Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:This article describes a method for investigating attitudes towards prioritisation in medicine. SETTING:University of Kuopio, Finland. DESIGN:The method consisted of a set of 24 paired scenarios, which were imaginary patient cases, each containing three different ethical indicators randomly selected from a list of indicators (for example, child, rich patient, severe disease etc.). The scenarios were grouped into 12 random pairs and the procedure was repeated four times, resulting in 12 scenario pairs arranged randomly in five different sets. SURVEY:This method was tested with four groups of subjects (n = 8, n = 47, n = 104 and n = 36). RESULTS:Children and patients with a severe disease were prioritised in all groups. The aged, patients with a mild disease and patients with a self-acquired disease were negatively prioritised in all groups. Poor or rich patients were prioritised in some groups but negatively prioritised in others. CONCLUSIONS:The validity and reliability of this method are good and it is suitable for investigating attitudes towards medical prioritisation.
journal_name
J Med Ethicsjournal_title
Journal of medical ethicsauthors
Ryynänen OP,Myllykangas M,Vaskilampi T,Takala Jdoi
10.1136/jme.22.4.238subject
Has Abstractpub_date
1996-08-01 00:00:00pages
238-42issue
4eissn
0306-6800issn
1473-4257journal_volume
22pub_type
杂志文章abstract::Two protechnology arguments, the "hopeful principle" and the "automatic escalator", often used in bioethics, are identified and critically analysed in this paper. It is shown that the hopeful principle is closely related to the problematic precautionary principle, and the automatic escalator argument has close affinit...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.2006.016477
更新日期:2007-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::Physician-written "do not resuscitate" DNR orders elicit negative reactions from stakeholders that may decrease appropriate end-of-life care. The semantic significance of the phrase has led to a proposed replacement of DNR with "allow natural death" (AND). Prior to this investigation, no scientific papers address the ...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018317
更新日期:2008-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:UNLABELLED:The difficulties of undertaking good quality effectiveness research in palliative medicine are well documented. Much of the ethical literature in this area focuses on the vulnerability of the palliative care population. It is clear that a wider ethical approach will need to be used to justify research in the...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.2007.022632
更新日期:2008-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::In his classic paper, 'Why abortion is immoral', Don Marquis argues that what makes killing an adult seriously immoral is that it deprives the victim of the valuable future he/she would have otherwise had. Moreover, Marquis contends, because abortion deprives a fetus of the very same thing, aborting a fetus is just as...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100604
更新日期:2013-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::David Shaw's response to Hugh McLachlan's criticism of his proposed new perspective on euthanasia is ineffectual, mistaken and unfair. It is false to say that the latter does not present an argument to support his claim that there is a moral difference between killing and letting die. It is not the consequences alone ...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.2011.044966
更新日期:2011-12-01 00:00:00
abstract::The International Bioethics Committee (IBC) of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) is currently drafting a Universal Bioethics Declaration ("the declaration"). The content and even the name of the declaration has yet to be finalized, but it is expected to range widely over hum...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.2004.006502
更新日期:2005-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Discussions on the ethics and regulation of clinical research have a great deal to say about the responsibilities of investigators, sponsors, research institutions and institutional review boards, but very little about the responsibilities of research participants. In this article, we discuss the responsibilities of p...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100319
更新日期:2012-12-01 00:00:00
abstract:PURPOSE:Many research ethics committees (RECs) have been established in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in response to increased research in these countries. How well these RECs are functioning remains largely unknown. Our objective was to assess the usefulness of a self-assessment tool in obtaining benchmarki...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101587
更新日期:2015-04-01 00:00:00
abstract::Most moral dilemmas in medicine are analysed using the four principles with some consideration of consequentialism but these frameworks have limitations. It is not always clear how to judge which consequences are best. When principles conflict it is not always easy to decide which should dominate. They also do not tak...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 评论,杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.29.5.297
更新日期:2003-10-01 00:00:00
abstract::The research assessment exercise (RAE) forms the basis for determining the funding of higher education institutions in the UK. Monies are distributed according to a range of performance criteria, the most important of which is "research outputs". Problems to do with publication misconduct, and in particular, issues of...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.26.6.422
更新日期:2000-12-01 00:00:00
abstract::More than 25 years into the HIV epidemic, in excess of 2 million new infections continue to occur each year. HIV prevention research is crucial for groups at heightened risk for HIV, but the design and conduct of HIV prevention research with vulnerable populations worldwide raises considerable ethical challenge...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.2010.035444
更新日期:2010-12-01 00:00:00
abstract::The United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visitors (UKCC) document, Exercising Accountability, states that the role of patient's advocate is an essential aspect of good professional nursing practice (1). The author examines the case for and against the nurse being the best person to act as a...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.20.3.152
更新日期:1994-09-01 00:00:00
abstract::Multiple self approaches purport that to have equal concern about all stages of one's life is not a requirement of rationality. This poses a challenge to the prudential lifespan account which Norman Daniels advocates in Just health: meeting health needs fairly. Daniels has criticised the multiple self approach in earl...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.2008.024380
更新日期:2009-01-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Although fair distribution of healthcare services for older patients is an important challenge, qualitative research exploring clinicians' considerations in clinical prioritisation within this field is scarce. OBJECTIVES:To explore how clinicians understand their professional role in clinical prioritisation...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章,多中心研究
