当前位置： SCI文献检索 > CLINICAL RADIOLOGY期刊下所有文献 > Volume and landmark analysis: comparison of MRI measurements obtained with an endorectal coil and with a phased-array coil.

Volume and landmark analysis: comparison of MRI measurements obtained with an endorectal coil and with a phased-array coil.

Abstract：

AIM:To compare prostate volumes and distances between anatomical landmarks on MRI images obtained with a phased-array coil (PAC) only and with a PAC and an endorectal coil (ERC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Informed consent was waived for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. Fifty-nine men underwent PAC-MRI and ERC-MRI at 1.5 (n = 3) or 3 T (n = 56). On MRI images, two radiologists independently measured prostate volume and distances between the anterior rectal wall (ARW) and symphysis pubis at the level of the verumontanum; ARW and symphysis pubis at the level of the mid-symphysis pubis; and bladder neck and mid-symphysis pubis. Differences between measurements from PAC-MRI and ERC-MRI were assessed with the Wilcoxon RANK SUM test. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). RESULTS:Differences in prostate volume between PAC-MRI and ERC-MRI [median: -0.75 mm(3) (p = 0.10) and median: -0.84 mm(3) (p = 0.06) for readers 1 and 2, respectively] were not significant. For readers 1 and 2, median differences between distances were as follows: -10.20 and -12.75 mm, respectively, ARW to symphysis pubis at the level of the verumontanum; -6.60 and -6.08 mm, respectively, ARW to symphysis pubis at the level of the mid-symphysis pubis; -3 and -3 mm respectively, bladder neck to mid-symphysis pubis. All differences in distance were significant for both readers (p ≤ 0.0005). Distances were larger on PAC-MRI (p ≤ 0.0005). Inter-reader agreement regarding prostate volume was almost perfect on PAC-MRI (CCC: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.98-1.00) and ERC-MRI (CCC: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.99-1.00); inter-reader agreement for distance measurements varied (CCCs: 0.54-0.86). CONCLUSION:Measurements of distances between anatomical landmarks differed significantly between ERC-MRI and PAC-MRI, although prostate volume measurements did not.

journal_name

Clin Radiol

journal_title

Clinical radiology

authors

Mazaheri Y,Afaq AA,Jung SI,Goldman DA,Wang L,Aslan H,Zelefsky MJ,Akin O,Hricak H

doi

10.1016/j.crad.2014.12.002

subject

Has Abstract

pub_date

2015-04-01 00:00:00

pages

379-86

issue

eissn

0009-9260

issn

1365-229X

pii

S0009-9260(14)00543-1

journal_volume

pub_type

杂志文章

在线工具

Volume and landmark analysis: comparison of MRI measurements obtained with an endorectal coil and with a phased-array coil.