHODS:First, MCsquare was validated using tissue-mimicking IROC lung phantom measurements as well as benchmarked with the general purpose Monte Carlo TOPAS for patient dose calculation. Then a comparative analysis between MCsquare and ADC was performed for a total of 50 patients with 10 patients per site (including liver, pelvis, brain, head-and-neck, and lung). Differences among TOPAS, MCsquare, and ADC were evaluated using four dosimetric indices based on the dose-volume histogram (target Dmean, D95, homogeneity index, V95), a 3D gamma index analysis (using 3%/3 mm criteria), and estimations of tumor control probability (TCP). RESULTS:Comparison between MCsquare and TOPAS showed less than 1.8% difference for all of the dosimetric indices/TCP values and resulted in a 3D gamma index passing rate for voxels within the target in excess of 99%. When comparing ADC and MCsquare, the variances of all the indices were found to increase as the degree of tissue heterogeneity increased. In the case of lung, the D95s for ADC were found to differ by as much as 6.5% from the corresponding MCsquare statistic. The median gamma index passing rate for voxels within the target volume decreased from 99.3% for liver to 75.8% for lung. Resulting TCP differences can be large for lung (≤10.5%) and head-and-neck (≤6.2%), while smaller for brain, pelvis and liver (≤1.5%). CONCLUSIONS:Given the differences found in the analysis, accurate dose calculation algorithms such as Monte Carlo simulations are needed for proton therapy, especially for disease sites with high heterogeneity, such as head-and-neck and lung. The establishment of MCsquare can facilitate patient plan reviews at any institution and can potentially provide unbiased comparison in clinical trials given its accuracy, speed and open-source availability.

journal_name

Med Phys

journal_title

Medical physics

authors

Huang S,Souris K,Li S,Kang M,Barragan Montero AM,Janssens G,Lin A,Garver E,Ainsley C,Taylor P,Xiao Y,Lin L

doi

10.1002/mp.13231

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2018-12-01 00:00:00

pages

5631-5642

issue

eissn

0094-2405

issn

2473-4209

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Validation and application of a fast Monte Carlo algorithm for assessing the clinical impact of approximations in analytical dose calculations for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.