doi:10.1136/jme.2007.020693
更新日期:2008-05-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Wish-fulfilling medicine appears to be on the rise. It can be defined as 'doctors and other health professionals using medical means (medical technology, drugs, and so on) in a medical setting to fulfil the explicitly stated, prima facie non-medical wish of a patient'. Some instances of wish fulfilling medic...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101480
更新日期:2014-12-01 00:00:00
abstract::This essay seeks to characterise the essential features of an equitable health care system in terms of the classical Aristotelian concepts of horizontal and vertical equity, the common (but ill-defined) language of "need" and the economic notion of cost-effectiveness as a prelude to identifying some of the more import...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.27.4.275
更新日期:2001-08-01 00:00:00
abstract::Fourteen experienced psychiatric nurses participated in a pilot study aimed at describing the experiential aspect of making decisions for the patient. In-depth interviews focused on conflicts, were transcribed, coded, and categorized according to the Grounded Theory method. The theoretical construct, 'modifying autono...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章,评审
doi:10.1136/jme.20.2.101
更新日期:1994-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::A report of a problem-based learning project on the ethics of terminal care, offered as one of the options available to first year MB ChB students in Edinburgh University Medical School. The project formed part of the 'clinical correlation course' in the new curriculum. Six students took part under the supervision of ...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.7.2.62
更新日期:1981-06-01 00:00:00
abstract::This article, prompted by an extended essay published in the Journal of Medical Ethics by Charles Foster, and the current controversy surrounding the case of Vincent Lambert, analyses the legal and ethical arguments in relation to the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of co...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105599
更新日期:2019-12-01 00:00:00
abstract::Simon Rippon has recently argued against kidney markets on the grounds that introducing the option to vend will result in many people, especially the poor, being subject to harmful pressure to vend. Though compelling, Rippon's argument fails. What he takes to be a single phenomenon-social and legal pressure to vend-is...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 评论,杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102390
更新日期:2015-06-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Although genetic research into Alzheimer disease (AD) is increasing, the ethical aspects of this kind of research and the differences between ethical issues related to genetic and non-genetic research into AD have not yet received much attention. OBJECTIVES:(1) To identify and compare the five ethical issue...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.2008.025049
更新日期:2009-02-01 00:00:00
abstract::In a recent article, Udo Schuklenk and Suzanne van de Vathorst argued in favour of a legal option of physician-assisted death for patients with 'treatment-resistant' depression. In this commentary, I contend that their argument neglects the important consideration of the professional integrity of physicians. In light ...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 评论,杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103060
更新日期:2015-11-01 00:00:00
abstract::Recognising that offers of payment to research participants can serve various purposes-reimbursement, compensation and incentive-helps uncover differences between participants, which can justify differential payment of participants within the same study. Participants with different study-related expenses will need dif...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105140
更新日期:2019-05-01 00:00:00
abstract::Dolores Dooley Clarke describes how the course in medical ethics at University College, Cork is structured, how it has changed and how it is likely to change as time goes on. Originally, the students seemed to view it as an intrusion 'to be tolerated' in their programme of 'strictly medical' studies. However, having m...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.4.1.36
更新日期:1978-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::In the light of increasing public mistrust, there is an urgent need to clarify the moral status of the medical profession and of the relationship of the clinician to his/her patients. In addressing this question, I first establish the coherence, within moral philosophy generally, of the concept of supererogation (the ...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.28.2.70
更新日期:2002-04-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:Because opioids can suppress respiratory drive, the principle of double effect (PDE) has been used to justify their use for terminally ill patients. Recent studies, however, suggest that the risk of respiratory depression in typical end-of-life (EOL) situations may be overstated and that heightened concern f...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100105
更新日期:2012-03-01 00:00:00
abstract::Moral evaluation of risk/benefit in early phase studies requires assessing the clinical promise of a candidate intervention using preclinical evidence. Yet, there is little to guide ethics committees, investigators, sponsors or other stakeholders morally charged with making these assessments ('evaluators'). In what fo...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102882
更新日期:2016-01-01 00:00:00
abstract::With the recent Clinical Trials Directive, a degree of harmonisation into research ethics committees (RECs) across Europe, including the time taken to assess a trial proposal and the kinds of issues a committee should take into account, has been introduced by the European Union (EU). How four different member states-H...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.2005.013888
更新日期:2006-08-01 00:00:00
abstract:BACKGROUND:The importance of respecting patients and participants in clinical research is widely recognised. However, what it means to respect persons beyond recognising them as autonomous is unclear, and little is known about what patients find to be respectful. OBJECTIVE:To understand patients' conceptions of respec...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/jme.2008.027235
更新日期:2009-07-01 00:00:00
abstract::Several prominent writers including Norman Daniels, James Sabin, Amy Gutmann, Dennis Thompson and Leonard Fleck advance a view of legitimacy according to which, roughly, policies are legitimate if and only if they result from democratic deliberation, which employs only public reasons that are publicised to stakeholder...
journal_title:Journal of medical ethics
pub_type: 杂志文章
doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104559
更新日期:2018-06-01 00:00:00